Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy: Pathogenic Mechanisms and Management Strategies


Organ or tissue

Clinical syndrome or problem

Role of cardiac dysfunction or problem

Comments

Reference (first author, year)

Heart, endocardium

Infective endocarditis

Increased prevalence

0.34 vs. 0.1 % of noncirrhotics in large autopsy series

Snyder, 1977 [63]

Liver

TIPS insertion

Aggravate diastolic dysfunction; precipitate overt LVF

Usually transient; related to increased preload. LVF in 12 % post TIPS*

Huonker 1999 [64], Merli 2002 [46], Gines 2002 [47]

Liver

Mortality after TIPS

Aggravate diastolic dysfunction

Diastolic function 4 weeks after TIPS only predictor of 1-year mortality

Cazzaniga 2007 [48]

Liver

Transplantation

Precipitate overt LVF; worsen outcomes

Usually transient, but 12–56 % shows LVF in postoperative phase. 7–15 % deaths post transplantation due to cardiac causes

Sampathkumar 1998 [65], Nasraway 1995 [66], Rayes 1995 [67], Donovan 1996 [44]

Lung

HPS

CCM—involved in pathogenesis?

Inadequate right ventricular contractility may contribute to hypoxia or pulmonary vascular abnormalities

No clear studies to date

Kidney

HRS following SBP

Precipitate HRS

Patients with HRS after SBP have inadequate LV function, lower CO associated with developing HRS

Ruiz del Arbol 2003 [50], Ruiz del Arbol 2005 [51]

Kidney

Salt/water retention

CCM—involved in pathogenesis?

Inadequate pump function decreases effective circulating volume?

No clear studies to date

Whole body, brain

Reduced quality of life; fatigue

CCM—involved in pathogenesis?

Fatigue unrelated to CCM in one study to date

Girgrah, 2003 [68]


CCM cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, CO cardiac output, TIPS transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, LVF left ventricular failure, HPS hepatopulmonary syndrome, HRS hepatorenal syndrome, SBP spontaneous bacterial peritonitis



Other surgical stresses including TIPS insertion and surgical portosystemic shunting procedures have also been reported to precipitate overt heart failure [7, 8, 10, 46]. In a large randomized trial comparing TIPS to large volume paracentesis, 12 % of the TIPS group developed overt heart failure, whereas this was not observed in any patient undergoing paracentesis [47].

Cazzaniga et al. examined the predictive risk factors for death after TIPS insertion [48]. On multivariate analysis, only the degree of diastolic dysfunction (E/A ratio) at day 28 after the procedure (but not baseline E/A) was a significant predictor of 1-year mortality. Thus, the diastolic response to the increased preload caused by the TIPS is crucial [49]. In that study, it was noteworthy that none of the traditional prognostic markers of liver failure such as model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and Child–Pugh score, were able to predict mortality—only the diastolic response of the heart a month after the cardiovascular challenge of the TIPS insertion proved to be a useful predictor [48].

Moreover, another study suggested that an insufficient ventricular contractile reserve contributes to the pathogenesis of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) . Ruiz del Arbol et al. studied 23 cirrhotic patients who were admitted with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) [50]. SBP is a known risk factor for the development of type 1 HRS. Despite antibiotic treatment and infection resolution, eight patients developed HRS, whereas 15 had unimpaired renal function. The major difference between these two groups was the cardiac response: The HRS group had a lower baseline CO than the other group. Moreover, CO actually declined after infection resolution in the HRS group, whereas it remained unchanged in the other group. A separate longitudinal study by these authors found that among a cohort of 66 patients with severe cirrhosis, 27 who went on to develop HRS had lower CO and elevated serum markers of a hyperdynamic circulation [51].

Specific diagnostic criteria for CCM have recently been formulated by an international expert consensus committee.1 The consensus definition of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy is: “Chronic cardiac dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis, characterized by blunted contractile responsiveness to stress, and/or altered diastolic relaxation with electrophysiological abnormalities, in the absence of known cardiac disease.” While patients with cirrhosis have baseline increase in CO, when challenged, they demonstrate attenuated systolic and diastolic contractile responses to stress stimuli, electrophysiological repolarization changes, including prolonged QT interval, and enlargement or hypertrophy of cardiac chambers. The diagnostic criteria are listed in Table 17.2 [52].


Table 17.2
Diagnostic criteria for cirrhotic cardiomyopathy









































1. Abnormal systolic contractile responses to stress

2. Diastolic dysfunction at rest

3. Absence of clinically significant cardiopulmonary disease

Systolic dysfunction (at least one of the following):

 1. Blunted increase in CO with exercise, volume challenge or pharmacological stimuli

 2. Resting LVEF < 55 %

Diastolic dysfunction (at least one of the following):

 1. E/A ratio (age corrected) < 1.0

 2. Prolonged deceleration time (> 200 ms)

 3. Prolonged isovolumic relaxation time (> 80 ms)

Supportive criteria:

 1. Electrophysiological abnormalities including the following:

  Abnormal chronotropic response to stress

  Electromechanical uncoupling/dyssynchrony

  Prolonged QTc interval

 2. Heart chamber alterations: enlarged LA, increased LVWT

 3. Increased pro-BNP and BNP

 4. Increased troponin I


BNP brain natriuretic peptide, CO cardiac output, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, LA left atrium, LVWT left ventricular wall thickness, BNP brain natriuretic peptide




Treatment


Peripheral vasodilatation exists universally in patients with cirrhosis and therefore, unless the heart is stressed, overt ventricular failure is usually absent. In effect, the vasodilatation “auto-treats” the latent heart failure and may mask its presence. Physicians need to be vigilant when patients with cirrhosis face challenges such as TIPS insertion, infection, or LT. If overt heart failure occurs, general supportive treatment should be applied which includes bed rest, administration of oxygen, salt and water restriction, diuretic therapy, and careful preload reduction by appropriate drugs.

