Dietary Intervention and Nutritional Counseling


Parameters

Determinant factors

Desirable weight

Body composition: lean body mass (LBM)/fatty mass (FM)

Basal metabolic rate (BMR)

Sex

Conservative approach

Normative approach

Age

Height

BMR is calculated utilizing the actual weight

BMR is calculated utilizing the desirable weight

Weight

LBM

Physical activity level (PAL)

Frequency, intensity, and duration of the different activities during the 24 h, included the sleeping time

Physical activity energy expenditure is affected by the actual weight

Daily energy expenditure (24 h-EE)

BMR × PAL



A321264_1_En_21_Fig1_HTML.jpg


Fig. 21.1
Algorithm to calculate the 24 h-daily expenditure


To lose 1 kg/week of BF, it is necessary a daily negative energy balance of about 1,000 kcal, and the guidelines usually suggest a moderate reduction of the TDEI, around 500–1,000 kcal/die cut down from the estimated 24 hEE or from the usual TDEI, whether the subject’s BW is steady and anyway never going below the BMR more than 10 %; this is aimed to a gradual and long-lasting weight loss: losing 3–5 kg of BW is an excellent achievement, allowing to preserve the LBM and prevent the dehydration, without raising the risk of eating disorders. Cognitive-behavioral therapy together with physical activity program gives the best and long-lasting results [14, 65].

To define an adequate dietary energy intake, it is also necessary to take into account the patient’s eating habit (quality and quantity of food consumption, meals planning, and eating disorders suspected by psychodynamic tests). Food surveys could be retrospective, with the use of memory such as the 24/48 h recall, food frequency, dietary history, or perspective by recording the weight or the estimated quantity of the foods consumed.

Usually, food frequency questionnaire, dietary history, and food diary allow to collect all the data required. Then, the calculated 24 h-EE can be compared to the actual TDEI taking into account the BW changes. Energy balance is the difference between food intake and energy expenditure [24 hEE = BMR + DIT (diet-induced thermogenesis) + PA (physical activity)]. This balance is positive in obese subjects actively gaining BW; instead, if the BW is steady, the TDEI is equivalent to 24 h-EE and the subject is in energetic balance with a TDEI not necessarily too high.

Established the most adequate energy intake to obtain a healthy BW loss, it should be set the protein intake level as above stated (1–1.2 g/kg “desirable BW”) and the protein-kcal must be apart from the NP-kcal which, in the end, have to be split between CHOs and lipids, pointing out that proteins and CHOs provide 4 kcal/g while lipids 9 kcal/g. Fifty percent of protein intake should come from animal source and the other 50 % from plant to avoid a high intake of animal lipids and meanwhile providing an adequate intake of vegetable protective factors (phytochemicals). Assuming the nitrogen (N) content of the proteins to be on average 16 %, it is easy to state that 6.25 g of proteins are equivalent to 1 g of N. It must be emphasized that in order to achieve an efficient protein synthesis, 100–150 nonprotein kcal (NP-kcal) are needed for every intake of 1 g N or 6.25 g proteins. In a dietary plan providing for the actual energy expenditure, protein amount could not be higher than 13–15 % of the TDEI, but in formulating a low-calorie diet, protein requirements must be counted in grams/kg of “desirable BW” to meet the proteins need [66].

Once satisfied the protein requirement, NP-kcal should be split as CHOs, 65–70 E%, and lipids, 30–35 E%. The distribution of NP-kcal requires a careful screening of comorbidities: this is a critical issue for the metabolic effects of the dietary models described above, to avoid the possible adverse effects or in order to exploit their metabolic properties. Total CHOs should be composed between complex, 80 %, and simple, 20 %. The amount of fats should consist of SFAs (1/3), MUFAs (1/2), n PUFAs (1/6), and the RI of EFAs (essential fatty acids) and of the liposoluble vitamins (α-tocopherol, β-carotene, vitamin D) have to be assured; to respect this proportion, it is sufficient to have an intake of 30 % as animal fats and 70 % as vegetable fats. Animal fats, indeed, consist of 2/3 SFAs and 1/3 MUFA with a low PUFA content, and instead plant source are made up of 1/3 SFA and 2/3 MUFA and PUFA [67] (Fig. 21.2). With respect to the TDEI, total CHOs intake should provide 45–60 % of TDEI, with maximum 15 % of simple sugar, while fats should provide 20–35 % of TDEI [67]. The highest values of the range (RI) should be considered only in the low-carbohydrate diets, when required. In other cases, the intake of total lipids must be ≤30 %, SFAs 7–10 %, and trans-fatty acids ≤1 % of TDEI [26, 67]. On the other hand, a too-low-fat diet has poor organoleptic properties, resulting bland and tasteless. Olive oil should not be removed since its composition in MUFA helps to keep an adequate HDL cholesterol level. To achieve a good level of ω-3-fatty acids, 150 g of any kind of fish twice a week are enough, better if chosen among anchovy, sardine, mackerel, or similar. In the end, an eating plan well balanced and consistent with dietary guidelines endorses to consume at least five servings of fruits and vegetables per day, emphasizing the use of whole grains, with a daily fiber intake of 35 g or more. BW-loss diet that excludes one or more foods or food groups and/or substantially restrict macronutrients intake below the PRI could produce nutrient deficiencies and increase health risks. The micronutrient intake level should be evaluated on a weekly basis or on a longer term for liposoluble vitamins and β-carotene; in a moderate low-calorie diet, it is possible to meet PRI by the weekly consumption of the different food groups as suggested by the guidelines for a healthy diet [67]. The supply of essential fatty acids, minerals, vitamins, and fiber has to be checked in relation to the DRVs (Table 21.2).

