Hepatic Segmental Resections

Hepatic Segmental Resections
William R. Jarnagin
Charbel Sandroussi
Paul D. Greig
Introduction
Better understanding of hepatic anatomy has been pivotal in the evolution of safe liver surgery (see Chapter 18 and Figs. 17.6, 18.6 and 23.1). Compared to lobar and extended lobar resections, segmental liver resections, where appropriate, allow preservation of liver parenchyma without compromising oncologic results. The ability to resect one or two segments rather than the entire lobe allows parenchymal preservation, which is critical in patients with diseased parenchyma and in those with extensive disease and/ or a high likelihood of requiring future liver directed therapy. The latter are particularly relevant in patients with metastatic disease. Segmental vascular inflow control may facilitate the resection by precisely mapping the transection plane, although this is not always possible. In addition, such anatomically based resections involving the removal of a hepatic segment confined by tumor-bearing portal tributaries may, in fact, be more sound from an oncologic standpoint.
Anatomy and Terminology
The segmental anatomy of the liver originated from the original descriptions of Couinaud in 1952. Couinaud’s work showed that the liver consists of eight independent segments, each with its own vascular inflow, hepatic venous outflow, and biliary drainage and each amenable to resection. These segments form the foundation of current hepatic nomenclature (Fig. 24.1A and B; see also Fig. 18.6). The Brisbane Terminology eliminates confusing terminology of lobes and sectors used in past descriptions of liver anatomy. The terms hemi-liver (first order division), section (second order division), and segments (third order division) are not interchangeable and provides common terminology for better communication among surgeons, radiologists, and other physicians.
The first order division separates the right (segments 5 to 8) and left (segments 1 to 4) hemi-livers (or liver) along the principal resection plane or Cantlie’s line, delineated by the middle hepatic vein (MHV), coursing along a line from the gallbladder fossa to the IVC. The second order division separates the right and left hemi-livers into liver
sections based on the portal distribution (i.e., the primary divisions of the right and left portal pedicles) and the hepatic venous drainage. The right liver is divided into right anterior (segments 5 and 8), and right posterior (segments 6 and 7) sections, separated by the right hepatic vein (RHV). The left liver is divided into left lateral (segments 2 and 3) and left medial (segments 4a and 4b) sections by the umbilical vein, which runs along a line delineated by the falciform ligament. Together, segments 2 and 3 are commonly, but erroneously, referred to as the left lateral segment.

Figure 24.1 A: Axial CT scan image through the upper liver demonstrating the anatomic boundaries of segments 1, 2, 4a, 8, and 7. B: Axial CT scan image through the lower liver demonstrating the anatomic boundaries of segments 1, 3, 4b, 5, and 6. RHV, right hepatic vein; MHV, middle hepatic vein; LHV, left hepatic vein. From: W.R. Jarnagin (ed.), Blumgart’s Surgery of the Liver, Biliary Tract and Pancreas, 5th Edition, Elsevier, 2012.
The third order division separates segments into segments (numbers 1 to 8) and is defined by hepatic arterial supply and biliary drainage (see Figs. 17.6 and 18.6).
Selection of Patients
Anatomically based resections should be the gold standard in most cases, excluding fenestration of liver cysts (see Chapter 28), wedge excisions of superficial lesions, and enucleation of certain lesions such as metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (see Chapter 25). A clear understanding of the patient’s segmental liver anatomy is essential to a safe, controlled resection. Segmental resections are not limited by indication nor by the presence of hepatic parenchymal disease.
Achieving a balance between parenchymal sparing resections and adequate tumor clearance is clearly an important consideration for all resections but is critical in patients with diseased livers. In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), where cirrhosis is frequently present, segmental liver resection forms a bridge between the major hepatectomy and non-anatomic resection to preserve the maximum liver volume to prevent postoperative liver failure. Since HCC have a propensity for intraportal extension and dissemination, segmental resections, by removing the parenchyma supplied by the principal segmental portal vein branch, are likely to be more effective than non-anatomic resections from an oncologic standpoint. Segmental liver resection is also preferred in patients with multifocal colorectal metastasis treated extensively with preoperative chemotherapy, which frequently results in hepatic dysfunction and impaired regeneration due to steatosis (see Fig. 18.1).
PREOPERATIVE PLANNING
The planning of a segmental-based resection must take into account anatomic variations and their relationship to the plane of transection (Fig. 24.2) (see Figs. 17.9, 19.2, and 21.1, 21.2, 21.3 and 21.4). Resection has been facilitated by the precision digital imaging provided by computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasound (US), allowing interpretation of intrahepatic vascular and biliary anatomy (see Chapter 18) and the ability to manipulate and scroll through reconstructions in the axial, coronal, or sagittal planes using software such as picture archiving and communication system(PACS). With the appropriate protocol for arterial and venous enhancement, the third and fourth level vascular structures can be accurately defined. More sophisticated software is available that may facilitate the preoperative planning. These easily manipulated, three-dimensional reconstructions that create a virtual reproduction of the liver can be used to determine the proposed plane of transection, taking into account the minimum resection margin, and residual volume of liver (Fig. 24.3).

