Malabsorption Syndromes
Malabsorption results from premucosal, mucosal, and postmucosal diseases (Table 6.26). In premucosal diseases, defective digestion and absorption results from pancreatic or other systemic diseases and reduced bile salt concentrations. Mucosal defects result from anatomic or biochemical epithelial alterations, the presence of microorganisms, and inflammatory or infiltrative processes. Postmucosal diseases include malabsorption due to lymphatic obstruction, vascular disease, or congestive heart failure. Mucosal diseases are the most common disorders that a surgical pathologist is likely to encounter. Malabsorption syndromes affect patients
of all ages and the age incidence depends on the etiology. Celiac disease, the most common cause of malabsorption in developed countries, is detected at almost any age. Infectious disease, lactase deficiency, and nutrient deficiencies are the most common causes of malabsorption in the developing world. In an ideal world, the pathologist should be supplied with relevant clinical information, including results of laboratory or serologic tests, before attempting to arrive at a specific diagnosis. Information that allows the pathologist to make the most useful interpretation of the biopsy specimens is listed in Table 6.27.
of all ages and the age incidence depends on the etiology. Celiac disease, the most common cause of malabsorption in developed countries, is detected at almost any age. Infectious disease, lactase deficiency, and nutrient deficiencies are the most common causes of malabsorption in the developing world. In an ideal world, the pathologist should be supplied with relevant clinical information, including results of laboratory or serologic tests, before attempting to arrive at a specific diagnosis. Information that allows the pathologist to make the most useful interpretation of the biopsy specimens is listed in Table 6.27.
TABLE 6.25 Host Factors that Influence Outcome of Travelers’ Diarrhea | |
---|---|
|
TABLE 6.26 Causes of Malabsorption | |
---|---|
|
Small intestinal biopsies can be obtained by either a suction capsule or by forceps after endoscopic visualization. The suction capsule method requires radiographic guidance and is more expensive than the more commonly used forceps biopsy. Focal or patchy lesions can be visualized and biopsied by the endoscopic method. This technique also permits visualization of the gastrointestinal tract and avoids the radiation exposure associated with suction biopsy. However, capsule biopsies are still preferred over endoscopic biopsies by some gastroenterologists, particularly in children younger than 2 years of age.
Either the duodenum or the jejunum is an appropriate site for biopsy, but the biopsy should be procured no more proximal than the second part of the duodenum to avoid artifacts due to prominent Brunner glands or the nonspecific or peptic duodenitis commonly seen in the bulb and proximal duodenum. Unfortunately, more often than not the biopsies derive from the proximal duodenum, a site that is not ideal for the interpretation of villous architecture. It is important to note that the presence of a normal small intestinal biopsy does not exclude many malabsorptive conditions. Conditions with malabsorption and a normal small bowel villous architecture are listed in Tables 6.28 and 6.29.
TABLE 6.27 Information To Be Provided to Pathologists Interpreting Small Bowel Biopsies for Malabsorption | |
---|---|
|
TABLE 6.28 Malabsorption with Normal-appearing Proximal Jejunal Biopsy | |
---|---|
|
Certain factors optimize the diagnostic accuracy of the biopsy interpretation, including (a) careful biopsy handling and orientation, (b) provision of accurate clinical information
to the pathologist, (c) an understanding by the pathologist of the spectrum of normal intestinal histology, and (d) familiarity with the spectrum of small intestinal diseases that may present as malabsorption.
to the pathologist, (c) an understanding by the pathologist of the spectrum of normal intestinal histology, and (d) familiarity with the spectrum of small intestinal diseases that may present as malabsorption.
Handling of Small Intestinal Biopsies
It is the clinician who decides when an intestinal biopsy needs to be obtained, but the pathologist and the clinician should work together to decide the best way to utilize and/or fix a given tissue specimen. Once it is decided that histologic interpretation will provide the optimal information, the optimal fixation can be decided, including a decision as to whether it is necessary to perform biochemical, microbiologic, electron microscopic, or immunophenotypic studies.
TABLE 6.29 Malabsorption with Normal Villi but with Diagnostic Features | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
A nonfragmented, well-oriented biopsy specimen aids in establishing an accurate diagnosis. Immediate orientation by the gastroenterologist is ideal, but impractical in regular clinical practice. The optimal method of orienting the specimen is to put the base of the mucosa on filter paper and float it upside down in a bottle of fixative, allowing the specimen to float freely with the villi to hang down in a dependent way, thereby minimizing artifactual distortion. This facilitates a more accurate evaluation of the height of the villi and length of the crypts to determine the ratio of these two measurements. Appropriate orientation can also be achieved by scanning under a dissecting microscope. An initial impression of the villous architecture can also be obtained by this method. However, its applicability in clinical practice is limited. In most institutions, adequate orientation is achieved by asking an experienced histotechnologist to embed the biopsies on edge.
Although Bouin, Hollande, or B5 fixatives yield little shrinkage artifact and optimal nuclear detail, most pathology departments use neutral buffered formalin as the fixative. Adequate fixation for histology and superior preservation of DNA for ancillary studies is possible with formalin fixation. Formalin is also inexpensive and easy to discard. There is a lack of consensus among pathologists regarding the number of slides and levels that should be prepared and examined histologically. Examination of multiple sections and levels increases the likelihood of finding patchy changes and well-oriented villi.
Evaluating the Small Intestinal Biopsy
When assessing a biopsy, it is usually best to follow a standardized format so as not to miss disease that may cause the underlying clinical syndrome (Fig. 6.184). This includes an examination of (a) villous height, crypt length, and overall architecture; (b) the lumen; (c) the surface epithelium; (d) crypts; (e) lamina propria constituents; (f) the presence of abnormal deposits; and (g) changes in other layers of the bowel wall. The histologic findings may allow the diagnosis of specific diseases (Table 6.30).