Chapter 39 Assisted Reproductive Technology: Laboratory Aspects
HUMAN SEMEN: PREPARATION AND EVALUATION
Semen Collection
Many clinicians limit male infertility evaluation to a single semen analysis if the initial sample is found to be normal. However, a thorough infertility evaluation requires analysis of two ejaculates collected as least 1 month apart because semen quality varies over time.1 If either one of the two ejaculates are abnormal, additional samples should be evaluated. Some clinicians recommend that all fertility patients undergo semen analysis once or twice yearly during the duration of their treatment. More frequent analysis may be indicated in postsurgical patients as a part of routine follow-up.
It is preferable for samples to be collected near the andrology assessment area. Rooms designated for production of semen samples should be located in a quiet part of the facility and doors should be labeled with DO NOT DISTURB signs. Reading materials and/or video aids should be available for those men requiring them.
Semen Parameters
Semen Volume
The suffix -spermia refers to the volume of seminal fluid. A man is aspermic if he produces no semen after orgasm, hypospermic if he produces less than 0.55 mL of ejaculate, and hyperspermic if ejaculate volume is above 6.0 mL. The most common cause of low ejaculate volume is incomplete collection. Any abnormalities or interruptions during collection should be noted. Sample loss often compounds interpretation because distinct sperm-rich and sperm-poor fractions can be emitted. Short duration of abstinence from ejaculation may also lead to low semen volume. Hyperspermia is a rare clinical entity with unknown significance. Although spermatozoa density may be decreased, spermatozoa motility is unchanged.2
Semen pH
The semen pH should be recorded because it may be a useful parameter for diagnosis of some conditions affecting semen quality. Normal semen is alkaline, with a pH between 7.2 and 8.0.3 Values up to 8.5 have been noted in otherwise normal samples. Measurement is most easily performed with pH paper.
Semen Liquefaction
Fresh semen quickly coagulates into a gelatinous mass after ejaculation before liquefying over 5 to 25 minutes at room temperature. Coagulation is due to coagulating proteins contributed by the seminal vesicles in the final portion of the ejaculate; secretions from the bulbourethral glands of Cowper and prostate present in the initial fraction of the ejaculate are responsible for liquefaction.4
An absence of coagulation may indicate absent or hypoplastic seminal vesicles, or ejaculatory duct obstruction. Conversely, prolonged liquefaction time may be due to a lack of prostate-supplied, liquefying proteases such as prostate-specific antigen, amylase, and plasminogen activators.5 Absence of liquefaction may cause infertility, although impaired liquefaction is frequently associated with normal fertility.
Spermatozoa Concentration
The Makler counting chamber (Sefi Medical Instruments, Haifa, Israel) is a specialized instrument designed for rapid semen analysis. Since its inception in 1980, the Makler counting chamber has gained wide acceptance and is used in many laboratories. The main advantage of the Makler counting chamber over the Neubauer hemocytometer is that except in cases of extremely high spermatozoa concentration, no dilution of the semen specimen is needed. Additionally, motility and forward progression may be assessed at the time of spermatozoa concentration determination. Although the Makler Chamber simplifies determination of spermatozoa concentration in semen analysis, the method lacks the accuracy of traditional hemocytometry and may be prone to errors.6
Spermatozoa Motility and Forward Progression
The World Health Organization (WHO) 1999 progression system classifies spermatozoa into one of four categories: A represents spermatozoa with rapid progressive motility; B, slow or sluggish progressive motility; C, nonprogressive motility; and D, no motility.7 The percentage of spermatozoa in each category is reported. A normal semen specimen contains at least 50% motile spermatozoa with the majority exhibiting good (modal progression class >2, WHO class A and B) forward progression. Athenozoospermia is defined as less than 50% of spermatozoa with good motility.
Spermatozoa Morphology
In 1986, Kruger and associates proposed a strict criteria for classification of normal and abnormal spermatozoa morphology.8 Objective measurements of individual spermatozoa components are included in this system, also known as the Tygerberg strict criteria classification system. According to this system, a spermatozoon is considered normal only if: (1) the head measures 5 to 6 microns in length and 2.5 to 3.5 microns in width; (2) acrosomal staining covers 40% to 70% of the anterior aspect of the sperm head; (3) the midpiece is 1.5 times as long as the head length and less than 1 micron in width; (4) the tail is approximately 45 microns long, uniform, uncoiled, and free from kinks; and (5) cytoplasmic droplets are no more than half the size of the spermatozoa head and occupy the midpiece only. Borderline forms are considered abnormal in this classification scheme.
