1. Identify and understand the five subsystems of the premature infant. 2. Identify and understand four types of premature infant stress cues. 3. Identify and understand the three stages of premature infant development. 4. Identify three oral reflexes typically seen in infants. 5. Understand the purpose of the outpatient clinical feeding evaluation. 6. Understand the individual roles of the caregiver and feeding specialist in the clinical feeding evaluation. 7. Describe the sequence of activities in the clinical feeding evaluation. Evaluation of the term infant and the preterm infant is quite different. Infants born prematurely with congenital or acquired medical conditions are at higher risk of developing feeding and nutritional problems than term, healthy newborns.1 The preterm infant presents an interesting model for the understanding of sensory stress on the developing brain. Neurobehavioral and neuroelectrophysiologic studies show that the preterm infant is prone to deficits. These may include attention deficits; sensory and motor disorganization; difficulties in self-regulation; and modulation of autonomic, motor, sensory, and affective interactive state systems that can continue well into preschool years.2 The subsystems of a preterm infant play a vital role in feeding. These systems include (1) physiologic stability, (2) motor performance, (3) state systems, (4) attention, and (5) self-regulatory systems. The infant’s subsystems require continuous regulatory and facilitative structuring in their environment (usually the neonatal intensive care unit [NICU]) to support effective learning and maturation.3 Feeding specialists need to assist the preterm infant in regulating these systems to achieve successful oral ingestion. The time from the initiation of oral feedings to ad lib oral feedings in the preterm infant may be days to several weeks or months. Premature infants normally develop the ability to interact as their nervous system matures. Gorski et al.4 termed this process “neurosocial, behavioral development.” The initial stage in this development is known as in-turning. Infants in this stage are generally younger than 32 weeks’ postconceptional age (PCA) and respond to the environment in a purely physiologic manner. Infants are mainly in a sleep state, with no ability to regulate arousal. They demonstrate involuntary and jerky movements and are unable to engage socially. They can be easily stressed, may need ventilatory support, and generally devote all energy to autonomic stability and homeostasis. The second stage is termed coming out. This stage is characterized by improved physiologic stability. Infants are between 32 and 35 weeks’ PCA and demonstrate more frequent periods of alertness. They may maintain color, oxygen saturation, and respiratory stability and a consistent heart rate during some interactions. These infants continue to be easily stressed, although they may participate in brief interactions demonstrating visual, auditory, and social responses. Infants at this stage slowly begin the feeding process. The third stage is known as active reciprocity. Infants in this stage are generally 36 weeks’ PCA and older. Infants have the capacity for self-arousal and self-soothing. They actively seek stimuli and may tolerate some stressful interactions without a loss of physiologic stability. This stage is indicative of neurobehavioral maturation and tolerance for mutually satisfying experiences with caregivers. Neurodevelopmental assessments are designed to consider factors that influence early development, such as whether the infant is born at term or preterm or whether the infant is at risk for developmental delay. Many tests have been developed and researched to assess feeding the term and preterm infant. Most institutions use a combination of tests that measure physiologic, motor, state-regulatory, attentional-interactive, self-regulatory, and feeding processes. Several published clinical assessment scales have been developed.5–10 It is wise to review all these and ascertain the best assessment tool for the infant being evaluated. Regardless of the test choice, the developmental specialist should be careful to observe the threshold at which an infant shifts from an organized to a disorganized response. Testing conditions should be standardized to prevent excessive variability over multiple testing sessions. Assessment of the sensory and motor components of the facial and intraoral structures is essential before the infant attempts oral feedings. The clinician should observe the infant’s oral structures at rest and in response to light touch on the face, lips, and intraorally. Normally infants enjoy playful/light touching in their mouths. Their response to the placement of a finger or pacifier in the mouth should be observed. Was the response one of pleasure or did it markedly alter the infant’s baseline homeostatic state? Reflexes that are present in utero, at birth, and throughout one’s lifetime are the gag, cough, transverse tongue, and swallow. Oral reflexes that should be present after birth are the rooting (32 weeks up to 6 months), sucking (17 weeks up to 4 months), palmomental (see below, birth to 3 or 4 months), Santmyer (see below, 34 weeks to 1 to 2 years), and phasic bite (28 weeks to 9 to 12 months). These reflexes assist in the acquisition of food but disappear or are integrated by muscle function at the aforementioned intervals.11 The details of the instrumental evaluation of swallowing in adults were described in Chapter 10. Similar examinations are used with infants, although positioning during the examination and the stimuli used may differ. Because of the potential risks of x-radiation in infants, the videofluorographic swallowing study is used more judiciously than in adults. Therefore radiographic studies may be shorter in duration. Issues of cooperation during the study may also differ. In general, the oral, pharyngeal, and esophageal phases of swallow are studied in all persons with dysphagia. In infants, children, and adults, the lower gastrointestinal tract also may require evaluation. The videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VSS) for preterm and term infants is usually completed in the upright lateral position using special supportive devices for proper positioning. A Tumble Form seat (Patterson Medical/Sammons Preston, Bolingbrook, Ill.) can be placed on a chair and adjusted to upright and semiupright positions. For preterm and term infants, only liquid barium is used to ascertain the safety of oral feedings. At 5 to 7 months it is common to use a variety of pureed foods and fluids. Once the infant is 12 months old, more textures and viscosities are used in the assessment. The infant is tested with thin liquid barium with a bottle and nipple. A variety of nipples and bottles with variable flow rates may be used to determine whether the infant can tolerate liquids safely. The clinician may need to pace the infant throughout the procedure for safe swallowing, and at times the liquid barium may need to be thickened for the infant to tolerate oral feedings safely. Assessment of the oral phase includes observations of the organization of the suck-swallow-breathe sequence, the amount of bursts the infant is capable of performing, the position of the lips and tongue on the nipple, and head position. Infants may channel barium into the valleculae before initiation of the swallow; this is considered part of the normal swallow.12,13 If the pharyngeal phase is slow or demonstrates reduced motility, the child may be at risk for aspiration. Infants may not show overt signs of coughing during aspiration. Usually aspiration is seen in the anterior trachea. When the infant is positioned properly, the esophageal phase can be evaluated. Ideally there will be a strong primary peristaltic wave that clears all material through the lower esophageal sphincter into the stomach. A normal secondary wave may be seen (independent of a swallow) to clear any residual material through the lower esophageal sphincter. The esophageal phase should be completed in 6 to 10 seconds. The radiologist should document any dysmotility, obstruction, stricture, or tracheoesophageal fistula. 1. Counting the suspected number of reflux events seen within the first 5 to 10 minutes of the feeding 2. Observing whether the infant is able to protect the airway if the reflux flows to the level of the upper esophageal sphincter 3. Documenting any change or lack of change in behavior as a result of these events
Special Considerations in Evaluating Infants and Children
INFANTS
DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES
BEDSIDE DEVELOPMENTAL and/or FEEDING EVALUATION
Oral Reflexes
INSTRUMENTAL EVALUATION
Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study
Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study and Upper Gastrointestinal Series
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree