© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015
Daniel J. Stein and Reza Shaker (eds.)Inflammatory Bowel Disease10.1007/978-3-319-14072-8_1515. Why Can’t I Just Stay on Prednisone? The Long-Term Adverse Effects of Steroids
(1)
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W. Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
Keywords
GlucocorticoidsUlcerative colitisCrohn’s diseaseOsteoporosisInfectionAcneDiabetesHypertensionObesitySuggested Response to the Patient
Steroids do an excellent job of treating active inflammation associated with ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease and are often used to bring severe disease into remission. Unfortunately, there are numerous adverse effects that occur with prolonged use, and they have even been shown to overall shorten patients’ life-spans. Potential complications can vary dramatically, from acne and irritability to life-threatening infection and suicidality. Other complications include weight gain, diabetes, high blood pressure, osteoporosis, death of a bone in your hip, anxiety, depression, and serious infections. The risks increase with higher doses and longer duration of therapy. For this reason, we prefer to use other medications with better safety profiles for long-term use to maintain your disease under good control.
Review of the Literature
Glucocorticoids have been used for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease for over 50 years. Pivotal randomized controlled trials from the 1950s and 1960s in ulcerative colitis [1, 2] and from the 1970s and 1980s in Crohn’s disease [3, 4] showed superior efficacy compared to placebo at inducing clinical remission. This effectiveness was confirmed in the more recent GETAID study whereby oral prednisolone administered for 3–7 weeks induced clinical remission in 90 % of patients with active Crohn’s disease [5]. Though glucocorticoids are effective at achieving remission, they perform poorly as maintenance agents. A meta-analysis of RCTs showed that over a 2-year period, patients with quiescent Crohn’s disease who were given glucocorticoids did not have any reduction in risk of relapse [6].
Though the numerous adverse effects of glucocorticoid use have been well known and described, IBD-specific outcomes have been documented only more recently. For example, results of prospective, observational, treatment registry data for Crohn’s disease have suggested an increased risk of serious infections and death associated with glucocorticoid use even after adjusting for other factors [7]. Based on these data and data from additional observational studies, recent treatment guidelines have strongly denounced the long-term use of glucocorticoids, especially given the wide availability of newer agents with better safety profiles [8, 9].
Long-term glucocorticoid use can result in adverse effects involving virtually any organ system, and in general, risk tends to correlate with both dose and duration of use. The concept of a maximum tolerable amount is controversial and poorly defined, as studies looking at even relatively low-dose prednisone have demonstrated safety concerns with chronic use [10]. Prednisone—the prototypical oral glucocorticoid used in treatment of IBD—exerts its effects primarily via inhibition of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, leading essentially to iatrogenic Cushing’s syndrome. With its predominate function being a glucocorticoid agonist, it lacks significant mineralocorticoid as well as gonadotropic activity.
Cardiovascular
Among the adverse effects of greatest concern are those related to increased cardiovascular risk. Glucocorticoid use has been demonstrated to accelerate the development of atherosclerosis and consequently is associated with increased risk of ischemic heart disease and congestive heart failure. A large population-based study showed that glucocorticoid users had a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular disease, defined as a composite outcome of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, angina, heart failure, stroke, or transient ischemic attack [11]. Additionally, glucocorticoid use has been found to be arrhythmogenic, and is associated with higher rates of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, even independent of the presence of preexisting cardiovascular or pulmonary disease [12]. Hypertension is also common with glucocorticoid administration. Interestingly, although hypertension is seen in 70–80 % of patients who develop Cushing’s syndrome [13], rates among patients taking exogenous glucocorticoids tend to be lower—roughly 20 % [14]. This difference is postulated to be a result of improvement in the underlying inflammatory state for which steroids were initiated.
