Ileal Conduit Construction After Exenteration (Bricker Conduit)
Yuxiang Wen
Scott R. Steele
INDICATIONS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
Each year approximately 40,000 new cases of rectal cancer are diagnosed in the United States, comprising nearly 30% of all colorectal malignancies. Locally advanced rectal cancer may often require an extensive pelvic operation. Despite the increase in sphincter-sparing operations, the abdominoperineal resection (APR) remains the operation of choice for many low-lying rectal cancers, certain recurrent rectal cancers, as salvage therapy for anal cancers, as well as advanced gynecologic and genitourinary malignancies. For tumors that involve adjacent organs requiring multivisceral resection, pelvic exenteration is performed to achieve negative margins in accordance with standard oncologic principles. With exenteration, en bloc resection of the bladder, urethra, and rectum is performed along with the prostate in men, and uterus, ovaries, fallopian tubes, and vagina in women—all to various degrees depending on the individual tumor extent. Although the procedure involves formation of a permanent colostomy for the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, restoration of the genitourinary system requires reconstruction of a new bladder. The ileal conduit is one type of non-continent urinary diversion procedure that was first described by Seiffert in 1935, and subsequently popularized since the 1950s by Bricker and Wallace. Although having certain nuances, it is a relatively straightforward and reproducible technique that has been the most commonly used urinary diversion method after pelvic exenteration for several years. This operation encompasses isolating a loop of distal ileum to create the neo-bladder, attaching the ureters, and restoration of the GI continuity through an ileal-ileal, ileocolic, or ileorectal anastomosis.
Contraindications to the use of an ileal conduit include chronic problems associated with the intestine to include small bowel Crohn’s disease and other inflammatory conditions. It is also contraindicated in patients with renal impairment secondary to long-term obstruction or chronic renal failure. For select patients who require urinary diversion, an alternative to ileal conduit includes an orthotopic bladder substitution.
PREOPERATIVE PLANNING
As with other major operations, a thorough overall assessment of the patient’s cardiac, pulmonary, renal, and hepatic function is necessary before surgery. Depending on the risk stratification, appropriate referral for further testing and treatment should be performed. Several surgical risk calculators are available, such as the American College of Surgeon’s National Surgery Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator (http://riskcalculator.facs.org), and these are valuable to aid in estimating outcomes and in preoperative counseling.
The authors’ and editors’ preference is to use a complete mechanical bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol along with oral antibiotics (neomycin and erythromycin) to try to help reduce the incidence of postoperative ileus, wound infections, and digestive anastomotic dehiscence, as well as clearing the ileal conduit of stool. In addition, we invoke an enhanced recovery pathway for appropriate patients, although almost all patients are able to receive at least some portion. Although enhanced recovery protocols may include anywhere from 8 to 26 different components, almost all begin with detailed patient education on expectations and outcomes in the outpatient setting before pursuing optimal perioperative techniques, early enteral nutrition, and early mobilization. Initially
described by Professor Henrik Kehlet in the setting of open abdominal surgery, the impact of this “fast track” protocol in the setting of a minimally invasive/laparoscopic approach has also demonstrated improved outcomes, even in patients undergoing ileal conduit procedures.
described by Professor Henrik Kehlet in the setting of open abdominal surgery, the impact of this “fast track” protocol in the setting of a minimally invasive/laparoscopic approach has also demonstrated improved outcomes, even in patients undergoing ileal conduit procedures.
The stoma site(s) are marked by an enterostomal therapist before the operation, and stoma therapists play a critical role in education and management in stoma-related issues. Risks and benefits, as well as quality-of-life expectations of living and managing an ileal conduit should be explicitly explained to the patient.
TECHNICAL TIPS
After exenteration and clearance of margins, it is time for construction of the ileal conduit for urinary diversion.
Mobilization and preparation of ureters
First, it is important to recognize the most common place to identify the ureters—crossing the bifurcation of the common iliac vessels. Either a lateral or a medial approach may be used during this portion of the procedure to help identify the structures, and the sacral promontory serves as another landmark to help orientation. Obviously, this step should have been completed before any major vascular ligation or extensive dissection/division during the exenteration portion of the operation (Fig. 42-1). After identification of the course of the bilateral ureters, dissection of the ureters is performed distally with care. The blood supply to the ureter comes in from medially and laterally; therefore, during the mobilization, periureteral soft tissue should be kept with the ureter to preserve the blood supply. Preserving length is another crucial aspect of this step of the procedure, and transection of the ureters should be performed as close to the bladder as possible. We prefer to “tag” the ureters using sutures on the distal end to help identify and retract them at this stage. In addition, medium clips are placed at the distal end to avoid continual spillage of urine and to allow dilatation while the ileal conduit is harvested and prepared.
