What Do I Tell Patients About Saw Palmetto for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia?




Saw palmetto is widely used to treat lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Although there is passionate support for herbal and complementary therapies for LUTS, clinical evidence is mixed. Because there is a well-recognized, profound placebo effect in tests of efficacy for agents treating LUTS, it is imperative that all therapies be tested in placebo-controlled trials. This article reviews evidence of the efficacy and safety of saw palmetto for men with LUTS caused by BPH, with particular emphasis on published randomized clinical trials and the upcoming Complementary and Alternative Medicine for Urologic Symptoms (CAMUS) trial.


History of herbal therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia


Historically, herbal therapy is considered to be the mainstay of complementary and alternative medicine for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Millions of people worldwide, including in the United States, use herbal agents to treat symptoms of BPH and prevent its progression. Despite their widespread use for maintaining prostatic health in older men, the long-term efficacy and safety of over-the-counter phytotherapies for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) attributable to BPH are not clear.


BPH is a common cause of morbidity among older men in the United States and other developed countries. Although BPH is a histologic process and its exact cause is unknown, this condition confers morbidity primarily through LUTS. Additionally, men with BPH, and particularly those with larger prostates as a result of BPH, are at an increased risk for complications, such as acute urinary retention, and may progress to requiring surgical treatment for BPH. In fact, although the availability of effective medical therapy has reduced the need for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), the traditional surgical treatment for BPH, the Centers for Disease Control’s National Hospital Discharge Survey reports that 132,000 TURP procedures were performed in the United States in 2000. Although a working epidemiologic definition of symptomatic BPH is still being debated, the clinical manifestations of BPH are generally agreed upon. Clinical BPH, defined as an American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUASI) score greater than 7 (moderate to severe LUTS) and a depressed peak uroflow rate (<15 mL/s), affects 17% of men aged 50 to 59 years, 27% of men aged 60 to 69 years, and 35% of men aged 70 to 79 years.


Men with bothersome LUTS caused by BPH can choose from a spectrum of traditional medical treatments, including alpha blockers and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors, minimally invasive therapies that use heat to damage or destroy prostate tissue, TURP, and other surgical therapies. The Medical Treatment of Prostatic Symptoms trial tested finasteride and doxazosin, alone and in combination, for the prevention of BPH progression. BPH progression was defined as a confirmed increase in an AUASI score by at least 4 points, acute urinary retention, incontinence, urinary tract infection or urosepsis, or new renal insufficiency. Almost all progression events were in the first 2 categories. Finasteride is a 5-alpha reductase inhibitor that blocks the conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone, the major intraprostatic androgen, and reduces prostate size. Doxazosin blocks alpha-adrenergic receptors in the lower urinary tract, resulting in a reduction in smooth muscle tone in the prostate and bladder neck. Alpha-blockers rapidly improve voiding symptoms and urinary flow rate, and the improvements are long lasting. Common side effects are dizziness, retrograde ejaculation, and postural hypotension. The 5-alpha reductase inhibitors reduce prostate volume and decrease the risk of urinary retention and the need for surgical intervention. The reduction in prostate volume takes months. Common side effects are decreased ejaculate volume and, rarely, erectile dysfunction. For men with severe symptoms and large prostates, combination therapy was more effective than either therapy alone, but was associated with a greater risk of side effects and greater cost. Combination finasteride and doxazosin therapy is an attractive option, given the different mechanisms of action.


Almost 30 phytotherapeutic compounds are currently available for the treatment of BPH. Those that have been studied most are extracts of the fruit of Serenoa repens , the saw palmetto dwarf palm that grows in the Southeastern United States. Second to saw palmetto is the extract of the bark of Pygeum africanum , the African plum tree. The proposed mechanisms of action for saw palmetto include 5-alpha reductase inhibition, intraprostatic androgen receptor blockage, and adrenergic receptor antagonism, as well as an antiinflammatory effect. In vitro studies have shown that Pygeum extracts have antiinflammatory and immunomodulatory properties, effects on bladder contractility, modulation of androgen production, and direct effects on the function of prostate epithelium. Although there is conflicting evidence in the literature concerning the efficacy and safety of saw palmetto in the treatment of men with LUTS secondary to BPH, a recent meta-analysis of saw palmetto conducted by the Cochrane Review committee concluded that there is no observed benefit of using saw palmetto in the treatment of LUTS related to BPH, compared with placebo.




