Colorectal Cancer: Surgery and Local Ablation of Liver Metasteses



Colorectal Cancer: Surgery and Local Ablation of Liver Metasteses


Philippe Taleb

Bernard Nordlinger



Introduction

The most frequent cause of death in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) is liver metastases, which concern 20% of patients with stage II and 50% with stage III colon cancer. However, the presence of liver or lung metastases from CRC does not preclude curative treatment. If only a minority of patients with liver metastases is amenable to surgery, surgical resection remains the only treatment that can, to date, ensure long-term survival and cure in some patients. Recent progress, including new chemotherapeutic regimens, ablative techniques, and interventional radiology, may increase the number of patients that can be treated with a curative intent. Unfortunately, recurrences are still observed in most patients after resection of liver metastases. To reduce this risk, new therapeutic managements are tested using adjuvant intravenous and/or intra-arterial chemotherapies, or curative treatments are provided, in the event of recurrence with either surgery or local ablative techniques.


Resection of Liver Metastases: Update

Without any treatment, the median survival of patients with CRC liver metastases rarely exceeds 1 year. In a large prospective study conducted from 1980 to 1990 and including 484 patients with untreated hepatic metastases from CRC, the median survival was 31% at 1 year, 7.9% at 2 years, 2.6% at 3 years, and 0.9% at 4 years. The volume of liver involvement, presence of extrahepatic disease, metastatic lymph nodes in the mesentery, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, and age of the patient all influenced the survival rate. Depending on the presence or absence of these criteria, median survival varied from 3.8 to 21 months (1). In the absence of any randomized trial, few retrospective studies have compared the survival of patients with potentially resectable metastases that were left untreated with survival of patients after resection of colorectal metastases (2,3). There were no 5-year survivors in untreated patients, whereas 25% to 30% of patients survived 5 years after complete resection of metastases. The benefit of surgical resection for liver metastases is now well recognized, and complete resection with intent to cure is, to date, the only treatment that can ensure a long-term survival. Liver transplantation has been abandoned for this indication because immunosuppression has been associated with relapse of cancer in all patients (4).


Preoperative Assessment

The decision to perform surgical resection for liver metastases and the extent of resection are based on the patient’s condition, extent of the disease, and liver function. Surgery should be considered only with curative intent if liver metastases can be totally resected with tumorfree margins and sufficient postoperative remnant liver to avoid liver failure. Patients must not have nonresectable extrahepatic disease. The goals of preoperative assessment are to determine whether the patient’s condition will permit hepatic resection (i.e., general anaesthesia, clamping maneuvers requiring a correct cardiovascular status). It should exclude the presence of nonresectable extrahepatic disease and delineate the anatomy of metastases. If remnant parenchyma is normal, 75% of the volume of the liver can be resected. However, many patients receive preoperative chemotherapy, which may alter liver parenchyma. Liver function can be assessed by the Child-Pugh classification, hepatic biochemical blood tests, and, in some cases, indocyanine green retention tests. The volume of the nontumorous parenchyma that will be left in place after hepatic resection should be evaluated by computed tomography (CT) scan volumetry.


Surgical Treatment


Intraoperative Assessment

The exact place of laparoscopy in liver surgery is not clearly determined (5). Surgery should begin with a careful exploration of the abdominal cavity to rule out peritoneal carcinosis or an unexpected bilobar involvement of the liver by metastases, which could be a contraindication for resection. The presence of metastatic lymph nodes in the porta hepatis and the coeliac region considerably worsens the prognosis but should not be considered as an absolute contraindication to resection if they can be completely removed because 5-year recurrencefree surviving patients have been reported in such cases (6). Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) should be performed in every case because it allows a precise mapping of the anatomical relations of the metastases to the main intraparenchymatous vascular pedicles and helps select the type of resection. IOUS can detect small intraparenchymatous lesions and thereby modify the extent of the initially planned operation (7). It may also be used to guide the fine-needle biopsy of doubtful lesions or to evaluate the degree of destruction of a metastasis treated by radiofrequency (RF) ablation.



