Abstract
A thorough history and physical examination is needed to establish a cardiac risk assessment. Guideline-driven management of the patient’s cardiac conditions pre- and postoperatively is essential. The first step in evaluation of the patient is to define the cardiac risk factors, which include: coronary artery disease (CAD), congestive heart failure (CHF), valvular heart disease (VHD), arrhythmia and conduction disorders, cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED), and pulmonary vascular disease. The 2014 ACC/AHA Perioperative Clinical Practice Guideline outlines a stepwise approach for perioperative cardiac assessment. Patients with unstable coronary syndromes, decompensated CHF, and unstable arrhythmias should be treated prior to elective surgeries. In patients who are stable, several risk stratification tools are available to estimate the perioperative risk. In patients with coronary artery stenting, the decision on timing of surgery and dual antiplatelet therapy involve the type of surgery, risk of delaying the surgery, risk of stent thrombosis and ischemia, and the risk of bleeding. The surgeon and consultants should closely coordinate the pre- and postoperative care.
Keywords
Coronary artery disease, Drug eluting coronary stents, Dual antiplatelet therapy, Systolic and diastolic congestive heart failure, Aortic stenosis, Supraventricular tachycardia, Ventricular tachycardia, Cardiac implantable electronic devices, Pulmonary hypertension
Key Points
- 1.
A careful history and physical examination may identify underlying cardiac disease.
- 2.
Patients with coronary artery stenting should have close coordination between the cardiology consultant and surgical team in order to determine appropriate antiplatelet therapy management.
- 3.
Patients with decompensated congestive heart failure have an increased operative risk and should be medically optimized prior to surgery.
- 4.
Patients with valvular heart disease should be evaluated for changes in their clinical status. Transvalvular aortic valve replacement is an option available for severe aortic stenosis in certain patients.
- 5.
Patients with unstable cardiac arrhythmias should be treated prior to surgery.
- 6.
A wide variety of cardiac implantable electronic devices are available. An appropriate prescription for perioperative management of the device should be established prior to surgery.
- 7.
Patients with pulmonary hypertension should be managed by experts perioperatively.
Introduction
Careful perioperative evaluation of a patient undergoing surgery combines clinical assessment with current clinical practice guidelines (CPG). The CPGs translate scientific evidence into guidelines that standardize cardiovascular care. These guidelines assess the strength and quality of evidence using evidence-based methodologies . Defining the patient’s perioperative risk in the context of CPGs and communicating this with the patient, surgeon, anesthesiologist, and other caregivers is essential. Using this approach, the patient and surgical team can understand the perioperative cardiovascular risk in the context of the anticipated surgery.
In 2014, the Guideline on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Management of Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery was updated . This guideline combined with other disease specific CPGs and statements provide the reference for this chapter.
Timing and Surgical Risk
It is important for the cardiology consultant to understand the timing and risk of a surgery. An emergency surgery is required within six hours when life or limb is threatened. An urgent procedure will need to be performed within 6 to 24 hours. This will allow for a limited evaluation and optimization of the patient’s risk factors. A time-sensitive procedure, >1 week to 6 weeks, will allow for evaluation and management of a patient in order to avoid potential complications. An elective procedure can be delayed for up to one year ( Table 3.1 ).
Definition | Time |
---|---|
Emergency | <6hours |
Urgent | 6-24 hours |
Time-Sensitive | 1-6 weeks |
Elective | Up to 1 year |
A low risk procedure is when the combined surgical patient characteristics have a <1% risk of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) of death or myocardial infarction (MI). A ≥1% MACE is considered an elevated risk procedure .
Evaluating the Patient and Risk Stratification
Defining the patient’s clinical risk factors is the first step in risk assessment. Clinical risk factors include: coronary artery disease (CAD), congestive heart failure (CHF), valvular heart disease (VHD), arrhythmia and conduction disorders, cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED), and pulmonary vascular disease.
The 2014 ACC/AHA Perioperative Clinical Practice Guideline outlines a stepwise approach for perioperative cardiac assessment for CAD ( Fig. 3.1 ). For emergent surgeries, the patient should proceed directly to the operating room. In elective or time sensitive procedures, patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), symptomatic arrhythmias, new exacerbation of CHF, or symptomatic valvular disease should be managed according to the appropriate CPG prior to surgery.
