Fig. 1.1
Blunt tip ESD knives. From the bottom: IT-knife (Olympus Medical Systems), SAFEKnife V (Fujifilm), Swan Blade (Hoya/Pentax), Mucosectom (Hoya/Pentax)
Fig. 1.2
Tip-cutting ESD knives. From the left: Hook knife (Olympus Medical Systems), Dual knife (Olympus Medical Systems), Flex knife (Olympus Medical Systems), Flush knife BT and Flush knife (Fujifilm)
The creation of a submucosal fluid cushion (SFC) is a convenient safety measure to prophylactically avoid inadvertent deep muscularis injury during ER. The procedural simplicity of this measure allows it to be applied universally, regardless of technical variations in the resection, tumor location, or skill level of the operator. Classical saline injection is sufficient for most quick snare-based ER techniques. The creation of a more durable and reliable SFC is desirable for performing more time-consuming ESD procedures safely. The efficacy of various viscous and highly osmotic solutions in producing a long-lasting SFC has been tested. For example, Yamamoto and colleagues introduced hyaluronic acid solution as an injectate for ESD [24–26]. Hyaluronate is widely used in the fields of orthopedics and ophthalmology as a lubricant, and the safety of the drug is ensured with a wealth of clinical data in those fields. The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan approved 0.4 % hyaluronic acid solution as an injectate for ER and it is now commercially available (MUCOUP, Johnson & Johnson, Tokyo, Japan). Because hyaluronate is not readily accessible for the majority of gastroenterologists working outside of Japan, cheaper alternatives such as glycerol, dextrose [27–29], and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) solutions are also used for ESD [30, 31]. Many researchers are still investigating the development of improved needle knives and injectate for submucosal dissection [32–36]. The pathway of ER development clearly demonstrates that the challenges associated with ESD cannot be completely eliminated with a single development, and can be overcome only with a multidisciplinary approach.
Challenges for Globalization and Future Prospects
The efforts of many researchers and technological developers have made ESD both safer and easier, and as a result the ESD technique is now widely practiced in Japan as a first-line therapeutic option for early gastrointestinal neoplasms. The indications of ER could be expanded for larger lesions by ESD. In the extended indications for gastric cancer, there is no limitation on tumor size for differentiated (intestinal type) mucosal cancers without ulceration. An enormous amount of data has been obtained from meticulous histological analysis of ESD specimens following a strict, standardized pathological protocol. These results have indicated that the therapeutic outcomes of ESD for the extended indications of purely differentiated lesions are comparable with those of surgical resection [15, 37]. However, ESD is not yet the global method of choice for ER techniques. The social acceptance of ESD is geographically diverse, and the technique is predominantly practiced in East Asia. ESD requires specialized skills to intuitively manipulate flexible endoscopes and needle knives with unique designs that result in longer operation times. As a result, ESD requires optimal training in selected relatively easy cases to gradually obtain a high level of skill that will permit the safe completion of the procedure for challenging cases such as Barrett’s and colonic neoplasms, which are the main indications of ER in the West. In fact, the safety of ESD in Western countries that have a lower prevalence of early gastric cancers and lack the appropriate cases for training is not equivalent to the published data for ESD in Eastern countries [12, 38, 39]. It is difficult to establish the knowledge and skill bases for adequate preoperative assessment of the precise delineation of lesions. These basic attributes are mandatory to achieve a satisfactory outcome from ESD due to the absence of opportunities for screening endoscopies to detect asymptomatic, early cancers in Western countries. Other therapeutic options, including piecemeal resection and even surgical resection, should be considered if overwhelming challenges are encountered during ER.
Various novel, multi-degree-of-freedom therapeutic endoscopes have been developed to enable intuitive performance of complicated surgical procedures with the flexible endoscopic platform. Therapeutic scopes with water-jet capabilities and multi-bending portions are recognized as standard equipment for ESD. The triangulation platform is considered an eventual design of the therapeutic endoscope, which has dual mobile instrumental channels or articulated manipulators at the tip of an endoscope (Fig. 1.3) [40, 41]. These systems provide an operative environment more like laparoscopic surgery rather than ordinary endoscopic intervention. They have been tested with ESD for deflecting the diseased mucosa away from the dissection plane and horizontally swinging a needle knife parallel to the muscularis propria. Ho and colleagues have applied robotics to the triangulation platform and successfully introduced their original master–slave type endoscopic robot to gastric ESD in human patients [42, 43]. At present, all triangulation platforms are still too cumbersome in their current form and need to be miniaturized for use within a narrow GI lumen.
Fig. 1.3
A multi-tasking platform (EndoSAMURAI, Olympus Medical Systems). Reproduction of this image, obtained from Ikeda et al. [40], was permitted by Elsevier
Conclusions
ESD has greatly improved the resectability of early GI neoplasms by ER. The ESD procedure has rapidly increased in sophistication in tandem with instrument developments during the last decade, but there is still room for improvement. In order to truly benefit from the use of ESD, the advantage of en bloc resection should be balanced against the procedural risks. The endoscopists performing ESD must receive appropriate training, and the operative environment should be appropriate for not only the therapeutic procedure but also for preoperative diagnosis and periprocedural management. Recent technological advances, including robotics, may enable the concept of en bloc resection by ESD to be universally accepted in the near future as standard of care for patients with early gastrointestinal neoplastic lesions.
References
1.
Niwa H. Improvement of fibrogastroscope for biopsy and application of color television and high frequent currents for endoscopic biopsy (in Japanese). Gastroenterol Endosc. 1968;10:315.
2.
Tsuneoka K, Uchida T. Fibergastroscopic polypectomy with snare method and its significance developed in our department: polyp resection and recovery instruments (in Japanese with English abstract). Gastroenterol Endosc. 1969;11:174–84.
3.
Tada M, Shimada M, Murakami F, et al. Development of the strip-off biopsy [in Japanese with English abstract]. Gastroenterol Endosc. 1984;26:833–9.
4.
5.
Kakushima N, Fujishiro M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastrointestinal neoplasms. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(19):2962–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
6.
Takekoshi T, Takagi K, Fujii A, et al. Treatment of early gastric cancer by endoscopic double snare polypectomy (EDSP). Gan No Rinsho. 1986;32(10):1185–90.PubMed
7.
8.
Inoue H, Endo M, Takeshita K, et al. A new simplified technique of endoscopic esophageal mucosal resection using a cap-fitted panendoscope (EMRC). Surg Endosc. 1992;6(5):264–5.PubMedCrossRef