Highly sensitive and specific to identify different stages of fibrosis
Applicable to the monitoring of disease progression or regression as part of the natural history of liver disease or treatment process
Readily available and inexpensive
Reproducible
Not susceptible to false positive results
In the following section, we review the markers that have been validated in METAVIR F4 fibrosis/cirrhosis stage for patients with HCV/HBV/NAFLD and ALD (Table 5.2).
Table 5.2
Specific and nonspecific liver fibrosis markers in cirrhosis
Test | Variables | Median AUROC | Median sensitivity (%) | Median specificity (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
APRI | AST and platelet count | HCV0.83 | HCV 76 | HCV 72 |
HBV 0.75 | HBV 45a | HBV 88a | ||
EtOH 0.65 | EtOH 44 | EtOH 94 | ||
NASH (??) | NASH 77 | NASH 71 | ||
FIB-4 | Age, AST, ALT, and platelet count | HCV 0.87 | HCV 90 | HCV 92 |
HBV 0.89 | HBV | HBV | ||
EtOH 0.80 | EtOH — | EtOH — | ||
NASH 0.802 | NASH 73 | NASH 89 | ||
FibroTest | A2M, Haptogloben, GGT, TBil, apoprotein A1 | HCV 0.87 | HCV 74 | HCV 82 |
HBV 0.87 | HBV 72 | HBV 87 | ||
EtOH 0.94 | – | – | ||
NASH 0.860 | NASH 73 | NASH 92 | ||
ELF Score | Age, TIMP-1, PIIINP, and hyaluronic acid | HCV 0.94 | HCV 93 | HCV 86 |
HBV | HBV | HBV | ||
EtOH | EtOH | EtOH | ||
NASH 0.89 | NASH 91 | NASH 69 | ||
FibroMeter | Hyaluronic acid, Platelet, PT, AST, A2M, urea, Age | HCV 0.92 | HCV 72 | HCV 90 |
HBV 0.87 | HBV 79 | HBV 83 | ||
EtOH 0.96a | ||||
NASH 0.94 | ||||
HepaScore | Age, sex, TBil, A2M, hyaluronic acid, GGT | HCV 0.88 | HCV 71 | HCV 84 |
HBV 0.91 | HBV 87 | HBV 86 | ||
EtOH 0.91 | EtOH 87 | EtOH 89 | ||
NASH 0.92 | NASH 87 | NASH 89 |
Indirect (Class II) Markers of Liver Fibrosis
AST-to-Platelet Ratio Index
The AST-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) score is the simplest nonspecific liver fibrosis marker for predicting fibrosis [7]. The APRI incorporates only AST and platelet count and can be calculated using the formula:
The APRI is based on the premise that progression to cirrhosis and increasing portal pressure are associated with reduced production of thrombopoietin by hepatocytes, increased platelet sequestration within the spleen, and reduced clearance of AST [8].
HCV
The AUROC for APRI in cirrhosis was 0.83 with an optimal cutoff of 1.0, for a sensitivity and specificity of 76 and 72 %, respectively. A threshold of 2.0 exhibited a specificity of 91 % for diagnosing cirrhosis, but the sensitivity for this level was only 46 %. A major advantage of APRI is that it has been validated in special populations such as HIV/HCV coinfection [8].
HBV
APRI is one of the most widely used and validated biomarkers in HBV. It is able to predict cirrhosis with more accuracy than advanced fibrosis. A meta-analysis of APRI in 1798 HBV patients found a mean AUROC value of 0.75 in diagnosing HBV cirrhosis [16]. Degos et al. reported an AUROC of 0.77 (95 % CI, 0.73–0.81) with a sensitivity of 45 % (95 % CI, 39–52) and specificity of 88 % (95 % CI, 87–90.0) for APRI’s performance in predicting cirrhosis in a cohort of patients with either hepatitis B or C [19]. A positive predictive value (PPV) of 39 % (95 % CI, 33–45) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 91 % (95 % CI, 89–92) were observed [19].
Alcohol
In assessing cirrhosis secondary to ALD, a cutoff of 1.10 yielded an AUROC 0.648 (95 % CI, 0.43–0.87) with a sensitivity and specificity of 44 and 94 %, respectively. A PPV of 0.44 and NPV of 0.94 were reported [20].
NASH
Adams et al. used a cutoff of 0.54 for assessing NASH cirrhosis with a sensitivity of 77 %, specificity of 71 %, PPV 22 %, and NPV of 97 %. Specific noninvasive serum models developed for the prediction of cirrhosis in HCV are more useful for the prediction of advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis in subjects with NAFLD when compared to APRI [21].
Limitations to the interpretation of APRI include the presence of acute hepatitis; AST elevation from nonliver origin, thrombocytopenia from other causes such as bone marrow suppression related to alcohol or HCV-induced thrombocytopenia.
