Robot-Assisted Cystectomy: Getting Started: Prior Experience, Learning Curve, and Initial Patient Selection


Comfort with steps of robotic prostatectomy

Experience with open radical cystectomy and urinary diversion

Laparoscopic experience

Understanding of patient positioning

Review of other surgeon experience

Anesthesiology support

Ease in troubleshooting robotic issues

Monitoring of surgical results



While the surgeon receives most of the accolades and burdens for the outcomes of these procedures, the bedside assistant is a particularly important member of the surgical team. We have used both urology residents and fellows, but also found that having a dedicated surgical assistant is helpful. These assistants provide some stability to the surgical team. Whoever fills the role of bedside assistant; it is important that they are comfortable with basic laparoscopic techniques, safe torcar placement, suctioning, tissue handling, retraction, placement of clips, passing suture material, and providing essential exposure. These are not easy tasks and are not quickly mastered by assistants that are infrequently exposed to robotic or laparoscopic procedures. Therefore, consistency and repetition in this role is particularly important.

Similarly, anesthesia providers play a critical role in the successful completion of these procedures. Registry data has shown that about 60 % of all new cancer patients older than 65 years suffer form at least one other serious disease [9]. Bladder cancer patients frequently have comorbid health conditions that directly impact parts of the procedure. For example, the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is common in both men (19 %) and women (8.9 %) with bladder cancer [10], likely secondary to the increased risk of disease associated with smoking. This has significant implications upon pneumoperitoneum and carbon dioxide retention. Similarly, obesity in combination with steep Trendelenberg positioning can create increased pulmonary pressures. Furthermore, patients must be draped and padded in such a fashion that they will not suffer complications from the extended duration of these procedures. Techniques to manage these potential issues are critical to the successful completion of the procedure and to prevent unnecessary complications.

Finally, circulating and scrub nurses are critical to the efficient completion of these cases. They are responsible for the efficient sterile draping of the robotic arms and preparing the patient and robot for the procedure. They are also needed to quickly and accurately identify and provide equipment and supplies that are commonly required for the completion of these procedures. Quick and efficient nursing practice can alter a procedure from lasting many hours to one that provides efficient and improved patient care.

The ability of the team to effectively communicate and prepare for these procedures will play a major role in patient safety and the quality of the surgical intervention. The integrated approach and education of all the team members is essential to the successful adoption of robot-assisted bladder surgery.



Lessons to Take from Prior Surgical Experience


As discussed previously, comfort in robot-assisted pelvic surgery, specifically robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, is a prerequisite for a urologist looking to add robot-assisted bladder cancer surgery to their armamentarium. While significant and important differences between the procedures exist, experience gained from robot-assisted radical prostatectomy translates to robot-assisted bladder cancer surgery particularly with respect to pelvic lymphadenectomy, neurovascular bundle preservation (if performed), and apical prostate dissection. Furthermore, ease and understanding of basic robotic maneuvers (such as suturing, knot tying, and cautery) and visualization (with different angle lenses) within the confines of the pelvis facilitates quicker adaptation for the surgeon and the surgical team alike. Finally, the anatomic approach and landmarks in the pelvis are exactly the same. For these reasons, we feel that comfort with robotic radical prostatectomy is critical prior to adopting robotic bladder cancer surgery.

Similarly, familiarity and comfort in performing open radical cystectomy with urinary diversion are a prerequisite in adapting the robot assisted approach. Such familiarity is obviously critical should a conversion to open radical cystectomy be necessary. Beyond that, however, the basic surgical and oncological principles and anatomy are similar between the open and the robotic approaches. Finally, the majority of surgeons starting an experience with robot-assisted radical cystectomy perform the urinary diversion in an open fashion. Therefore, expertise with open urinary diversion is imperative as it may be performed through a smaller incision, an incision positioned higher in the abdomen, and/or from a different angle.

While many of these concepts are discussed in detail elsewhere in this text, it is important to highlight portions of both open cystectomy and robotic prostatectomy that impact upon a surgeon transitioning to a practice offering RARC. The specific technical aspects of the procedure are discussed in detail throughout this textbook and are beyond the scope of this chapter. However, there are several important points that relate to prior experience and starting a robot-assisted cystectomy program that warrant discussion. Therefore, here we outline several portions of both RARP and open cystectomy and discuss how they impact the adoption of RARC.


