Reconstructive Plastic Surgery


Area

Scale

Preferred procedure

Arms

0 Normal

None

1 Adiposity with good skin tone

ultrasound assisted lipoplasty (UAL)and/or standard assisted lipoplasty (SAL)

2 Loose, hanging skin without severe adiposity

Brachioplasty

3 Loose, hanging skin with severe adiposity

Brachioplasty ± UAL and/or SAL

Breasts

0 Normal

None

1 Ptosis grade I/II or severe macromastia

Traditional mastopexy, reduction, or augmentation techniques

2 Ptosis grade I/II or moderate volume loss or constricted breast

Traditional mastopexy ± augmentation

3 Severe lateral roll and/or severe volume loss with loose skin

Parenchymal reshaping techniques with dermal suspension; consider autoaugmentation

Back

0 Normal

None

1 Single fat roll or adiposity

UAL and/or SAL

2 Multiple skin and fat rolls

Excisional lifting procedures

3 Ptosis of rolls

Excisional lifting procedures

Abdomen

0 Normal

None

1 Redundant skin with rhytids or moderate adiposity without overhang

Mini abdominoplasty, UAL and/or SAL

2 Overhanging pannus

Full abdominoplasty

3 Multiple rolls or epigastric fullness

Modified abdominoplasty techniques, including fleur-de-lis and/or upper body lift

Flank

0 Normal

None

1 Adiposity

UAL and/or SAL

2 Rolls

UAL and/or SAL

3 Ptosis of rolls

Excisional lifting procedures

Buttocks

0 Normal

None

1 Mild to moderate adiposity and/or mild to moderate cellulite

UAL and/or SAL

2 Severe adiposity and/or severe cellulite

UAL and/or SAL ± excisional lifting procedure

3 Skinfolds

Excisional lifting procedure

Mons

0 Normal

None

1 Excessive adiposity

UAL and/or SAL

2 Ptosis

Monsplasty

3 Significant overhang below symphysis

Monsplasty

Hips/lateral thighs

0 Normal

None

1 Mild to moderate adiposity and/or mild to moderate cellulite

UAL and/or SAL

2 Severe adiposity and/or severe cellulite

UAL and/or SAL ± excisional lifting procedure

3 Skinfolds

Excisional lifting procedure

Medial thighs

0 Normal

None

1 Excessive adiposity

UAL and/or SAL ± excisional lifting procedure

2 Severe adiposity and/or severe cellulite

UAL and/or SAL ± excisional lifting procedure

3 Skinfolds

Excisional lifting procedure

Lower thighs/knees

0 Normal

None

1 Adiposity

UAL and SAL ± excisional lifting procedure

2 Severe adiposity

UAL and SAL ± excisional lifting procedure

3 Skinfolds

Excisional lifting procedure



Patients in fact complain for a wide range of physical anomalies that do interfere with their quality of life often causing functional impairment.

According to Balagué et al., body contouring must be included in morbid obesity management as patients undergoing those procedures present better long-term weight control [3, 4].

As a general rule, contouring operations should be done after weight loss is complete, as wound complications tend to be higher when surgery is performed in patients who are still obese.

Given the opportunity to prioritize which parts of their bodies they would like to have addressed first by a plastic surgeon, the waist/abdomen is usually at the top of the list (46.2 %), followed by the upper arm (23.3 %), the chest/breast (12.3 %), and the rear/buttock (18.2 %) [5].

Performing multiple procedures in two or more stages should be considered if the patient has goals of reshaping different regions. The advantages of staging include less anesthetic time, reduced blood loss, less surgeon fatigue, avoidance of opposing vectors of pull on regions of the skin, and the chance to correct further irregularities [610].

The authors present a description of personal surgical approaches to the most requested interventions.



25.2 Abdominoplasty


Although abdominoplasty is a common procedure within plastic surgery, the management of the post massive weight loss of the abdomen is much more complicated [1, 2]. The aim is to reshape the abdominal wall by combining skin and subcutaneous tissue resection with musculoaponeurotic reinforcement. Conventional transverse resection is the first choice, but several and long scars may be necessary to give the patient the desired contour. The presence of a median or paramedian supraumbilical scar must be carefully considered especially after bariatric procedures. Vertical scars in the upper abdomen may impair vascularity or limit the advancement of the superior flap leading to unfavorable aesthetic results [11]. In those cases, transverse resection cannot guarantee adequate body contouring so the “anchor-line” abdominoplasty must be preferred [12].