In men with spermatozoa counts greater than 20 million/mL and motility greater than 30%, fertilization rates during IVF cycles were 91% for men with greater than 14% normal spermatozoa by Tygerberg strict criteria and 37% for men with less than 14% normal forms.8 This study established the reference value for normal morphology as 15% or greater by strict criteria.
In 1992, the WHO adopted a grading system based on the Tygerberg strict characterization of distinct spermatozoon components.3 Under these guidelines, a spermatozoon is considered normal if: (1) the head measures 4 to 5.5 microns in length and 2.5 to 3.5 microns in width; (2) acrosomal staining covers 40% to 70% of the anterior aspect of the sperm head; (3) there are no neck, midpiece, or tail defects; and (4) cytoplasmic droplets are less than one third the size of the head. Although these parameters appear quite similar to Tygerberg criteria, slightly looser standards increase the reference value for normal morphology to 30%. Use of both grading schemes varies from laboratory to laboratory.
Spermatozoa Viability
Another method for assessing spermatozoa viability is the hypo-osmotic swelling test. The test relies on the ability of live spermatozoa to tolerate moderate hypo-osmotic stress as evidenced by controlled swelling. Dead spermatozoa do not show discernible swelling when exposed to hypo-osmotic conditions, whereas viable spermatozoa exhibit a characteristic coiling pattern in the tail.9
Functional Spermatozoa Tests
Zona Pellucida Binding Assay
The zona pellucida binding assay is another adjunctive test of spermatozoa function. This test assesses the capacity of spermatozoa to bind to the outer surface of the zona pellucida, a prerequisite for binding and penetrating the egg. Microscopically, the zona pellucida is divided and each half is mixed with a sample of the patient’s spermatozoa or a sample of a fertile donor. Spermatozoa bound to the zona pellucida outer surface are counted. A hemizona index is calculated by dividing the total number of patient spermatozoa bound by the total number of donor spermatozoa bound. Successful IVF is associated with an index greater than 60%.10
Hamster Egg Penetration Assay
The zona pellucida, the acellular glycoprotein layer surrounding the ovum, regulates species-specific fertilization. Removal of this layer allows evaluation of interspecies, spermatozoa–oocyte interaction using the sperm penetration assay (SPA). This procedure assesses the ability of human spermatozoa to penetrate a hamster oocyte as a test of the fertilizing capability of the human spermatozoa.11 Human spermatozoa penetration of zona-free hamster oocytes has been shown to correlate with human spermatozoa penetration of human ova.12
Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay/Single-cell Gel Electrophoresis
Assays utilize direct staining and evaluation of spermatozoa chromatin to assess the integrity of the genetic material. The tests provide useful information on the presence of genetic damage to spermatozoa DNA. Briefly, both procedures evaluate shifts from intact, double-stranded DNA to denatured, single-stranded DNA.13 These assays can be used to assess male spermatozoa DNA integrity as related to fertility potential and embryo development as well as effects of reproductive toxins.14
Collection-Specific Spermatozoa Evaluation and Processing
Processing of Semen Collected by Masturbation
Spermatozoa Migration Techniques (Swim-up Method)
Spermatozoa washing of a sample before enrichment for motile spermatozoa (swim-up from pellet) has been criticized because dead and abnormal spermatozoa present in the original sample remain in the pellet. Aitken and Clarkson showed that the functional fertilizing capacity of motile spermatozoa isolated from such a pellet can be impaired when compared to that of motile spermatozoa isolated before spermatozoa washing and pelleting.15 The authors propose that the production of oxygen free radicals by abnormal spermatozoa in the pellet may result in cellular damage in motile spermatozoa, leading to abnormal spermatozoa function. Additionally, the centrifuged pellet has a relatively small interface with the overlying layer, making it difficult for motile spermatozoa in the bottom of the pellet to migrate into the media.
