Chapter 72 LAPAROSCOPIC SACRAL COLPOPEXY
Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy was first reported by Nezhat and colleagues in 1994.1 Adoption of this procedure has increased in the past decade and has evolved to include robotic assistance. The possible advantages of laparoscopic surgery are improved visualization of anatomy of the peritoneal cavity because of laparoscopic magnification, insufflation effects, and improved hemostasis; shortened hospitalization resulting in potential cost reduction; decreased postoperative pain and more rapid recovery and return to work; and better cosmetic appearance of smaller incisions. Disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery include a steep learning curve in acquiring suturing skills, technical difficulty of presacral dissection, increased operating time early in the surgeon’s experience, and possibly greater hospital cost because of increased operating room time and the use of disposable surgical instruments. These disadvantages, inadequate experience in advanced laparoscopy in residency and fellowship programs, surgeon preference for vaginal route surgery, and recently introduced minimally invasive apical suspension procedures have thwarted widespread adoption of laparoscopic surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
The technique of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy described in this chapter follows standard procedures for operative laparoscopy for access and is identical to the more proven open abdominal sacral colpopexy (see Chapter 73). Clinical outcome and complications are summarized.
ANATOMY
When considering the anatomy of the repair of pelvic organ support, a surgeon must keep in mind the three levels of support of the vagina described by DeLancey in 1992.2 The upper fourth of the vagina (level I) is suspended by the cardinal-uterosacral complex, the middle half (level II) is attached laterally to the arcus tendineus fasciae pelvis and the medial aspect of the levator ani muscles, and the lower fourth (level III) is fused to the perineal body. The endopelvic fascia laterally blends with the muscularis of the vagina. All pelvic support defects, whether anterior, apical, or posterior, represent a break in the continuity of the endopelvic fascia or vaginal muscularis and a loss of its suspension, attachment, or fusion to adjacent structures. The goals of pelvic reconstructive surgery are to correct all symptomatic defects, thereby reestablishing vaginal support at all three levels, and to maintain or restore normal visceral and sexual function.
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
Operative Laparoscopy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Setup, Instrumentation, and Trocar Placement
Ideal stirrups for combined laparovaginal cases are the Allen stirrups and Yellofins (Allen Medical Systems, Acton, MA), which have levers that can quickly convert the patient from low to high lithotomy position while preserving sterility of the field. A sterile pouch attached to each thigh is equipped with commonly used instruments such as unipolar scissors, bipolar cautery, blunt-tipped graspers, bowel graspers, and suction irrigation.