Hepatocellular Adenoma


Subtype

Prevalence

Clinical

Genotype

Histological appearance

Immunohistochemistry

MRI features

Comments

HNF1α-inactivated

15–18
 
Biallelic inactivation of TCF1

Steatosis

↓LFABP

Homogeneous fat distribution
 
β-Catenin activated

35–50
 
β-Catenin activation
 
↑Nuclear β-catenin ↓Glutamine synthetase
 
Increased risk of malignant transformation

Inflammatory

25–35

Predominantly in female patients and frequently associated with alcohol use and obesity

Wild-type TCF1 and β-catenin IL6ST gene mutation

Inflammatory infiltrates, sinusoidal dilatation/telangiectasia, dystrophic vessels, ductular reactions

↑SAA, ↑CRP

Hyperintense signal on T2W images, strong arterial enhancement, persistent enhancement on delayed phase

1/6 cases also have β-catenin mutation

Unclassified
  
Wild-type TCF1 and β-catenin
   
Diagnosis of exclusion


HNF1α hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 alpha, TCF1 transcription factor 1, LFABP liver fatty acid binding protein, SAA serum amyloid A protein, CRP C-reactive protein, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, T2W T2-weighted images







13.3 Clinical Presentation


Patients may be completely asymptomatic, and the diagnosis may only be made as an incidental finding by imaging studies, e.g., during the course of investigation of abnormal liver function tests, liver mass on ultrasound, or research for metastasis in patients with a history of cancer.

The clinical presentation is either with a palpable mass lesion or its complications including chronic or acute upper abdominal pain as a result of intratumoral hemorrhage, necrosis, or hepatomegaly and hemorrhagic shock.

The diagnosis may be suspected from MRI characteristics (with typical arterial-type hypervascularized attenuation pattern), but diagnostic biopsy should be considered to confirm the diagnosis of HA.

HA mostly presents as solitary nodule, but two or more tumors may be found; if more than ten nodules are detected, hepatic adenomatosis must be considered. Tumor size is variable with a range of 1–30 cm (usually 8–15 cm). In reports from Southeast Asia and North America, the rate of solitary lesions is 80 and 65.2 %, respectively; in European reports, more than half of patients with HA have multiple lesions: the reason for this difference is unclear [5].


13.4 Evolution


HA is of clinical importance because its tendency is to bleed and to rupture spontaneously, with catastrophic consequences and intraperitoneal bleeding. There is no conclusive evidence to prove a correlation of the size of HA and rupture; some authors report an increased risk of rupture in tumors more than 6.5 cm in size [17]. A report, analyzing the evolution of HAs and their risk of rupture, found that the mean diameter of the lesions in China, Europe, and North America were 10.8, 12.4, and 14 cm, respectively [5]. There are two types of hemorrhage which are mostly observed in HA: hemorrhage inside the HA nodule, usually admixed with necrotic changes, and spontaneous hemorrhagic rupture which can cause subcapsular hematoma and possible hemoperitoneum. In reported series, the incidence of bleeding is around 20–25 % of cases (see Table 13.2), and it is more frequent in HA with sinusoidal dilatation and congestion.


Table 13.2
Published series with more than 15 cases and completed data












































































































































































































































































Study

Year

HA (n)

Mean diameter (cm)

HCC transformation (%)

Hemorrhage (%)

Resected

Edmondson et al. [18]

1976

42


0

69

41

Kerlin et al. [19]

1983

23

9

8.6

69.5

17

Mathieu et al. [20]

1986

27

7.5

0

40.7

27

Leese et al. [21]

1988

18

13

0

50

17

Iwatsuki et al. [22]

1990

25

12

0

16

25

Arrivé et al. [23]

1994

29

5.4

10.3

51.7

21

Pertschy et al. [24]

1994

30


0

0

29

Chung et al. [25]

1995

16

5.4

0

75

15

Nagorney [26]

1995

24

9

4.1

16.6

19

De Carlis et al. [27]

1997

19

7.9

10.5

26.3

19

Ott and Hohenberger [28]

1998

23



17.4

23

Closset et al. [29]

2000

16

8.1

6.2

43.7

16

Ichikawa et al. [30]

2000

24


8.3

41.6

13

Reddy et al. [31]

2001

25

5.9

4

12

25

Terkivatan et al. [32]

2001

33


0

36.3

19

Decotte et al. [33]

2003

17


0

0

17

Toso et al. [34]

2005

23


8.7

43.4

23

Erdogan et al. [35]

2006

22

7.2

0

100

22

Van der Windt et al. [36]

2006

48


0

27

16

Chaib et al. [37]

2007

28

8

0

10.7

28

Koffron et al. [38]

2007

47


0


47

Reddy et al. [39]

2007

25

8.5

0


25

Buell et al. [40]

2008

25


0


25

Cho et al. [41]

2008

41


4.8

29.2

41

Petri et al. [42]

2008

22

7.7

0


22

Bioulac-Sage et al. [16]

2009

128

7

3.6

17.9

128

Deneve et al. [43]

2009

124


4

25

119

Dokmak et al. [44]

2009

91


9.8

24.1

91

Mounajjed and Wu [45]

2011

35


0

20

35

Bunchorntavakul et al. [46]

2011

60


0

11.6

25

De Angelis et al. [47]

2014

62

7.2


11.8

62

Further, malignant transformation of HAs to HCC has been described by several groups and occurs in 5–9 % of cases ([29, 48], see Table 13.2). The issue of when HA develops into malignancy and which factors influence malignant degeneration are still being investigated. In some reports [5] a total of 5.6 % showed HCC foci within an adenoma upon final pathology; the mean size of the tumor with HCC was larger than the mean tumor diameter in benign HA (11.2 cm vs 7.8 cm). The risk of malignancy is particularly higher for β-catenin mutation HA, which are most frequently associated with glycogenosis type I, androgenic hormone intake, and familial adenomatous polyposis.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Oct 6, 2016 | Posted by in GASTROENTEROLOGY | Comments Off on Hepatocellular Adenoma

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access