of the Breast: Current Indications and Outlook to the Future


Study

Year

No. patients

Cancer

N+

Mammography

MRI

Warner

2004

1,236 BRCA

22

9%

36%

77%

Kriege

2004

1,909

51

14%

40%

71%

Kuhl

2005

1,613

12

8%

42%

83%

Maribs

2005

1,349

35

14%

40%

77%

Lehman

2005

1,367 contralateral

4
 
25%

100%

Hagen

2007

1,491 BRCA

25

26%

50%

86%

Riedl

2007

1,327

28
 
50%

86%

Kuhl

2009

1,687

27

11%

33%

93%

Sardanelli

2011

1,501

52

22%

50%

91%



The lifetime risk for breast cancer in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation is 60–85% but for ovarian cancer is 40–60% in BRCA1 patients versus 10–30% in BRCA2 patients. The risk of contralateral breast cancer is 30% within 5 years of the first breast cancer. Risk-reduction options include either bilateral mastectomy with (95% reduction) or without (90% reduction) oophorectomy, oophorectomy alone before the age of 50 years, or tamoxifen chemo-prevention (38% risk reduction). Other options include more intense and earlier screening starting at the age of 30 years with annual MRI of the breast. The role of mammography in BRCA1 mutation carriers is controversial due to an increased risk of radiation-induced breast cancer in vitro. Compared with MRI as a screening method alone, the majority of comparative imaging screening trials shows a small number of additional cancers with mammography but no or very little value of US after annual MRI and mammography [4, 5]. Imaging features of breast cancer in high-risk women are often more benign appearing, particularly in BRCA1 mutation carriers, in whom 23% of invasive ductal cancer demonstrates a fibroadenoma-like appearance with an oval or round shape and smooth margins but no dark septations [6]. Moreover, no mammographic calcifications are seen in invasive cancer. A posterior prepectoral location of breast cancer is seen in 67% of BRCA1 mutation carriers [6]. Second-look US is crucial to identify suspicious lesions on MRI to allow subsequent USguided biopsy. If US remains negative, spot-compression mammography or tomosynthesis may help identify MRI lesions. If no traditional imaging method identifies the suspicious MRI-only lesion, then MRI-guided biopsy with clip positioning and postbiopsy mammography allows adequate patient management. A 6-months’ follow-up, MRI remains important to demonstrate no increase in size after a negative MRI-guided biopsy. The benefit of high-risk screening was shown in a study comparing breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 patients diagnosed with and without MRI. The group with MRI had significantly smaller tumors and less chemotherapy; however, the slightly higher 3-year and disease-free and overall survival was not significant [7].


Implant Evaluation


MRI of the breast for implant evaluation has a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 97% in the diagnosis of implant rupture [8]. The incidence of rupture increases with implant age, with most ruptures occurring between 10 and 15 years after implantation. The imaging protocol includes four T2-weighted sequences: native, fatsuppressed, water-suppressed, and dedicated to silicone only (fat and water suppression). The silicone-only sequence should be performed in two different slice orientations to differentiate a rupture from implant folds.

Intracapsular implant rupture is defined as rupture of the implant shell, with silicone leakage that does not extend beyond the fibrous capsule. The most reliable MRI criterion for intracapsular rupture is the presence of multiple curvilinear low-signal-intensity lines within the highsignal- intensity silicone gel, the so-called linguine sign. These curvilinear lines represent the collapsed implant shell floating within the silicone gel [9]. The linguine sign is missing in an uncollapsed rupture, and instead, MRI shows free silicone outside the implant shell but still contained by the fibrous capsule. Focal silicone invagination between the inner shell and fibrous capsule are common, resulting in the teardrop sign and the key-hole sign. Extracapsular silicone implant rupture is defined as rupture of both the implant shell and the fibrous capsule, with macroscopic silicone leakage that extends beyond the fibrous capsule into surrounding tissues. Focal areas of high signal intensity in the silicone-only sequence represent free silicone. Capsular contracture can be confirmed at MRI in the event of a round breast implant with increased capsular thickness. Implant infection is more common in oncoplastic procedures and demonstrates rim enhancement around the implant. Contrast-enhanced MRI is indicated in addition to the four T2 sequences whenever there is an oncoplastic question about the glandular breast tissue, a mass in the breast, or an associated high-risk situation.



Breast Cancer Staging


MRI of the breast has several roles in this situation:



  • To measure the extent (size and location) of the known breast cancer


  • To identify additional foci of cancer elsewhere in the breast (multifocality)


  • To define adequate resection margins of the cancer


  • To screen the contralateral breast for breast cancer.

A large number of papers confirm the superiority of MRI compared with US and mammography to fulfil these tasks, particularly in patients with invasive lobular cancer [10], cancer in high-risk patients, patients with a size discrepancy >1 cm between mammography and US, and patients eligible for partial breast irradiation. However, there are no randomized trials that demonstrate evidence for reduced recurrence rate or mortality from breast cancer. Moreover, the Comparative Effectiveness of MRI in Breast Cancer (COMICE) trial, a multicenter trial from the UK, demonstrated no difference in re-operation rate between breast cancer patients with and without breast MRI [11]. The study was limited by poor design and absent MRI quality assurance, as most centers started the use of breast MRI and had no MRI-guided biopsy. Therefore, the study represents poor use of MRI technology and should not be considered. Identifying occult foci of breast cancer in the ipsilateral or contralateral breast does not necessarily increase the percent of patients undergoing mastectomy.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Mar 18, 2017 | Posted by in UROLOGY | Comments Off on of the Breast: Current Indications and Outlook to the Future

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access