Figure 24.2 Axial CT image showing variant portal venous anatomy, with the left portal vein (LPV) arising as a branch of the right anterior sectoral branch (Ant PV) and the posterior sectoral branch (Post PV) branching separately from the main portal vein (MPV).
General Operative Principles
Preoperative Assessment and Anesthesia
The preoperative assessment and preparation of the patient for a liver resection are described in Chapter 18. Comorbidities should be identified and optimized. Careful assessment of liver function, particularly in those with intrinsic liver disease is important. Preoperative biliary decompression and/or portal vein embolization are infrequently required for patients undergoing segmental compared to more extensive resections (see Chapters 18, 19, 20, and 26). Particular attention should be paid to the reduction of the central venous pressure during transection in order to reduce blood loss, and measures to prevent hypothermia, infections, and venous thromboembolism are required.

Figure 24.3 Three-dimensional model generated from a preoperative CT scan using ScoutTM software system (Pathfinder Therapeutics, Inc, Nashville, TN). The planned resection plane is shown. The total liver volume, the functional liver volume (total volume—tumor volume), and future liver remnant volumes are shown.

Exposure and Mobilization
Segmental resections may be performed laparoscopically (see Chapter 31) or at laparotomy. For open resections, exposure can be achieved through a variety of incisions (see Figs. 18.7, 19.3 and 21.5), including right subcostal with midline extension (hockey-stick) or its modification (J-shaped), or a bilateral subcostal incision with (Mercedes incision) or without (chevron) midline extension. A long midline incision may be used for selected liver resections, particularly if combined with a left or sigmoid colon or rectal resection; thoracoabdominal is seldom required. Following laparotomy and general inspection, the liver is mobilized by transection of the obliterated umbilical vein and division of the falciform ligament as it triangulates onto the IVC to identify the origins of the hepatic veins (see Fig. 19.4). Mobilization of the right and left livers requires division of the triangular ligaments in order to free the liver fully from the hemidiaphragms. During the division of the lesser omentum (gastro-hepatic ligament), attention should be given to the presence of an accessory or replaced left hepatic artery arising from the left gastric artery (see Chapter 20). Full mobilization of the right liver requires division of the coronary ligaments; if resection of one of the posterior right segments is planned (6 and/or 7), then the right adrenal gland must be separated and allowed to retract into the retroperitoneum and dissection of the retrohepatic IVC must be performed, as one would for more extensive procedures (see Chapters 19 and 23, Figs. 19.5, 19.6, and 23.12).
Intraoperative Assessment
The intraoperative assessment of the liver requires correlation of the findings of inspection and palpation of the mobilized liver with those of the preoperative imaging (see Chapter 18). Intraoperative ultrasound is used to localize the lesion, confirm the preoperative imaging findings, and further stage the proposed remnant liver (see Fig. 18.9). Operative US of the liver may be valuable to identify venous tumor thrombus and to assess the proposed plane of transection and its three-dimensional relationship with major hepatic veins and portal triads. Anatomically based segmentectomy and subsegmentectomy by intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS)-guided finger compression has been described. With this technique, IOUS-guided finger compression of the vascular pedicle feeding the segment results in demarcation of the parenchyma, allowing a complete resection.
Transection Techniques
Over the years, the method of transecting the liver parenchyma has received much attention, and several devices have evolved for facilitating this portion of the operation (see Chapter 18). In truth, for resections that are anatomically based and performed using proper intraoperative management (i.e., low central venous pressure) and meticulous technique, the method of parenchymal transection is a secondary issue. The Cavitron ultrasonic aspirator (CUSA, Valleylab, Boulder, CO), which reduced blood loss compared with the clamp crushing technique in one study is now widely used for liver transection, even in cirrhotic livers. Clamp crushing, the conventional method of liver transection is used in some centers, and when properly done, allows precise delineation of intrahepatic vascular and biliary structures. The hydro-jet dissector (ERBE, Teubingen, Germany) is also widely used. The goal of all of these approaches is to selectively clear away the liver parenchymal tissue to expose the vascular and biliary structures for ligation. There is no evidence supporting one particular technique, and hence the technique chosen for transection is often dependent on local expertise.
Techniques that rely on destructive control of the parenchyma before division include linear cutting staplers, in-line radiofrequency ablation (Habib, Angiodynamics Queensbury NY) and bipolar cautery (Gyrus-Gyrus ACMI Southborough MA, Ligasure-Covidien Boulder CO). In-line radiofrequency ablation allows some surgeons to perform minor and major hepatectomies with low blood loss and low blood transfusion requirements. However, this device has raised serious concerns regarding preservation of venous drainage of the remnant liver and the risk of tissue necrosis and postoperative
bile leakage. The role of this technology probably is limited to small peripheral resections because of the substantial risk of bile duct injury when this instrument is used near the liver hilum and its inability to control bleeding from large venous branches. The Aquamantys [Salient Surgical Technologies (Formerly TissueLink Medical), Dover, NH] is another device that uses radiofrequency energy to divide the liver parenchyma, although in a more controlled fashion, combined with saline and configured as a bipolar tip for coagulating small pedicle and venous structures.

