Malabsorption Syndromes



Malabsorption Syndromes





Malabsorption results from premucosal, mucosal, and postmucosal diseases (Table 6.26). In premucosal diseases, defective digestion and absorption results from pancreatic or other systemic diseases and reduced bile salt concentrations. Mucosal defects result from anatomic or biochemical epithelial alterations, the presence of microorganisms, and inflammatory or infiltrative processes. Postmucosal diseases include malabsorption due to lymphatic obstruction, vascular disease, or congestive heart failure. Mucosal diseases are the most common disorders that a surgical pathologist is likely to encounter. Malabsorption syndromes affect patients
of all ages and the age incidence depends on the etiology. Celiac disease, the most common cause of malabsorption in developed countries, is detected at almost any age. Infectious disease, lactase deficiency, and nutrient deficiencies are the most common causes of malabsorption in the developing world. In an ideal world, the pathologist should be supplied with relevant clinical information, including results of laboratory or serologic tests, before attempting to arrive at a specific diagnosis. Information that allows the pathologist to make the most useful interpretation of the biopsy specimens is listed in Table 6.27.








TABLE 6.25 Host Factors that Influence Outcome of Travelers’ Diarrhea




Drugs
   Digitalis
   Lithium
   Diuretics
   Immunosuppressive agents
Immunodeficiency
Decreased gastric acidity
Stroke
Inflammatory bowel disease
Previous high susceptibility to travelers’ diarrhea








TABLE 6.26 Causes of Malabsorption




Inadequate digestion
   Postgastrectomy steatorrhea
   Deficient activation of pancreatic lipase
   Chronic pancreatitis
   Pancreatic carcinoma
   Cystic fibrosis
   Pancreatic resection
Reduced intestinal bile salt concentration (with impaired micelle formation)
   Parenchymal liver disease
   Cholestasis (intrahepatic or extrahepatic)
   Blind loop syndrome
   Interrupted enterohepatic circulation of bile salts
   Ileal resection or inflammation
   Drugs that sequester or precipitate bile salts
Inadequate absorptive surface secondary to surgical procedures
Lymphatic obstruction
   Intestinal lymphangiectasia
   Whipple disease
   Lymphoma
Primary mucosal absorptive defects
Inflammatory or infiltrative disorders
   Regional enteritis
   Amyloidosis
   Scleroderma
   Lymphoma
   Radiation enteritis
   Eosinophilic enteritis
   Tropical sprue
   Infectious enteritis
   Collagenous sprue
   Nonspecific ulcerative jejunitis
   Mastocytosis
   Dermatologic disorders (e.g., dermatitis herpetiformis)
Biochemical or genetic abnormalities
   Celiac disease
   Disaccharidase deficiency
   Hypogammaglobulinemia
   Abetalipoproteinemia
   Monosaccharide malabsorption
Failed cell division
   Radiation
   Colchicine
Endocrine and metabolic disorders
   Diabetes mellitus
   Hypoparathyroidism
   Adrenal insufficiency
   Hyperthyroidism
   Zollinger-Ellison syndrome
   Pancreatic insufficiency (Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, gastrinoma)
   Carcinoid syndrome
Cardiovascular disorders
   Constrictive pericarditis
   Congestive heart failure
   Mesenteric vascular insufficiency
   Vasculitis

Small intestinal biopsies can be obtained by either a suction capsule or by forceps after endoscopic visualization. The suction capsule method requires radiographic guidance and is more expensive than the more commonly used forceps biopsy. Focal or patchy lesions can be visualized and biopsied by the endoscopic method. This technique also permits visualization of the gastrointestinal tract and avoids the radiation exposure associated with suction biopsy. However, capsule biopsies are still preferred over endoscopic biopsies by some gastroenterologists, particularly in children younger than 2 years of age.

Either the duodenum or the jejunum is an appropriate site for biopsy, but the biopsy should be procured no more proximal than the second part of the duodenum to avoid artifacts due to prominent Brunner glands or the nonspecific or peptic duodenitis commonly seen in the bulb and proximal duodenum. Unfortunately, more often than not the biopsies derive from the proximal duodenum, a site that is not ideal for the interpretation of villous architecture. It is important to note that the presence of a normal small intestinal biopsy does not exclude many malabsorptive conditions. Conditions with malabsorption and a normal small bowel villous architecture are listed in Tables 6.28 and 6.29.