Endocrine
Glucocorticoids have long been associated with disorders of glucose metabolism and are the most common causative agents of drug-induced diabetes. The effect is predominately through increased insulin resistance, which occurs via alterations in glucose utilization as well as upregulation of hepatic gluconeogenesis. Glucocorticoid-induced hyperglycemia tends to manifest as postprandial elevations in blood glucose more so than elevated fasting levels. One study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis found that 9 % of patients started on glucocorticoids developed diabetes within 2 years [15]. Another analysis of a large group of Medicaid enrollees found that glucocorticoid use portended a RR of 2.23 (95 % CI 1.92–2.59) among patients newly initiated on hypoglycemic therapy. The RR rose to 10.3 among patients taking an equivalent of 30 mg/day of prednisone [16]. In addition to diabetes, weight gain is among the most common adverse events, occurring in 70 % of long-term glucocorticoid users [17]. The pattern of weight gain tends to involve a redistribution of body fat and the development of truncal and central adiposity, with the so-called moon facies and buffalo hump.
Musculoskeletal
The impact of glucocorticoid use on bone health is significant. The increased predilection toward the development of osteoporosis, and in turn fragility fractures, imposes a significant morbidity and mortality burden. Glucocorticoid use is the leading cause of secondary osteoporosis [18]. This is achieved through a variety of mechanisms which serve to increase bone resorption while decreasing bone formation. Glucocorticoids inhibit the differentiation and maturation of osteoblasts through interference with several cell signaling pathways and are also detrimental to the function of mature osteoblasts and osteocytes by inhibiting the expression of IGF-1 resulting in decreased production of type I collagen and higher rates of apoptosis [19]. Osteoclast formation is conversely promoted by glucocorticoids, as a result of decreased apoptosis and alterations of signaling cascades which upregulate differentiation of this cell line, leading to higher levels of osteoclasts and an increase in bone resorption [20]. Another mechanism by which resorption is increased is via glucocorticoid-mediated reduction in levels of gonadotropins, leading to lower levels of serum androgens and estrogens [21].
Glucocorticoids impact bone health through significant interactions with the Ca2+-Vitamin D-PTH axis as well. This is felt to occur via two main mechanisms. First, glucocorticoids decrease gut absorption of calcium via antagonism of vitamin D and downregulation of duodenal calcium channels [22]. Second, renal tubular reabsorption of calcium is inhibited thus promoting urinary calcium loss. Whether this leads to a form of secondary hyperparathyroidism remains uncertain as studies have failed to demonstrate elevations in parathyroid hormone levels among patients taking glucocorticoids [23]. Moreover, IBD may not actually be an independent risk factor for hypovitaminosis D, and the overall incidence of osteomalacia is actually not increased [24].
Fracture risk, especially of the vertebral body, is increased among glucocorticoid users, with risk rising steadily early after the initiation of steroid therapy, as this tends to correlate with the period of most rapid bone loss [23]. Despite clear evidence of steroid impact on bone density, other factors likely contribute to an increased fracture risk. A 2005 study showed that fracture risk remained elevated in glucocorticoid users even with normal BMD values [25]. A comprehensive systematic review of bone disease in IBD patients found that fracture risk in general is only modestly elevated (RR 1.4), though glucocorticoid use was consistently the largest independent risk factor [24].
An additional musculoskeletal concern among glucocorticoid users is steroid myopathy, a well-described phenomenon characterized typically by proximal muscle weakness and wasting, as a result of direct catabolic effect of steroids on skeletal myocytes [26]. Lower extremities tend to be involved more severely than upper extremities, and typically pain and myalgia are not seen. Serum muscle enzyme levels may be normal, and EMG or muscle biopsy may either be normal or show mild nonspecific findings. Diagnosis can thus be difficult to establish, but improvement in muscle strength upon dose reduction or discontinuation of the offending glucocorticoid is expected. Avascular necrosis or osteonecrosis is also seen more commonly among patients on glucocorticoids and potentially at a higher rate in IBD patients as compared to patients taking glucocorticoids for other indications [27].