Surgical Correction of Posterior Pelvic Floor Defects

9 Surgical Correction of Posterior Pelvic Floor Defects




Posterior pelvic floor defects include a variety of pelvic floor support disorders and anatomic defects of the anal sphincter. These various abnormalities may be asymptomatic, create traditional symptoms of prolapse, or result in a variety of functional arrangements. Posterior vaginal wall prolapse co-exists with anterior or apical prolapse in up to 50% of patients. Various types of posterior wall prolapse include a posterior enterocele, rectocele, sigmoidocele, and perineal descent (Figure 9-1). Although these various defects can occur in isolation, they commonly occur in combination. Defects in the external anal sphincter, which anatomically make up a significant portion of the perineum, can contribute to a gapping perineum and may also contribute to incontinence of either gas, liquid, or solid stool.



A rectocele is best defined as an anterior protrusion of the rectal wall into the posterior vaginal wall. The rectovaginal space is occupied by areolar tissue and allows the vagina and the rectum to function independently of each other. Although many theories and anatomic descriptions describe the support of the posterior vaginal wall, it is probably best described as a complex interaction between the connective tissue support and muscular support of the pelvic floor that maintains the integrity of the vaginal tube.


An enterocele is a hernia in which the peritoneum and abdominal contents displace the vagina and may even be in contact with vaginal mucosa. The normal intervening endopelvic fascia is deficient or absent, and small bowel fills the hernia sac. Generally, enteroceles have been divided into four types: congenital, traction, pulsion, and iatrogenic. Factors that may predispose a woman to the development of congenital enteroceles include neurologic disorders such as spina bifida and connective tissue disorders. Traction enteroceles occur secondary to uterovaginal prolapse, and pulsion enteroceles are the result of prolonged increases in intraabdominal pressure. Iatrogenic enteroceles occur after surgical procedures that elevate the normally horizontal vaginal axis in a vertical direction, such as a colposuspension for stress incontinence or after hysterectomy if the vaginal cuff and cul-de-sac are not appropriately managed. Clinically, enteroceles are best classified based on their anatomic location. Apical enteroceles herniate through the apex of the vagina, posterior enteroceles herniate posteriorly to the vaginal apex, and anterior enteroceles herniate anterior to the vaginal apex (Figure 9-2).



The descent of the sigmoid colon into the lower pelvic cavity, leading to mechanical obstruction of the rectum, is a sigmoidocele.


DeLancey (1999) divided the connective tissue support of the vagina into three levels. All three levels of support should be evaluated and addressed during the surgical management of the posterior vaginal wall. Level I support is the uppermost or apical portion of the posterior vaginal wall and is suspended and supported primarily by the cardinal and uterosacral ligaments. Level II support includes the support of the middle half of the vagina, and this support is provided by the endopelvic fascia attaching the lateral posterior vaginal wall to the aponeurosis of the levator ani muscle on the pelvic side wall. The perineal body includes interlacing muscle fibers of the bulbocavernosus, transverse perineal, and external anal sphincter muscles. Anteriorly, the perineum is attached to the vaginal epithelium and muscularis of the posterior vaginal wall. Laterally, it is attached to the ischiopubic ramus through the transverse perineal muscles and the perineal membrane. The perineal body is described as extending cranially on the posterior vaginal wall to approximately 2 to 3 centimeters proximal to the hymenal ring. This dense fused level of support is what DeLancey has described as level III support. Posterior to the perineal body includes the anterior portion of the external anal sphincter and its attachment to the longitudinal fibrous sheet of the internal anal sphincter (Figure 9-3). (See Video 9-1, “Anatomy of the Posterior Vaginal Wall.” image)



Although no significant causes can be found to explain prolapse and specifically posterior vaginal wall prolapse, one contributing factor relates to the state of the puborectalis muscle in general. In a woman with an intact pelvic floor, the puborectalis is in a chronic state of contraction; this contraction closes the vaginal canal, and the anterior and posterior vaginal walls are in direct opposition. With defecation, the increased pressure placed on the posterior vaginal wall is equalibrated by the opposing anterior vaginal wall, and minimal stress is placed on the endopelvic fascia attachments. If muscular or neurologic damage has occurred to the puborectalis, then the levator hiatus widens and the vaginal canal opens. The increased rectal pressure and distention associated with defecation places a strain on the endopelvic fascial attachments, and the fibromuscularis of the posterior vaginal wall can result in a rectocele and perineal descent. Other factors that can contribute to the development of posterior pelvic floor abnormalities (whether anatomic, functional, or both) include damage to the support of the posterior vaginal wall at the time of vaginal delivery, as well as conditions that create chronic strain and constipation. As previously mentioned, alterations of the axis of the vagina may increase the forces placed on the connective tissue support. For example, historically, over elevation of the anterior vaginal wall with a retropubic urethropexy or needle suspension procedure has resulted in significant rates of posterior vaginal wall prolapse in the form of enteroceles and rectoceles. More recently, patients who have had mesh-augmented repair of an anterior vaginal wall prolapse have a higher chance of developing posterior vaginal wall prolapse, in comparison with those who have had a native tissue repair of the anterior vaginal wall. Most likely, this is due to the fact that abdominal pressure transmission will be directed in its entirety to the weakest segment of the pelvic floor. It would seem that augmenting one segment of the pelvic floor may create a significant discrepancy in support that leads to prolapse of the opposite segment.


Patients with posterior vaginal prolapse may be totally asymptomatic or may have a variety of anatomic and functional complaints. In general, before surgical correction, testing should be undertaken that might help the surgeon truly determine whether anatomic correction will result in symptomatic relief of the patient’s complaints. This chapter discusses a variety of techniques used to correct posterior vaginal wall prolapse and perineal defects. (The history, physical examination, and staging of posterior vaginal wall prolapse are discussed in Chapter 3.)



Preoperative Considerations before Surgical Repair


Ellerkmann and colleagues (2001) reported that 25% to 67% of patients with pelvic organ prolapse admit to symptoms of defecatory dysfunction. These symptoms include straining to have a bowel movement, having to splint to facilitate expulsion of stool, dyschezia, chronic constipation, and occasional fecal incontinence. Patients may also complain of symptoms related to sexual function. Patients who have an anatomic defect with primarily functional complaints must be thoroughly evaluated and consented before undergoing a surgical procedure, because the correlation between correcting the defect and restoring the functional problems is at times unpredictable. A physical examination should entail a close inspection and assessment of the degree of prolapse, the state of the perineum, the total vaginal length, and the extent and size of the genital or levator hiatus. A rectal examination is performed to further assess the presence and position of a rectocele, as well as help differentiate a rectocele from an enterocele. Inspection and examination of the anal area is also indicated with one finger in the rectum and another in the vagina. A sliding posterior enterocele may be palpated as prolapsed loops of small bowel will become apparent between the intervening tissues of the rectovaginal septum.


At times, further objective assessment of the posterior vaginal wall with either radiographic studies or physiologic studies will help the surgeon determine the potential benefit of surgical intervention. These studies are indicated in patients who have significant bowel symptoms, rather than those patients who have anatomic defects with complaints primarily of prolapse. The main radiologic studies that are used for posterior pelvic floor abnormalities include defecating proctography and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In addition, these studies help rule out other anatomic abnormalities that could be contributing to the patient’s symptoms, including sigmoidoceles, anorectal intussusception rectal prolapse, and perineal descent, which can all contribute to the development of symptoms of defecatory dysfunction. The authors prefer to use defecating video proctography to help evaluate the dynamics of evacuation by visualizing the rectum after filling it with liquid barium and determining the extent of the rectocele fluoroscopically. Anal ultrasound is the preferred method for assessing the anal sphincter muscles. Physiologic tests have included anal manometry, electromyography, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency studies, and colonic transit time studies. Except for the transit time studies, the other physiologic studies are only indicated in patients who have significant fecal incontinence; these studies are of minimal clinical use in the patient with posterior pelvic wall prolapse with symptoms of outlet obstruction. The colonic transit time study has been shown to be a good predictor regarding the resolution of difficult evacuation in patients with rectoceles. This study involves serial x-ray examinations of the abdomen used to determine the movement of radiopaque markers after ingesting Sitzmarks capsules. This study may also be helpful as part of the routine preoperative evaluation of patients with rectoceles.


Dynamic MRI provides high-quality images of the pelvic soft tissues and viscera. MRI is noninvasive and does not require ionizing radiation or significant patient preparation. However, poor correlation exists between MRI grading of prolapse and clinical staging. At this time, a standardized method of establishing a radiologic diagnosis of the rectocele is lacking. Clinical examination has good sensitivity for detecting rectoceles, and most enteroceles should be intraoperatively identified during dissection of the upper portion of the posterior vaginal wall. Therefore radiographic confirmation of the presence or absence of posterior vaginal wall prolapse is not worthwhile. Although defecatory dysfunction is common in women with prolapse, the extent of the prolapse does not necessarily correlate with the extent of the bowel symptoms. If the woman’s primary complaint is defecatory dysfunction or fecal incontinence and not a bulge, then surgical correction of the rectocele or perineal defect may not correct her symptoms. Specific ancillary testing is then pursued on the basis of the woman’s complaints, with the goal of identifying appropriate surgical candidates.



Surgical Management of Posterior Compartment Defects


The surgical indications for posterior vaginal wall prolapse are controversial. Most surgeons advocate operative repair if the prolapse is large, if a rectocele fails to empty on defecography, or if it is clinically associated with frequent vaginal or perineal manipulation by the patient for satisfactory evacuation. Rectocele repair with distal levatorplasty and perineoplasty is also commonly performed in conjunction with repairs of other segments of the pelvic floor or with obliterative procedures to decrease the size of the genital hiatus.


This chapter addresses a variety of different surgical techniques that have been used to correct posterior pelvic organ prolapse. Although the majority of the discussion involves rectocele repair, a discussion of patients with perineal defects, defects of the anal sphincter, and co-existent enteroceles and sigmoidoceles is also included. The goal of these techniques should be to reconstruct the entire posterior vaginal wall as needed from the apex to and including the perineum. The goal of all posterior repair procedures should be to ultimately create a perpendicular relationship between the posterior vaginal wall and the perineum. These procedures should be performed without creating vaginal bands or constrictions but, at the same time, appropriately decreasing the caliber of the genital hiatus if necessary. Other pelvic floor defects, if present, should also be addressed in the same setting.


The published literature continues to classify rectocele repairs into what has been termed as the traditional technique, which implies that the repair has been supplemented with a levator ani muscle plication in the midline, or a site-specific technique, which implies that discrete defects in the rectovaginal fascia are identified and repaired and that no levator plication is performed. To date, no studies have addressed how often a posterior enterocele and or sigmoidocele co-exist with a rectocele or how the presence of these defects impacts ultimate surgical outcomes. Based on the current understanding of the anatomy of the posterior vaginal wall and perineum, defect-specific repairs clearly involve plication of the fibromuscular layer of the posterior vaginal wall. Based on the initial level of dissection, this tissue may be found on the anterior wall of the rectum or may have to be mobilized off the vaginal epithelium to allow an appropriate tension-free plication. In patients with advanced prolapse and a widened genital hiatus, the only way to address the gaping vagina is to perform a distal levatorplasty. In the author’s opinion, future surgical studies assessing the outcomes of prolapse repair involving the posterior vaginal wall should take into consideration these points and realize that these procedures are not mutually exclusive; a combination of the techniques, especially in cases of advanced prolapse, is commonly required. Other types of repair that have been reported include transanal repairs, transperineal mesh (biologic or synthetic) augmented repairs, and abdominal sacral colpopexy in which the mesh attachment is extended down to the distal portion of the posterior vaginal wall and/or perineum. The author has also observed that aggressive reattachment of the uppermost portion of the full thickness of the posterior vaginal wall (level I support) to the uterosacral ligament provides significant support to the posterior vaginal wall in patients with high rectoceles or rectoceles in conjunction with a posterior enterocele (Figure 9-4).




Technique for Rectocele Repair and Perineoplasty




1. The patient is placed in the lithotomy position in high leg stirrups, and the vagina is sterilely prepared and draped. A catheter is placed to empty the bladder. A pelvic examination under anesthesia, including a careful rectovaginal examination, is performed. The thickness and laxity of the posterior vaginal wall and rectovaginal septum is palpated and closely observed, including how much displacement of the rectal wall protrudes toward the vagina with a palpating finger. The wideness of the levator hiatus and the quality of the levator muscles are bilaterally estimated; the perineal body, not only its length from the posterior fourchette to anus but its thickness, is also palpated. Sometimes a distal perineal rectocele can be quite symptomatic and is only palpable when the rectal finger is hooked backward toward the surgeon during a rectovaginal examination. Because one of the complications of rectocele repair is overzealous fibromuscular or levator plication resulting in vaginal constriction and dyspareunia, the desired caliber of the vagina along its length and especially near the introitus at the hymenal ring is carefully estimated.


2. Two Allis clamps are placed at the posterior fourchette at approximately 5 and 7 o’clock and are gently pulled downward to examine the entire posterior vaginal wall and to again estimate the amount of gaping of the introitus. A dilute hemostatic solution, such as 0.5% Lidocaine with 1 : 200,000 epinephrine, is injected into the perineum and rectovaginal space. A Lone Star retractor is sometimes useful to help visualize the entire vagina and aid in retraction during a rectocele repair.


3. Some surgeons make a V or diamond incision in the perineum to resect the redundant tissue, and others simply make a midline incision. The authors prefer to excise a diamond-shaped piece of perineal and vaginal skin, based on the desired caliber of the vagina and introitus (Figure 9-5). Once this tissue is excised, Allis clamps are used to grasp the edges of the vaginal epithelium. The author perfers to perform this dissection and the entire repair with a finger in the rectum.


4. The Allis clamps help retract the incised vaginal wall by lifting it. The index finger of the nondominant hand of the surgeon is in the rectum to apply countertraction against the elevated vaginal wall. The rectovaginal space is sharply incised using scissors until the entire vagina is dissected off the rectum to the levator ani muscles, which is done bilaterally and proximally; the rectum is separated off the vagina toward the vaginal apex. Once the dissection extends beyond the extraperitoneal portion of the rectum, the rectovaginal space is entered. This is an avascular preperitoneal space that allows access to the peritoneum over the cul-de-sac. At times an enterocele can be in the rectovaginal space over the rectocele; consequently, the surgeon should inspect for this and, if an enterocele is identified, correct it (Figure 9-6) The reader is referred to the section, “Technique for Enterocele Repair” on page 150 for a more detailed description. Likewise, if apical prolapse exists, then a sacrospinous ligament or uterosacral colpopexy can be performed before the rectocele repair is completed.


5. A series of sutures are progressively placed bilaterally through the fibromuscular tissue to reduce the rectocele. The vagina should be examined after every two or three sutures to ensure that the posterior vaginal wall is smooth and not becoming too tight during the repair. In addition, irregularities in the posterior vaginal wall from sutures placed at slightly different levels may result in dyspareunia; the offending sutures should be removed and replaced to ensure that the posterior vaginal wall repair is smooth. The repair is begun proximally and extends in a distal direction. The author prefers to perform a two-layered plication when possible (see Figure 9-6).


6. Mixing a partial fibromuscular plication with areas of site-specific defect repair is acceptable, especially in the distal posterior vaginal wall. The surgeon may note a defect in the midline, right, left, or at the perineal body and may be able to identify edges of the fibromuscular tissue or rectovaginal septum. In this case, sutures are placed to repair the defect and even to connect the perineal body to the rectovaginal septum. Performing the repair with a finger in the rectum facilitates the placement of the stitches (Figure 9-7).


7. If necessary, a perineorrhaphy is then performed to help thicken the perineum, both in the craniocaudal direction and in the anteroposterior direction. A rectovaginal examination verifies whether the rectocele has been completely corrected and whether sutures or lacerations are no longer present in the rectal mucosa. The surgeon must be careful not to constrict the hymenal ring too much, which is a frequent cause of entry dyspareunia.


8. The rectovaginal space is carefully visualized for all bleeding vessels that are appropriately cauterized. The rectovaginal space is irrigated, and closure of the posterior vagina is started with a fine running or interrupted delayed absorbable suture. Sometimes, some redundant vaginal wall should be trimmed; however, care should be taken not to over trim and constrict the vagina. The sutures to the hymen are locked, and then the perineorrhaphy incision is closed with simple running or interrupted sutures.


9. No studies have indicated the best type of sutures for rectocele repair. A reasonable choice is a delayed absorbable suture, such as 2.0 Vicryl for the fibromuscular plication of the rectum and the reconstruction of the perineal body; 3.0 Vicryl can be used for closing the posterior vaginal wall and perineal skin.


10. Vaginal packing is reasonable to help decrease the incidence of rectovaginal septum hematoma, but it is not mandatory.

< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 24, 2016 | Posted by in UROLOGY | Comments Off on Surgical Correction of Posterior Pelvic Floor Defects

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access