Evidence of current use of saw palmetto and other herbal agents in treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia


The use of herbal therapies by adults in the United States has increased significantly in the last decade. It is estimated that 1 in every 5 people in the United States uses an herb to treat a condition or promote health. Likewise, herbal therapy for BPH is rapidly gaining popularity in the Western world. A 2002 nationwide survey found that approximately 2.5 million men used saw palmetto for treatment of BPH in the United States. It is estimated that up to 90% of patients newly diagnosed with BPH have already tried an herbal treatment by the time they were referred to a urologist.


The trend in using phytotherapy for BPH can be partly explained by positive views of herbal therapies and personal values and beliefs. However, the published literature raises concerns about the safety and efficacy of herbal treatments for BPH.


Plant extracts are widely used by men with BPH in the United States and usually sold as dietary supplements. In Europe, these extracts are often prescription drugs. A nationwide German study reported that 50% of urologists preferred saw palmetto over pharmaceutical agents for treatment of BPH.


In a 2002 Cochrane meta-analysis of the effectiveness of saw palmetto extracts for men with BPH, 21 randomized trials 4 to 48 weeks in duration were identified, with 3193 total subjects. Data from the trials indicated that, compared with placebo, saw palmetto reduced nocturia by 0.76 times per night (10 trials), increased the odds of self-rated improvement 1.76 fold (6 trials), and improved peak flow rates by 1.86 mL/s (9 trials). Adverse effects were mild and infrequent. Methodological problems noted within the trials included lack of standardized symptom scores and short study durations. The most common dosage was 160 mg twice daily, but a comparative trial showed similar effectiveness with the more convenient dosage of 320 mg once daily.


There has been strong interest among numerous investigators, particularly urologists, to further examine the safety and efficacy of phytotherapy for BPH in the form of large multicenter clinical trials, such as the Complementary and Alternative Medicines for Urological Symptoms (CAMUS) trial. If the results of these ongoing clinical trials show effectiveness at reducing LUTS, men with BPH might find herbal therapy preferable to medical therapy because of the appeal of naturalistic herbal therapy and minimal side effects.




Evidence of current use of saw palmetto and other herbal agents in treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia


The use of herbal therapies by adults in the United States has increased significantly in the last decade. It is estimated that 1 in every 5 people in the United States uses an herb to treat a condition or promote health. Likewise, herbal therapy for BPH is rapidly gaining popularity in the Western world. A 2002 nationwide survey found that approximately 2.5 million men used saw palmetto for treatment of BPH in the United States. It is estimated that up to 90% of patients newly diagnosed with BPH have already tried an herbal treatment by the time they were referred to a urologist.


The trend in using phytotherapy for BPH can be partly explained by positive views of herbal therapies and personal values and beliefs. However, the published literature raises concerns about the safety and efficacy of herbal treatments for BPH.


Plant extracts are widely used by men with BPH in the United States and usually sold as dietary supplements. In Europe, these extracts are often prescription drugs. A nationwide German study reported that 50% of urologists preferred saw palmetto over pharmaceutical agents for treatment of BPH.


In a 2002 Cochrane meta-analysis of the effectiveness of saw palmetto extracts for men with BPH, 21 randomized trials 4 to 48 weeks in duration were identified, with 3193 total subjects. Data from the trials indicated that, compared with placebo, saw palmetto reduced nocturia by 0.76 times per night (10 trials), increased the odds of self-rated improvement 1.76 fold (6 trials), and improved peak flow rates by 1.86 mL/s (9 trials). Adverse effects were mild and infrequent. Methodological problems noted within the trials included lack of standardized symptom scores and short study durations. The most common dosage was 160 mg twice daily, but a comparative trial showed similar effectiveness with the more convenient dosage of 320 mg once daily.


There has been strong interest among numerous investigators, particularly urologists, to further examine the safety and efficacy of phytotherapy for BPH in the form of large multicenter clinical trials, such as the Complementary and Alternative Medicines for Urological Symptoms (CAMUS) trial. If the results of these ongoing clinical trials show effectiveness at reducing LUTS, men with BPH might find herbal therapy preferable to medical therapy because of the appeal of naturalistic herbal therapy and minimal side effects.




