Fig. 23.1
(a) Central 2.2 cm tumour abutting the collecting system. 6 F ureteric catheter has been inserted and noted next to the lesion. (b) The RF probe is inserted and cool perfusion of the collecting system with Dextrose 5 % starts. (c) Follow up CT at 6 months showing complete ablation of the tumour
Because the ablation treats the tumor in situ without surgical removal or assessment of surgical margins, imaging is vital to the assessment of the results of RF ablation. Areas of complete necrosis show no enhancement at CT or MR (Fig. 23.1c), whereas areas of viable tumor show persistent enhancement. In complete ablation is defined as any enhancement within the tumor ablation zone on CT or MRI on initial 6-week imaging after RFA. Recurrence is defined as any enhancement or increase in size of the tumor ablation zone, after an initial non-enhancing 6-weeks CT or MRI [15, 16]. These patients are given the option of a repeat ablation or extirpative surgery. However, post ablation surgery could be extremely difficult due to extensive fibrosis [17].
Cryotherapy
Cryoablation (CA) causes cell destruction by rapid cycles between freeze and thaw temperature. A temperature of −19.4 °C leads to complete cell death. If ice ball formation extends beyond the tumour by >3.1 mm, a temperature of −20 °C is reached in the tumour tissue [18]. Cryotherapy could be performed through a percutaneous, open or laparoscopic approach, with the majority of cases performed with the latter [8]. The percutaneous approach is associated with decreased postoperative pain, less hospital stay and shorter convalescence time but with a higher primary failure rate in comparison with the laparoscopic CA [19, 20].
In a meta-analysis, Kunkle and Uzzo [8] compared the outcome of cryoablation (n = 600; 65 % laparoscopic route) and RFA (n = 775; 94 % percutaneous route); cryoablation was associated with a lower re-ablation rate (1.3 % vs. 8.5 %), lower local tumor progression rate (5.2 % vs. 12.9 %), and fewer metastases (1.0 % vs. 2.5 %; p = 0.06) than RFA. The meta-analysis was flawed in that it was consisted of retrospective series each with their own selection biases [21]. Furthermore, RFA was primarily performed percutaneously (compared with laparoscopic cryoablation) where incomplete treatment and re-ablation is more commonly acceptable because retreatment is easier to perform [21]. In another meta analysis by Kunkle et al. [22] analyzed 99 studies with 6471 small renal tumours (<4 cm) managed with partial nephrectomy, cryoablation, RF ablation, and observation. The local recurrence was overall more frequent after RFA (11.7 %) than CA (4.6 %). Both techniques had significantly increased local progression rates compared with surgery (relative risk 7.45 for CA and 18.23 for RFA). Progression to metastatic disease though was described in 1.2 % of cases after CA and 2.3 % of cases after RFA, with no statistical difference compared with partial nephrectomy.
High Intensity Focus Ultrasound (HIFU)
HIFU uses high intensity ultrasound waves that focus on the tumor under imaging guidance and aiming to achieve a temperature sufficient for immediate thermal destruction of all tissues within the target zone. Current problems include the intervening tissues and the mobility of the kidney during breathing [23]. In a very recently published study, including 17 renal tumours HIFU achieved local tumor control in 2/3 of the lesions [24]. This technique is still considered experimental and further studies are required to define its role in the management of localized RCC [5, 24].
References
1.
2.
3.
Van Poppel H, Becker F, Cadeddu JA, et al. Treatment of localized renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2011;60(4):776–83.PubMedCrossRef
< div class='tao-gold-member'>
Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register a > to continue