A321264_1_En_21_Fig2_HTML.jpg


Fig. 21.2
Flow chart to allocate the macronutrients in a balanced diet



Table 21.2
Criteria to develop a balanced diet in obese subjects















































































Criteria

Parameters

1

Intake energy

Energy intake: reducing 500–1,000 kcal from the usual intake and anyway never < BMR −10 %

Estimate basal metabolic rate (BMR)

Estimate 24 h energy expenditure (24 h-EE)

Aim: ↓ 3–5 Kg/month

Assessing nutritional habits (usual energetic intake)

Body weight changes in the last month (steady state or dynamic)

2

Protein intake

1 g protein/Kg desirable weight

Desirable weight

100–150 kcal nonprotein/g nitrogen intake

Metabolic impairments and/or pathological conditions, e.g., kidney failure, microalbuminuria of nephrotic syndrome, etc.)

3

Nonprotein kcal Allocation (carbohydrates and lipids)

Total fats: 20–35 % total kcal

Dietary reference intakes

Saturated fatty acids: ≤ 7–10 % tot. kcal trans-fatty acid ≤1 % tot. kcal

Nutritional status assessment

Metabolic impairments (dyslipidemia, diabetes, etc.)

Monounsaturated fatty acids: ≤15 % tot kcal

Polyunsaturated fatty acids: ≤10 % tot. kcal Essential fatty acids: ω-6 = 2 % and ω-3 = 0,5 % tot kcal

Cholesterol: ≤300 mg/die

Carbohydrates: ≥ 45 % tot kcal; ≥100 g/die

Simple sugars: ≤15 % tot. kcal

Calcium: 1,000–1,500 mg/die

NaCl: ≤6 g o Na 2,4 g/die

4

Verifying fiber and micronutrients intake (minerals and vitamins)

Evaluation of the need to use nutritional supplements

Dietary reference intakes

Fiber: 35 g

Nutritional status assessment

Energy intake of the diet

5

Meal scheduling

Frequency complying with recommended requirements in guidelines

Usual day schedule

Meal consumption modalities

Food choices variety

Nutritional habits

Regular meals

Limits (family, socials, working, food preferences, etc.)



21.6 Nutritional Counseling and Conclusion


The World Health Organization defined obesity as a serious chronic disease, largely preventable through lifestyle changes [75]. This definition means that although the weight loss is essential for reducing the risk of obesity-associated comorbidities and mortality, the acquisition of a healthy lifestyle should be the main objective of the whole therapeutic intervention. Dietary treatment should instruct patients on how to modify their diets in order to lower the caloric intake, obtaining a slow and progressive BW loss, reducing CVR, and other comorbidities. It was described an inverse relation between adherence to a Mediterranean dietary pattern and the prevalence of obesity in a free-eating, population-based sample of men and women, irrespective of various potential confounders [68]; several studies support the evidence that promoting eating habits consistent with Mediterranean diet (MD) nutrients pattern may be a useful and safe strategy for the treatment of obesity [69]. The MD features were recently revised by Bach-Faig A et al. [72]: the MD is rich in plant foods (cereals, fruits, vegetables, legumes, tree nuts, seeds, and olives), with olive oil as the principal source of added fat, along with high-to-moderate intakes of fish and seafood; moderate consumption of eggs, poultry, and dairy products (cheese and yogurt); low consumption of red meat; and a moderate intake of alcohol (mainly wine during meals) [70].

