Advanced Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery


Author

Year

No. of patients

OP time (min)

LOS (day)

Morbidity (%)

Comment

LAP

Open

LAP

Open

LAP

Open

LAP

Open

Bauer et al.

1996

25

14



6.5

8.5



High conversion if mass and fistula

Wu et al.

1997

46

70

144

202

4.5

7.9

10

21

52 % complex or redo cases

Dunker et al.

1998

11

11



5.5

9.9

9

9

Improved cosmesis

Wong et al.

1999

55
 
150
 
6.0
 
5
 
46 % complex cases

Canin-Endres et al.

1999

70
 
183
 
4.2
 
14
 
41 with fistulae, 1 conversion

Alabaz et al.

2000

26

48

150

90

7.0

9.6



Favorable results

Bemelman et al.

2000

30

48

138

104

5.7

10.2

15

10

Different hospitals for each group

Young-Fadok et al.

2001

33

33

147

124

4.0

7.0



Laparoscopy less expensive

Schmidt et al.

2001

46
 
207
 
5.7
   
Safe and effective, high conversion rate

Milsom et al.

2001

31

29

140

85

5.0

6.0

16

28

Prospective, randomized trial

Evans et al.

2002

84
 
145
 
5.6
 
11
 
Results improve with experience

Dupree et al.

2002

21

24

75

98

3.0

5.0

14

16

Laparoscopy less expensive

Shore et al.

2003

20

20

145

133

4.3

8.2



Laparoscopy less expensive

Benoist et al.

2003

24

32

179

198

7.7

8.0

20

10

Similar operative times, 17 % converted

Bergamaschi et al.

2003

39

53

185

105

5.6

11.2

9

10

Long-term obstruction less, 11 % vs. 35 %

Huilgol et al.

2004

21

19

136

120

6.4

8.2

19

16
 
Rosman et al.

2005
  
26.8 min longer
 
2.62 days less
 
OR 0.62
 
Meta-analysis, SBO reduced in LAP cases

Tilney et al.

2006

338

445

29.6 min longer
     
Meta-analysis, conversion 6.8 %

Tan et al.

2007
  
26 min longer
 
1.82 days less
 
12.8

20.2

Meta-analysis, conversion 11.2 %

Lesperance et al.

2009

2,826 (6 %)

46,783
  
6.0

9.0

8

16

Nationwide Inpatient Sample

Soop et al.

2009

109
 
150
 
4.0
 
11
 
Conversion 6 %

Nguyen et al.

2009

335
 
177
 
5.0
 
13
 
Largest series, conversion rate 2 %




  • The majority of studies are retrospective case–control series and report conversion rates from 10 to 20 %, which increases to 40–50 % with complex cases (abscess, fistula, or reoperative surgery).


  • Without tactile sensation, one of the concerns of laparoscopic surgery in the patient with Crohn’s is missing an isolated proximal ileal lesion, but this has not been reported.


  • Crohn’s recurrence rates after laparoscopy are similar to conventional procedures.


  • Laparoscopic resection for Crohn’s disease appears to be safe.






      Ulcerative Colitis






      • Studies of laparoscopic proctocolectomy for ulcerative are summarized in Tables 35.2 and 35.3.


        Table 35.2
        Early descriptive studies of laparoscopic colectomy for ulcerative colitis










































































        Author

        Year

        No. of patients

        Comment

        Meijerink et al.

        1999

        10

        Feasible, 7 for acute colitis

        Marcello et al.

        2000

        13

        Restorative proctocolectomy, favorable results

        Seshadri et al.

        2001

        37

        25 % morbidity

        Hamel et al.

        2001

        21

        Compared with ileocolic resection, similar morbidity, and LOS

        Marcello et al.

        2001

        16

        For acute colitis, comparative study, favorable results

        Brown et al.

        2001

        25

        Longer OP time in LAP group

        Dunker et al.

        2001

        35

        Better cosmesis

        Ky et al.

        2002

        32

        Single-stage procedure, good results

        Bell and Seymour

        2002

        18

        Total colectomy for acute colitis, seems safe

        Rivadeneira et al.

        2004

        23

        Hand-assisted procedure, reduced operative time

        Kienle et al.

        2003

        59

        Large study, laparoscopic colon mobilization only

        Nakajima et al.

        2004

        16

        Hand-assisted technique, favorable results


        IPAA ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, EBL estimated blood loss, LOS length of stay



        Table 35.3
        Comparative studies of laparoscopic resection for ulcerative colitis





















































































































        Author

        Year

        No. of patients

        OP time (min)

        LOS (day)

        Morbidity (%)

        Comment

        LAP

        Open

        LAP

        Open

        LAP

        Open

        LAP

        Open

        Maartense et al.

        2004

        30

        30

        210

        133

        10

        11

        20

        17

        SF-36 and GIQLI scores similar

        Larson et al.

        2006

        100

        200

        333

        230

        4

        7

        33

        37

        LAP faster than hand assisted (320 min vs. 372 min)

        Zhang et al.

        2007

        21

        25

        325

        220

        9

        11

        25

        28
         

        Benavente-Chenhalls

        2008

        16

        16

        500

        382

        25

        44

        5.3

        9.9

        UC and primary sclerosing cholangitis

        Ahmed Ali et al.

        2009

        253

        354

        91 min longer
         
        2.7 days less
         
        38–47

        42–53

        Cochrane review

        Fichera et al.

        2009

        73

        106

        335

        322

        8.3

        7.4
           
        Incisional hernia repair 7.8 % open vs. 0 % LAP

        Chung et al.

        2009

        37

        44

        223

        140

        4.9

        8.5

        9/37

        21/44

        1st of 3 stage procedure, 2nd stage earlier in LAP


      • Recent reports demonstrate that laparoscopic total colectomy and proctocolectomy with and without ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is technically feasible and shares the same advantages as seen with segmental colonic resection.


      • Indar et al. showed that adhesions are reduced with laparoscopic pouch procedures, in a series of 34 patients (21 females).


      Diverticulitis






      • There are now a large number of studies evaluating laparoscopic surgery for diverticulitis (Tables 35.4 and 35.5).


        Table 35.4
        Descriptive series of laparoscopic resection for diverticulitis








































































































































        Study

        Year

        N

        Mortality (%)

        Morbidity (%)

        Conversion (%)

        OR time (min) a

        Resume diet (day)a

        Flatus/BM (day)a

        LOS (day)a

        Eijsbouts et al.

        1997

        41

        0

        18

        15

        195

        NA

        NA

        6.5

        Stevenson et al.

        1998

        100

        0

        21

        8

        180

        2

        2

        4

        Tuech et al.

        2000

        77

        0

        17

        14

        NA

        NA

        NA

        NA

        Trebuchet et al.

        2002

        170

        0

        8.2

        4.1

        141

        3.4

        NA

        8.5

        Bouillot et al.

        2002

        179

        0

        15

        14

        223

        3.3

        2.5

        9.3

        Pugliese et al.

        2004

        103

        0

        8

        3

        190

        NA

        4

        9.7

        Schneidbach et al.

        2004

        1,545

        0.4

        17

        6.1

        169

        NA

        NA

        NA

        Pessaux et al.

        2004

        582

        1.2

        25

        NA

        NA

        NA

        NA

        NA

        Schwandner et al.

        2005

        363

        0.6

        22

        6.6

        192

        2.8

        4.0

        11.8

        Jones et al.

        2008

        500

        0.2

        11

        8–1.5

        120

        NA

        NA

        4


        OR operating room, BM bowel movement, LOS length of stay, NA not available

        aMedian or mean values listed



        Table 35.5
        Case–control studies of laparoscopic resection for diverticulitis











































































        Study

        Year

        No. of patients

        Mortality (%)

        Morbidity (%)

        Convert (%)

        OR time (min)a

        Resume diet (day)

        Flatus/BM (day)

        LOS (day)

        Total costsa

        CON

        LAP

        CON

        LAP

        CON

        LAP

        CON

        LAP

        CON

        LAP

        CON

        LAP

        CON

        LAP

        CON

        LAP

        Diverticulitis

        Liberman et al.

        1996

        14

        14

        0

        0

        14

        14

        0

        182

        192

        6.1

        2.9b

        NA
         
        9.2

        6.3b

        P 13,400

        11,500

        Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

        Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

        Mar 29, 2017 | Posted by in GASTROENTEROLOGY | Comments Off on Advanced Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

        Full access? Get Clinical Tree

        Get Clinical Tree app for offline access