Collection of relevant studies for this review


The authors performed PubMed ( www.pubmed.gov ), Web of Science ( www.isiwebofknowledge.com ), and Cochrane library ( www.cochrane.org ) world literature searches for articles in the English language. The search terms saw palmetto and BPH or herbal agent and BPH returned 35 studies published between 2000 and 2011 worldwide. Nineteen randomized clinical trials (RCT) were identified, but only 8 RCT were included (≥100 patients) ( Table 1 ); 4 meta-analysis studies (≥2 clinical studies) ( Table 2 ), 7 experimental basic scientific studies, 2 prospective studies, and 3 retrospective studies ( Table 3 ) were related to saw palmetto or herbs and BPH. Most of the world literature, in descending order, is from the United States, United Kingdom, Spain, Germany, Italy, France, Russia, Romania, Turkey, Australia, and Brazil. All large RCTs and meta-analyses were carefully selected and reviewed.



Table 1

Randomized clinical trials evaluating saw palmetto and other herbal agents in BPH



























































































































First Author Year of Publication Journal Study N Main Findings/Conclusions
Anceschi 2010 Minerva Urol Nefro RCT 114 This study suggests that pretreatment with saw palmetto before surgery for BPH is effective in reducing intraoperative and postoperative complications.
Bercovich 2010 Urologia RCT NA A new plant extract (Pluvio), which contains avocado, soya oil and nettle root, was compared with controls in men with BPH. IPSS, uroflow, postvoid residual volume, prostate volume, and PSA were measured. This study showed that Pluvio is highly effective for the treatment of BPH.
Lee 2009 Clinical Trials RCT/CAMUS 3300 This RCT is the largest to evaluate saw palmetto for the treatment of BPH to date and the only one to include a dose-ranging protocol. The results of this study will provide the most definitive test of the efficacy of saw palmetto in men with BPH.
Lopatkin 2007 Int Urol Nephrol RCT 219 This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a combined agent (160 mg Sabal fruit extract and 120 mg nettle root extract in men with BPH. IPSS was reduced by 53% ( P <.001), peak and average urinary flow increased by 19% ( P <.001), and residual urine volume decreased by 44% ( P = .03). This study concludes that treatment with PRO 160/120 provides a clinically relevant benefit.
Bent 2006 NEJM RCT/STEP 225 This study examined the role of saw palmetto in BPH treatment. No significant difference between the saw palmetto and placebo groups was identified over a 1-year period.
Hutchison 2006 Eur Urol RCT/TRIUMPH NA Tamsulosin, finasteride, saw palmetto and Pygeum were all assessed in treating LUTS/BPH patients. Drug treatments were associated with some improvement compared with watchful waiting for most patients. Tamsulosin was the most effective in improving urinary symptoms (68%). Additionally, Pygeum therapy was shown to significantly improve urinary symptoms (43%).
Engelman 2006 Arzneimittelf-orschung RCT 140 A combination of 160 mg Sabal fruit extract and 120 mg nettle root extract (PRO 160/120), compared with tamsulosin in treatment of BPH. Primary outcomes were IPSS and adverse events. The study supports noninferiority of PRO 160/120 in the treatment of LUTS caused by BPH.
Popa 2005 MMW Fortschr Med RCT NA This study recommends the use of the combined Sabal extract and nettle root extract (PRO 160/120) in the treatment of BPH.
Zlotta 2005 Eur Urol RCT NA This study compares saw palmetto, tamsulosin, and finasteride. After 3 months, there were no statistically significant differences between the 3 treatment groups in terms of IPSS and slight improvement in sexual performance. This study demonstrates that saw palmetto has no negative impact on male sexual function.
Debruyne 2004 Eur Urol RCT/PERMAL 704 This study compares saw palmetto and tamsulosin for the treatment of BPH and concluded that 320 mg daily saw palmetto is slightly superior to 0.4 mg daily tamsulosin.
Willets 2003 BJUI RCT 100 Saw palmetto was compared with placebo. This study concluded that there is no significant beneficial effect of saw palmetto over placebo.
Melo 2002 Int Braz J Urol RCT NA This study analyzed the effect of combined Pygeum and nettle root extract, compared with placebo. This combination produced clinical and urodynamic effects similar to placebo.
Sökeland 2000 BJUI RCT 431 This study compared combined Sabal and nettle root extract (PRO 160/120) to finasteride in patients with BPH. It showed that efficacy of both PRO 160/120 and finasteride was equivalent. Additionally, PRO 160/120 had better tolerability than finasteride.
Marks 2000 J Urol RCT 44 This study compared the effects of saw palmetto to placebo and concluded that saw palmetto appears to be a safe, highly desirable option for men with BPH.
Glemain 2002 Prog Urol RCT/OCOS 352 This study compared a combination of tamsulosin and saw palmetto with tamsulosin alone. It concluded that the addition of saw palmetto or tamsulosin did not provide any significant benefit.
Preuss 2001 Int Urol and Nephro RCT NA This study examined the efficacy of a combination of rye grass, saw palmetto, beta-sitosterol, and vitamin E compared with placebo. After 3 months, the combined therapy had significantly lessened symptoms of BPH and no significant adverse side effects were noted.