Corbalán MD et al. [69] assert that “although there is no all-inclusive diet for the treatment of obesity and metabolic syndrome, a Mediterranean-style diet has most of the desired attributes, including lower refined carbohydrate content, high fiber content, moderate fat content (mostly unsaturated), and moderate to high vegetable protein content.” According to the recommendations of the Spanish Society of Community Nutrition, the distribution of macronutrient components in MD is: 35 % fat (<10 % SFA and 20 % MUFA), 50 % CHOs, and 15–20 % protein [69].

Educational efforts should highlight the following topics as reported NIH clinical guidelines [14]:



  • Energy value of different foods


  • Food composition: fats, CHOs (including dietary fiber), and proteins


  • Reading nutrition labels to determine caloric content and food composition


  • New habits of purchasing with preference to low calorie foods


  • Food preparation avoiding adding high-calorie ingredients during cooking (e.g., spreads and oils)


  • Avoiding overconsumption of high-calorie foods (both high-fat and high-CHO foods)


  • Maintaining adequate water intake


  • Reducing portion sizes


  • Limiting alcohol consumption

Whatever else is reported by healthy eating guidelines and effectively depicted in the diet pyramid or “eatwell plate” showing the proportions of food groups that should be eaten daily in a well-balanced diet completes these topics.

However, a successful BW loss is more likely to occur when patients’ food preferences are considered to tailor an individual diet, adapted to the specific realities of different countries and to the variations in the dietary pattern related to geographical, socio-economic, and cultural contexts, taking into account the traditional, local, eco-friendly, and biodiverse products, thereby contributing to a higher and long-term sustainable compliance.

In the traditional framework, the patient is in a state of almost total dependence by the physician, and hence this model has been defined prescriptive, directive, paternalistic, or authoritarian. On the other side, the obese patients live in a dichotomous relationship with food, friend, or foe, and they think that the diet is not a means to improve their health status but a way to prove their willpower. In this perspective, when the patient transgresses the diet, he experiences a failure resulting in reduced self-esteem. Conversely, the nutritional counseling aims to “enable” the patient to make a decision about personal choices or problems or issues directly concerning themselves. The counseling procedure emphasizes the importance of the self-perception, self-determination, and self-control, taking the shape of helping a relationship finalize to return to autonomy, a greater sense of dignity and self-esteem to the person [70]. As in all chronic diseases, the objective is not the full recovery, but in the case of obesity can represent a way aimed at not only the weight loss but also in the ability to self-manage risk situations, to develop active lifestyle, and knowing how to choose what is really important to live fully their own existence and thus enhance the quality of life. The aim should be not only to improve the knowledge of the patients but especially their skills, know-how, and their ability to master events, known as how to be. The main tools at the basis of nutritional counseling are common with the cognitive behavioral therapy: therapeutic alliance, therapeutic adherence, motivation, problem solving, empowerment, and narrative medicine. The latest experience bears the cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) as a key tool to achieve a lifestyle change and thus a long-lasting and stable BW loss. It has been designed to improve diet and physical activity compliance in the patients combining the behavioral method of influencing and reinforcing a positive behavior to the cognitive approach of conditioning emotions and human behavior by thoughts [71].

In summary, dietary intervention should respect physiological and metabolic bases. Any exception should take in account coexistent metabolic impairments and is allowed only if supported by clinical scientific evidences. The effectiveness of the dietary therapy should be evaluated in risk reduction for mortality and morbidity and in the ability of maintaining the results achieved rather than considering the BW loss only. The dietary intervention must follow a thorough multidimensional assessment of the biological (nutritional status), psychological, and social indices that could affect the BW gain and the unhealthy food habits. Since among the “dieters” there is a dropout rate of 40 % after 12 months [72], while a long-term success occurs only in ≤15 % [73], it is necessary to promote an active involvement of the patients, planning realistic solutions and goals to comply with, and trying to avoid unreachable achievements. Although the basis to formulate a balanced diet is strict scientific evidence, a high degree of flexibility is required to reach a good compliance of the patient [74, 75]. A good experience and knowledge by the professional operators can turn the dietary prescription into a guideline for a nutritional “reeducational” intervention.


References



Introduction



1.

Wing RR, Phelan S (2005) Long-term weight loss maintenance. Am J Clin Nutr 82(1 Suppl):222S–225S. Review. PubMed PMID: 16002825PubMed


2.

Elte JW, Castro Cabezas M, Vrijland WW, Ruseler CH, Groen M, Mannaerts GH (2008) Proposal for a multidisciplinary approach to the patient with morbid obesity: the St. Franciscus Hospital morbid obesity program. Eur J Intern Med 19(2):92–98. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejim.​2007.​06.​015. Epub 2008 Jan 11. Review. PubMed PMID: 18249303PubMedCrossRef

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 5, 2017 | Posted by in UROLOGY | Comments Off on Dietary Intervention and Nutritional Counseling

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access