Chapter 4 – Acute Liver Failure in Children




Abstract




Pediatric acute liver failure (PALF) is not a single diagnosis. Rather, PALF is a complex, rapidly progressive clinical syndrome that is the final common pathway for many disparate conditions; some known and others yet to be identified [1, 2]. The estimated frequency of acute liver failure (ALF) in all age groups in the USA is about 17 cases per 100,000 population per year, but the frequency in children is unknown. In the USA, ALF accounts for 10–15% of pediatric liver transplants performed annually [3]. Management requires a multidisciplinary team involving the hepatologist, critical care specialist, and liver transplant surgeon. Acute liver failure is a rapidly evolving clinical condition. The absence of adequately powered studies to inform diagnostic algorithms, to assess markers of disease severity and trajectory, and to guide liver transplant decisions transfers a significant burden to the clinician. Constructing a diagnostic approach and individualized management strategy that may include the decision to pursue liver transplantation is challenging. There are a number of pressing clinical questions faced when children with PALF first present. Does the patient have a condition that is treatable? What is the risk of deterioration or improvement on each day the child is alive with his/her native liver? Is a living related or deceased liver transplant necessary for patient survival? Is full recovery possible without a liver transplant? Are associated morbidities recoverable or irreversible?





Chapter 4 Acute Liver Failure in Children


James Squires and Estella Alonso



Introduction


Pediatric acute liver failure (PALF) is not a single diagnosis. Rather, PALF is a complex, rapidly progressive clinical syndrome that is the final common pathway for many disparate conditions; some known and others yet to be identified [1, 2]. The estimated frequency of acute liver failure (ALF) in all age groups in the USA is about 17 cases per 100,000 population per year, but the frequency in children is unknown. In the USA, ALF accounts for 10–15% of pediatric liver transplants performed annually [3]. Management requires a multidisciplinary team involving the hepatologist, critical care specialist, and liver transplant surgeon. Acute liver failure is a rapidly evolving clinical condition. The absence of adequately powered studies to inform diagnostic algorithms, to assess markers of disease severity and trajectory, and to guide liver transplant decisions transfers a significant burden to the clinician. Constructing a diagnostic approach and individualized management strategy that may include the decision to pursue liver transplantation is challenging. There are a number of pressing clinical questions faced when children with PALF first present. Does the patient have a condition that is treatable? What is the risk of deterioration or improvement on each day the child is alive with his/her native liver? Is a living related or deceased liver transplant necessary for patient survival? Is full recovery possible without a liver transplant? Are associated morbidities recoverable or irreversible?



Clinical Characterization


Defining PALF is challenging. In adults, the research definition requires the onset of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) less than eight weeks after the first signs of hepatic dysfunction. While HE is a required element for adults with liver failure, it is acknowledged that it is difficult to assess in children and may not be reliably identified in a clinical setting [4]. When present, developmental differences in the clinical manifestations of HE have been noted between infants and young children. Recognizing the difficulties inherent to assessing encephalopathy in children, entry criteria for the longitudinal cohort study by the Pediatric Acute Liver Failure Study Group (PALFSG) were developed by a consensus of experts whereby HE was not a requirement to attain a diagnosis of PALF [5] (Table 4.1).




Table 4.1 PALFSG Study Entry Criteria














  • No known evidence of chronic liver disease



  • Biochemical evidence of acute liver injury



  • Coagulopathy not corrected by vitamin K

◦◦ INR ≥ 1.5 (or PT between 15 and 19.9 seconds) with clinical HE
◦◦ INR is ≥ 2.0 (or PT ≥ 20 seconds) with or without HE


PALF: pediatric acute liver failure; INR: international normalized ratio; PT: prothrombin time; HE: hepatic encephalopathy.