Figure 24.4 A clamp has been passed around the right portal pedicle after making two small hepatotomies in the gallbladder fossa and posteriorly along the caudate process. Further dissection will help identify the segmental pedicles, which can be confirmed with initial clamping, and then divided with a vascular stapler.
Pretransection vascular control is used by many surgeons, with potential oncologic and hemostasis implications. Early occlusion of the hepatic venous outflow of the resected segment(s) may reduce the risk of venous tumor emboli. Occlusion of the hepatic artery and portal vein to the segment(s) being resected facilitate the procedure by defining the line of division between ischemic segments to be removed and the viable remnant liver, thereby potentially reducing blood loss. Occlusion of the inflow to sectors of the right hemi-liver (6/7 and 5/8) or to the segments of the left lobe (2, 3, 4a, and 4b) can be performed either by dissection and division of the artery and vein outside the liver, leaving the transection of the hepatic duct and remaining hilar plate for later in the procedure, or by the Glissonian technique in which the sectoral or segmental pedicle is encircled (using either an anterior or posterior intrahepatic approach) and then exposed by incising the reflection of Glisson’s capsule and clearing away overlying parenchymal tissue. The portal triad to the segment or segments of interest can then be divided en masse, either by suture or a linear stapler (Fig. 24.4) (see also Fig. 21.14).
Recommended References and Readings
Abulkhir A, Limongelli P, Healey AJ, et al. Preoperative portal vein embolization for major liver resection: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2008;247:49-57.
Agrawal S, Belghiti J. Oncologic resection for malignant tumors of the liver. Ann Surg. 2011;253:656-665.
Ayav A, Jiao LR, Habib NA. Bloodless liver resection using radiofrequency energy. Dig Surg. 2007;24:314-317.
Ayav A, Jiao L, Dickinson R, et al. Liver resection with a new multiprobe bipolar radiofrequency device. Arch Surg. 2008;143:396-401.
Baer HU, Maddern GJ, Blumgart LH. New water-jet dissector: initial experience in hepatic surgery. Br J Surg. 1991;78:502-503.
Belghiti J, Ogata S. Preoperative optimization of the liver for resection in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford). 2005;7:252-253.
Billingsley KG, Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, et al. Segment-oriented hepatic resection in the management of malignant neoplasms of the liver. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:471-481.
Bismuth H, Castaing D, Garden OJ. Segmental surgery of the liver. Surg Annu. 1988;20:291-310.
Bismuth H, Houssin D, Castaing D. Major and minor segmentectomies “reglees” in liver surgery. World J Surg. 1982;6(1):10-24.
Clavien PA, Selzner M, Rüdiger HA, et al. A prospective randomized study in 100 consecutive patients undergoing major liver resection with versus without ischemic preconditioning. Ann Surg. 2003;238:843-850.
Couinaud C. Segmental and lobar left hepatectomies. J Chir (Paris). 1952a;68:821-839.
Couinaud C. Segmental and lobar left hepatectomies; studies on anatomical conditions. J Chir (Paris). 1952b;68:697-715.
Couinaud C. Contribution of anatomical research to liver surgery. Fr Med. 1956;19:5-12.
Couinaud C. Surgical Anatomy of the Liver Revisited. Paris: C. Couinaud; 1989.
Curro G, Habib N, Jiao L, et al. Radiofrequency-assisted liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis: preliminary results. Transplant Proc. 2008;40:3523-3525.
Fan ST, Lai EC, Lo CM, et al. Hepatectomy with an ultrasonic dissector for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1996;83:117-120.
Figueras J, Lopez-Ben S, Lladó L, et al. Hilar dissection versus the “glissonean” approach and stapling of the pedicle for major hepatectomies: a prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2003; 238:111-119.
Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Imamura H, et al. Prognostic impact of anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2005;242:252-259.
Imamura H, Seyama Y, Kokudo N, et al. One thousand fifty-six hepatectomies without mortality in 8 years. Arch Surg. 2003; 138:1198-1206.
Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y, et al. Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg. 2002;236:397-406.
Kim J, Ahmad SA, Lowy AM, et al. Increased biliary fistulas after liver resection with the harmonic scalpel. Am Surg. 2003;69:815-819.
Kooby DA, Fong Y, Suriawinata A, et al. Impact of steatosis on perioperative outcome following hepatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7(8):1034-1044.
Launois B, Jamieson GG. The importance of Glisson’s capsule and its sheaths in the intrahepatic approach to resection of the liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992;174:7-10.
Liau KH, Blumgart LH, DeMatteo RP. Segment-oriented approach to liver resection. Surg Clin North Am. 2004;84:543-561.
Lin TY. A simplified technique for hepatic resection: the crush method. Ann Surg. 1974;180:285-290.
Little JM, Hollands MJ. Impact of the CUSA and operative ultrasound on hepatic resection. HPB Surg. 1991;3:271-277.
Lupo L, Gallerani A, Panzera P, et al. Randomized clinical trial of radiofrequency-assisted versus clamp-crushing liver resection. Br J Surg. 2007;94:287-291.
Machado MA, Herman P, Machado MC. A standardized technique for right segmental liver resections. Arch Surg. 2003;138:918-920.
Makuuchi M, Takayama T, Kosuge T, et al. The value of ultrasonography for hepatic surgery. Hepatogastroenterology. 1991;38: 64-70.
Polk W, Fong Y, Karpeh M, et al. A technique for the use of cryosurgery to assist hepatic resection. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180(2):171-176.
Scheele J, Stang R, Altendorf-Hofmann A, et al. Resection of colorectal liver metastases. World J Surg. 1995;19:59-71.