Types of Liver Resection

If remnant liver parenchyma is normal, up to six of the eight anatomical segments can be resected without inducing postoperative liver failure. Liver resections can be divided in two groups: (a) anatomical resections removing one or several segments, and (b) atypical or wedge resections removing a portion of liver parenchyma surrounding a hepatic lesion. Resections removing three or more continuous segments are defined as major hepatic resections: right hepatectomy (segments V, VI, VII, and VIII); left hepatectomy (segments II, III, and IV); and extended right hepatectomy, also called right lobectomy (segments IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII) (8,9).


Surgical Strategy

The aim of carcinologic surgery for liver metastases is to remove or destroy with ablation procedures all metastatic sites with a free clearance margin. The type of liver resection depends on the size, number, and location of the metastases; their relation to the main vascular and biliary pedicles; and the volume of the liver parenchyma that can be left in place after surgery. Superficial small metastases can be resected with wedge resections. Larger lesions often require major resections. It should also be kept in mind that a large resection may preclude further surgery in the case of intrahepatic recurrence.

If synchronous metastases are discovered at the same time as the primary cancer, it is usually preferable to perform the bowel resection during a first procedure because combined resection of both primary and liver metastases is associated with an increased mortality and morbidity rate (intra-abdominal fluid infection, vascular clamping deleterious for the viability of digestive sutures) when hepatic resection is a major resection (6). Usually, surgical resection of the liver metastases is delayed for 2 to 4 months after bowel resection, allowing observation of the response of liver metastases to systemic chemotherapy, which is often administered during the interval, and constituting an important prognostic factor.


Results of Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases


Complications of Surgery

In most recent studies, in-hospital mortality rates vary from 0% to 5% and are strongly influenced by perioperative blood loss, preoperative liver function, and extent of liver resection (Table 46.1). Reversible postoperative complications are observed in 25% to 40% of patients. Morbidity after hepatic resection is usually due to transient liver failure, hemorrhage, subphrenic abcesses, or biliary fistula. The mean hospital stay after liver surgery ranges from 10 to 15 days in the absence of complications.








Table 46.1 Mortality and Morbidity Rates After Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases




















































Reference Year Patients (n) Mortality (%) Morbidity (%)
Nordlinger et al. (10) 1987 80 5 13
Doci et al. (11) 1991 100 5 39
AFCa (12) 1997 1,818 2 24
Sheele et al. (13) 1995 469 4
Jamison et al. (14) 1997 280 4
Fong et al. (15) 1999 1,001 3
Minagawa et al. (16) 2000 235 0
aAFC, Association Française de Chirurgie.


Long-Term Results

Liver resection of colorectal metastases is associated with 3- and 5-year survival rates close to 40% and 30%, respectively (Table 46.2). After resection, recurrences are observed in two-thirds of patients and involve the liver in 50% of cases. In a large retrospective survey, 5-year survival was 28% in 1,568 patients who had a resection of isolated colorectal liver metastases and 15% in 250 patients who had resected liver and extrahepatic metastases. None of the 77 patients who had a palliative resection survived for 5 years (18).

Several studies have assessed factors influencing survival. Gender and the site of the primary tumor do not seem to influence the outcome. The stage of the primary tumor is associated with 5-year survival rate of 70% in stage I or II CRCs and 33% in stage III (6). Prognosis seems better in cases of metachronous metastases and small lesions, and when there are less than four lesions but the involvement of one or both lobes does not influence the outcome. CEA level is strongly correlated to the recurrencefree survival. A free margin of ≥1 cm offers better chances of avoiding recurrence, but several series have shown that a smaller margin did not affect survival (19). The type of resection does not seem to influence the prognosis provided that a clear margin is obtained. Blood transfusions could be associated with an adverse outcome but may reflect the surgical difficulties for the resection of large and numerous lesions. In large retrospective series of 1,568 patients with resected liver metastases from carcinoma, a multivariate analysis showed that age, size of the largest metastasis, CEA level, stage of the primary tumor, diseasefree interval, number of liver nodules, and resection margin >1 cm or <1 cm were only independent prognosis factors (18).