25.2.1 Surgical Technique


Bowel preparation with enemas is carried out the day before surgery. Foley catheter is positioned preoperatively. Elastic stockings are applied to the legs to prevent venous stasis, and low-dose heparin is administered for deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis. Marking of the surgical incisions is made in the midline drawn from the xiphoid to the pubic symphysis with the patient in upright position. With the patient supine, a lower horizontal ellipsis plus an upper vertical medial triangle, which entails the supraumbilical scars, is marked. The upper components of the elliptical drawing run obliquely downward beneath the umbilicus, which is different from the conventional design. In this way, the final horizontal scars are placed as low as possible, in the natural suprapubic fold.

The width of the upper triangle is established by pinching, with the patient supine, so as to obtain the new abdominal silhouette. No excess tension must be exerted to avoid pubic hairline elevation.

Incisions are performed along the preoperative drawing, and an “en bloc” resection of skin and subcutaneous tissue is carried out. The umbilicus is resected in a triangular shape, with the base placed superiorly, isolating and preserving its stalk, which is left attached to the abdominal fascia.

The lateral flaps are elevated through sharp dissection in a prefascial plane in order to mobilize the flaps, sparing the lateral musculocutaneous perforators and being careful not to impair the vascular supply.

Plication of the rectus sheath is then performed; in most cases, it is vertical and sometimes vertical and horizontal depending on the myoaponeurotic laxity, and it is carried out with an inverted nonabsorbable suture such as Prolene 1-0.

In case of abdominal recurrent incisional or inguinal hernias, a Prolene mesh is placed in a preperitoneal position. The umbilicus, previously cut out in a triangular shape, with a superior base, is fixed to the aponeurosis and repositioned on the abdominal flap through a “Y”-shaped incision. Before advancing the abdominal flaps and starting the sutures, the operating table is flexed 30° to release tension on the sutures. Subcutaneous approximation is attained with absorbable polyglycolic acid sutures, followed by a running subcuticular nylon suture. Two suction drains are always placed, one in a supraumbilical position and the other in a lower position, beneath the umbilicus. The abdomen is padded with a cotton-wool bandage. An elastic pressure dressing is applied all over the area (Figs. 25.1 and 25.2).

A321264_1_En_25_Fig1_HTML.jpg


Fig. 25.1
Preoperative view of abdominal deformity after weight loss


A321264_1_En_25_Fig2_HTML.jpg


Fig. 25.2
Postoperative result after “anchor-line” abdominoplasty


25.2.2 Complications


For abdominal procedures, a multifactorial analysis of variance showed that the preoperative weight had a highly statistically significant effect on the incidence of complications, whereas previous bariatric surgery did not [13].

Patients with BMI over 35 have an increased risk to develop seromas, wound dehiscence, infection, and thrombosis [14].

Avoidance of pulmonary embolus is of utmost importance. Early mobilization and the use of low-molecular-weight heparin are commonly accepted even if with different schemes. The risk of seroma is high as well, and various techniques have been suggested to control its formation: mattress sutures, tissue sealants, and the use of doxycycline into the drains [15, 16].

Necrosis is less common and together with the recurrence of the upper abdominal excess or unsightly scars may depend on surgical planning and technique [17].


25.3 Mastopexy


Breast reshaping after massive weight loss still remains a challenging procedure, because of the significant skin and subcutaneous tissues redundancy left following bariatric procedures [18, 19]. In such cases, volume depletion and development of skin/nipple-areola complex (NAC) ptosis result in severe distortion of breast morphology, and standard mastopexy techniques are frequently inadequate to reconstruct a pleasant breast. The use of implants to restore original breast volume is not advisable in these patients, because of skin laxity and the poor soft tissue coverage obtained. The ideal volume restoration in this scenario is represented by the use of autologous tissues (AICAP flap) [20].


25.3.1 Surgical Technique


Preoperative marking according to Pitanguy’s inverted T superior pedicle mastopexy are obtained at the bed of the patient. A pinch test in the supine position is always performed to identify the presence of significant skin laxity in the upper abdominal wall. Under general anesthesia, disepithelization of the preoperative inverted-T pattern is performed. A flap is islanded on perforators from the anterior intercostal arteries and harvested to increase breast volume and correct abdominal skin laxity in a single step. The flap includes soft tissues above and below the inframammary fold, extending cranially 5–6 cm above the fold and inferiorly over the costal cage, according to skin laxity. The “auto-prosthesis” is stabilized to the pectoralis major fascia with absorbable sutures in order to prevent shearing forces on the perforators. Breast shape is then checked in sitting position, and abdominal subcutaneous tissue is undermined in order to allow primary closure of the abdominal donor site, as in a reverse abdominoplasty. The inframammary fold is redefined with nonabsorbable stitches to rib periosteum, in order to prevent its caudal dislocation.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 5, 2017 | Posted by in UROLOGY | Comments Off on Reconstructive Plastic Surgery

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access