Compounding the diagnostic challenge, pinpointing the time at which the “first signs of hepatic dysfunction” occur is difficult and dependent upon clinical observation by individuals with variable expertise in assessing liver disease. Symptoms such as jaundice may go undetected for a period. The interval between the apparent onset of jaundice and HE has been used to characterize various “subtypes” of PALF such as “hyperacute,” “acute,” and “subacute” PALF, and yet the first day of the illness is all but impossible to determine. There are currently no validated alternatives to these imperfect subjective measures to distinguish categories of patients with acute severe liver injury from ALF or to distinguish ALF that is recoverable without liver transplant from those who would die without liver transplant.


In the era before liver transplantation, the dynamic natural history of PALF was for children to either survive or die and a worsening clinical course did not preclude a favorable outcome (Figure 4.1). A previously healthy patient typically experiences a non-specific prodrome of variable duration with features that might include abdominal discomfort and malaise with or without fever. Symptoms may persist or wax and wane for days or weeks before the child is brought to medical attention. In the absence of jaundice or other clinically evident sign of liver dysfunction, the child may receive empiric treatment to relieve symptoms. However, if there are clinical signs of liver injury or encephalopathy, or if blood work is obtained that reveals hepatic dysfunction, the clinical syndrome of PALF can be recognized.





Figure 4.1 The clinical trajectory of a child with acute liver failure is difficult to predict. Liver transplantation interrupts the natural history of acute liver failure. Improved assessment and estimate of the clinical trajectory will enhance transplant decisions in the future. SIRS: systemic inflammatory response syndrome.


With the exception of acute ingestions (e.g., mushrooms, acetaminophen), the precise onset of disease is rarely identified. Patient outcome is reflected, in part, by the interaction among etiology, disease severity, supportive management, and treatment. Yet, outcomes vary among children with seemingly similar etiology, disease severity, and treatment; therefore, additional factors are likely involved to explain these variations. Modifying factors likely include the inflammatory milieu, end-organ damage, immune activation, potential for liver regeneration, and management interventions. Medical and liver transplant decisions require reliable repeated assessments of the probability of survival with native liver from one time interval to the next. Liver transplant decisions for children with ALF, which must include the risks associated with living organ donation, are made difficult given the uncertainty of patient outcome. The uncertainty regarding where the patient resides along the “natural course” of the disease at the time of initial presentation or at any point thereafter requires considerable clinical judgment. Liver transplant arbitrarily interrupts the natural course of PALF and it is accepted that some patients who receive a liver transplant may have survived without one. Given the insufficient number of organs to satisfy patient needs, the field would be well served if there were a more precise method to identify those patients who will survive without a liver transplant, as well as those who will die despite liver transplant.



Etiology


Specific etiologies can be broadly categorized as infectious, immunologic, metabolic, and toxin/drug related; however, an identified cause for liver injury is lacking in approximately 30–50% of cases [5, 6]. Figure 4.2 details the causes of ALF in 1,144 children enrolled in the PALFSG from 19 pediatric liver transplant centers in the USA, Canada, and the UK between 1999 and 2014. In developing countries, the etiologies are similar but are dominated by infectious etiologies, with hepatitis A virus (HAV) being the most common identified etiology [7, 8]. This brief summation of processes that can cause PALF is supplemented by other chapters detailing each specific disease state.





Figure 4.2. Etiology of acute liver failure in 1,144 children from the Pediatric Acute Liver Failure Study Group (PALFSG) 1999–2014.


APAP: acetaminophen; GALD: gestational alloimmune liver disease; HLH: hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.


Adapted from reference [1].


Indeterminate


Historically, a specific diagnosis was not established in over 50% of PALF and these children were categorized as indeterminate (IND-PALF). Likely, the indeterminate group consisted of some patients who underwent an incomplete diagnostic evaluation, and within the PALFSG cohort, inadequate assessments for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), mitochondrial disorders, and other metabolic diseases were the most common deficiencies [9]. Comprehensive viral testing in PALF has also been found to often be incomplete [10]. Recent efforts have looked to address this shortcoming. While almost 43% of the overall PALFSG participants were categorized as indeterminate (Figure 4.2), the incorporation of standardized diagnostic test recommendations into electronic medical record (EMR) order sets enabled a significant reduction in the percentage of IND-PALF, from 48% during the first two phases of the study (1999–2010) to 30.8% when looking at phase three (2011–2014) [1]. In smaller studies, the utility of next generation sequencing and un-biased whole exome sequencing has expanded diagnostic capabilities as well [11, 12]. Still, “indeterminate” remains the most common categorization of these critically ill children.


The presentation of IND-PALF mirrors that of most other children with acute liver failure (Figure 4.1). IND-PALF can occur at any age and cases do not segregate by sex or race. Temporal clustering of IND-PALF supports a potential role for a community-acquired viral infection, but a novel or previously known pathogenic virus has not been identified [6]. Injury secondary to overzealous inflammatory responses and immune dysregulation have been suspected in many cases of IND-PALF and the degree of increasing inflammatory network connectivity in these patients has been shown to be associated with poorer outcomes [13, 14]. Some patients with IND-PALF present with a hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)-like phenotype including elevated soluble IL-2 receptor levels [15, 16]. However, the majority of patients with evidence of immune activation do not meet criteria for HLH but do exhibit characteristic features that suggest a common pathogenesis [17]. This sub-set of IND-PALF patients have distinctive liver histology which includes a dense CD103+CD8+ T-cell infiltrate further suggesting an immune mediated liver injury [16, 17]. PALF patients with this “activated” CD8 T cell hepatitis are more likely to receive liver transplantation than patients with other causes of PALF. Based on these observations, there has been a growing trend toward treatment of PALF associated with activated CD8+ T cell hepatitis with immunosuppression. However, the therapeutic benefit of this practice remains unknown [18]. The clinical course of IND-PALF can be variable, yet the trajectory of commonly obtained clinical measures such as international normalized ratio (INR), total bilirubin, and the presence of HE has been shown to have important prognostic value [19]. When considering transplant, having an indeterminate diagnosis appears to influence decisions toward listing [20]. Additional co-morbidities, such as transient bone marrow suppression and aplastic anemia, can be seen in these children, even after successful liver transplantation [6].



Acetaminophen


Acetaminophen (N-acetyl-p-aminophenol (paracetamol)) is widely used in children for management of fever and pain. It is available without prescription and is commercially available as a single formulation or can be compounded with decongestants or narcotics. Acetaminophen (APAP) is safe and well tolerated when dosing instructions are strictly followed. However, it has a low therapeutic index, and in certain individuals or clinical scenarios, chronic administration of therapeutic dosages of acetaminophen can result in significant hepatotoxic effects [21]. Notably, APAP toxicity is the most commonly identified cause of PALF in over 1,100 children enrolled in the PALFSG [1]. Two clinical scenarios are associated with acetaminophen hepatotoxicity.


The most common scenario follows an intentional single ingestion of a hepatotoxic dose of 15–25 g in adults (or >100 mg/kg in children) in an attempt at suicide or attention-seeking behavior [22]. Plasma acetaminophen at four and 24 hours after a single ingestion will assist in determining the relative toxicity of the ingestion [23]. Females over ten years of age represent the most common demographic associated with intentional overdose in children, but it should be considered in all age groups outside the newborn period [5]. Immediately following ingestion, patients may experience non-specific symptoms of nausea and vomiting. While a liver biopsy is not generally indicated in the setting of known acetaminophen overdose, centrilobular hepatic necrosis is the hallmark finding and should raise the consideration of acetaminophen toxicity even without a clear history of exposure. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) given enterally or intravenously can successfully reverse the toxic injury if given shortly after the ingestion, ideally within 24 hours. Mechanistically, NAC has demonstrated hepatoprotective effects in acetaminophen toxicity by antagonizing the damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) molecule high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) which drives a pro-inflammatory program in PALF [24] and by enhancing hepatic and mitochondrial glutathione levels (scavenging of reactive oxygen and peroxynitrite) [25]. If treatment is delayed beyond 24 hours following ingestion, the patient is at increased risk of having irreversible liver injury. Regardless of the interval between ingestion and presentation, NAC should be administered when a toxic ingestion has occurred. Serum aminotransferase levels can reach over 10,000 IU/mL and the total bilirubin is generally lower than might be expected given the degree of liver injury, typically <10 mg/dL. Early metabolic acidosis and serum lactate elevations can be seen along with co-morbidities of acute renal failure (10–50%) and pancreatitis (0.3–5%) [2]. If treatment is not initiated, jaundice develops within 48 to 72 hours, with death occurring in the most severe cases by five to seven days following the ingestion.