Preparing the ileal segment for the conduit
Identification of the appropriate segment of the terminal ileum is the next step. If patients have had previous pelvic radiation or prior inflammation/stricture, it is imperative that a segment of unaffected ileum is selected. As stated earlier, Crohn’s disease normally is a contraindication to the use of an ileal conduit. The length of the ileal segment should be adapted to the individual patient’s body habitus, especially for obese patients where a longer segment is typically required to reach through a thick abdominal wall. To avoid metabolic disturbances related to mineral and fat-soluble vitamin absorption, at least 15 cm of terminal ileum should be preserved; therefore, an ileal segment of 12-18 cm in length, leaving an additional adjacent segment proximal to the ileocecal valve is chosen. Gentle traction and manipulation are necessary to avoid any tension or stretch on the conduit.
FIGURE 42-1 Isolation of the ureters. The left ureter generally requires a more proximally extended isolation.
FIGURE 42-2 Illeal conduit harvest. A. An ileal segment 15 cm proximal to the ileocecal valve is isolated. B. It is then placed caudally to the anastomosis of the small bowel.
The mesentery to this section of bowel is trans-illuminated to identify an avascular plane for incision. The selected segment of mesentery is then carefully incised with the help of Kelly clamps and 3-0 ties, or harmonic devices. Care should be taken to avoid injury to any of the major feeding vessels to maintain adequate blood supply to the ileal conduit and surrounding bowel. The mesentery around the bowl with tagged sutures should be delicately dissected to allow placement of GIA stapler or clamps. The bowel is divided, and the distal end of the conduit (which will be exteriorized later) is tagged with a long suture to maintain orientation (Fig. 42-2A). Restoration of the GI continuity is completed by anastomosing the proximal and distal ends of ileum using either staplers or sutures in an end-to-end or (preferably) side-to-side manner (Fig. 42-2B). The senior author prefers to reinforce the staple line with interrupted 3-0 Vicryl sutures in a Lembert manner. The mesenteric window may be closed with running or interrupted dissolvable sutures. This is theoretically to prevent internal hernia development; however, it is important to avoid creating a smaller hole that could more readily induce strangulation or to ligate the blood supply to that segment of the bowel.
Ureteral anastomosis: The new ileal conduit is brought underneath the ileal-ileal anastomosis (Fig. 42-2B). Sterile towels are placed around the ileal conduit. Iodine-soaked sponges may be used to clean the bowel lumen of the conduit. At this point, the next step is either stoma formation or ileoureteral anastomosis. However, because ureteral stents are generally inserted to prevent strictures, we prefer to perform the anastomosis first so that the stent passage is easier. In isolated urologic cases, because there is only cystectomy without colon resection, creation of stoma first would provide more optimal localization and orientation for ileoureteral anastomosis as well as the passage of the left ureter through sigmoid mesentery. However, after pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer, there is already excision of mesocolon and mesorectum and inferior mesenteric artery ligation. Therefore, there is no need for passage of the left ureter through the sigmoid mesentery, which makes this portion of the procedure easier.
Ileoureteral anastomosis—Bricker versus Wallace
Similar to other anastomoses, the major principles in performing a satisfactory ileal-ureteral anastomosis include preservation of adequate blood supply to distal ureters, avoidance of any tension on
the anastomosis, and avoidance of any kinking or twisting of the ileal conduit or ureters. In general, the different techniques used to perform the ileoureteral anastomosis include the Lu Duc, Bricker, and Wallace. The anti-refluxing technique proposed by Lu Duc and colleagues is often used in patients with underlying decreased renal function, although not the sole indication. In addition, there is no solid evidence of whether or not it is effective in achieving this end. Furthermore, this technique precludes the use of loopogram study for assessment of upper genitourinary tract after conduit formation. Hence, the end-to-side Bricker technique and end-to-end Wallace technique remain the most common techniques.Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree