Gene mutated
Gene function
General population gene frequency
Associated non-gynecologic cancers/other conditions (male and female)
Ovarian cancer lifetime risk
Endometrial cancer lifetime risk
Other associated gynecologic cancers
Gynecologic surgical prophylaxis and efficacy
Chemo prophylaxis options for gynecologic cancers
Gynecologic surveillance and efficacy
Successful PGD reported
Comment
BRCA genes
BRCA1
dsDNA repair/HR
1 in 800 (AJ 1 in 40)
BC (approx. 60 % by age 70 year for female, lower for male), prostate risk 3-fold, pancreatic risk 2-fold
39–65 %
2 % with tamoxifen use
None
RRSO offers complete protection against tubal and OC risk. Residual (~4 %) risk of PPC remains
COCP may protect against OC but needs to be offset against further increased risk of BC and is not recommended solely for risk-reduction pre-RRSO
6-monthly TVS and CA125a. Evidence of good sensitivity but majority of cancers detected are high stage
Yes
1. Risk of occult cancer detection as a result of RRSO
2. BC risk-reduction if surgery performed premenopausally
3. Mucinous/non-epithelial OC not known to be BRCA-associated
BRCA2
dsDNA repair/HR
1 in 800 (AJ 1 in 40)
BC (approx. 50 % by age 70 year for female, lower for male), prostate risk 5-fold, pancreatic risk 4-fold, melanoma risk 3-fold, stomach 3-fold, gallbladder 5-fold
11–37 %
2 % with tamoxifen use
None
Yes
Lynch syndrome (HNPCC) genes
MLH1
MMR
1 in 600–2,000 (MLH1 50 %, MSH2 40 %, MSH6 7–10 %, PMS2 <5 %, EPCAM 1 %)
CRC, EC, OC, renal pelvis/ureteric cancers, small bowel cancers, sebaceous skin tumors; possible BC and Prostate (BC and prostate risk controversial)
3–33 %
40–60 % (highest risk in MSH6)
None
Hysterectomy + BSO offers complete protection against EC/OC. Case reports of PPC following surgery – uncertain if risk increased
Aspirin may reduce EC risk. Levonorgestrel IUS may reduce EC risk (unproven efficacy) COCP might reduce EC/OC risk (unproven efficacy)
Consider annual TVS and CA125 ± outpatient hysteroscopy + endometrial biopsy (unproven efficacy)
Yes
Bowel surgeons should liaise with gynecologists if patients require surgery for bowel cancer – provides opportunity for hysterectomy + BSO at same time. Prior bowel surgery is not contra-indication to attempt at laparoscopic hysterectomy + BSO
MSH2
MMR
Yes
MSH6
MMR
No
PMS2
MMR
No
EPCAM
Inactivates MSH2
Cowden syndrome
PTEN
Phosphatase
1 in 125,000
BC, thyroid cancer, EC, CRC, renal cancer, Lhermitte–Duclos disease (cerebellar dysplastic gangliocytoma)
General population risk
EC 10–32 %
None
Total hysterectomy and salpingectomy offers complete protection against EC. Consider ovarian preservation depending on patient age. Hysterectomy would need to be done at age 32 to prevent 95 % of EC
Consider levonorgestrel IUS until hysterectomy (unproven efficacy). Theoretically COCP might reduce risk of endometrial cancer. However might also increase risk of breast cancer. No data on efficacy
Consider annual outpatient hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy until has hysterectomy (efficacy unknown)
No
Presents with multiple hamartomas of ectodermal, mesodermal, and endodermal origin
Peutz-Jeghers syndrome
STK11
Protein kinase
1 in 300,000
Breast (45–50 %), colon (39 %), stomach (29 %), pancreas (11–36 %), small bowel (13 %)
18–21 % (mostly sex cord stromal tumors – usually benign)
General population risk
cervix 10 % (minimal deviation adenocarcinoma)
Not currently recommended
No data available
Annual pelvic examination and cervical smear. Consider annual transvaginal ultrasounda
No
1. Sensitivity of cervical smears for adenoma malignum may be less than for cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia
2. In authors’ view, surgical prophylaxis for gynecological cancers should be considered on completion of child-bearing
DICER1 syndrome
DICER1
Ribonuclease
Rare – not known
Pleuropulmonary blastoma, cystic nephroma, nasal chondromesenchymal hamartoma, ocular medulloepithelioma, familial multinodular goiter
Sertoli Leydig tumors of ovary
General population risk
None
Not reported
Not reported
No guidance available
No
Very rare. No data to justify surgical prophylaxis
27.2 Determining Risk
It is good practice to take a family history of cancer when a patient is seen for the first time; criteria are shown in Table 27.2. If this suggests an inherited predisposition, then referral to Clinical Genetics services should be offered. This ensures access to (1) accurate risk-assessment, (2) explanation of genetic testing and its implications (3) enrolment in screening programs and clinical trials and (4) referral to a surgeon experienced in risk-reducing procedures. Identifying a predisposition to cancer can affect the patient’s psychological and physical well-being and has implications for their blood-relatives. This requires sensitive handling.
