Tips to Preserve Continence During Robotic Radical Prostatectomy

© Springer-Verlag London 2017
Abhay Rané, Burak Turna, Riccardo Autorino and Jens J. Rassweiler (eds.)Practical Tips in Urology10.1007/978-1-4471-4348-2_65

65. Tips to Preserve Continence During Robotic Radical Prostatectomy

Bernardo Rocco , Elisa De Lorenzis  and Angelica Anna Chiara Grasso 

Clinica Urologica I, Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda – Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy



Bernardo Rocco (Corresponding author)


Elisa De Lorenzis


Angelica Anna Chiara Grasso


While incontinence and impotence are the two major drawbacks of radical prostatectomy, incontinence seems to be the problem that troubles patients most, even if it occurs less frequently than impotence. The prevalence of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy can be influenced by preoperative patient characteristics, surgeon experience, surgical techniques and methods used to collect and report data. In this chapter we will focus on surgical tips to improve continence recovery during robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), analyzing the procedures step by step.

Radical prostatectomyRobotic surgeryRobotic prostatectomyUrinary continenceProstate cancerSurgery techniqueContinence


According to the American Urological Association (AUA), the reported risk of urinary incontinence post-radical prostatectomy (RP) ranged from 3 to 74 % [1]. Nevertheless, the definition itself of “continence” is not standardized and univocal (0 pad/safety pad/0-1 pad). Despite the lack of randomized studies comparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and open radical prostatectomy (ORP), there is a trend towards faster recovery of continence with the robotic approach. In a 2012 meta-analysis a statistically significant advantage in favor of RARP compared to ORP and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) was demonstrated in terms of 12-month urinary continence recovery [2].

Factors Impacting on Continence

The prevalence of urinary incontinence after RP can be influenced by preoperative patient characteristics, surgeon experience, surgical technique, and methods used to collect and report data.

One fundamental aspect for the surgeon is the perfect knowledge of the anatomy and the consequences of the removal of the prostate on the static system of the pelvis; therefore the aim of the reconstructive phase is to restore the pelvic anatomy and the urinary support system.

In this chapter we will focus on surgical tips during RARP to improve continence recovery.

Access to the Urethra and Length of Membranous Urethra

As suggested by von Bodman et al. and Hakimi et al., both the membranous urethral length and volume on preoperative MRI, and a longer intraoperative urethra, are predictors of continence recovery [3, 4].

Another tip that has been correlated with higher continence rates at 3 months is the placement of the puboperiurethral stitch (12-in monofilament polyglytone suture on a CT-1 needle) after the ligation of the DVC [5] described this technique, which advantages are the anterior support to the striated sphincter and the stabilization of the posterior urethra that can aid in the preservation of the urethral length during the dissection of the prostatic apex.

Access to the Urethra: Key Points

  • maximal preservation of urethral length

  • stabilization of the posterior urethra with the puboperiurethral stitch

Approach to the Dorsal Venous Complex (DVC)

Lei et al. in 2011 published the first description of selective suture ligation of the DVC during RARP [6]. In the first step an athermal, sharp division of prominent DVC components is performed to identify the avascular plane anterior to the urethra and the pillars of Walsh laterally. In the second step a selective suturing of DVC is performed followed by the anastomosis using a 3-0 Vicryl cut to 23 cm on a CT- 3 needle. This sequence minimizes instrument changes. The selective suture ligation of the DVC, compared to suture ligation prior to athermal DVC division, was associated with better urinary function and continence at 5 months, shorter operative times and similar positive surgical margins (PSM).

Approach to the Dorsal Venous Complex: Key Points

  • constant pneumoperitoneum (15–20 mmHg)

  • athermal DVC division and then selective ligation of DVC

  • ligature of the DVC is beneficial for surgeons in their learning curve

Bladder Neck Preservation

Anatomically, the bladder neck (BN) is represented by three muscular layers: the inner longitudinal layer, the middle circular layer and the outer longitudinal layer.

Careful dissection of the prostatovesical junction can maintain most of the circular muscle fibers of the BN, accelerating the return of urinary continence [7].

In our technique the BN is identified by a cessation of the fat extending from the bladder at the level of the prostato-vesical junction. The bladder is dissected off the prostate in the midline using a sweeping motion of the monopolar scissor while visualizing the bladder fibers. The full thickness of the posterior BN should be incised at the junction between the prostate and the bladder. The dissection is directed posteriorly and slightly cranially to expose the seminal vesicles.

Bladder neck preservation (BNP) is one variation of the BN dissection that has been associated with advantages like a lower risk of BN contracture [8] and earlier return to postoperative continence, but it has been postulated that it may increase the likelihood of PSM [9].

The first randomized, controlled, single blind trial comparing patients undergoing complete BNP with controls without preservation during ORP and RARP found that BNP was associated with significantly higher early and overall continence rates, and better quality of life outcomes without compromising cancer control [10]. In 2014, Lee et al. proposed a “graded” BNP during RARP, from grade 1 (wide BN dissection that necessitates BN reconstruction) to grade 4 (tight as possible BN dissection) [11]. The author underlined that a too distal dissection may compromise oncologic control by leaving residual prostatic tissue; a too proximal dissection may leave a large BN necessitating time-consuming BN reconstruction. In this study, BNP was an independent predictor of continence at 3 months, but not at 1 year; there was no difference among the four groups in PSM rates.

Bladder Neck Reconstruction

BNP is not possible in all patients. In these circumstances, some have shown improved urinary continence with bladder neck reconstruction (BNR). In case of large prostate and/or median lobes or previous endoscopic resection of prostate, a wide BN is frequently created.

In these cases, it is essential to protect the ureteral orifices and to reduce the BN diameter before the vesico-urethral anastomosis. The BN plication stitch (a single suture to plicate the BN in a figure of 8 fashion after the vesicourethral anastomosis) proposed by Lee et al. was associated with shorter mean time to reach total continence and higher total continence at 1 month and 12 months [12]. Patel’s team described a modified transverse plication for BNR: a bilateral plication over the lateral aspect of the bladder. The suture begins laterally and runs medially until the BN size matches that of the urethra [13].

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 21, 2017 | Posted by in UROLOGY | Comments Off on Tips to Preserve Continence During Robotic Radical Prostatectomy

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access