Traditionally, endoscopic mucosal resection and surgery were the only available treatments for large colorectal tumors, even for those detected at an early stage. The endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique, which enables en-bloc resection of large tumors, is accepted as a standard minimally invasive treatment for early gastric cancer in Japan. This article explains in detail how ESD is performed and compares it with endoscopic mucosal resection.
Traditionally, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and surgery were the only available treatments for large colorectal tumors, even for those detected at an early stage. In Japan, EMR is indicated for the treatment of colorectal adenomas, intramucosal and submucosal superficial (invasion <1000 μm from the muscularis mucosae) cancers, because of its negligible risk of lymph node metastasis and excellent clinical outcomes.
The endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique, which enables en-bloc resection of large tumors, is accepted as a standard minimally invasive treatment for early gastric cancer in Japan. However, it is not widely used to treat superficial colorectal cancer because of technical difficulty and the higher risk of complications. Conventional EMR, therefore, is used for the resection of non-polypoid colorectal neoplasms (NP-CRNs), including the large flat carpet lesions, called colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs). EMR, however, is not designed for en-bloc resection of LSTs larger than 20 mm. Piecemeal EMR is associated with the risks of incomplete removal and local recurrence albeit most recurrences can be successfully treated by additional EMR and only a few cases require surgery. ESD of LSTs larger than 20 mm is therefore an attractive treatment provided that it is safe to use in the colon and rectum.
Based on the refinement of ESD instruments and progress in the development of ESD skills, the ESD technique has recently been reported to be useful in the treatment of large colorectal LSTs instead of EMR or surgery. Herein, the authors describe their experience.
Indications for colorectal ESD
The indication for colorectal ESD at the National Cancer Center Hospital (NCCH) in Tokyo, Japan, is a nongranular type LST (LST-NG) larger than 20 mm.
Based on clinicopathologic analyses of LSTs, LST-NGs, which are large (>1 cm) superficial elevated NP-CRNs with a smooth surface, have a higher rate of submucosal (sm) invasion, which can be difficult to predict endoscopically. About 30% of LST-NGs with sm invasions are multifocal, and such invasions are primarily superficial submucosal cancers (sm1s) and difficult to predict before endoscopic treatment.
Granular type LSTs (LST-Gs) have a lower rate of sm invasion, and most such invasions are found under the largest nodule or depression, which are easier to predict endoscopically. LST-Gs larger than 20 mm can be treated by endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR) rather than by ESD, with the area that has the largest nodule resected before resection of the remaining tumor. LST-Gs larger than 30 mm or 40 mm are possible candidates for ESD because they have higher sm invasion rates and are more difficult to treat even by EPMR; so they have been treated by either EPMR or ESD, based on the individual endoscopist’s judgment.
Estimation of the depth of invasion
A non-invasive pattern should be verified in each lesion, indicating suitability for EMR or ESD: the estimated invasion depth should be less than that of superficial submucosal cancers (sm1s). No biopsy is performed before ESD because it can cause fibrosis and may interfere with submucosal lifting.
Estimation of the depth of invasion
A non-invasive pattern should be verified in each lesion, indicating suitability for EMR or ESD: the estimated invasion depth should be less than that of superficial submucosal cancers (sm1s). No biopsy is performed before ESD because it can cause fibrosis and may interfere with submucosal lifting.
Cessation period of anticoagulant and antiplatelet before ESD
ESD is considered to be a high-risk procedure. Most patients receiving aspirin or ticlopidine alone underwent ESD after a cessation period of 5 to 7 days and restarted the drugs after 7 days if possible. Patients receiving warfarin used intravenous heparin or subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin in the perioperative period and resumed warfarin after the ESD procedure.
ESD procedure at NCCH
The procedures were primarily performed using a ball-tip bipolar needle knife (B-knife) (XEMEX Co, Tokyo Japan) ( Fig. 1 A) and an insulation-tip (IT) electrosurgical knife (Olympus Optical Co, Tokyo, Japan) (see Fig. 1 B) with carbon dioxide insufflations instead of air insufflation to reduce patient discomfort (see Fig. 1 C). After submucosal injection of 10% glycerin and 5% fructose (Glyceol, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Tokyo, Japan) and 0.4% hyaluronic acid (MucoUp, Seikakagu Co, Tokyo, Japan) (see Fig. 1 D) into the sm layer, a circumferential incision was made using the B-knife and an ESD was then performed using the B-knife and IT knife (see Fig. 1 A, B).
Submucosal injection solution
A mixture of 2 solutions was prepared before the procedure to create a longer-lasting sm fluid cushion.
Solution 1: Indigo carmine dye (2 mL of 1% solution) and epinephrine (1 mL of 0.1% solution) were mixed with 200 mL Glyceol in a container, which was then drawn into a 5-mL disposable syringe.
Solution 2: MucoUp was drawn into another 5-mL syringe with a smaller amount of indigo carmine dye and epinephrine. During the actual ESD procedure, a small amount of solution 1 was injected into the sm layer to confirm the appropriate sm layer elevation and then solution 2 was injected into the properly elevated sm layer. Finally, a small amount of solution 1 was injected again to flush out any residual solution 2.
Detailed colorectal ESD procedures
- 1.
The margins of the lesion were delineated before ESD by spraying 0.4% indigo carmine dye ( Fig. 2 A). After creation of the submucosal fluid cushion, an initial incision was made with the B-knife at the oral side of the lesion (see Fig. 2 B). In colorectal cases, it was not necessary to actually mark around lesions because tumor margins can be visualized clearly with indigo carmine.
- 2.
The B-knife was inserted into the initial incision, and an electrosurgical current was applied in endocut mode (50 W) using a standard electrosurgical generator (ICC 200, ERBE, Tubingen, Germany) to continue the marginal incision around the oral side of the lesion.
- 3.
After partial resection of the margin on the oral side of the lesion to ensure adequate submucosal lifting, submucosal dissection was begun using the same B-knife in retroflex view (see Fig. 2 B).
- 4.
Additional resection of the margin on the anal side was performed using the B-knife in the straight view (see Fig. 2 C).
- 5.
After the lesion was partially dissected so that the sm layer could be visualized sufficiently, an IT knife (see Fig. 2 D) was used to complete the dissection of the sm layer quickly and safely. The previously indicated solutions were injected repeatedly into the sm layer to maintain the sm fluid cushion so as to minimize the risk of perforation.
- 6.
Hemostatic forceps were used in soft coagulation mode (70–80 W) to control visible bleeding. The patient’s position was sometimes changed to facilitate visualization of the tissue plane, and dissection continued until the lesion was completely excised.
- 7.
After the colorectal ESD was completed, routine colonoscopic review to detect any possible perforation or exposed vessels was conducted and minimum coagulation was performed using hemostatic forceps on nonbleeding visible vessels to prevent postoperative bleeding (see Fig. 2 E).
- 8.
The resected specimen was stretched and fixed to the board using small pins (see Fig. 2 F).