Processing of Spermatozoa Collected Following Retrograde Ejaculation
Viable spermatozoa may be retrieved from the urine of patients failing medical therapy.16 Because urine’s acidity makes it naturally toxic to spermatozoa, it is first suggested to alter the chemical milieu of the bladder to minimize its deleterious effects on spermatozoa quality. Alkalinization of the urine above a pH of 7.5 can be achieved by instructing the patient to ingest sodium bicarbonate for several days prior to collection. The patient empties the bladder before masturbation. Immediately after orgasm, the patient urinates into a sterile container, which is taken to the laboratory for spermatozoa extraction. Alternatively, for men unable to volitionally void, the bladder may be catheterized and washed with fresh, pH-adjusted, spermatozoa processing medium. After irrigation, a small volume of medium is left in the bladder. The patient masturbates and ejaculates, and the bladder is catheterized again to obtain fluid containing retrograde ejaculate, which is collected and transported to the laboratory for processing. Laboratory procedures begin with centrifugation and removal of urine from the spermatozoa. The resuspended pellet can then be processed as previously described for samples produced from masturbation.
Processing of Spermatozoa Collected Following Vibratory Stimulation/Electroejaculation
Failure of emission is termed anejaculation. Causes of anejaculation are similar to those of retrograde ejaculation, although spinal cord injury is a much more common cause. Because most of these patients do not respond to sympathomimetic therapy, they may require the use of external stimulatory devices to achieve emission. The most common methods of stimulation are penile vibratory stimulation and rectal electroejaculation. Penile vibratory stimulation entails the application of a penile vibrator to the glans penis, leading to a reflexive ejaculation. This technique induces ejaculation in approximately 70% of anejaculatory men with spinal cord injuries.17
Men with lesions above the level of T10 are more likely to respond than those with lesions below that level. Electroejaculation may be used in men who do not respond to vibratory stimulation. This procedure involves carefully inserting a probe into the rectum, followed by the intermittent application of electrical current to the periprostatic nerve plexus. The current stimulates the muscular tissue of the prostate, seminal vesicle, vas deferens, and epididymis to contract and propel semen into the urethra. It is successful in approximately 75% of patients.18,19 If antegrade ejaculation ensues, it may be collected from the urethra. If retrograde ejaculation occurs, then the urine is alkalinized beforehand and the bladder irrigated with medium and catheterized to remove any spermatozoa-bearing fluid.
Risks of electroejaculation include rectal thermal injury or perforation. The rectum should be examined with proctoscopy before and after the procedure. Life-threatening autonomic dysreflexia, or massive, uncoordinated sympathetic release, may occur in patients with spinal cord injuries above the level of T6. Blood pressure monitoring is imperative in this patient population. Semen obtained by vibratory stimulation and electroejaculation frequently has low volume, high spermatozoa concentration, and poor motility, likely owing to stasis within the genital tract.20 Again, processing of samples produced with vibratory stimulation or electroejaculation continues as in samples produced with masturbation.
Processing of Spermatozoa Collected Following Surgical Spermatozoa Collection
The management of severe male factor infertility has been dramatically changed with the introduction of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Because only one spermatozoa is needed to inject into each oocyte, few spermatozoa are needed to ensure fertilization of retrieved oocytes with ICSI. Advances in surgical techniques of spermatozoa retrieval combined with ICSI have allowed men with certain male infertility factors previously considered to be incompatible with fertility to father biologic progeny. Spermatozoa may be retrieved in men with both nonobstructive and obstructive azoospermia. Chapter 53 discusses the technical details of the specific surgical procedures.
Microsurgical Epididymal Sperm Aspiration
Microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA) is indicated for men with reconstructible or nonreconstructible obstructive azoospermia. It is a relatively simple procedure requiring regional or general anesthesia. MESA involves direct exposure of the epididymis with microscopic retrieval of spermatozoa from that structure. An incision is made through the scrotal skin, dartos, and tunica vaginalis to expose the testis and epididymis. A small incision is made in the wall of an epididymal tubule, and a needle or hollow glass rod is used to aspirate fluid from the lumen.
Although pregnancy rates are similar, MESA is preferred to the other, less-invasive method of epididymal spermatozoa extraction, percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA), because it provides the setting to correct reconstructible etiologies of azoospermia identified at the time of exploration. Additionally more spermatozoa are recovered with MESA than PESA.21