TABLE 6.27 Information To Be Provided to Pathologists Interpreting Small Bowel Biopsies for Malabsorption




Patient age
Patient sex
Ethnicity
Country of domicile
Travel history
Reason for the biopsy
Drug use
History of associated diseases
   AIDS
   Neoplasias
   Infections
   Metabolic diseases
   Immune deficiencies
   Prior surgery








TABLE 6.28 Malabsorption with Normal-appearing Proximal Jejunal Biopsy




Dermatosis other than dermatitis herpetiformis
Pancreatitis
Alcoholism
Cirrhosis
Hepatitis
Iron deficiency anemia
Ulcerative colitis
Postgastrectomy without bacterial overgrowth
Malignancy outside the gastrointestinal tract
Cholera
Biliary obstruction

Certain factors optimize the diagnostic accuracy of the biopsy interpretation, including (a) careful biopsy handling and orientation, (b) provision of accurate clinical information
to the pathologist, (c) an understanding by the pathologist of the spectrum of normal intestinal histology, and (d) familiarity with the spectrum of small intestinal diseases that may present as malabsorption.


Handling of Small Intestinal Biopsies

It is the clinician who decides when an intestinal biopsy needs to be obtained, but the pathologist and the clinician should work together to decide the best way to utilize and/or fix a given tissue specimen. Once it is decided that histologic interpretation will provide the optimal information, the optimal fixation can be decided, including a decision as to whether it is necessary to perform biochemical, microbiologic, electron microscopic, or immunophenotypic studies.








TABLE 6.29 Malabsorption with Normal Villi but with Diagnostic Features





































Disease Specific Histologic Features
Abetalipoproteinemia Vacuolated enterocytes containing lipids involving upper two thirds of the villi; acanthocytes
Crohn disease Noncaseating granulomas
X-linked immunodeficiency Absent lamina propria plasma cells
Lipid storage disease Vacuolated ganglion cells, capillaries, and macrophages
Amyloidosis Congo red–positive material in muscularis and blood vessels
Chronic granulomatous disease Pigmented vacuolated macrophages in lamina propria
Melanosis Brown pigmented macrophages in lamina propria
Systemic mastocytosis Mast cell infiltrates in lamina propria
Hemochromatosis Iron deposits in epithelium and macrophages
Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare PAS-positive diastase-resistant macrophages containing acid-fast organisms
PAS, periodic acid–Schiff.

A nonfragmented, well-oriented biopsy specimen aids in establishing an accurate diagnosis. Immediate orientation by the gastroenterologist is ideal, but impractical in regular clinical practice. The optimal method of orienting the specimen is to put the base of the mucosa on filter paper and float it upside down in a bottle of fixative, allowing the specimen to float freely with the villi to hang down in a dependent way, thereby minimizing artifactual distortion. This facilitates a more accurate evaluation of the height of the villi and length of the crypts to determine the ratio of these two measurements. Appropriate orientation can also be achieved by scanning under a dissecting microscope. An initial impression of the villous architecture can also be obtained by this method. However, its applicability in clinical practice is limited. In most institutions, adequate orientation is achieved by asking an experienced histotechnologist to embed the biopsies on edge.

Although Bouin, Hollande, or B5 fixatives yield little shrinkage artifact and optimal nuclear detail, most pathology departments use neutral buffered formalin as the fixative. Adequate fixation for histology and superior preservation of DNA for ancillary studies is possible with formalin fixation. Formalin is also inexpensive and easy to discard. There is a lack of consensus among pathologists regarding the number of slides and levels that should be prepared and examined histologically. Examination of multiple sections and levels increases the likelihood of finding patchy changes and well-oriented villi.


Evaluating the Small Intestinal Biopsy

When assessing a biopsy, it is usually best to follow a standardized format so as not to miss disease that may cause the underlying clinical syndrome (Fig. 6.184). This includes an examination of (a) villous height, crypt length, and overall architecture; (b) the lumen; (c) the surface epithelium; (d) crypts; (e) lamina propria constituents; (f) the presence of abnormal deposits; and (g) changes in other layers of the bowel wall. The histologic findings may allow the diagnosis of specific diseases (Table 6.30).

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 22, 2016 | Posted by in GASTROENTEROLOGY | Comments Off on Malabsorption Syndromes

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access