For patients who are otherwise stable, there are several risk stratification tools available to estimate the perioperative risk. The Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) incorporates high-risk surgery (intraperitoneal, intrathoracic, or suprainguinal vascular), history of ischemic heart disease, history of CHF, history of cerebrovascular disease, history of diabetes requiring preoperative insulin, and preoperative creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dl to establish a perioperative risk . The rates of complication in patients with 0, 1, 2, or ≥3 risk factors are 0.4%, 0.9%, 7%, and 11% respectively. The American College of Surgeons NSQIP MICA risk prediction rule incorporates different surgical sites and predicts the risks for cardiac arrest or myocardial infarction (MI) ( http://www.surgicalriskcalculator.com/miorcardiacarrest ) . The American College of Surgeons NSQIP Surgical risk calculator uses the current procedural terminology code along with 21 specific patient variables ( http://riskcalculator.facs.org/ ) .
Patients with a perioperative risk < 1% can usually proceed to surgery without any further risk stratification. Patients with a perioperative risk ≥ 1% should have an assessment of their functional capacity. Functional capacity is expressed in terms of metabolic equivalents (METs). One MET is the resting oxygen consumption for a 70 kg, 40-year-old male. An excellent functional capacity, defined as > 10 METs, includes strenuous sports such as singles tennis or basketball. Good functional capacity, 7-10 METs, includes activities such as jogging. Moderate functional capacity, 4-6 METs, includes heavy housework, climbing a flight of stairs, walking up a hill, or walking for 4 miles per hour (mph) on a level surface. Examples of poor functional capacity, ≤4 METs, include walking at 2-3 mph or light housework ( Table 3.2 ). Patients who have a moderate or excellent functional capacity can proceed with surgery without any further testing. Patients with an unknown or poor functional capacity undergoing high-risk surgery may require further cardiac testing if the results will change management. Patients with a poor exercise tolerance have a higher incidence of perioperative complications .
Coronary Artery Disease
Preoperative
A MI that occurred within six months of planned noncardiac surgery is considered recent . Data shows that the rates of postoperative MI decreased as the length of time from the cardiac event to surgery increased . Surgery should take place at least 60 days after the last cardiac event . Furthermore, the patient’s age also plays an important role. Patients over 55 years of age have a greater prevalence of cardiac risk factors which increases their overall risk for MACE . Patients over the age of 65 have an increased risk of acute ischemic stroke undergoing noncardiac surgery .
Routine revascularization prior to noncardiac surgery to reduce perioperative cardiac events is not recommended . The Coronary-Artery Revascularization before Elective Major Vascular Surgery trial demonstrated that revascularization before elective major vascular surgery does not improve long-term survival . Furthermore, there was no significant reduction in MACE postoperatively. In this trial, patients with clinically significant, stable coronary disease were randomized to undergo coronary revascularization or medical therapy. Patients were carefully screened and those with coronary artery disease not amenable to revascularization, ≥ 50% stenosis of the left main coronary artery, left ventricular ejection fraction <20%, and severe aortic stenosis (AS) were excluded.
Indications for revascularization prior to surgery include: high risk coronary anatomy such as left main disease, unstable angina, MI, or arrhythmias that are ischemic in origin. Patients who require revascularization prior to surgery should be treated according to the CPG for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous intervention (PCI) .
In patients who underwent a drug eluting stent (DES) who now require surgery, the decision to continue aspirin or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) should be individualized. DAPT includes an aspirin and a P2Y 12 platelet receptor-inhibitor, which includes clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor. Non-operative risk factors for DES thrombosis include: premature discontinuation of DAPT, diabetes, renal failure, low ejection fraction, advanced age, and procedural characteristics. These include type of DES, bifurcation and ostial lesions, long stent length, multiple stents, overlapping stents, small-diameter vessels and suboptimal results such as coronary dissection or under expansion . In the operative setting, multiple factors such as coronary vasospasm, activation of inflammatory pathways, increase in catecholamine secretion, reduction in tissue plasminogen activator, and increased platelet activation and shear stress may also lead to acute stent thrombosis.
In the nonoperative setting, the rates of stent thrombosis with newer-generation DES is low . Several trials have shown that there was no significant difference in the rates of stent thrombosis in patients treated with 3 to 6 months of DAPT as compared to patients treated with longer durations . In the operative setting, studies showed that the risk of stent thrombosis is greater when the surgery is performed soon after stent implantation. The risk of thrombosis was 3.5% within 6 weeks of stent (BMS and first generation DES stents- sirolimus and paclitaxel) implantation and 1% at 6 and 24 months . In a meta-analysis of 839 patients with DES, 2.3% had stent thrombosis within six months of implantation, 1.7% within 6 to 12 months, and 0.86% >12 months after implantation .
The 2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease has updated the recommendations of DAPT perioperatively . The decision on timing of surgery and DAPT therapy involve the type of surgery, risk of delaying the surgery, risk of stent thrombosis and ischemia, and the risk of bleeding. In situations where noncardiac surgery needs to be performed urgently, balloon angioplasty may be required and surgery should be postponed for at least 14 days . Patients who had recent BMS stent implantation, surgery should be delayed for at least 30 days. Patients with DES placed within the first 3 months should have their surgery delayed. Proceeding with surgery within the first 3 to 6 months may be considered if the risk of delaying surgery is greater than the risk of stent thrombosis (Class IIb). Patients with DES implanted ≥ 6 months can proceed with surgery (Class I) ( Table 3.3 ).
Balloon Angioplasty | Delay surgery for at least 14 days (Class I) |
BMS stent | <30 days, Delay surgery for at least 30 days, continue ASA (Class I) |
≥30 days, Proceed with surgery | |
DES stent | <3 months, Delay surgery |
3-6 months, Proceed based on risk vs. benefits (Class IIb) | |
>6 months, Proceed with surgery (Class I) |
In those situations where discontinuation of P2Y 12 platelet receptor-inhibitor therapy is required, aspirin should be continued if surgically feasible. The risk of bleeding with DAPT therapy is most likely to be higher than aspirin alone or no antiplatelet therapy but the degree of increase is currently unclear . Clopidogrel and ticagrelor should be stopped 5 days prior to surgery, and prasugrel should be stopped 7 days prior to surgery . Restarting P2Y 12 platelet receptor-inhibitor therapy should be done as soon as the patient is surgically stable .
Postoperative
Perioperative MI is a common complication of major noncardiac surgery. A perioperative MI increases the risk of cardiac morbidity and mortality . Myocardial infarction can be diagnosed based on clinical symptoms, electrocardiographic (ECG) findings, measurement of biomarkers, and imaging. The Third Universal Definition of an MI is defined as detection of a rise and/or fall of cardiac biomarkers with at least one value above the 99 th percentile upper reference limit and with at least one of the following: 1) symptoms of ischemia; 2) new or presumed new significant ST-segment-T-wave changes or new left bundle branch block (LBBB); 3) development of pathological Q waves in the ECG; 4) imaging evidence of new loss of viable myocardium or new regional wall motion abnormality; and, 5) identification of an intra-coronary thrombus by angiography or autopsy .
Patients with a perioperative MI and myocardial injury that do not fulfill the Third Universal Definition of a MI have a worse short and long-term outcome . Myocardial infarction is classified in five categories. A spontaneous MI (Type 1) is due to atherosclerotic plaque rupture resulting in intraluminal thrombus . A Type 2 MI is due to an ischemic imbalance. Myocardial injury with necrosis occurs when the demand for myocardial oxygen is greater than the supply. Cardiac death due to myocardial infarction is classified as Type 3. Type 4 and 5 are related to peri-procedural injury in the setting of PCI or CABG respectively. While most perioperative MIs are usually Type 2, clinicians should be vigilant for Type 1 MIs.
Biomarkers of cardiac necrosis include cardiac troponin (T or I) or the MB fraction of creatinine kinase. It is important to distinguish between a rise and/or fall of biomarkers from a chronic elevation. Blood samples should be drawn on first assessment and then repeated 3-6 hours later. The measurement of troponin levels is recommended in the setting of signs or symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischemia or MI (CIass I) . The routine use of biomarkers in patients without signs or symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischemia or MI is not recommended (Class III).
ECG manifestations of acute MI ( Figs. 3.2 and 3.3 ) are defined as: 1) new ST elevation at the J point in 2 continuous leads with the cut-point ≥1 mm in all leads other than leads V2-V3. These leads require ≥ 2 mm in men ≥40 years, ≥ 2.5 mm in men <40 years, or ≥ 1.5 mm in women . In patients with a concern for left circumflex ischemia, leads can be positioned in the left posterior axillary line (V7), left mid-scapular line (V8), and the left paraspinal border (V9). In patients with a suspected inferior or right ventricular infarction, leads can be placed in the right V3 and V4 positions. In addition, ST depression in ≥2 precordial leads (V1–V4) may indicate transmural posterior injury. Multilead ST depression with coexistent ST elevation in lead aVR has been described in patients with left main or proximal left anterior descending artery occlusion . In addition, patients may also present with a new LBBB. In those patients with an existing LBBB, the Sgarbossa criteria can be used: 1) ST-elevation ≥1 mm and concordant with QRS complex (5 points); 2) ST segment depression ≥ 1 mm in lead V1, V2 or V3 (3 points); and, 3) ST-elevation ≥ 5 mm and discordant with QRS complex (2 points). A score of more than 3 points has a 98% specificity .
With the exception of a true posterior myocardial infarction, the absence of persistent ST-elevation is suggestive of non-ST segment acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). These patients can be categorized on the basis of elevated cardiac biomarkers. Patients with elevated cardiac biomarkers in the appropriate clinical context are considered to have non-ST segment myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). ECG changes such as ST depression, transient ST elevation, and/or prominent T-wave inversions may be present but are not required for a diagnosis of NSTEMI. Patients with clinical symptoms but with no elevations in cardiac biomarkers are considered to have unstable angina (UA) .
Currently, there is little data on the management of myocardial infarction and injury in the post-operative setting. In patients who fulfill the diagnostic criteria for an acute MI, immediate consultation with a cardiologist, cardiac catheterization laboratory, and surgical team should be done in order to facilitate immediate revascularization when possible. These patients should receive guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) according to the AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction . Patients who develop NSTE-ACS following noncardiac surgery should receive GDMT with limitations imposed by the specific surgical procedure and the severity of the NSTE-ACS .
Congestive Heart Failure
Preoperative
Heart failure is a diverse clinical syndrome due to any structural or functional impairment of left ventricular filling or ejection of blood . Patients with heart failure can have a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, <40%, (HFrEF), or a heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, >50%, (HFpEF) . Common symptoms include fatigue, orthopnea, shortness of breath either at rest or exertion, dyspnea, tachypnea, cough, lower extremity edema, increasing abdominal girth or discomfort, and loss of appetite. Prior to surgery, the presence of pulmonary or systemic congestion should be determined. Patients with pulmonary congestion may have rales, dullness to percussion, or diminished breath sounds. However typical lung exam findings may be absent in patients with elevated left ventricular filling pressures due to compensatory changes in lymphatic and perivascular tissue. The presence of increased jugular venous pressure (JVP) has a good sensitivity (70%) and specificity (79%) for estimating an increased left ventricular filling pressure . Patients with decompensated CHF should be treated according to GDMT for heart failure . A two-dimensional echocardiogram should be performed in patients who have newly diagnosed heart failure, develop a significant clinical change, or receive treatment that affects cardiac function.
Postoperative
Patients with active or stable heart failure have an increased risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality . The presence of a severely decreased, <30%, left ventricular ejection fraction, is an independent risk factor in perioperative outcome and increased long-term mortality in patients undergoing elevated-risk noncardiac surgery .
There is limited data on the use of pulmonary artery catheters perioperatively. The routine use of pulmonary artery catheters perioperatively is not recommended . They may be considered in patients who are unable to have medical conditions that may affect hemodynamics corrected prior to surgery . According to the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure, pulmonary artery catheters should be used in those patients who have respiratory compromise or impaired perfusion that cannot be adequately assessed clinically (Class I) .
Valvular Heart Disease
Preoperative
Since the progression of VHD may be slow, patients may not exhibit symptoms due to a gradual decrease in their daily activities. A detailed examination may reveal signs of severe VHD. Echocardiography is recommended in patients with suspected moderate or greater degree of stenosis or regurgitation who have not had an echocardiogram within one year or who exhibit a change in their clinical status on examination . In patients who meet the criteria for treatment of the valvular disease, intervention prior to elective surgery is indicated .
Patients who have severe AS should be evaluated for a change in their clinical symptoms. The Class I recommendations for aortic valve intervention include: 1) symptomatic patients; 2) asymptomatic patients with severe AS with a LVEF <50%; and, 3) patients with severe AS who are undergoing other cardiac surgery . Options for treatment include surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and balloon valvuloplasty. Current indications for TAVR include patients who have a prohibitive surgical risk and a predicted post-TAVR survival of >12 months. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty may be considered as a bridge to SVAR or TAVR in those patients who require emergent or urgent surgery (Class IIb) .
Patients with severe mitral stenosis (MS) should also be evaluated prior to surgery. Class I indications for intervention include patients who are symptomatic. Patients with suitable anatomy can undergo a percutaneous mitral balloon commissurotomy.
Patients with chronic aortic insufficiency and chronic mitral insufficiency should be managed according to the Guidelines for Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease .
Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) have unexplained asymmetric pattern of hypertrophy associated with non-dilated ventricular chambers in the absence of a cardiac or systemic disorder that could explain the hypertrophy . Based on echocardiography, HCM is defined by an end-diastolic wall thickness ≥ 1.5 cm in any myocardial segment accompanied by a normal wall thickness in the other segments. The complex pathophysiology of HCM includes: left-ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction, diastolic dysfunction, myocardial ischemia, autonomic dysfunction, mitral regurgitation, and atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Patients may have an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) if there is a history of cardiac arrest, ventricular fibrillation, or hemodynamically significant ventricular tachycardia . There are no large trials examining perioperative risk. However, retrospective data suggests that patients with HCM have an increased operative risk. In one study with 227 patients with HCM, the presence of HCM tripled the risk of perioperative MI and death .
Except in highest risk patients, prophylactic antibiotics are not recommended for patients with VHD undergoing genitourinary (GU) procedures (Class III) . Antibiotic therapy may be reasonable prior to elective cystoscopy or other urinary tract procedures in patients who are at highest risk for endocarditis with an enterococci urinary tract infection or colonization (Class IIb) . Highest risk patients include: 1) prosthetic cardiac valve; 2) previous infective endocarditis; 3) congenital heart disease (CHD)- unrepaired cyanotic disease, completely repaired CHD with prosthetic material or device during the first six months, repaired CHD with residual defects; and, 4) cardiac transplantation recipients who develop cardiac valvulopathy. If they require urgent procedures, treatment with an antimicrobial effective against enterococci may also be reasonable (Class IIb) .
Postoperative
Patients with AS have a fixed obstruction to forward blood flow. During anesthesia, a decrease in vascular resistance results in hypotension due to an inability to increase cardiac output. This results in an ischemic cascade due to a decrease in coronary perfusion resulting in a further decline in cardiac output. Atrial arrhythmias in the setting of severe AS also lead to hypotension due to the loss of atrial contractility. Patients with severe symptomatic AS undergoing nonemergent procedures had a 2.1% 30-day mortality compared to 1% in patients without severe AS . In addition, there is an increased frequency of postoperative MI. In emergent and urgent noncardiac surgery, patients with severe AS had a 5.9% mortality .
In patients with MS, tachycardia, either sinus tachycardia or atrial arrhythmias, should be avoided. A rapid ventricular rate will lead to a decrease in diastolic filling time leading to an increase in left atrial pressure, resulting in pulmonary edema. In addition, judicious use of intravenous fluids should be used perioperatively to avoid pulmonary edema.
Perioperatively, in patients with aortic or mitral insufficiency, adequate preload should be maintained and significantly elevated blood pressures should be avoided.
In patients with HCM, the effects of anesthesia, perioperative volume loss, arterial vasodilatation, and tachycardia may increase the degree of LVOT obstruction resulting in decreased cardiac output. In addition, increased contractility, such as the use of inotropic agents, will also increase the degree of LVOT obstruction. Maneuvers to improve hypotension include intravenous fluids and beta-blockers. Drugs that increase systemic vascular resistance without increasing heart rate or contractility, such as phenylephrine and vasopressin, can also be used . Perioperative atrial fibrillation may also lead to hemodynamic compromise due to the loss of atrial kick. Pharmacologic or direct current cardioversion may be required.
Arrhythmias
Preoperative
Patients may have supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmias. Patients with unstable atrial or ventricular arrhythmias should be referred to a cardiologist prior to surgery.
Supraventricular tachycardias (SVT) are a group of arrhythmias with atrial and/or ventricular rates above 100 beats per minute (bpm) with a mechanism that occurs at or above the bundle of His . This definition excludes atrial fibrillation. Patients with SVT may present with palpitations, panic or anxiety, neck pulsations, lightheadedness, or syncope. Patients may have hemodynamic instability due to the presence of a SVT regardless of the ventricular rate . Patients may be managed medically or undergo catheter-based ablation.
Atrial fibrillation involves uncoordinated atrial activation resulting in an ineffective atrial contraction. ECG manifestations include: 1) irregular atrial activity, 2) absence of distinct P waves; and, 3) irregular R-R intervals . Atrial fibrillation can be paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation terminates spontaneously or with intervention within seven days of onset. Episodes may occur with variable frequency. Persistent atrial fibrillation is continuous atrial fibrillation that is longer than seven days but less than 12 months. Permanent atrial fibrillation is characterized when the patient or physician has decided to defer further attempts to maintain sinus rhythm . Patients may be treated with beta-blockers, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, or antiarrhythmic medications. In addition, patients should be treated with anti-thrombotic therapy in order to prevent thromboembolism. For patients with a CHA 2 DS 2 -Vasc score (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years [2 points], diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or TIA or thromboembolism [2 points], vascular disease, age 65 to 74 years, female sex), ≥1 oral anticoagulation is recommended . Options for anticoagulation include aspirin, warfarin, and target-specific oral anticoagulants. These include a direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran, and direct factor Xa inhibitors, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban. There is limited data on bridging with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin . There is also limited data on the management of direct thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors perioperatively. The timing of cessation of and resumption of therapeutic coagulation should be guided by the individual risks and benefits.
Patients may have an SVT due to an accessory pathway. Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome is characterized by patients who have SVT and ventricular pre-excitation on ECG, short PR and delta wave ( Fig. 3.4 ). Patients may also have an accessory pathway that is not evident on the 12-lead ECG (concealed accessory pathway) .
Patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) should be evaluated by a cardiologist in order to determine whether the patient is stable and an appropriate surgical candidate.
Postoperative
Patients who develop tachycardia postoperatively should have a 12-lead ECG. An ECG that reveals a wide complex tachycardia may either have VT or SVT with abnormal conduction. SVT with abnormal conduction may occur in the setting of existing bundle branch block or intraventricular conduction defect, aberrant conduction due to tachycardia, electrolyte and metabolic disorders, conduction over an accessory pathway, paced rhythm, or artifact . It is important to differentiate SVT from VT since the administration of diltiazem or verapamil may result in hemodynamic instability in the setting of VT or atrial fibrillation with pre-excitation. Patients with pre-excitation who develop arrhythmias postoperatively should be managed in consultation with a cardiologist.
Class I recommendations for acute treatment of patients with SVT include vagal maneuvers, adenosine ( Fig. 3.5 ), and synchronized cardioversion for hemodynamically unstable SVT or when pharmacologic therapy is contraindicated .
Patients who develop complex ventricular ectopy such as ventricular tachycardia should be evaluated for myocardial ischemia, electrolyte abnormalities, or adverse effects from medications.
Bradyarrhythmias postoperatively may be due to sleep apnea, electrolyte abnormalities, myocardial ischemia, medications, or due to increased vagal tone factors such as pain .
Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices
Preoperative
There are a wide variety of CIEDs available. Communication between the CIED and surgical teams is required to develop an individualized treatment plan.
Device interaction is generally electrical interference from nonphysiologic electrical sources, such as electrocautery, or rarely direct damage to the generator or leads . In patients undergoing monopolar surgery, inhibition of pacing and inappropriate activation of anti-tachycardia therapies may occur. Patients who have an inhibition of pacing may experience hemodynamic instability. In patients with ICDs, over-sensing results in inhibition of pacing and inappropriate ICD therapy. This includes both anti-tachycardic pacing therapy and ICD shocks. Uncommonly, electrical reset of the pulse generator, permanent damage or failure of the pulse generator, and damage to the lead-myocardial interface may occur .
Prior to surgery, the CIED team should be notified of the type of procedure, anatomic location, use of monopolar electrosurgery, other sources of electromagnetic interference (EMI), surgical venue, post-procedural recovery, and any unusual surgical circumstances. The CIED team will communicate the history of the device, pacemaker (PPM) dependency, and the appropriate perioperative CIED recommendations. Patients with pacemakers are recommended to have the device evaluated every 3 to 12 months, and patients with ICD and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) every 3 to 6 months either in person or by remote interrogation . Patients who have had a change in their clinical condition should have their devices reevaluated prior to surgery. Devices near Elective Replacement Time may be unreliable and the generator should be changed prior to surgery.
In general, electrosurgery applied below the umbilicus is unlikely to cause pacemaker or ICD/CRT-D interference as compared to above the umbilicus. The greatest risk of over-sensing occurs when the anatomical surgical site and placement of the return electrode occurs across the CIED and/or leads . In order to minimize the effects on the CIED, patients undergoing TURP should have placement of the return pads on the buttock or thigh. Patients who are pacemaker dependent, asynchronous pacing by programming or placement of a magnet over the pulse generator may be required for most procedures above the umbilicus. Inactivation of ICD detection is recommended for all procedures using monopolar electrosurgery above the umbilicus. Intraoperatively external defibrillation equipment should be available. It is important to note that application of a magnet over an ICD will not protect the patient from EMI inhibition of pacing. Changing the pacing mode will require reprogramming of the ICD. All patients should have plethysmographic or arterial pressure monitoring during the procedure since electrocautery may interfere with electrocardiographic monitoring and interpretation of the patient’s underlying rhythm .
Postoperative
Postoperatively, patients with an ICD should have continuous cardiac monitoring until a member of the CIED team reevaluates the ICD and confirms that the appropriate preoperative settings are restored. This is essential since patients with ICDs are considered to be at risk for ventricular arrhythmias perioperatively . Postoperative assessment of the PPM will depend on the operative environment. Patients who have intraoperative reprogramming, unexpected hemodynamic change, emergent surgery above the umbilicus, procedures that have a possibility of affecting device function, or who are unable to logistically have the device evaluated within one month should have the device evaluated prior to transfer from a cardiac telemetry environment . Unless there was a change in the patient’s clinical status perioperatively, patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate do not need additional CIED evaluation. Patients who require lithotripsy should have their device evaluated within 1 month unless there was a clinical change during the procedure . Patients undergoing monopolar electrosurgery with no unexpected perioperative complications should have their device evaluated within the month either in person or by remote telemetry .
Pulmonary Hypertension
Preoperative
Pulmonary hypertension is defined by the presence of mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥25 mmHg assessed by right heart catheterization . The classification of pulmonary hypertension is based on groups of patients with similar pathological findings, hemodynamic profiles, and management strategies. Patients can be classified as: group 1, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), mPAP≥25 mm Hg with normal pulmonary artery occlusion pressure ≤15 mm Hg and pulmonary vascular resistance above 3 wood units in the absence of pulmonary parenchymal or thromboembolic disease; group 2, pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease; group 3, pulmonary hypertension due to lung diseases and/or hypoxia; group 4, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; and group 5, pulmonary hypertension with unclear or multifactorial mechanisms ( Box 3.1 ) .
- 1.
Pulmonary arterial hypertension
- 1.1
Idiopathic PAH
- 1.2
Heritable PAH
- 1.2.1
BMPR2
- 1.2.2
ALK-1, ENG, SMAD9, CAV1, KCNK3
- 1.2.3
Unknown
- 1.2.1
- 1.3
Drug and toxin induced
- 1.4
Associated with:
- 1.4.1
Connective tissue disease
- 1.4.2
HIV infection
- 1.4.3
Portal hypertension
- 1.4.4
Congenital heart diseases
- 1.4.5
Schistosomiasis
- 1.4.1
- 1′.
Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease and/or pulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis
- 1”.
Persistent PH of the newborn
- 1.1
- 2.
PH due to left heart disease
- 2.1
Left ventricular systolic dysfunction
- 2.2
Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction
- 2.3
Valvular disease
- 2.4
Congenital/acquired left heart inflow/outflow tract obstruction and congenital cardiomyopathies
- 2.1
- 3.
PH due to lung diseases and/or hypoxia
- 3.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- 3.2
Interstitial lung disease
- 3.3
Other pulmonary diseases with mixed restrictive and obstructive pattern
- 3.4
Sleep-disordered breathing
- 3.5
Alveolar hypoventilation disorders
- 3.6
Chronic exposure to high altitude
- 3.7
Developmental lung diseases
- 3.1
- 4.
Chronic thromboembolic PH
- 5.
PH with unclear multifactorial mechanisms
- 5.1
Hematologic disorders: chronic hemolytic anemia, myeloproliferative disorders, splenectomy
- 5.2
Systemic disorders: sarcoidosis, pulmonary histiocytosis, lymphangioleiomyomatosis
- 5.3
Metabolic disorders: glycogen storage disease, Gaucher disease, thyroid disorders
- 5.4
Others: tumoral obstruction, fibrosing mediastinitis, chronic renal failure, segmental PH
- 5.1
BMPR 2, bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2; CAV1, caveolin-1; ENG, endoglin; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; PAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension; PH, pulmonary hypertension
In observational studies, patients with PAH have an increased morbidity and mortality . Risk factors include urgency of surgery, severity of pulmonary hypertension, degree of RV dysfunction, and surgery in a center without expertise in pulmonary hypertension . Given the complex nature of PAH, patients should be managed at a PAH center of excellence . Preoperatively, patients should have a thorough cardiac evaluation and optimization prior to surgery. Signs and symptoms of deterioration may include changes in functional status, presence of elevated jugular venous pressure, congestive heart failure, hypoxia, or syncope. In addition, the patient’s pulmonary hypertension medications and the possibility of additional pulmonary hypertension specific medications should be made available prior to surgery .
Postoperative
Postoperative management requires close coordination between the surgeon and PAH team. Postoperative complications may include respiratory failure, cardiac arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, renal insufficiency, sepsis, hepatic dysfunction, hypertension, cardiac ischemia and stroke .
Perioperative Medical Interventions
Several classes of drugs including beta blockers, statin therapy, alpha agonists, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and antiplatelet therapy have been studied perioperatively. In addition, the use of anticoagulants is also discussed briefly.
Studies have shown that perioperative beta blockers can reduce perioperative cardiac events but were associated with an increased risk of stroke, hypotension and bradycardia . Given this, it is not recommended to start beta-blocker therapy on the day of surgery (Class III) . The current guidelines recommend continuing beta-blockade for patients who are on beta-blockers chronically (Class I). Beta-blockers can be started on those patients who have 3 or more risk factors, such diabetes, renal insufficiency, cerebrovascular accident, heart failure, coronary artery disease, and in patients who are at intermediate-or high-risk for myocardial ischemia (Class IIb) . The beta-blocker should be started 2 to 7 days prior to surgery.
Patients on chronic statin therapy should have them continued perioperatively (Class I) . Alpha-2 agonists, such as clonidine, are not recommended in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery . ACE inhibitors may be continued perioperatively, and if they are held prior to surgery, they should be restarted when the patient is stable .
The benefits of aspirin in non-stented patients undergoing surgery is uncertain. In patients with cerebrovascular disease or increased risk of CAD with no history of coronary stenting, it may be reasonable to continue daily aspirin therapy, where the benefits of decreasing potential cardiovascular events outweigh the risks of perioperative bleeding (Class IIb) . Given data that suggests that aspirin was associated with a higher risk of bleeding and did not reduce the risk of myocardial infarction, the initiation or continuation of aspirin is not recommended in patients undergoing elective noncardiac noncarotid surgery unless the risk of ischemic events outweighs the risks of surgical bleeding (Class III) .
For patients with mechanical mitral valve or mechanical aortic valve with one additional risk factor such as atrial fibrillation, prior thromboembolism, left ventricular dysfunction, older-generation prosthetic aortic valve, or hypercoagulable state, bridging anticoagulation may be appropriate when the risk of surgical bleeding is more than minimal (Class I) . In patients with mechanical valves undergoing minor procedures, continuation of therapeutic anticoagulation is recommended (Class I) . Patients with mechanical aortic valves and no other risk factors for thrombosis, temporary cessation of vitamin K antagonists without bridging can be done as long as the interruption is brief (Class I) . Factor Xa inhibitors and direct thrombin inhibitors are not indicated for mechanical valves.
In patients with atrial fibrillation, the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation does not provide specific perioperative recommendations but recommends an individualized approach .
No guidelines are available for factor Xa inhibitors and direct thrombin inhibitors perioperatively. In patients with normal renal function undergoing elective procedures, it is suggested to discontinue the anticoagulant ≥ 48 hours . In patients on dabigatran requiring urgent reversal, idarucizumab is now available to completely reverse the anticoagulant effects . For patients on vitamin K antagonists, options include fresh frozen plasma, prothrombin complex concentrates, and vitamin K. Vitamin K is not routinely recommended due to the delay in both action and return to a target therapeutic level. As of this writing, there are no approved reversal agents for factor Xa inhibitors.
Timing and Surgical Risk
It is important for the cardiology consultant to understand the timing and risk of a surgery. An emergency surgery is required within six hours when life or limb is threatened. An urgent procedure will need to be performed within 6 to 24 hours. This will allow for a limited evaluation and optimization of the patient’s risk factors. A time-sensitive procedure, >1 week to 6 weeks, will allow for evaluation and management of a patient in order to avoid potential complications. An elective procedure can be delayed for up to one year ( Table 3.1 ).
Definition | Time |
---|---|
Emergency | <6hours |
Urgent | 6-24 hours |
Time-Sensitive | 1-6 weeks |
Elective | Up to 1 year |
A low risk procedure is when the combined surgical patient characteristics have a <1% risk of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) of death or myocardial infarction (MI). A ≥1% MACE is considered an elevated risk procedure .
Evaluating the Patient and Risk Stratification
Defining the patient’s clinical risk factors is the first step in risk assessment. Clinical risk factors include: coronary artery disease (CAD), congestive heart failure (CHF), valvular heart disease (VHD), arrhythmia and conduction disorders, cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED), and pulmonary vascular disease.
The 2014 ACC/AHA Perioperative Clinical Practice Guideline outlines a stepwise approach for perioperative cardiac assessment for CAD ( Fig. 3.1 ). For emergent surgeries, the patient should proceed directly to the operating room. In elective or time sensitive procedures, patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), symptomatic arrhythmias, new exacerbation of CHF, or symptomatic valvular disease should be managed according to the appropriate CPG prior to surgery.