Single-Incision Robotic Surgery


Investigators

Evidence type

Procedure

Number of patients

Access

Operation time (in minutes)

Ostrowitz et al. [1]

Prospective clinical series

Right hemicolectomy

3

SILS port

166

Romanelli et al. [2]

Case report

Cholecystectomy

1

Separate fascial incisions

156

Ragupathi et al. [3]

Clinical case report

Partial cecetomy

1

GelPort

120

Singh et al. [8]

Clinical case report

Right hemicolectomy

1

GelPort

179

Kroh et al. [5]

Prospective clinical series

Cholecystectomy

13

Glove technique

107

Wren and Curet [4]

Comparative studya

Cholecystectomy

10

da Vinci SSI

105.3

Morel et al. [6]

Prospective clinical series

Cholecystectomy

28

da Vinci SSI

 80

Spinoglio et al. [9]

Comparative studyb

Cholecystectomy

25

da Vinci SSI

 62 [13]

Konstantinidis et al. [11]

Case series

Cholecystectomy

45

da Vinci SSI

 84.5

Pietrabissa et al. [12]

Multicenter prospective case series

Cholecystectomy

100

da Vinci SSI

 71


aComparative study vs. standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy

bComparative study vs. laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery





12.2.2 Outcomes


Outcomes gleaned from the literature seem to establish the safety of single-incision robotic surgery. Pietrabissa et al. reported a conversion rate of 2 % in a series of 100 cholecystectomies, with one conversion to multiport laparoscopy and the other to open surgery, both due to severe chronic inflammation. Minor complications encountered included gall bladder rupture (7 %) and bleeding (5 %). Konstantinidis et al. in a study of 45 patients who underwent cholecystectomy reported no conversion to open surgery, although additional port placement was required in three patients. Complication rates were similarto the study by Pietrabissa et al. and 40 of the patients were discharged within 24 h. Interestingly, the duration of surgery did not change significantly with increasing operative experience. The remaining studies were too small to draw meaningful conclusions regarding outcomes, but the feasibility of such procedures has been established.


12.2.3 Contraindications


Contraindications for single-incision robotic surgery are not dissimilar to those for conventional laparoscopic surgery or multiport robotic surgery. Robotic general surgery (abdominal procedures) are usually performed in the Trendelenburg or reverse Trendelenburg position; thus, the physiologic effects of a steep incline and pneumoperitoneum creation must be taken into account. The most important physiologic changes are listed in Table 12.2.


Table 12.2
Physiologic changes associated with the Trendeleburg position































Physiologic variable

Position-induced change

Intracranial/intraocular pressure

Increase

Central venous pressure

Increase

Cardiac output

Decrease

Blood pressure

Increase

Venous return

Increase then decrease

Systemic vascular resistance

Decrease

Airway resistance

Increase

Due to the potential for risky physiologic changes, the following are considered relative contraindications for robotic surgery:



  • History of cerebrovascular accident, intracranial aneurysm, elevated intracranial pressure, or glaucoma


  • Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bullous emphysema, spontaneous pneumothorax, or diaphragmatic hernia



12.3 Description of the Technique



12.3.1 Basic Structure


The typical robot consists of the surgical console, a three-dimensional camera system, and a bedside cart equipped with robotic arms. Conventional robotic surgery uses four separate arms; one for the camera and the other three for the instruments. Slight variations exist between different generations of systems, but the principles remain the same. The locations of the ports vary according to the type of procedure being performed.

Single-port/single-site robotic surgery is a modification of the multiport approach and can be carried out in two ways. One method involves inserting three ports of the multiport robotic system through separate but closely placed incisions or through a GelPort® device (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, USA) or simply through the fingers of a standard surgical glove. A newer method takes advantage of a specially designed single-incision platform comprising a large silicone port with four channels and commonly placed in the umbilicus. The single-port robotic trocars and instruments differ in design from those of the conventional robotic system.


12.3.2 Individual Components



12.3.2.1 Console


The da Vinci console developed by Intuitive Surgical is currently the only commercially available robot. A number of robot alternatives are in various stages of development and are projected to enter the market within the next few years. The console shown in Fig. 12.1 may be housed at a remote location, but at most hospitals, the console is housed within the operating room itself.
Mar 29, 2017 | Posted by in GASTROENTEROLOGY | Comments Off on Single-Incision Robotic Surgery

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access