Control of Extrahepatic Metastatic Sites

Preoperative chest radiograph combined with a CT scan is performed to detect lung metastases. Synchronous liver and lung metastases should not be considered a contraindication to hepatic resection, provided that both sites can be completly resected. The carcinologic principle for resection of lung metastases is similar to that for liver metastases. The primary tumor should have been totally resected with no evidence of local recurrence or other unresectable metastases. In one study, 239
patients were operated on for lung metastases of CRC, 43 (18%) had previously had synchronous liver metastases surgically resected. Seven patients (16%) underwent subsequent lung resection for recurrences, and the median survival from lung resection was 19 months (20). Similar results were reported by the Metastatic Lung Tumour Study Group of Japan, with 47 patients who underwent pulmonary and hepatic resection with 3-, 5-, and 8-year survivals of 36%, 31%, and 23%, respectively (21). Surgical resection of lung metastases can significantly prolong survival. Prognostic factors are similar to those associated with resection of liver metastases; age, gender, and type of resection have not not been shown to have an impact on survival. After resection of lung metastases, the lung is the first site of recurrence in 50% to 70% of cases, followed by locoregional recurrences at the site of the primary metastasis, and brain and liver metastases. Repeat lung resections can be considered in some cases because 5-year actuarial survival rates of 30% have been reported (22). Exploration of other sites of possible metastasis, such as brain by CT scan or bone by scintigraphy, is performed only if there is a clinical suspicion. Their presence is a contraindication to liver or lung resection because the prognosis depends on the evolution of these unresectable metastases.








Table 46.2 Overall Survival After Surgical Resection of Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer




























































Reference Year Patients (n) Survival
3-Year (%) 5-Year (%)
Nordlinger et al. (10) 1987 80 40 25
AFCa (12) 1997 1,818 41 26
Gayowski et al. (17) 1994 204 32
Sheele et al. (13) 1995 469 41 33
Nordlinger et al. (18) 1996 1,569 41 26
Jamison et al. (14) 1997 280 27
Fong et al. (15) 1999 1,001 57 37
Minagawa et al. (16) 2000 235 51 38
aAFC, Association Française de Chirurgie.


Repeat Liver Resections for Recurrent Metastases

Recurrence limited to the liver following previous hepatic resection occurs in 25% to 50% of cases and may be amenable to repeat resection (23,24). Postoperative mortality and morbidity do not differ from those reported after a first resection, and mean survival approaches 2 years. In a recent series including 146 patients with intrahepatic recurrence following hepatectomy treated by repeat liver resection, the actuarial survival rates were 78% at 1 year, 30% at 3 years, and 16% at 5 and 10 years, comparable to that observed following primary liver resections (23). Hepatic recurrences should therefore be resected whenever technically feasible.


Progress in Surgery of Liver Metastases

Only 10% to 20% of patients with liver metastases fulfill standard selection criteria for direct resection. The trend is to be more aggressive and to increase the indications for surgical resection. Portal vein embolization, ablative techniques, and chemotherapy may be available to surgery patients who would have been considered unresectable some years ago.


Portal Vein Embolization

If the future remnant liver after liver resection is too small to provide sufficient postoperative liver function, preoperative selective portal vein embolization has been proposed to induce ipsilateral atrophy and controlateral hypertrophy of the remnant liver, thus preventing postoperative liver failure (25). In patients with noncirrhotic livers, preoperative portal vein embolization can be expected to induce a 40% to 60% increase in the size of the nonembolized portion. However, if liver metastases are present in the nonembolized portion of the liver, induced liver regeneration or hypertrophy is associated with an accelerated increase in the size of metastases (26). Following embolization, a liver resection judged primarily impossible, due to unsufficient volume of remnant liver, is feasible in 60% of cases, with mortality and morbidity rates comparable to those observed following liver resections without embolization. In a recent study, actuarial survival rates after hepatectomy with (n = 19) or without (n = 88) portal vein embolization were comparable: 81%, 67%, and 40% versus 88%, 61%, and 38% at 1, 3, and 5, years, respectively (25).


Chemotherapy

Systemic chemotherapy is used when liver metastases are not amenable to surgical resection. Clinical trials have shown that palliative chemotherapy is better for quality of life than symptomatic treatment alone, if administred before symptoms occur. Associations of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid are associated with a tumor response rate close to 20% of cases. When associated with new drugs, such as oxaliplatin or CPT-11, response rates approach 50% (27). With active chemotherapy regimens (irinotecan or oxaliplatine + 5-FU/leucoverin) alone, survival rate is <5% at 5 years.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Aug 25, 2016 | Posted by in NEPHROLOGY | Comments Off on Colorectal Cancer: Surgery and Local Ablation of Liver Metasteses

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access