Preoperative Evaluation of Patients with Urinary Incontinence and Selection of Appropriate Surgical Procedures for Stress Incontinence

2 Preoperative Evaluation of Patients with Urinary Incontinence and Selection of Appropriate Surgical Procedures for Stress Incontinence







Preoperative Evaluation


The evaluation of a patient with urinary incontinence (UI) is focused on characterizing the incontinence, identifying any concomitant or contributory factors, and determining the patient’s treatment goals and preferences to direct initial treatment decision making and counseling. Essential elements in the initial assessment include a focused medical history and physical examination and basic clinical testing. Additional elements may be necessary if UI is poorly characterized or additional findings suggest a more complicated situation (Video 2-1 image).



History


Evaluation of patients with UI begins with a thorough history and review of the medical record. Elements of the history should be directed toward determining the type of UI (stress urinary incontinence [SUI], urge urinary incontinence [UUI], or mixed incontinence [MUI]) and assessing the duration, frequency, and severity of incontinence episodes; impact of symptoms on lifestyle; and patient expectations of treatment. In addition, the patient should be questioned regarding the presence of other lower urinary tract symptoms and concomitant bowel and pelvic conditions, which may be contributory. Prior treatments for UI, if any, should be reviewed in detail (Videos 2-2 and 2-3 image). Finally, obstetric, surgical, bowel, and medication histories should be reviewed with the patient to identify any complicating factors or comorbidity that may have an impact on treatment options. Symptoms of other pelvic floor disorders, such as pelvic organ prolapse (POP), defecatory dysfunction, pelvic pain, and sexual dysfunction, should also be sought.




Physical Examination


As part of the initial assessment, a thorough physical examination should be performed with special attention paid to the lower abdomen and pelvis. Components of overall health status include assessment of mental status, obesity (body mass index), and physical dexterity and mobility. Abdominal examination should assess for masses, bladder distention, and relevant surgical scars. Genitourinary examination should include an overall assessment of genital anatomy and neurologic function. The presence of urine leakage from the urethral meatus should be confirmed, if possible, in patients describing SUI symptoms; extraurethral leakage (fistula formation) should always be considered in patients who have had previous surgery or radiation. The vagina should be inspected to assess estrogen status, for concomitant POP, and, if relevant, for the presence of any foreign body or material (Videos 2-4 and 2-5 image).




Hypermobility


Some debate surrounds the role of urethral hypermobility or lack thereof in the assessment of SUI. Urethral hypermobility refers to the degree of rotation and descent of the urethra away from its retropubic position with increased abdominal pressure and is considered a sign of loss of urethral support. When urine leakage occurs without urethral hypermobility, primary urethral sphincter weakness (i.e., intrinsic sphincter deficiency) is suspected.


The cotton-tipped swab (Q-tip) test was designed to quantify the degree of hypermobility by measuring the angle of deflection from horizontal of the swab inserted into the urethra during cough or Valsalva maneuver. To perform the test, a swab is inserted per the urethra to the level of the urethrovesical junction, and the angle of the swab compared with horizontal is assessed. Next, the patient coughs or strains, and the change in the angle of the swab is noted. An excursion of 30 degrees or more is a positive test for hypermobility. Although this test is not a diagnostic test, it is an objective measure for quantifying bladder neck mobility during excursion (Video 2-7 image and Figure 2-1).





Clinical Testing


Basic clinical testing should be performed to confirm the symptoms and findings of the history and physical examination and to rule out any complicating factors or conditions that may have an impact on treatment decision making.





May 29, 2016 | Posted by in GASTOINESTINAL SURGERY | Comments Off on Preoperative Evaluation of Patients with Urinary Incontinence and Selection of Appropriate Surgical Procedures for Stress Incontinence

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access