Surgical Concepts to Bridge RARP to RARC



Lymphadenectomy


Lymphadenectomy is likely the most difficult portion of RARC for most practitioners to master. While the importance of an extended pelvic lymphadenectomy is debatable for patients with prostate cancer, its importance for patients with invasive urothelial carcinoma is well established. Numerous studies have now demonstrated improved survival with extended lymphadenectomy and adequate nodal dissection templates are vital. Indeed, lymph node yield is perhaps the most commonly utilized marker of surgical quality. Therefore, it is critical for surgeons embarking upon RARC to perform an adequate lymphadenectomy and also demonstrate comfort with the extent and degree of lymphadenectomy necessary for patients with invasive bladder cancer.

As high-volume RARP providers, we found it helpful to extend the boundaries of lymphadenectomy during RARP for patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. This allowed more familiarity with handling the pelvic vessels and allowed us to develop safe and efficient techniques for dealing with bleeding situations. Over time, we expanded our RARP practice to routinely include lymph node packets in the obturator, internal iliac, and external iliac regions. We found it useful to begin this dissection posteriorly to the iliac vessels between the lymph node packet and the pelvic side wall. This experience was important in developing and maintaining a program in RARC due to the huge volume discrepancies that exist between RARP and RARC.


Posterior Dissection


Dissection of the seminal vesicles and developing a plane between the prostate and the rectum are essential components of RARP as well as RARC. While we have typically performed the seminal vesicle dissection during RARP from an anterior approach, familiarity with the transperitoneal posterior-based approach to RARP would facilitate the conversion to RARC. Posterior-based approaches to RARP enable surgeons to more accurately identify the vascular pedicles at the time of RARC as well as to perform selective neurovascular bundle preservation during RARC when clinically appropriate. We found it helpful after performing the ureteral dissection and lymphadenectomy with the 30° lens that switching to the 0° lens enabled more caudal dissection between the prostate and the rectum during RARC where it was almost possible to reach the apex of the prostate. This caudal dissection is important during RARC as it decreases the risk of rectal injury and enables easier dissection for the remainder of the procedure. Furthermore, the sheer bulk of a cystoprostatectomy specimen is much more challenging to manage after the bladder has been dropped off the anterior abdomenal wall (we would recommend this as one of the last steps in RARC) than the smaller specimen obtained at the time of prostatectomy. This bulk makes the cystoprostatectomy specimen more difficult to maneuver particularly for residual posterior and rectal attachments.


Anterior and Apical Dissection


Developing the space of Retzius and dissection of the apex of the prostate are routine procedures during both RARC and RARP. Surgeons comfortable with RARP should be able to transition these skills easily to RARC. Differences do exist, in part due to location of the tumor and the possibility of extravesical disease that make comfort with this portion of the procedure important. Specifically, surgeons must be comfortable with subtle modifications of the anterior dissection to ensure a negative surgical margin, even in patients with anterior-based T3 tumors. Furthermore, apical dissection remains important (particularly in the setting of orthotopic urinary diversion), though surgeons comfortable with control of the dorsal venous complex and apical prostate dissection should be able to transfer this to their expertise expeditiously. Unlike in prostatectomy it is important to prevent urine spillage. For this we recommend that after the prostate apex has been carefully dissected that the urethra be identified so that a large Hemo-o-lok® polymer clip (Teleflex, Limerick, PA) or stapler can be used to ensure a hermetic seal and prevent possible tumor or urine leakage after removal of the Foley catheter.


Surgical Concepts Bridging Open Cystectomy to RARC



Lymphadenectomy


Just as comfort with lymphadenectomy from a robotic approach is important when starting RARC, familiarity open pelvic lymphadenectomy is important. This experience is critical to define and replicate the landmarks and limits of dissection. Cystectomy surgeons have for years defined the role of extended lymphadenectomy and it is critical not to lose any progress that may influence the outcome from the disease and intervention. Accordingly, lymphadenectomy at a minimum should include the obturator, internal iliac, external iliac, and distal 1/3 of the common iliac. We recommend that extended pelvic lymphadenectomy be performed as the new standard to include all lymphatic tissue including the common iliacs, proximally to the aortic bifurcation and pre-sacral tissue as well [11]. An important landmark that we use to limit the cranial aspect of the dissection is the take off of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA).

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Mar 29, 2017 | Posted by in UROLOGY | Comments Off on Robot-Assisted Cystectomy: Getting Started: Prior Experience, Learning Curve, and Initial Patient Selection

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access