Comparative Outcomes: POEM Versus Balloons, Botox, and Surgical Myotomy

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
Kevin M. Reavis (ed.)Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM)10.1007/978-3-319-50051-5_9

9. Comparative Outcomes: POEM Versus Balloons, Botox, and Surgical Myotomy

Steven R. DeMeester 

Foregut and Thoracic Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, The Oregon Clinic, 4805 NE Glisan Street, Ste 6N60, Portland, OR 97213, USA



Steven R. DeMeester

AchalasiaLaparoscopic myotomyHeller myotomyPOEMBotoxPneumatic dilatation

Symptoms in patients with achalasia are produced by outflow obstruction at the level of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). As a consequence of neural destruction, the LES does not undergo normal swallow-induced relaxation. In addition, the esophageal body loses normal peristaltic function and esophageal emptying is on the basis of gravity. All therapies for achalasia are palliative in that normal LES or esophageal body function cannot be restored. The efficacy of any therapy for achalasia is directly related to its ability to reduce the outflow obstruction at the LES. In its untreated form, achalasia is at the opposite end of the spectrum from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Treatment for GERD is to augment the defective LES, while treatment for achalasia is to render the LES less competent. Consequently, overzealous augmentation of the LES for GERD can lead to an achalasia-like condition, and all treatments for achalasia risk inducing significant GERD. Likewise, the importance of obtaining an appropriate diagnosis of GERD or achalasia with objective testing including esophageal manometry prior to instituting therapy is critical to prevent inappropriate treatment and poor outcomes.

Recently, the role of manometry has taken on importance beyond confirming a diagnosis of achalasia. On high-resolution manometry (HRM), three achalasia types have been defined, and the outcome with achalasia treatment has been linked with the specific subtype. Type I or “classic” achalasia has incomplete LES opening and an aperistaltic, flaccid esophageal body. Type II has panesophageal pressurization, and Type III has no normal peristalsis, but evidence of distal esophageal spasm. Characteristic of all three types is an elevated integration relaxation pressure (IRP) above 15 mmHg [1]. The highest success rates with treatment for achalasia appear to be in patients with Type II achalasia [2, 3]. Laparoscopic myotomy and POEM are effective in all subtypes of achalasia, but the outcome with pneumatic dilatation has been shown to be poor in patients with Type III achalasia [2]. In these patients, alternative therapies are recommended.

Until recently, the treatment of achalasia involved trade-offs between efficacy and invasiveness. On the low efficacy and low invasiveness side are Botox injection and a single pneumatic dilatation. While these can be efficacious, they tend to less reliably produce good long-term outcomes than therapies on the more invasive end of the spectrum. Moving toward more invasive and better efficacy are multiple pneumatic dilatations and finally Heller myotomy. The introduction of laparoscopic techniques for the Heller myotomy reduced the invasiveness without compromising efficacy. Now, with the introduction of POEM, a paradigm shift has occurred where patients can have the efficacy of the laparoscopic Heller myotomy with essentially the invasiveness of a single pneumatic dilatation.

Injection of botulinum toxin is an attractive option for patients with achalasia, given the simplicity of the procedure. During endoscopy, 100 units of botulinum toxin A is injected in equal aliquots around the gastroesophageal junction, typically in four or eight locations. Efficacy with botulinum toxin is typically the lowest of the achalasia treatment alternatives and its effects are temporary [4]. Consequently, botulinum toxin is typically reserved for patients who are poor candidates for other more definitive therapies, or as a temporizing measure until a more definitive therapy can be arranged. A drawback to botulinum toxin injection is that it can induce submucosal scarring which can make a laparoscopic myotomy or POEM procedure more difficult. Further, although very safe, excessively deep injection in the area of the LES can lead to aortic injury and must be avoided.

Pneumatic dilatation is done with an achalasia balloon that is at least 150% the normal size of the esophagus, in an effort to disrupt the dysfunctional LES musculature. A single dilatation with a 30-mm balloon is unlikely to provide permanent relief of symptoms, but repeated dilatations and use of larger (35 and 40 mm) balloons for recurrent symptoms leads to improved results. In a randomized trial from Europe, an aggressive pneumatic dilatation protocol led to success rates similar to that observed with a laparoscopic Heller myotomy, but with a 4% risk of esophageal perforation [5]. Success, defined as a reduction of the Eckardt symptom score to three or less, occurred in 90% of patients after laparoscopic myotomy compared to 86% of patients after pneumatic dilatation at 2 years. The frequency of an abnormal pH test and endoscopic esophagitis was similar for the two treatments (15% and 19%, respectively, for pneumatic dilatation and 23% and 21%, respectively, for laparoscopic myotomy with partial fundoplication). Risk factors for the need for re-dilatation included preexisting daily chest pain, age younger than 40 years, and a > 10 cm column of retained barium 5 min after contrast ingestion on a timed barium esophogram 3 months after dilatation [5]. Long-term results after pneumatic dilatation either as a single dilatation or after multiple dilatations show a success rate of 78% at 5 years, 61% at 10 years, and 58% at 15 years [6]. Recently, the outcome with pneumatic dilatation has been shown to be poor in patients with type III achalasia [2]. Consequently, patients with type III achalasia are considered to have a relative contraindication to pneumatic dilatation and alternative therapies are preferred.