Takayama T, Makuuchi M, Kubota K, et al. Randomized comparison of ultrasonic vs clamp transection of the liver. Arch Surg. 2001; 136:922-928.
The Brisbane 2000. Terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB (Oxford). 2002;4:99-100.
Torzilli G, Procopio F, Cimino M, et al. Anatomical segmental and subsegmental resection of the liver for hepatocellular carcinoma: a new approach by means of ultrasound-guided vessel compression. Ann Surg. 2010;251:229-235.
Wakai T, Shirai Y, Sakata J, et al. Anatomic resection independently improves long-term survival in patients with T1-T2 hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1356-1365.
Hepatic Segmental Resections
William R. Jarnagin
Charbel Sandroussi
Paul D. Greig
Introduction
Better understanding of hepatic anatomy has been pivotal in the evolution of safe liver surgery (see Chapter 18 and Figs. 17.6, 18.6 and 23.1). Compared to lobar and extended lobar resections, segmental liver resections, where appropriate, allow preservation of liver parenchyma without compromising oncologic results. The ability to resect one or two segments rather than the entire lobe allows parenchymal preservation, which is critical in patients with diseased parenchyma and in those with extensive disease and/ or a high likelihood of requiring future liver directed therapy. The latter are particularly relevant in patients with metastatic disease. Segmental vascular inflow control may facilitate the resection by precisely mapping the transection plane, although this is not always possible. In addition, such anatomically based resections involving the removal of a hepatic segment confined by tumor-bearing portal tributaries may, in fact, be more sound from an oncologic standpoint.
Anatomy and Terminology
The segmental anatomy of the liver originated from the original descriptions of Couinaud in 1952. Couinaud’s work showed that the liver consists of eight independent segments, each with its own vascular inflow, hepatic venous outflow, and biliary drainage and each amenable to resection. These segments form the foundation of current hepatic nomenclature (Fig. 24.1A and B; see also Fig. 18.6). The Brisbane Terminology eliminates confusing terminology of lobes and sectors used in past descriptions of liver anatomy. The terms hemi-liver (first order division), section (second order division), and segments (third order division) are not interchangeable and provides common terminology for better communication among surgeons, radiologists, and other physicians.
The first order division separates the right (segments 5 to 8) and left (segments 1 to 4) hemi-livers (or liver) along the principal resection plane or Cantlie’s line, delineated by the middle hepatic vein (MHV), coursing along a line from the gallbladder fossa to the IVC. The second order division separates the right and left hemi-livers into liver
sections based on the portal distribution (i.e., the primary divisions of the right and left portal pedicles) and the hepatic venous drainage. The right liver is divided into right anterior (segments 5 and 8), and right posterior (segments 6 and 7) sections, separated by the right hepatic vein (RHV). The left liver is divided into left lateral (segments 2 and 3) and left medial (segments 4a and 4b) sections by the umbilical vein, which runs along a line delineated by the falciform ligament. Together, segments 2 and 3 are commonly, but erroneously, referred to as the left lateral segment.