In the second most common presentation, patients inadvertently partake in a “therapeutic misadventure” whereby they unintentionally overdose by taking therapeutic doses of multiple APAP-containing medications [22]. Risk factors for developing severe hepatotoxicity secondary to a therapeutic misadventure include concomitant use of other medicines that alter hepatic metabolism, delayed medical care, younger age, and prolonged periods of fasting [26]. In both adults and children, polymorphic variants in UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A, a main metabolizing enzyme of APAP, have been shown to affect the risk of developing APAP toxicity [27, 28]. The presence of acetaminophen adducts in the serum may indicate unsuspected hepatotoxicity or underreported acetaminophen (ab)use [29]. Additionally, the presence of adducts in indeterminate cases of PALF suggests occult APAP toxicity may play a role in approximately 10% of children where a distinct diagnosis for ALF cannot be established [30]. Although the magnitude of this clinical problem in children is not well defined, between 16% and 48% of acetaminophen-induced ALF in adults results from unintentional overdosing, reinforcing the concept that accidental misuse of this medication leading to serious liver injury is relatively common [22]. Similar to children with a single intentional overdose, alanine aminotransferase levels can reach into the many thousands with a relatively low total bilirubin level.



Medication (Non-Acetaminophen) or Toxin


Liver injury caused by drugs, herbals, or toxins other than acetaminophen was identified in a little more than 3% of cases in the PALFSG registry, the vast majority occurring in children over ten years of age [1, 5]. Anti-epileptics (valproic acid, phenytoin, carbamazepine, felbamate) are the most common offenders in children [5, 31]. Valproic acid, particularly in children with unsuspected mitochondrial disease, may precipitate ALF. The list of xenobiotics associated with liver failure is extensive and expanding; a partial list is found in Table 4.2. Hepatotoxic agents, such as industrial solvents and mushroom toxin, are dose dependent and will predictably result in liver injury or failure. The diagnosis of hepatotoxic liver injury is often one of exclusion, based on latency, clinical features, laboratory values, histology, and a response to removal of the offending agent [32]. However, idiosyncratic drug reactions remain a common etiology. Given the complexity of drug-induced liver injury, the Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN), established by the National Institutes of Health in 2003, has and continues to standardize the nomenclature and causality assessment of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) including those associated with liver failure. In April of 2012 the website LiverTox® () was launched as a joint effort of the Liver Disease Research Branch of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) and the Division of Specialized Information Services of the National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health. The purpose of LiverTox® is to provide up-to-date, accurate, and easily accessed information on the diagnosis, cause, frequency, patterns, and management of liver injury attributable to medications, herbals and dietary supplements.




Table 4.2 Medications and Toxins Associated with Acute Liver Failure




























Type Xenobiotics
Anti-infective


  • Clavulanic acid/amoxicillin



  • Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole



  • Isoniazid



  • Minocycline/doxycycline



  • Quinolone (ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin)



  • Voriconazole



  • Macrolide (erythromycin, clarithromycin, azithromycin)



  • Others

Anticonvulsants


  • Phenytoin



  • Valproic acid



  • Carbamazepine



  • Others

Immunomodulators/anti-inflammatory


  • Methotrexate



  • Azathioprine



  • Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs



  • Acetaminophen



  • Biological (i.e., infliximab, basiliximab, etc.)



  • Others

Recreational drugs


  • Ecstasy



  • Cocaine



  • Others

Complementary, alternative or herbal medication


  • Pyrrolizidine alkaloids



  • Germander



  • Ma huang



  • Chaparral



  • Black cohosh root



  • Pennyroyal



  • Kava



  • Others

Toxin/industrial solvents


  • Amatoxin (mushrooms from Amianita spp.)