The Heller myotomy dates back to over 100 years and is named after the German surgeon Ernest Heller. This procedure, with three important modifications, has become the gold standard therapy in the US and most centers worldwide for the treatment of achalasia. The three modifications consist of the introduction of a minimally invasive laparoscopic approach, the addition of a partial fundoplication, and extension of the myotomy 2–3 cm down onto the stomach. The initial foray into minimally invasive surgery for achalasia was a thoracoscopic myotomy described by Pellegrini and colleagues in 1992 [7]. However, the laparoscopic approach has been proven superior and is now the standard of care for a minimally invasive myotomy for achalasia [8]. Similarly, following publication of a randomized trial showing that the addition of a partial fundoplication to a Heller myotomy reduces gastroesophageal reflux compared to myotomy alone without imposing increased outflow obstruction, a partial fundoplication should be added to a Heller myotomy [9]. Lastly, an analysis of outcome after myotomy showed that an extended gastric myotomy was associated with improved results. Consequently, extension of the myotomy 2–3 cm down onto the stomach is now accepted as the appropriate technique during laparoscopic myotomy [10].

A laparoscopic Heller myotomy with these modifications has been shown to produce excellent, durable results at centers around the world [1113]. In a series of 400 laparoscopic myotomies from Italy, 82% of patients were free of symptoms 10 years after the operation [14]. Further, a laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor has been shown to have a lower rate of re-intervention compared to pneumatic dilatation and to be effective for all subtypes of achalasia [15].

Complications can occur with a laparoscopic myotomy, but mortality should be extremely rare. In an analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, Niebisch et al. showed that the overall 30-day mortality after a laparoscopic fundoplication was 0.19% and was only 0.05% for patients under the age of 70 years [16]. Further, the most common complications following fundoplication were pulmonary (1.3%) and urinary tract infections (1.1%). These low mortality and complication rates for fundoplication should hold for myotomy and partial fundoplication as well [17]. There are three potential complications with a laparoscopic myotomy and fundoplication that deserve focused attention. The first is mucosal perforation during the myotomy. The literature and personal experience would suggest that perforation occurs more frequently in patients previously treated for achalasia, particularly with botulinum toxin injection [18]. Most perforations occur during the myotomy on the stomach since the mucosa below the gastroesophageal junction is very thin. Immediate recognition is of paramount importance and repair with fine absorbable sutures and covering the site with the partial fundoplication leads to successful healing in nearly all cases.

The second complication to focus on is a leak from the myotomy site. The possibility of a leak should be considered in any patient who has fever, chest pain, or clinical signs consistent with sepsis postoperatively. The work-up should include a water-soluble contrast swallow and/or upper endoscopy. Contrast radiographic studies are known to miss small leaks, and in the clinical setting of sepsis, they should not be relied upon to rule out a leak definitively. A CT scan can be useful and may show evidence of an abscess or air/fluid level near the hiatus or small air bubbles in the mediastinum. Endoscopy is a sensitive test and should be used to evaluate the esophagus if a leak is suspected or confirmed. Most small leaks can be managed with intravenous antibiotics and no oral intake, and in some cases, can be treated endoscopically with clips or endoscopic suturing. Larger leaks may require CT-guided drainage or, rarely, reoperation.

The third focused complication is recurrent or persistent dysphagia. Causes include an inadequate myotomy, typically related to insufficient extension onto the stomach, scaring and closure of the myotomy, excessive fundoplication, typically from a Nissen fundoplication, or a GERD-related complication such as erosive esophagitis or a peptic stricture. Determining the etiology usually requires upper endoscopy and a repeat manometry. In some patients, a timed barium swallow or a pH test can also be useful. Treatment is based on the etiology.

Recently, a new procedure for achalasia has been introduced, the per-oral endoscopic myotomy, or POEM. It may be the best of both worlds, allowing a precise myotomy with the recovery benefits of no external incisions and no physical restrictions. The POEM procedure was first used to treat achalasia in a human by Inoue in 2008, and his initial experience was reported in 2010 [19]. Since Inoue’s first procedure, there has now been thousands of POEM procedures performed worldwide. The POEM procedure begins with an incision in the mucosa followed by creation of a submucosal tunnel that is carried 2–3 cm below the gastroesophageal junction. A myotomy of the circular fibers of the muscularis propria down through the LES is then performed. The procedure is completed by closing the mucosal defect either with clips or sutures. There are numerous publications on the early results of POEM for achalasia. From these, a number of conclusions can be drawn.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 30, 2017 | Posted by in GASTROENTEROLOGY | Comments Off on Comparative Outcomes: POEM Versus Balloons, Botox, and Surgical Myotomy

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access