One of the effective treatments for noncirrhotic heart failure is vasodilators. However, due to the peculiar hemodynamic disturbances of cirrhosis that includes marked vasodilatation, afterload reduction with vasodilators may not be useful in cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. Indeed, vasodilators may aggravate the arterial hypotension and further decrease the effective circulating volume. In terms of other, more specific treatments to improve heart failure in cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, there is a major paucity of clinical trials in an area of urgent need for such studies. The scant evidence of various drug treatments can be summarized as follows.


β-Adrenergic Receptor Blockers (β-Blockers)


Sympathetic nervous activity is significantly increased in cirrhotic patients [53]; thus, β-blockers may protect the heart from damage resulting from the over-activated sympathetic system. It is well documented that β-blockers (propranolol/nadolol) and combined α- and β-blockers (carvedilol) are effective in decreasing portal venous hypertension and for prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients [54].

As mentioned previously, cardiovascular events occur in many patients after LT. Chopra et al. [55] demonstrated that during the perioperative period, a significant catecholamine surge occurs, producing elevations in heart rate and blood pressure. Safadi and colleagues tested the protective effects of β-blockers in the perioperative period of LT [56]. They found that these drugs attenuate both the sympathetic and neuroendocrine responses to stress; they balance myocardial oxygen supply/demand mismatch, and reduce inflammatory markers and free radicals. Therefore, β-blockers protected patients undergoing LT from adverse cardiac outcomes during the perioperative period. β-blockers significantly increased the probability of survival in the early postoperative period (30 days) in liver recipients [56].

Prolonged QT interval is associated with severe arrhythmias and sudden death in patients with noncirrhotic heart disease, but whether this applies to cirrhotic patients with prolonged QT interval remains unclear [53]. However, Zambruni and colleagues showed that in 30 patients with cirrhosis, chronic β-blocker dosing over 1–3 months significantly shortened the QTc interval, but only in the subgroup of those who had a baseline prolonged QTc interval [57]. Again, whether normalizing the prolonged QT interval exerts any long-term beneficial effect remains unknown, but most clinicians would agree that this certainly could not do any harm and may very well be beneficial.

There are some controversies over β-blocker usage in some specific subgroups of patients with cirrhosis. Krag and colleagues postulated that in HRS, treatment with β-blockers further decreases heart rate and CO and may therefore have deleterious effects on hemodynamics and renal function and thereby reduce survival [58].


Combination Vasoconstrictors and Albumin


For type 1 HRS, systemic vasoconstrictors combined with plasma expansion are currently the only available form of pharmacologic therapy. The combined administration of intravenous albumin and vasoconstrictors (e.g., terlipressin or alpha-1 agonists) normalizes circulatory function and serum creatinine in a significant number of patients with type 1 HRS. These effects, however, are rarely obtained when vasoconstrictors or intravenous albumin are given alone [51].

Splanchnic vasoconstrictors and albumin coadministration counteract the intense vasodilation in the splanchnic bed, thereby improving effective arterial blood volume. This improvement, in turn, suppresses the endogenous vasoconstrictors (e.g., renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, RAAS;SNS) that are responsible for renal vasoconstriction. Albumin administration, by expanding the circulating blood volume, on one hand, increases cardiac preload and CO and on the other hand, improves glomerular filtration rate [59].


Aldosterone Antagonists


The RAAS is the most important system controlling blood pressure, cardiovascular, and renal function. Moreover, RAAS activation may be a prime regulator of fibrogenesis in several tissues including the heart. Several clinical trials suggest that RAAS blockade is the single most important cardioprotective strategy for cardiovascular diseases [60]. Since the RAAS is activated in cirrhotic patients [61], it is rational to speculate that RAAS blockade will exert cardioprotective effects on cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. Ponzi et al. conducted the only RAAS-related study on cirrhotic cardiomyopathy [62]. They administrated the aldosterone antagonist potassium canrenoate to Child class A post-viral preascitic cirrhotic patients. After 6 months of treatment, the authors found some improvement in left ventricular hypertrophy and wall thickness, and a trend towards improved diastolic function indices that did not reach statistical significance; however, they suggested that 6 months was an insufficient duration to see significant normalization of diastolic dysfunction ; a longer course of treatment was probably needed. These results suggest that aldosterone antagonists, probably through an anti-fibrogenic effect may improve the morphologic myocardial changes or at least retard or block the contractility deterioration in cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. These results also suggest that drugs blocking the fibrogenic effects of the aldosterone system are beneficial, and that cardiac remodeling might occur in cirrhosis. Much more research is necessary.

In summary, cirrhotic cardiomyopathy manifests as heart failure under challenges such as physical stress and surgery. The mechanisms are not clear—NO, carbon monoxide, endocanabinoinds, and apoptosis may all play a role. There is no specific treatment. β-adrenergic blocker may protect the heart from damage resulting from the over-activated sympathetic system, while long-term aldosterone antagonists administration may be helpful. Albumin may improve cardiac function. LT eventually normalizes heart function.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 30, 2017 | Posted by in GASTROENTEROLOGY | Comments Off on Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy: Pathogenic Mechanisms and Management Strategies

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access