Table 27.2
Family history criteria suggestive of an inherited germline mutation causing gynecological cancer
Families with ovarian or ovarian and breast cancer |
≥2 individuals with ovarian cancer who are FDRa |
One ovarian cancerb and 1 breast cancer <50 years who are FDRa |
One ovarian cancerb and 2 breast cancers <60 years who are FDRa |
Breast cancer in proband (≤45 years) and mother with both breast and ovarian cancerb (in the same person) |
Breast cancer in proband (≤40 years) and sister with both breast and ovarian cancerb (in the same person) |
Families with Lynch syndrome (HNPCC) |
The family contains ≥3 individuals with a HNPCC related cancerc, who are FDR and ≥1 case is diagnosed before 50 years and the cancers affect ≥1 generation |
Families with only breast cancer |
≥4 breast cancers |
3 breast cancers related by FDR: one ≤30 years, or all ≤40 years, or one MBC and one bilateral breast cancer |
Breast cancer in proband (≤50 years) and breast cancer in mother (age of onset being ≤30 years in one and ≤50 years in the other), or bilateral breast cancer in mother (≤40 years onset), or one MBC and one bilateral breast cancer |
Two MBC (one <40 years) in the family and proband is a FDR of one of them |
Families with AJ ethnicity |
AJ ethnicity and any one of the following: |
Breast cancer (<40 years) or bilateral breast cancer (first cancer <50 years) in proband, irrespective of family history of cancer |
Breast cancer in proband (<50 years) and one FDR with breast cancer (<50 years) or ovarian cancer (any age) or MBC (any age) |
Breast cancer in proband (<60 years) and one FDR with breast cancer (<40 years) or ovarian cancer (any age) or MBC (any age) |
One FDR with ovarian cancer (<50 years) |
FDR with breast and ovarian cancer in the same woman (any age) |
Two FDR with breast cancer (<40 years) |
Two MBC (<60 years) in the family and proband is a FDR of one of them |
Accurate documentation of the types of cancer in a family and their age of onset is crucial. Where possible cancer registration documents, death certificates or histopathology reports should be obtained. For example, ovarian cancer is reported correctly by family members in only two-thirds of cases [3] and some histological subtypes may not be associated with a genetic cancer predisposition [4]. This information can modify the level of risk. Fabricated family histories have been reported, emphasizing the need to confirm cancer diagnoses [5]. For Lynch syndrome, initial testing is performed on archival tumor samples and these need to be requested. Clinical Genetics services have the infrastructure for obtaining cancer documentation and tumor samples. Surgeons involved in managing women at high risk should liaise closely with them. This is a rapidly evolving field and it is likely that current guidelines on who can be offered genetic testing will be broadened.
27.3 Management Options
For women whose high-risk status is confirmed, the principal management option is risk-reducing surgery (Table 27.1). The decision to undergo surgery will be influenced by a woman’s age, menopausal status and fertility wishes as well as her cancer risk [6]. Women wishing to delay surgery or those who decline surgery altogether, may wish to undergo cancer screening. Currently, no form of gynecological cancer screening has been shown to reduce mortality in high-risk families [7, 8]. If screening is performed, the woman and her clinicians need to be aware of the significant limitations and the possibility of psychological distress [9] and surgery for false-positive results [7]. Lifestyle modifications may affect risk, but should not be relied on to prevent cancer in high-risk women.
27.4 Risk-Reducing Surgery
Risk-reducing surgery is surgery to prevent the occurrence of a specific type of cancer in at-risk women. The term ‘risk-reducing’ is preferred to ‘prophylactic’ as it correctly implies that not all cancers can be prevented. In the case of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) for women at risk of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation-associated tubal and ovarian cancer, RRSO cannot prevent primary peritoneal cancer. RRSO may reduce (but not eliminate) the risk of breast cancer when performed before natural menopause.
Health-care professionals and women considering surgery should understand that risk-reducing surgery is being offered to prevent future ill-health, not to treat an established problem. As cancer penetrance is incomplete, cancer may never develop even if surgery is not performed. There are no tests which can accurately predict whether a woman will go on to develop cancer or not, even if she is high-risk. Once she has understood her risk level she needs to balance this against the risk of surgical complications. Fortunately, the majority of women considering risk-reducing surgery are young and fit.