div class=”ChapterContextInformation”>
29. Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Keywords
Pelvic organ prolapseCystocoeleRectocoeleUterovaginal prolapaseProcidentiaHysterectomyColporraphyColpocliesisPrevalence and Effects of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
The true prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is not known, this is partially because POP is an under-reported condition. Barriers to seeking treatment include embarrassment, lack of awareness of effective treatments and feeling that POP is a normal part of ageing and to be accepted [1].
It is estimated that up to half of all women who have had children may be affected by a degree of POP [2–5]. Large, well-designed epidemiological studies have consistently demonstrated the prevalence at rates of around 50% [2–5]. In older parous women (aged over 68 years) up to 97% have been demonstrated to have prolapse on clinical examination [5]. There is, however, a large difference between the number of women objectively demonstrated to have POP on clinical examination and those who experience bothersome symptoms. It have been shown that POP when defined by symptoms may have a prevalence as a low as 6% [6].
The lifetime risk of surgery for prolapse in women was been shown to be around 11–12% [7, 8] and these numbers have been quoted in many studies. However, more recent studies have suggested that by the time women reach their ninth decade, rates of up to 19% in Australia [9] and 20% in the United States have been reported [10]. Despite heterogeneity in these types of studies, including different patient populations, indications for surgery and type of healthcare system, this still makes POP one of the most common indications for surgery in women.
Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse has been demonstrated to have a significant impact on quality of life [11, 12], as it can impair both physical and social activities, as well as impacting on relationships and sexual function [13, 14].
Women with POP may reduce physical activities as a result of prolapse symptoms, or for fear that such activity may cause the POP to worsen or progress. POP may contribute to social isolation and withdrawal from physical exercise.
The relationship between prolapse and sexual function is now well understood. Both women and their partners have been shown to avoid sexual activity due to POP. Affected women may be aware of ‘something coming down’ or ‘in the way’ during sex as well as reduced sensation and reduced overall satisfaction with sex. A large systematic review showed that sexual function generally improves following prolapse surgery [15].
The relationship between prolapse and body image is a newer area of research. Prolapse has been shown to impact negatively on body image in a number of studies [12, 16–18] and prolapse surgery has been shown to improve body image [19].
Assessments of the impact of prolapse symptoms on quality of life, sexual function and body image are important in the evaluation of women with POP.
Aetiology of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
A simple understanding of functional pelvic anatomy is useful for understanding both the aetiology and pathophysiology of POP.
Delancey’s three levels of pelvic support from DeLancey JO. Anatomie aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1992 Jun 1;166(6):1717–28
Level 1: The uterosacral and lateral cervical ligament complex provides attachment of the uterus and the vaginal vault to the bony sacrum. This means that uterine prolapse occurs when this ligament complex breaks and becomes detached or becomes thinner and weakened. |
Level 2: The arcus tendineous fascia of the pelvis and the facia lying over the levator ani muscles provide support to the middle part of the vagina. Damage to this fascia- a fascial defect- contributes to the formation of pelvic organ prolapse of the bladder, bowel and uterus. |
Level 3: The urogenital diaphragm formed of the perianal muscles and the perineal body into which they insert provide support to the lower part of the vagina. Damage to these muscles, and particularly the point of insertion at the perineal body contributes to the formation of pelvic organ prolapse. |
The principal cause of pelvic organ prolapse is damage to the endopelvic fascia, pelvic floor muscles or ligamentous supports of the uterus. Primary damage usually happens to these support structures during pregnancy and childbirth, both through stretching and distension due to the mass effect of pregnancy and the trauma of delivery. Perineal trauma can result in injury of the endopelvic fascia, levator ani muscles and their insertions. Studies using MRI and 3D ultrasound have helped to establish the relationship between levator ani defects, including avulsion, and pelvic organ prolapse, but this remains an understudied area [21]. Significant perineal trauma including third and fourth degree perineal tears, shoulder dystocia and large birth weight are all shown to be independent risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse [22]. Studies showing that caesarean section is protective against pelvic organ prolapse also support parturition being the leading risk factor for development of pelvic organ prolapse [4].
The other primary cause of POP is connective tissue disorders, including Ehlers-Danlos and Marfan’s syndromes. These conditions affect the strength of the structures involved in pelvic organ support and often lead to development of pelvic organ prolapse at a younger age, or when pregnancy has not occurred. POP in a patient who is nulliparous and has normal connective tissue is, however, unusual.
Following initial damage to the supports of the pelvic organs following childbirth or due to connective tissue disorders, increasing age is the best-evidenced risk factor for POP, which has been shown to approximately double with each decade of life [23].
The mechanism for this is thought to be increased laxity and weakness in the pelvic ligaments and musculature. The hypo-oestrogenic environment of the menopause is also likely to be a risk factor for the development of POP, though evidence is conflicting and hormone replacement therapy has not been shown to be protective against POP [24].
Finally, any condition which causes a continual or regular increase in intra-abdominal pressure may contribute to the development of pelvic organ prolapse. This is due to direct pressure on the pelvic floor exacerbating damage caused by childbirth, connective tissue disease or ageing. Obesity, chronic constipation, heavy lifting and chronic cough are all risk factors. Occupations which require frequent heavy lifting or exercise regimes involving heavy weight lifting are known causes. Further lifestyle risk factors include smoking and low socioeconomic status [22]. It has been shown that regular low-impact physical exercise is protective against pelvic organ prolapse [25].
Anatomical Classification of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Types of pelvic organ prolapse
Anterior compartment |
• Urethrocoele- prolapse of the urethra into the vagina |
• Cystocoele- prolapse of the bladder into the vagina |
• Cystourethrocoele- prolapse of both urethra and bladder into the vagina |
Apical compartment |
• Uterine prolapse- descent of the uterus and cervix into the vagina |
• Vaginal vault prolapse- following hysterectomy, descent of the vaginal cuff scar into the vagina |
Posterior compartment |
• Enterocoele- prolapse of the Pouch of Douglas containing small bowel (ileum) into the vagina |
• Rectocoele- prolapse of the rectum into the vagina |
Anterior compartment prolapse is most common, followed by uterine prolapse and posterior compartment prolapse. In the Women’s Health Initiative study, of the 41% of women aged between 50–79 years who had POP; 34% had a cystocoele, 19% had a rectocoele and there was uterine prolapse in 14% [2].
Symptoms of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
POP is often asymptomatic and may be an incidental finding, for example at smear testing or cystoscopy. Symptoms of POP depend on the anatomical site of the prolapse, with different symptoms for anterior compartment POP (bladder) compared to posterior compartment prolapse (rectum). As POP causes symptoms which are embarrassing or taboo in nature, woman may not readily disclose these symptoms during a consultation [26]. Therefore, the use of patient reported outcome measures to assess patient’s symptoms and concerns is invaluable to helping to accurately ascertain the patient’s symptom profile [27–30].
Vaginal Symptoms
The primary symptom of POP is vaginal bulge. Affected women usually see or feel a bulge, lump or ‘something coming down’ inside the vagina or out through the introitus. The bulge may only be felt on direct palpation by the patient, rather than being visible, or may typically protrude on straining, physical activity or at the end of the day. Symptoms are impacted on by the effect of gravity and long periods of standing or physical exercise.
Pelvic pressure with a sensation of heaviness or dragging over the suprapubic area is another common symptom. Crampy low back pain, typically worse at the end of the day or after physical activity is also often reported. If the leading edge of the prolapse is protruding from the vagina and rubbing on underwear or incontinence pads, the vaginal skin on the prolapse may become sore and bleed, in cases of prolonged trauma ulceration may occur. This is a common cause of postmenopausal bleeding and also of microscopic haematuria. Patients with prolapse may well be referred for an urgent cystoscopy yielding an opportunity to identify vaginal trauma or ulceration as a source of bleeding.
Bowel Symptoms
If the prolapse affects the posterior compartment, then problems with evacuation and tenesmus can be bothersome symptoms. Some women use a finger to support the perineum to defecate effectively (perineal splinting), some need to manually evacuate using a finger inserted into the anus or the vagina (digitation). Some will complain of faecal soiling and difficulty getting clean due to trapping of faeces caused by the posterior compartment POP.
Urinary Symptoms
Similarly, voiding problems may occur with anterior compartment prolapse, particularly third degree or severe cases, with women needing to press on their perineum with a finger or press on the anterior vaginal wall to achieve voiding. Patients may find that they need to lean forward on the toilet to void urine effectively and some may complain of a spraying stream. Incomplete emptying and retention of urine may also occur. It is important to consider however, that mild and moderate degrees of prolapse do not usually cause obstruction so resolution of prolapse through surgery or pessary may not improve LUTS in this context.
Overactive bladder symptoms of urgency, frequency and nocturia may also occur. De novo overactive bladder symptoms can occur due to anterior wall prolapse, although the relationship between overactive bladder and anterior wall prolapse is non-linear. Some studies have demonstrated that anterior repair does produce significant improvement in overactive bladder symptoms [31, 32]. This is thought to be due in part to improvements in voiding post cystocoele repair [33]. Not all patients with overactive bladder symptoms in the context of prolapse will improve post-surgery.
Sexual Symptoms
Pelvic organ prolapse has been clearly demonstrated to have a significant negative impact on sexual function. POP can cause dyspareunia, obstructed intercourse, vaginal laxity and resulting loss of or decrease in libido [34–36]. Improvements in sexual function following intervention have been clearly demonstrated [15].
Examination and Classification of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
If a woman presents to a urologist with lower urinary tract symptoms or haematuria which are through to be related to POP, or if a prolapse is found on clinical examination, the patient should be referred for urogynaecological review.
The purpose of examination in a woman with POP symptoms is to assess for the presence of prolapse, assess which compartment(s) are affected and to assess the stage of the prolapse and the strength of the pelvic floor muscles. All of these findings will, along with the woman’s symptom profile, direct the management strategy.
In order to assess POP, initial examination should be undertaken with the woman supine with legs flexed. Firstly, the perineum should be inspected and signs of oestrogen deficiency, such as thin, dry or inflamed skin noted. In order to demonstrate the prolapse, the woman should be asked to cough hard and to strain or ‘bear down’. Reproducing prolapse in a clinical environment can be challenging and examination may be usefully carried out with the patient standing if an obvious prolapse cannot be demonstrated supine. During this assessment, leakage of urine on coughing/straining may also be noted. Treatment should be aimed at dealing with the symptoms the patient finds to be most bothersome; again, the use of self -completed validated questionnaires may be of value in this context.