Hand-Assisted Right Hemicolectomy
Christine M. Bartus
Deborah R. Schnipper
Jeffrey L. Cohen
Introduction
Hand-assisted laparoscopic (HAL) surgery involves the intra-abdominal placement of a hand through a minilaparotomy incision while pneumoperitoneum is maintained. The HAL approach is thought to facilitate colonic mobilization while maintaining the benefits of laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic colectomy lends itself to hand-assisted techniques. Most surgeons make an abdominal incision near the end of a laparoscopic-assisted colectomy to extract the specimen. This incision is often utilized to divide the mesentery or to fashion the anastomosis. Supporters of the hand-assisted technique believe that the hand should be placed through the wound to facilitate dissection and mobilization of the colon. By 1992, a number of surgeons began to make this incision early in the operation to facilitate dissection and return tactile sensation to the procedure. The hand can be used, similar to an open procedure, to palpate organs or tumors, reflect structures atraumatically, retract sutures, identify vessels, dissect bluntly, and to provide finger pressure to bleeding points while proximal control is obtained. The development of new sleeveless hand-assisted devices provides for hand exchanges without the loss of pneumoperitoneum, thus, allowing the operation to proceed without interruption. In addition, these devices protect the wound, act as a retrieval site for the specimen, and serve as the portal for construction of the extracorporeal anastomosis (1).
Randomized trials by the HALS Study group (2,3) and by Targarona et al. (4) demonstrated that HAL resection provides similar results to traditional laparoscopic colectomy with fewer conversions. Kang et al. (5) performed a study comparing hand-assisted versus open colectomy and showed that the hand-assisted approach resulted in shortened postoperative ileus, shortened length of stay, and smaller incision size with no difference in operative time or complications. A multicenter randomized prospective study group showed that hand-assisted left and total colectomy takes less time than laparoscopic and results in equivalent short term outcomes (6).
The procedures that can potentially benefit most from the hand-assisted technique are those operations that already require the creation of a minilaparotomy for their completion. More specifically, hand-assisted right hemicolectomy for cancer or benign disease involves extracorporeal bowel division and creation of the anastomosis after complete mobilization of the bowel. The approach was developed to balance the competing demands of optimizing patient benefits and simplifying the procedure, such that it may be more readily taught and learned. A completely laparoscopic approach, with creation of an intracorporeal anastomosis, still requires an extraction incision to remove the specimen and risks spillage of bowel contents, takes longer, costs more (uses more stapler reloads), and is technically more demanding with no demonstrated benefit to the patient. Thus, HAL right hemicolectomy will be described here as a viable and safe alternative to open right hemicolectomy.
Indications
Accepted indications for laparoscopic colectomy include most benign colonic diseases, such as colorectal polyps, rectal prolapse, diverticular disease, inflammatory bowel disease, intestinal stomas for diversion, volvulus, and symptomatic colonic lipomas. Right hemicolectomy is also performed for acutely bleeding angiodysplastic lesions that cannot be controlled with nonoperative therapy. More recently, data has emerged to support the use of laparoscopic techniques for malignant colonic disease, in addition to adenocarcinoma of the appendix.
Laparoscopic sigmoid resection remains the leading indication for minimally invasive colon resection for benign disease. Inflammatory bowel disease, both Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, can be laparoscopically treated. For example, the majority of reports have shown that laparoscopic total colectomy and laparoscopic proctocolectomy with and without ileoanal pouch construction are technically feasible and share the same advantages of minimally invasive surgery as segmental colon resection. Laparoscopic proctocolectomy has been performed in the elective setting, but several groups have performed laparoscopic total colectomy for acute unresolving colitis in the urgent setting. Neither procedure is recommended for the patient with toxic colitis.
Early in the history of laparoscopic resection of colon cancer, there was controversy related to the phenomenon of cancer implants at incision sites. However, subsequent extensive data from numerous large randomized controlled trials have supported the safety of minimally invasive approaches. Oncologic techniques must not be compromised by laparoscopic resection for colon cancer. Standard principles must be adhered to with the laparoscopic technique, including acceptable proximal and distal resection margins based upon the area supplied by the named feeding vessel, mesenteric lymphadenectomy containing a minimum of 12 lymph nodes and ligation of the primary feeding vessel at its base (7).
Preoperative Planning
Prior to any surgery, a definitive diagnosis should ideally be established. Colonoscopy, barium enemas, and computed tomography scanning aid in the establishment of a diagnosis. The specific choice of modality should be tailored to the individual patient presentation. With the exception of the ileocecal valve, much of the colon displays indistinct geography. Due to the lack of easily identifiable landmarks, India ink tattooing may be used to mark lesions located in segments of bowel remote from the ileocecal valve (1). The ink is injected into the submucosa in three or four quadrants around the lesion. Other options for localization involve the placement of metallic clips or intraoperative endoscopy. If clips are placed, immediate postoperative abdominal X-rays or intraoperative imaging with laparoscopic ultrasound or fluoroscopy should be utilized to locate the clips. This procedure is less frequently used, as the presence of an experienced radiologist and/or endoscopist is required.