FIB-4
FIB-4 is an inexpensive method for the evaluation of liver fibrosis based on simple variables such as age, AST, ALT, and platelet count that are routinely measured. The index is not influenced by a patient’s body mass index [22]. It is calculated using the following formula:
Although FIB4 is a useful and simple scoring system, which is more accurate than the APRI for the diagnosis of cirrhosis, the values and cutoffs differ for the various etiologies of cirrhosis.
HCV
The FIB-4 index enabled the correct identification of patients with cirrhosis (F4) with an AUROC of 0.91 (95 % CI, 0.86–0.93). The FIB-4 index < 1.45 had an NPV of 95 % in excluding severe fibrosis, with a sensitivity of 74 % [21].For values outside 1.45–3.25, the FIB-4 index is a simple, accurate, and inexpensive method for assessing liver fibrosis and proved to be concordant with FibroTest results. The test was validated in HCV-induced cirrhosis with an observed AUROC of 0.87, sensitivity of 90 %, and specificity of 92 % [23].
HBV
FIB-4 can predict the presence of cirrhosis due to chronic HBV with a high degree of accuracy. A FIB-4 score ≤ 1.58 identified mild to moderate fibrosis (F0–F2), while a score > 5.17 predicted cirrhosis in CHB. The AUROC for HBV-induced cirrhosis was 0.89 [24].
NAFLD/NASH
When assessing the performance of FIB4 in NAFLD, the data were only provided for advanced F3/F4 fibrosis and not exclusively for cirrhosis. The AUROC was 0.802 (95 % CI, 0.76–0.85). The predicative values of the FIB4 index for advanced fibrosis (F3–F4) identified the presence of advanced fibrosis with 89 % accuracy, using a cutoff value of > 2.67 [25].
Alcohol
When applied to ALD-induced cirrhosis, FIB-4 yielded an AUROC of 0.80 (95 % CI, 0.72–0.86) [26].
FibroTest/FibroSure
FibroTest/FibroSure is a frequently used biomarker of liver fibrosis which was initially validated in patients with chronic HCV. It employs a patented calculation of a combination of five serum biochemical parameters [27]. These include α-2-macroglobulin, apolipoprotein A1, haptoglobin, l-glutamyltranspeptidase, and bilirubin. Advantages of FibroTest include widespread availability, high applicability (> 95 %), and inter-laboratory reproducibility [28]. It was developed using a linear scale from 0 to 1; cirrhosis is diagnosed when the FibroTest score is greater than 0.75. The higher the Fibrotest score, the more likely the diagnosis of cirrhosis is correct. A major cause of a false positive is the presence of hemolysis or Gilbert’s disease.
HCV
There have been multiple studies in HCV along with significant validation in normal population studies. The assessment of cirrhosis in HCV with FibroTest has an AUROC of 0.87 ± 0.04 (95 % CI, 0.80–0.94). Using a cutoff of 0.63, there was an observed sensitivity of 0.74, specificity of 0.82 with NPV, and PPV of 0.96 and 0.53, respectively [29].
HBV
Multiple large studies have been conducted assessing the performance of FibroTest in HBV-induced cirrhosis. The results yielded an AUROC of 0.87 (95 % CI, 62–79), with a sensitivity of 72 % (95 % CI, 62–79) and specificity of 87 % (95 % CI, 84–90 %). FibroTest had an NPV of 92 %, which established that it is an excellent test to rule out cirrhosis in this patient population [9]. Drawbacks to FibroTest include its cost, lack of external validation, and lack of specificity for liver disease as its results can be severely impaired by comorbidities, i.e., Gilbert’s syndrome or hemolysis [9].
Alcohol
Applying FibroTest to assess cirrhosis in the setting of alcohol yielded an AUROC of 0.94 ± 0.02 (95 % CI, 0.87–0.97) [26].
NASH
When FibroTest was applied to patients with NASH/NAFLD, a cut-off value of 0.57 resulted in an AUROC of 0.86 (95 % CI, 0.77–0.95) with a sensitivity of 73 %, a specificity of 92 %, PPV of 49 %, and NPV of 97 % for the diagnosis of cirrhosis [21].
Direct (Class I) Markers of Liver Fibrosis
Multiple etiologies of liver disease including HCV, HBV, NAFLD/NASH, and ALD can lead to liver fibrosis though integrated signaling networks that regulate the deposition of extracellular matrix [8, 30].This sequence of events drives the activation of hepatic stellate cells into a myofibroblast-like phenotype that is contractile, proliferative, and fibrogenic. Collagen and other extracellular matrix (ECM) components are deposited as the liver generates a wound-healing response to encapsulate injury. The direct (or class I) markers of liver fibrosis are usually fragments of the liver matrix components produced by hepatic stellate cells during the process of ECM remodeling, usually reflecting the deposition or removal of ECM.