Inherited Gene Mutations in Gynecological Oncology


Gene mutated

Gene function

General population gene frequency

Associated non-gynecologic cancers/other conditions (male and female)

Ovarian cancer lifetime risk

Endometrial cancer lifetime risk

Other associated gynecologic cancers

Gynecologic surgical prophylaxis and efficacy

Chemo prophylaxis options for gynecologic cancers

Gynecologic surveillance and efficacy

Successful PGD reported

Comment

BRCA genes

BRCA1

dsDNA repair/HR

1 in 800 (AJ 1 in 40)

BC (approx. 60 % by age 70 year for female, lower for male), prostate risk 3-fold, pancreatic risk 2-fold

39–65 %

2 % with tamoxifen use

None

RRSO offers complete protection against tubal and OC risk. Residual (~4 %) risk of PPC remains

COCP may protect against OC but needs to be offset against further increased risk of BC and is not recommended solely for risk-reduction pre-RRSO

6-monthly TVS and CA125a. Evidence of good sensitivity but majority of cancers detected are high stage

Yes

1. Risk of occult cancer detection as a result of RRSO

2. BC risk-reduction if surgery performed premenopausally

3. Mucinous/non-epithelial OC not known to be BRCA-associated

BRCA2

dsDNA repair/HR

1 in 800 (AJ 1 in 40)

BC (approx. 50 % by age 70 year for female, lower for male), prostate risk 5-fold, pancreatic risk 4-fold, melanoma risk 3-fold, stomach 3-fold, gallbladder 5-fold

11–37 %

2 % with tamoxifen use

None

Yes

Lynch syndrome (HNPCC) genes

MLH1

MMR

1 in 600–2,000 (MLH1 50 %, MSH2 40 %, MSH6 7–10 %, PMS2 <5 %, EPCAM 1 %)

CRC, EC, OC, renal pelvis/ureteric cancers, small bowel cancers, sebaceous skin tumors; possible BC and Prostate (BC and prostate risk controversial)

3–33 %

40–60 % (highest risk in MSH6)

None

Hysterectomy + BSO offers complete protection against EC/OC. Case reports of PPC following surgery – uncertain if risk increased

Aspirin may reduce EC risk. Levonorgestrel IUS may reduce EC risk (unproven efficacy) COCP might reduce EC/OC risk (unproven efficacy)

Consider annual TVS and CA125 ± outpatient hysteroscopy + endometrial biopsy (unproven efficacy)

Yes

Bowel surgeons should liaise with gynecologists if patients require surgery for bowel cancer – provides opportunity for hysterectomy + BSO at same time. Prior bowel surgery is not contra-indication to attempt at laparoscopic hysterectomy + BSO

MSH2

MMR

Yes

MSH6

MMR

No

PMS2

MMR

No

EPCAM

Inactivates MSH2

Cowden syndrome

PTEN

Phosphatase

1 in 125,000

BC, thyroid cancer, EC, CRC, renal cancer, Lhermitte–Duclos disease (cerebellar dysplastic gangliocytoma)

General population risk

EC 10–32 %

None

Total hysterectomy and salpingectomy offers complete protection against EC. Consider ovarian preservation depending on patient age. Hysterectomy would need to be done at age 32 to prevent 95 % of EC

Consider levonorgestrel IUS until hysterectomy (unproven efficacy). Theoretically COCP might reduce risk of endometrial cancer. However might also increase risk of breast cancer. No data on efficacy

Consider annual outpatient hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy until has hysterectomy (efficacy unknown)

No

Presents with multiple hamartomas of ectodermal, mesodermal, and endodermal origin

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome

STK11

Protein kinase

1 in 300,000

Breast (45–50 %), colon (39 %), stomach (29 %), pancreas (11–36 %), small bowel (13 %)

18–21 % (mostly sex cord stromal tumors – usually benign)

General population risk

cervix 10 % (minimal deviation adenocarcinoma)

Not currently recommended

No data available

Annual pelvic examination and cervical smear. Consider annual transvaginal ultrasounda

No

1. Sensitivity of cervical smears for adenoma malignum may be less than for cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia

2. In authors’ view, surgical prophylaxis for gynecological cancers should be considered on completion of child-bearing

DICER1 syndrome

DICER1

Ribonuclease

Rare – not known

Pleuropulmonary blastoma, cystic nephroma, nasal chondromesenchymal hamartoma, ocular medulloepithelioma, familial multinodular goiter

Sertoli Leydig tumors of ovary

General population risk

None

Not reported

Not reported

No guidance available

No

Very rare. No data to justify surgical prophylaxis


dsDNA double stranded DNA, HR homologous recombination, MMR mismatch repair, LS Lynch syndrome, EC endometrial cancer, OC ovarian cancer, BC breast cancer, PPC primary peritoneal cancer, CRC colorectal cancer, TVS transvaginal sonography, IUS intra-uterine system, BSO bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, RRSO risk reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, HNPCC hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer syndrome, COCP combined oral contraceptive pill.

aCurrent National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN) recommendations





27.2 Determining Risk


It is good practice to take a family history of cancer when a patient is seen for the first time; criteria are shown in Table 27.2. If this suggests an inherited predisposition, then referral to Clinical Genetics services should be offered. This ensures access to (1) accurate risk-assessment, (2) explanation of genetic testing and its implications (3) enrolment in screening programs and clinical trials and (4) referral to a surgeon experienced in risk-reducing procedures. Identifying a predisposition to cancer can affect the patient’s psychological and physical well-being and has implications for their blood-relatives. This requires sensitive handling.