Figure 24.1 A: Axial CT scan image through the upper liver demonstrating the anatomic boundaries of segments 1, 2, 4a, 8, and 7. B: Axial CT scan image through the lower liver demonstrating the anatomic boundaries of segments 1, 3, 4b, 5, and 6. RHV, right hepatic vein; MHV, middle hepatic vein; LHV, left hepatic vein. From: W.R. Jarnagin (ed.), Blumgart’s Surgery of the Liver, Biliary Tract and Pancreas, 5th Edition, Elsevier, 2012.
The third order division separates segments into segments (numbers 1 to 8) and is defined by hepatic arterial supply and biliary drainage (see Figs. 17.6 and 18.6).
Selection of Patients
Anatomically based resections should be the gold standard in most cases, excluding fenestration of liver cysts (see Chapter 28), wedge excisions of superficial lesions, and enucleation of certain lesions such as metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (see Chapter 25). A clear understanding of the patient’s segmental liver anatomy is essential to a safe, controlled resection. Segmental resections are not limited by indication nor by the presence of hepatic parenchymal disease.
Achieving a balance between parenchymal sparing resections and adequate tumor clearance is clearly an important consideration for all resections but is critical in patients with diseased livers. In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), where cirrhosis is frequently present, segmental liver resection forms a bridge between the major hepatectomy and non-anatomic resection to preserve the maximum liver volume to prevent postoperative liver failure. Since HCC have a propensity for intraportal extension and dissemination, segmental resections, by removing the parenchyma supplied by the principal segmental portal vein branch, are likely to be more effective than non-anatomic resections from an oncologic standpoint. Segmental liver resection is also preferred in patients with multifocal colorectal metastasis treated extensively with preoperative chemotherapy, which frequently results in hepatic dysfunction and impaired regeneration due to steatosis (see Fig. 18.1).
PREOPERATIVE PLANNING
The planning of a segmental-based resection must take into account anatomic variations and their relationship to the plane of transection (Fig. 24.2) (see Figs. 17.9, 19.2, and 21.1, 21.2, 21.3 and 21.4). Resection has been facilitated by the precision digital imaging provided by computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasound (US), allowing interpretation of intrahepatic vascular and biliary anatomy (see Chapter 18) and the ability to manipulate and scroll through reconstructions in the axial, coronal, or sagittal planes using software such as picture archiving and communication system
(PACS). With the appropriate protocol for arterial and venous enhancement, the third and fourth level vascular structures can be accurately defined. More sophisticated software is available that may facilitate the preoperative planning. These easily manipulated, three-dimensional reconstructions that create a virtual reproduction of the liver can be used to determine the proposed plane of transection, taking into account the minimum resection margin, and residual volume of liver (Fig. 24.3).

