Ventral Hernia: Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
Samuel Szomstein
Aaron Lee
INDICATIONS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
Ventral hernia is a common complication after an open colorectal procedure. Although there are no universally agreed upon data on the incidence of ventral hernia formation after major abdominal surgery, reported incidence ranges from 11% to 50%. Up to 75% of patients will develop a ventral hernia within 3 years of the index procedure. Ventral hernias can affect patients’ quality of life significantly. There are several different ways to treat the condition from conservative management to surgical options, but this chapter focuses on the surgical option, specifically the laparoscopic approach.
Indications for ventral hernia repair in general are discussed in Chapter 65. The aim of this chapter is to discuss the specific pertaining to the laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia. There are several factors that a surgeon should consider when determining a particular technique to repair a ventral hernia. The general rule of thumb when repairing any ventral hernia is to fix it when it is symptomatic; and the symptoms include pain, obstruction, back pain, poor cosmesis, severe disability, incarceration, and/or skin changes.
Although it is not mandatory to fix an asymptomatic incisional hernia, the treating physician should be cognizant of the fact that no hernia will be effectively treated without surgery and that the hernia will progressively increase in size at an unpredictable rate. Some patients will have an unchanging hernia that does not bother them for years, whereas some will notice a rapid increase in size over a few months. This could be explained by the patients’ medical conditions, genetics, and baseline activity level. If a patient has poorly controlled chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, uncontrolled cough can exacerbate the condition at a faster rate than someone who does not have any respiratory conditions. A similar logic applies to patients with severe constipation or benign hypertension hyperplasia. Patients with congenital connective tissue disorders may have accelerated rate of hernia progression. Similarly, more patients will have the same undesirable effect on the hernia as opposed to the more sedentary patients. All these issues need to be considered when the risks benefit assessment is made for the asymptomatic ventral hernias.
The incisional hernia can be repaired either in an elective or emergent setting. Emergent indications may occur after overlooking sentinel signs such as history of obstruction or incarceration. Laparoscopy can be used in either setting, but the surgeon should be aware of the patient’s overall condition and prompt decision should be made to convert to open when the patient shows any signs of intolerance to laparoscopy.
Laparoscopy has shown benefits over laparotomy in terms of shorter length of hospital stay, earlier return to work, and better pain control compared to the open technique. Although it is beneficial, the technique is heavily dependent on the surgeon and equipment. However, it is critical that the technique is utilized by a surgeon who is adequately trained in the technique. There are several different entry techniques available and one may be more optimal than the other, depending on the clinical scenario. The surgeon should feel comfortable using both open and direct entry techniques in the event that one fails. Also, it is important to have all of the necessary components and equipment to perform basic laparoscopic surgery at the facility to ensure the best possible outcome for the patient. Most importantly, adequate discussion needs to happen between the surgeon and the patient about all the risks and benefits of laparoscopic ventral hernia (LVH) and the alternative options.
Contraindications are similar to the ones that are mentioned in chapter 51. It is paramount to understand not only the technical aspect but also the physiologic aspects of the surgery. Contraindications can be divided into absolute and relative, and these are summarized here.
Absolute—Hemodynamic instability, uncorrectable coagulopathy, uncorrectable hypercapnia, inadequately trained surgeons or staff in laparoscopy, lack of equipment
Relative—Multiple previous abdominal surgeries, multiple abdominal wall hernia surgeries, previous mesh placement, recent open abdominal surgery <6 weeks
As shown, patients should be able to tolerate general anesthesia to undergo an LVH procedure. The relative contraindications should be used as a guideline for better patient selection.
PREOPERATIVE PLANNING
A ventral hernia can be diagnosed during physical examination. Certain maneuvers will accentuate the hernia such as examining the patient while he or she is standing up, Valsalva maneuver, or abdominal flexion. Although most incisional hernia can be diagnosed without imaging and there is no rule against obtaining one, the authors are proponents of liberal usage of preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan for several different reasons.
The issue first is the inaccuracy of physical examination in determining the size and content of the hernia. This information is important when discussing the subtle details of the procedure with the patient. The size of the mesh, likelihood of bowel injury, and the level of complexity are examples of topics that can be discussed in full detail with the imaging. Also, the patient’s condition may inhibit surgeons from performing a thorough and accurate physical examination such as when the patient is morbidly obese, has severe arthritis, and is wheel chair bound or bed bound secondary to the patient’s existing medical conditions. There are several different imaging techniques available but the author prefers to use the CT as the primary imaging modality.