Abbreviations: IPSS, International Prostatic Symptoms Score; NA, not available; OCOS, Omix contre Omix + Serenoa repens ; STEP, Saw Palmetto Treatment of Enlarged Prostates; TRIUMPH, TransEuropean Research Into the Use of Management Policies for LUTS suggestive of BPH in Primary Health care.


Table 2

Meta-analysis evaluating saw palmetto and other herbal agents


































First Author Year of Publication Journal Study Design Main Findings/Conclusions
Mantovani 2010 Minerva Urol Nefrol Analysis of 2 studies This meta-analysis concluded that a daily dose of 320 mg of saw palmetto can significantly reduce symptoms related to BPH with a good tolerability.
Tacklind 2010 Cochrane Database Sys Rev Cochrane Reviews This systematic meta-analysis showed that saw palmetto provides no improvement in urinary symptoms secondary to BPH, compared with placebo. Additionally, it found that saw palmetto was well tolerated.
Boyle 2004 BJUI Meta-analysis This meta-analysis showed significant improvement in LUTS and flow rate in patients treated with saw palmetto for BPH, compared with placebo.
Buck 2004 J Urol Meta-analysis This meta-analysis suggested a wide spectrum of activity of saw palmetto. However, the precise mechanism of action remained unclear. Balance and caution are needed when extrapolating the results of in vitro laboratory studies to the complex human situation.


Table 3

Other studies evaluating saw palmetto and other herbal agents































































































First Author Year of Publication Journal Study Design N Main Findings/Conclusions
Bonvissuto 2011 Urology Experimental NA A combination of lycopene, selenium and saw palmetto caused an inhibitory effect on prostate of rat. This association might be useful in the treatment of BPH.
Sinescu 2011 Urol Int Prospective 120 Long-term treatment with 320 mg saw palmetto proved to be efficient in reducing urinary symptoms and improving sexual function in men with BPH.
Quiles 2011 Prostate Experimental 6 This study suggests that Pygeum has an antiproliferative effect on prostate fibroblasts and myofibroblasts but not on smooth muscle cells.
Pais 2011 Adv Ther Experimental NA A novel saw palmetto extract shown to effectively inhibit 5-alpha reductase enzyme activity that has been linked to BPH. This study confirms the effect of saw palmetto on prostate, compared with finasteride.
Agbabiaka 2009 Drug Saf Retrospective NA This study evaluated the safety of saw palmetto and recommended higher quality reporting to improve safety assessments in the future.
Scholtysek 2009 Biochem Biophys Res Commun Experimental NA This study showed the potential usage of saw palmetto and its extracts as antitumor agents.
Avins 2008 Compl Ther Med Subanalysis 225 This study examined the safety and efficacy of saw palmetto in men with BPH. No significant differences were observed between saw palmetto versus placebo regarding adverse events.
Hizl 2007 Int Urol Nephrol Prospective 60 This study evaluated the efficacy of saw palmetto alone versus tamsulosin and saw palmetto versus tamsulosin alone for patients with BPH. Both saw palmetto and tamsulosin seem to be effective in treating BPH.
Schleich 2006 Planta Med Experimental NA This study compared the antiandrogenic activity of Pygeum , saw palmetto, and pumpkin seeds in treatment of BPH and prostate cancer. Results showed that Pygeum has the highest antiandrogenic effect and may provide a novel approach for the prevention and treatment of BPH and prostate cancer.
Habib 2004 Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases Comparative analysis NA This study indicated that sources of saw palmetto vary significantly between brands. It also evaluated the safety and efficacy of saw palmetto in BPH as well as its therapeutic benefits, compared with available medications.
Talpur 2003 Mol Cell Biochem Experimental NA This study evaluated the antiandrogenic effects of saw palmetto and rye grass on prostatic enlargement in rats. Saw palmetto and rye grass influence prostatic hyperplasia via effects on androgen metabolism.
Vacherot 2003 Prostate Experimental NA This study evaluated the role of saw palmetto as an antiandrogenic agent on human prostatic stroma and epithelium specimens obtained from men with BPH. Induction of apoptosis and inhibition of cell proliferation are likely the basis for the clinical efficacy of saw palmetto.

Abbreviation: NA, not available.




The current available herbal agents used in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia


Table 4 lists most currently available herbal agents, dosages, and adverse effects. The current published evidence of using saw palmetto and other herbal agents is briefly discussed next.



Table 4

Summary of currently available herbal agents for benign prostatic hyperplasia












































































































































Herb Scientific Name Family Dosage Adverse Effects
Antiandrogenic
Saw palmetto Serenoa repens Arecaceae Dried: 160 mg twice daily; Liquid: 0.6–1.5 mL or 0.5–1.0 g of berries in 150 mL of water 3 times daily Nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, headache, hypertension, mild pruritus, decreased libido, and ejaculatory/erectile dysfunction
Antiproliferative
Pygeum Pygeum africanum Rosaceae Dried: 50 mg twice daily Nausea, gastric pain, constipation, diarrhea, dizziness, headache, insomnia, restlessness, and visual disturbance
Nettle root Urtica dioica Urtica ceae Dried: 600–1200 mg daily Liquid: 1.5–7.5 mL daily Mild gastric upset, allergic skin reactions, and sweating
Pumpkin seeds Cucurbita pepo Cucurbitaceae Dried: 5 g twice daily Potential electrolytes loss
African wild potato Hypoxis hemerocallide Hypoxidaceae Dried: 60–130 mg divided into 2–3 doses daily Nausea, vomiting, indigestion, diarrhea, constipation, anxiety, ventricular tachycardia, bone marrow suppression in patients with HIV disease, reduced absorption and blood levels of alpha- and beta-carotene and vitamin E
Beta-sitosterol 22,23-dihydrostigmasterol Beta-sitosterol Dried: 60–130 mg divided into 2–3 doses daily Nausea, indigestion, diarrhea, constipation, erectile dysfunction, loss of libido, reduced absorption and blood levels of alpha- and beta-carotene and vitamin E
Lycopene All-trans lycopene Lycopene Dried: 15 mg twice daily Reduced plasma PSA level
Red Clover Trifolium pratense Fabaceae Dried: 40–80 mg daily for 3 months Rashlike reactions, myalgia, headache, nausea, and vaginal spotting; large amounts can induce bleeding
Antiinflammatory
Rye grass pollen Secale cereale Poaceae Dried: 126 mg 3 times daily Nausea, abdominal distention and heartburn
Nutrients
Selenium Selenium Selenium For prostate cancer prevention, 200 mcg daily Nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, nail changes, fatigue, irritability, alopecia, and weight loss
Vitamin E Alpha-tocopherol Vitamin E For prostate cancer prevention, 50–100 IU daily Nausea, diarrhea, intestinal cramps, fatigue, weakness, headache, blurred vision, rash, gonadal dysfunction, and creatinuria
Miscellaneous
Garlic Allium sativum Alliaceae NA Mouth/breath odor, gastrointestinal irritation, heartburn, flatulence, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea
Prickly pear cactus Opuntia ficus-indica Cactaceae Dried: 500 mg 3 times daily for 2–8 mo Mild diarrhea, nausea, increased stool volume, abdominal fullness, and headache
Saxifraga stolonifera Meerb saxifraga Chinese herb NA NA
Saireito Saireito Chinese herb Dried: 5.4 g daily NA
Green tea Green tea NA NA NA
Fengweicao granule Fengweicao Pteris multifida Dried: 5 g twice daily NA
Ganoderma lucidum Ganoderma NA Dried: 6 mg daily NA
Qianlie Sanyu Qianlie NA NA NA
Bushenhuoxue Bushenhuoxue NA NA NA

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Mar 11, 2017 | Posted by in UROLOGY | Comments Off on What Do I Tell Patients About Saw Palmetto for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia?

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access