Natural Materials
Cotton is a naturally occurring absorbable suture that is no longer popular. It handles well but is comparatively weaker than silk. Similarly, it causes significant inflammation.
Surgical silk is also considered nonabsorbable, although it retains 50% of its tensile strength after 1 year, with minimal loss after 2 years. It is easily handled and offers good knot security secondary to its low memory. It elicits a significant immune response, which deters its use by many surgeons.
Synthetic Materials
Nylon is composed of synthetic fiber polymers. It can be manufactured as monofilaments, or twisted into polyfilament constructs. Unlike natural products, it produces less inflammation, making it a favorable option in skin closure. Twenty percent of its original tensile strength is lost by hydrolysis after the first year. It remains unchanged thereafter. Nylon is easy to handle but is more prone to knot unraveling and slipping. Good surgical technique is critical.
Polypropylene is a monofilamentous synthetic polymer of propylene [poly (1-methylethylene)]. Its structural makeup does not allow for easy handling or knot security, as it is quite stiff and has very high memory. It has low tensile strength compared to other nonabsorbable synthetic materials. Polypropylene has the advantage of low tissue reactivity and very slow absorption, which makes it useful in anchoring permanent materials, such as grafts, or in areas of slow wound healing.
Polyester sutures (Ethibond) are multifilament materials that exist in several forms. They can be noncoated or coated, with various agents: silicone, polybutilate, or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE or Teflon). The uncoated versions offer improved knot security, while the coated versions are easier to handle. Specifically, silicone coating improves suture manageability, at the expense of increased knot slippage and inflammation. Polybutilate coating causes less inflammation and is easy to handle, while PTFE coating simply facilitates handling. The common disadvantage of all these braided materials is they must be completely excised from tissue if infected.
Gore-Tex is a nonabsorbable suture composed of expanded PTFE, an inert compound. It therefore elicits minimal inflammatory reaction. PTFE is “expanded” to produce a material that is porous, with an air volume of approximately 50%. It was originally designed for cardiovascular anastomotic procedures. Its low immune response results in decreased adhesion formation. By the same token, infiltration of leukocytes and fibroblasts may be hindered, resulting in less tissue ingrowth. This feature is not necessarily favorable in its larger mesh form and may be associated with a heightened susceptibility to infection. As a consequence, its use in pelvic reconstructive surgery is becoming less common.
The metal suture material available is stainless steel wire, created from a metal alloy. It provides the best tensile strength and knot security of any of the suture materials previously mentioned. It produces less of an immune response than the other nonabsorbable materials. In exchange, it is very difficult to handle and deforms quite easily. An attempt to overcome this feature has been made by twisting the material into multistrands. This new, thicker construct must be managed with great care, as it can unintentionally penetrate gloves quite readily.