What is the Best Possible Therapy for My Mild to Moderate Ulcerative Colitis? State-of-the-Art Therapy for Mild to Moderate Ulcerative Colitis




© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015
Daniel J. Stein and Reza Shaker (eds.)Inflammatory Bowel Disease10.1007/978-3-319-14072-8_10


10. What is the Best Possible Therapy for My Mild to Moderate Ulcerative Colitis? State-of-the-Art Therapy for Mild to Moderate Ulcerative Colitis



Alexis P. Calloway  and David A. Schwartz 


(1)
Department of Gastroenterology, IBD Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 21st Avenue South, Suite 220, Nashville, TN 37232, USA

 



 

Alexis P. Calloway



 

David A. Schwartz (Corresponding author)



Keywords
ProctitisUlcerative colitisCorticosteroidsMesalamineBudesonideAzathioprineDistal active colitis



Suggested Response to the Patient


Once clinical severity is determined and infectious etiologies are ruled out, the therapy to treat mild to moderate ulcerative colitis is directed by the extent of involvement during colonoscopy. The goal is to gain control of active inflammation and maintain remission once achieved. Therapies used to treat the active disease are generally combinations of topical and/or oral 5-aminosalicylic acids (5-ASAs) and corticosteroids. Looking forward, medications to maintain remission aim to limit prolonged corticosteroid use given its side effects, such as infections and osteoporosis, and include continued use of 5-ASAs and often addition of thiopurines. Regardless of therapy selection, the control of disease is ultimately important in decreasing the overall risk for developing advanced colorectal cancer in patients with long-standing ulcerative colitis by decreasing the time of severe inflammation.


Brief Review of Literature



Mild to Moderate Active Proctitis


The cornerstone for induction and maintenance of remission in mild to moderate ulcerative colitis is 5-ASA agents which are thought to act by activating nuclear receptors that influence inflammation, cell proliferation, apoptosis, and the metabolic function of colonic epithelial cells [1]. In active proctitis, the therapy is targeted directly to the rectum with mesalamine suppositories which have been found to be more effective than oral 5-ASA formulations showing remission as early as 2 weeks in a meta-analysis comparing the two forms of delivery (oral vs. topical) [2]. This medication is usually given in a dose of 500 mg twice daily or 1 g daily and is considered safe, well tolerated, and effective in patients with active proctitis and distal colitis [3, 4]. The selection for the type of topical therapy is dependent on the extent of involvement with suppositories reaching 10–15 cm and foams reaching 15–20 cm, while enemas may reach up to the splenic flexure. Disadvantages include bloating and leaking which may lead to noncompliance. Topical corticosteroids are also used to assist in induction of remission but are not effective in maintenance [2, 5]. However, topical steroids have been found to be as effective as systemic corticosteroids with significantly lower inhibition of cortisol levels for patients with left-sided colitis [6]. At times, complete response is not obtained with topical therapy alone. In these instances, oral mesalamine may be added to the regimen as it has been found to provide quicker and more complete relief of rectal symptoms than oral or rectal formulations used alone [7].


Mild to Moderate Distal Active Colitis


As in patients experiencing difficulty controlling active proctitis, combination therapy is more effective than monotherapy for induction of remission. In a randomized double-blinded study, oral mesalamine in combination with mesalamine enemas induced remission in 64 % of patients within 8 weeks compared to 43 % of patients taking oral mesalamine with a placebo [8]. There is, however, a dose-related effect of oral 5-ASA therapy. The ASCEND III trial, a non-inferiority study, found that 70 % of the 389 patients receiving delayed-release mesalamine 4.8 g daily achieved treatment success at 6 weeks compared to 66 % of those receiving a dose of 2.4 g daily. However, significantly more patients who received 4.8 g daily achieved clinical remission at weeks 3 and 6 compared to those receiving 2.4 g daily [9]. In the ASCEND I trial, a statistically significant difference in treatment success was found in a subgroup of patients with moderate active colitis receiving delayed-release mesalamine at 4.8 g compared to those receiving 2.4 g, 72 % and 57 %, respectively [10]. Patients with moderate disease benefit the most from higher doses when considering balance of side effect profile to therapeutic response.

In general 5-ASAs are affordable and well tolerated; however, some patients experience nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia, headache, and anorexia in varying degrees making full compliance with this medication difficult. More severe reactions including pancreatitis, hepatotoxicity, bone marrow suppression, interstitial nephritis, and anemia have also been found. Additionally, 5-ASAs specifically sulfasalazine can affect sperm morphology which is reversible when discontinued [5]. In 1–2 % of the population, 5-ASA therapy can cause worsening of ulcerative colitis and should be discontinued in this group.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 5, 2017 | Posted by in GASTROENTEROLOGY | Comments Off on What is the Best Possible Therapy for My Mild to Moderate Ulcerative Colitis? State-of-the-Art Therapy for Mild to Moderate Ulcerative Colitis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access