Figure 24.2 Axial CT image showing variant portal venous anatomy, with the left portal vein (LPV) arising as a branch of the right anterior sectoral branch (Ant PV) and the posterior sectoral branch (Post PV) branching separately from the main portal vein (MPV).
General Operative Principles
Preoperative Assessment and Anesthesia
The preoperative assessment and preparation of the patient for a liver resection are described in Chapter 18. Comorbidities should be identified and optimized. Careful assessment of liver function, particularly in those with intrinsic liver disease is important. Preoperative biliary decompression and/or portal vein embolization are infrequently required for patients undergoing segmental compared to more extensive resections (see Chapters 18, 19, 20, and 26). Particular attention should be paid to the reduction of the central venous pressure during transection in order to reduce blood loss, and measures to prevent hypothermia, infections, and venous thromboembolism are required.

Figure 24.3 Three-dimensional model generated from a preoperative CT scan using ScoutTM software system (Pathfinder Therapeutics, Inc, Nashville, TN). The planned resection plane is shown. The total liver volume, the functional liver volume (total volume—tumor volume), and future liver remnant volumes are shown.

Exposure and Mobilization
Segmental resections may be performed laparoscopically (see Chapter 31) or at laparotomy. For open resections, exposure can be achieved through a variety of incisions (see Figs. 18.7, 19.3 and 21.5), including right subcostal with midline extension (hockey-stick) or its modification (J-shaped), or a bilateral subcostal incision with (Mercedes incision) or without (chevron) midline extension. A long midline incision may be used for selected liver resections, particularly if combined with a left or sigmoid colon or rectal resection; thoracoabdominal is seldom required. Following laparotomy and general inspection, the liver is mobilized by transection of the obliterated umbilical vein and division of the falciform ligament as it triangulates onto the IVC to identify the origins of the hepatic veins (see Fig. 19.4). Mobilization of the right and left livers requires division of the triangular ligaments in order to free the liver fully from the hemidiaphragms. During the division of the lesser omentum (gastro-hepatic ligament), attention should be given to the presence of an accessory or replaced left hepatic artery arising from the left gastric artery (see Chapter 20). Full mobilization of the right liver requires division of the coronary ligaments; if resection of one of the posterior right segments is planned (6 and/or 7), then the right adrenal gland must be separated and allowed to retract into the retroperitoneum and dissection of the retrohepatic IVC must be performed, as one would for more extensive procedures (see Chapters 19 and 23, Figs. 19.5, 19.6, and 23.12).
Intraoperative Assessment
The intraoperative assessment of the liver requires correlation of the findings of inspection and palpation of the mobilized liver with those of the preoperative imaging (see Chapter 18). Intraoperative ultrasound is used to localize the lesion, confirm the preoperative imaging findings, and further stage the proposed remnant liver (see Fig. 18.9

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 15, 2016 | Posted by in HEPATOPANCREATOBILIARY | Comments Off on Hepatic Segmental Resections

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access