Table 27.2
Family history criteria suggestive of an inherited germline mutation causing gynecological cancer

















































Families with ovarian or ovarian and breast cancer

 ≥2 individuals with ovarian cancer who are FDRa

 One ovarian cancerb and 1 breast cancer <50 years who are FDRa

 One ovarian cancerb and 2 breast cancers <60 years who are FDRa

 Breast cancer in proband (≤45 years) and mother with both breast and ovarian cancerb (in the same person)

 Breast cancer in proband (≤40 years) and sister with both breast and ovarian cancerb (in the same person)

Families with Lynch syndrome (HNPCC)

 The family contains ≥3 individuals with a HNPCC related cancerc, who are FDR and ≥1 case is diagnosed before 50 years and the cancers affect ≥1 generation

Families with only breast cancer

 ≥4 breast cancers

 3 breast cancers related by FDR: one ≤30 years, or all ≤40 years, or one MBC and one bilateral breast cancer

 Breast cancer in proband (≤50 years) and breast cancer in mother (age of onset being ≤30 years in one and ≤50 years in the other), or bilateral breast cancer in mother (≤40 years onset), or one MBC and one bilateral breast cancer

 Two MBC (one <40 years) in the family and proband is a FDR of one of them

Families with AJ ethnicity

 AJ ethnicity and any one of the following:

 Breast cancer (<40 years) or bilateral breast cancer (first cancer <50 years) in proband, irrespective of family history of cancer

 Breast cancer in proband (<50 years) and one FDR with breast cancer (<50 years) or ovarian cancer (any age) or MBC (any age)

 Breast cancer in proband (<60 years) and one FDR with breast cancer (<40 years) or ovarian cancer (any age) or MBC (any age)

 One FDR with ovarian cancer (<50 years)

 FDR with breast and ovarian cancer in the same woman (any age)

 Two FDR with breast cancer (<40 years)

 Two MBC (<60 years) in the family and proband is a FDR of one of them


FDR first degree relative, NHPCC hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, MBC male breast cancer, AJ Ashkenazi Jewish

aCriteria can be modified where paternal transmission is occurring i.e. families where affected relatives are related by second degree through an unaffected intervening male relative and there is an affected sister

bNB Tubal and primary peritoneal cancers may be considered equivalent to ovarian cancers

cHNPCC related cancers—colorectal, endometrial, ovarian, small bowel, ureteric, renal pelvic

Accurate documentation of the types of cancer in a family and their age of onset is crucial. Where possible cancer registration documents, death certificates or histopathology reports should be obtained. For example, ovarian cancer is reported correctly by family members in only two-thirds of cases [3] and some histological subtypes may not be associated with a genetic cancer predisposition [4]. This information can modify the level of risk. Fabricated family histories have been reported, emphasizing the need to confirm cancer diagnoses [5]. For Lynch syndrome, initial testing is performed on archival tumor samples and these need to be requested. Clinical Genetics services have the infrastructure for obtaining cancer documentation and tumor samples. Surgeons involved in managing women at high risk should liaise closely with them. This is a rapidly evolving field and it is likely that current guidelines on who can be offered genetic testing will be broadened.


27.3 Management Options


For women whose high-risk status is confirmed, the principal management option is risk-reducing surgery (Table 27.1). The decision to undergo surgery will be influenced by a woman’s age, menopausal status and fertility wishes as well as her cancer risk [6]. Women wishing to delay surgery or those who decline surgery altogether, may wish to undergo cancer screening. Currently, no form of gynecological cancer screening has been shown to reduce mortality in high-risk families [7, 8]. If screening is performed, the woman and her clinicians need to be aware of the significant limitations and the possibility of psychological distress [9] and surgery for false-positive results [7]. Lifestyle modifications may affect risk, but should not be relied on to prevent cancer in high-risk women.


27.4 Risk-Reducing Surgery


Risk-reducing surgery is surgery to prevent the occurrence of a specific type of cancer in at-risk women. The term ‘risk-reducing’ is preferred to ‘prophylactic’ as it correctly implies that not all cancers can be prevented. In the case of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) for women at risk of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation-associated tubal and ovarian cancer, RRSO cannot prevent primary peritoneal cancer. RRSO may reduce (but not eliminate) the risk of breast cancer when performed before natural menopause.

Health-care professionals and women considering surgery should understand that risk-reducing surgery is being offered to prevent future ill-health, not to treat an established problem. As cancer penetrance is incomplete, cancer may never develop even if surgery is not performed. There are no tests which can accurately predict whether a woman will go on to develop cancer or not, even if she is high-risk. Once she has understood her risk level she needs to balance this against the risk of surgical complications. Fortunately, the majority of women considering risk-reducing surgery are young and fit.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Mar 18, 2017 | Posted by in UROLOGY | Comments Off on Inherited Gene Mutations in Gynecological Oncology

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access