How Does QoL Compare Between Surveillance and Active Treatment?


Authors, journal, year

Country

Study design

Therapies and number of participants per study group

Measures

Number of measurements

AS compared to curative treatment

1. Jeldres et al., cancer, 2015 [15]

USA

Longitudinal

AS n = 77, RP n = 228

EPIC

Baseline (before or after biopsy), 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months

2. Van den Bergh et al., Scand J Urol, 2014 [16]

The Netherlands

Observational

AS robot-assisted RP n = 29, Robot-assisted RP n = 363

EORTC-QLQ-PR25, IIEF-15, ICIQ-SF

One preoperative and one postoperative

3. Watson et al., BJUI, 2015 [17]

UK

Cross-sectional

Surgery n = 115, RT n = 36, RT with adjuvant HT n = 81, primary HT n = 36, AS n = 43

EPIC-26

One between 9 and 24 months after diagnosis

4. De Cerqueira et al., Eur J cancer care, 2015 [18]

Brazil

Cross-sectional

Focal cryotherapy n = 10, brachytherapy n = 9, AS n = 11

IPSS

One between ≥12 or ≤24 months of diagnosis or treatment follow-up

5. Van den Bergh et al., BJUI, 2012 [19]

The Netherlands

Longitudinal

AS n = 129, RP n = 67, RT n = 70

10 items on sexual function

AS, 6 and 18 months after diagnosis; RP&RT, 6 and 12 months after start of treatment

6. Pham et al., J Urology, 2016 [20]

USA

Longitudinal

Non-cancer n = 420, AS n = 89

EPIC

Baseline (before or after biopsy), 12, 24, and 36 months

Single AS studies

7. Hilton et al., J Urology, 2012 [22]

USA

Longitudinal

AS one biopsy n = 427, AS two biopsies n = 220, AS three biopsies n = 70

SHIM

Every 6 months

8 Pearce et al., sexual medicine, 2015 [23]

USA

Longitudinal

AS n = 195

EPIC, AUA-SI

Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

9. Parker et al., BJUI, 2016 [24]

USA

Longitudinal

AS n = 180

EPIC

Time of enrollment and then every 6 months for up to 30 months

10. Fujita et al., J Urology, 2009 [12]

USA

Observational

AS n = 152

SHIM, IPSS

Baseline and one measurement in March 2008




Table 15.2
Details of studies into anxiety and distress











































































Authors, journal, year

Country

Study design

Therapies and number of patients per study group

Measures

Number and timing of measurements

AS compared to curative treatment

Van den Bergh et al., Scand J Urol, 2014 [16]

The Netherlands

Observational

AS robot-assisted RP n = 29, robot-assisted RP n = 363

EORTC-QLQ-C30

One preoperative and one postoperative

De Cerqueira et al., Eur J cancer care, 2015 [18]

Brazil

Cross-sectional

Focal cryotherapy n = 10, brachytherapy n = 9, AS n = 11

BAI, BDI, BHS, SF-36 MH

One between ≥12 or ≤24 months of diagnosis or treatment follow-up

Van den Bergh et al., BJUI, 2012 [19]

The Netherlands

Longitudinal

AS n = 129, RP n = 67, RT n = 70

SF-12, (MCS), CES-D, STAI-6

AS: 6 and 18 months after diagnosis; RP&RT: 6 and 12 months after start of treatment

Pham et al., J Urology, 2016 [20]

USA

Longitudinal

Non-cancer n = 420, AS n = 89

SF-36

Baseline (before or after biopsy), 12, 24, and 36 months

Single AS studies

Pearce et al., Sexual Medicine, 2015 [23]

USA

Longitudinal

AS n = 195

AUA-SI, MAX-PC

Baseline (before or after biopsy), 12, 24, and 36 months

Parker et al., BJUI, 2016 [24]

USA

Longitudinal

AS n = 180

MUIS-STAI, SF-12, fear of disease progression/recurrence with subscale MAX-PC

Time of enrollment and then every 6 months for up to 30 months

Venderbos et al., Psycho-oncology, 2015 [31]

The Netherlands

Longitudinal

AS n = 129

MAX-PC, STAI-6, CES-D

Baseline (<6 months after diagnosis), and after 9 an 18 months

Watts et al., BMJ Open, 2015 [32]

UK

Cross-sectional

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Feb 9, 2018 | Posted by in Uncategorized | Comments Off on How Does QoL Compare Between Surveillance and Active Treatment?

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access