Once the ventral hernia is diagnosed, it is important to establish the goal of care from both the hernia and colorectal disease standpoint with the patient. The hernia surgeon needs to determine the acuity and the complexity of the hernia and generate a reasonable plan to address it with the patient in terms of overall goal with the colorectal disease as a part of the equation. It is prudent to coordinate with the colorectal department if the surgeon is being referred for the hernia specifically, to address the hernia concomitantly or deferred until the later date. It is common for patients to have temporary ostomy after a colorectal procedure as a protective measure; and for these patients, it is reasonable to wait until the time of the reversal or even later to address the hernia. Also, it is important to know if the primary surgery is going be done laparoscopically or open because it may change the timing and the level of complexity of subsequent procedure depending on the method of the index procedure. Also, it is critical to coordinate with the colorectal surgeon because the hernia operation will most likely require a mesh, due to the infection risk, it is advisable to defer if a colon resection is planned.
SURGERY
The patient should follow the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) protocol as far as the venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and perioperative antibiotics are concerned. Patients should receive subcutaneous heparin injection or its equivalent; and during the surgery, a sequential compression device should be placed on the patient’s lower extremities. It is the authors’ preference prophylactically to use cefazolin as the antibiotic of choice as long as the patient has no allergy to β-lactam-based antibiotics; and if so, other antibiotics should be given according to the NSQIP guideline. Appropriate aspiration precaution should be followed during intubation. Usually, patients at the author’s institution have a bladder catheter placed for two reasons; to decompress the bladder in case it is necessary to enter the space of Retzius to place the mesh and to accurately measure the urine output.
Positioning
The patient should be positioned supine with both arms tucked, which allows the surgeon and his/her assistant to operate in the most ergonomically comfortable position. Before the positioning of the patient, it is important that the surgeon communicates with the operating room staff exactly what he/she wants. Also, it is critical to remember to place appropriate padding around the pressure points
to prevent any inadvertent ulcer or skin disruption such as the space between the intravenous line and skin, Foley and urethra, below both heels, and so on. The patient is secured with two different straps, one above the knees and one below. Once the patient is positioned and the airway is secured, the entire abdomen from the nipple line to the pubic symphysis is prepped using chlorhexidine prep solution. When draping the patient, it is important to place the sterile towels as wide as possible to place the ports that are necessary to perform the surgery.
to prevent any inadvertent ulcer or skin disruption such as the space between the intravenous line and skin, Foley and urethra, below both heels, and so on. The patient is secured with two different straps, one above the knees and one below. Once the patient is positioned and the airway is secured, the entire abdomen from the nipple line to the pubic symphysis is prepped using chlorhexidine prep solution. When draping the patient, it is important to place the sterile towels as wide as possible to place the ports that are necessary to perform the surgery.
Technique
Depending on the location of the hernia and the extent of previous surgeries, different entry techniques can be considered and utilized. If a patient has a large midline incision and previous surgical history that suggests severe peritonitis and is expected to have dense adhesions throughout the abdomen, supraumbilical midline port placement using Hasson technique is a viable option. With reasonable doubt that the patient has minimal adhesion or localized adhesion from the previous history, either right or left midclavicular site can be safely used to enter the peritoneum by a direct visualization trocar technique. The author routinely uses the Optiview technique at the Palmer’s point or the right midclavicular site away from the hernia with a 5-mm camera in a 5-mm trocar slip. When the reciprocal side of the Palmar’s point is being used, it is prudent to be extra careful when entering the peritoneum because the liver may be in the way and potentially get injured. Then pneumoperitoneum is established using high-flow CO2 to obtain minimal 15 mm Hg.
Once the pneumoperitoneum is obtained, the 10-mm 30-degree laparoscope is inserted and the full abdomen should be inspected. Necessary dissection should take place to free up any adhesion and reduce the hernia content. The author uses sharp dissection around any bowel and ultrasonic energy device for any omental adhesion. Extra care should be taken when taking down the content because any content in the hernia sac can potentially be injured during the dissection. Preoperative imaging can provide the surgeon with accurate information of the content in the hernia sac before the surgery. The hernia sac should be dissected and reduced as well. Once the hernia sac and its contents are reduced, the hernia size should be measured. There are several ways to measure the hernia, but the author measures it extracorporeally with full desufflation. On the basis of the measurement, the shape and size of the mesh is selected intraoperatively. The author uses a polypropylene-based mesh with hydrogel filament. The author places Prolene stitches at the four corners of the mesh.