  • Carbon tetrachloride



  • Tricholorethylene



  • 2-Nitropropane



  • 1,2,3-Trichloropropane


A careful history of exposure to hepatotoxins should be obtained from the family of any child presenting with ALF, including prescription and non-prescription drugs in the home that could have been ingested accidentally. In teenagers, a history should include evidence of depression, recreational drug use (e.g., cocaine, ecstasy), or solvent sniffing. Any exposure to hepatotoxic drugs, chemicals, or herbals should be considered possibly related to the liver injury. Ingestion of the Amanita mushroom is clearly traced to ALF.


Liver biopsy can assist in the diagnosis of drug-induced idiosyncratic liver injury. The histologic pattern of injury observed should be that expected from the drug to which the patient has been exposed. The patterns seen are hepatitis (hepatocellular necrosis), cholestasis, mixed cholestasis and hepatitis, and steatosis. Drugs that cause hepatitis (e.g., isoniazid, propylthiouracil, and halothane) have the greatest potential for causing PALF. Drugs associated with steatosis (e.g., sodium valproate, amiodarone) may also cause liver failure. Drugs that cause cholestasis (oxacillin) rarely produce liver failure, whereas drugs that cause mixed cholestasis and hepatitis (sulfa drugs) sometimes do. If histology differs from that expected by the drug in question, another cause should be sought. Exposure to a drug or toxin should not preclude a thorough search for other causes of liver injury.



Immune Mediate Liver Injury



Autoimmune Marker Positive

The classic serological markers associated with autoimmune liver disease, which include anti-nuclear antibody (ANA), smooth muscle antibody (SMA), and liver–kidney microsomal (LKM) antibody, are found to be positive in 28% of children with ALF [33]. However, the true frequency of positive autoimmune markers in PALF is not known as all three markers were obtained in only 55% of patients in the PALFSG, while 21% of children showed no markers [9]. Autoimmune-marker positive PALF has been reported in children as young as nine weeks and therefore should be considered in all age groups outside of early infancy.


The presence of autoantibodies in PALF is more common in those with a final diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH, 93%); however, they can be found in patients with other known causes of liver failure such as Wilson disease, drug-induced liver failure, and indeterminate [33]. Elevated serum globulins may not be present, and the condition appears to be evenly distributed among males and females. Histologic features show evidence of immune activation with the presence of a lymphoplasmocytic-enriched portal tract infiltrate, central perivenulitis, and lymphoid follicles with evidence of massive hepatic necrosis [34]. Notably, there should be no evidence of chronicity on the initial biopsy. While the presence of autoantibodies does not appear to significantly associate with outcomes, children who are LKM positive were found to be younger and more likely to undergo liver transplantation compared with other autoantibody subjects [33]. Corticosteroids can interrupt the liver injury in many patients and while steroid treatment did not improve survival overall in autoantibody positive children, the sub-group of patients with a known diagnosis other than AIH had a higher risk of death [33]. Some children appear to tolerate weaning corticosteroids without recurrence of their disease, while recurrent disease may be more common in adults.



Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is an enigmatic condition characterized by fever, hepatosplenomegaly, marked elevation in serum aminotransferase levels, cytopenias, hypertriglyceridemia, hyperferritinemia, and hypofibrinogenemia and should be conceptualized as a phenotype of critical illness due to toxic activation of immune cells from different underlying mechanisms [35, 36]. Additional diagnostic criteria now include low or absent natural killer (NK) cell activity, serum ferritin >500 μg/L, and soluble CD25 (soluble interleukin-2 receptor) >2400 U/mL. It can present from infancy through adolescence, although it is most commonly diagnosed in the first five years of life.



Indeterminate Pediatric Acute Liver Failure Associated with Activated CD8+ T Cell Hepatitis

As noted above, a subset of children with IND-PALF is noted to have evidence of immune dysregulation and inflammatory overactivation. While specific classification criteria are lacking, this emerging PALF-associated disease may benefit from future efforts to better define and categorize these patients, identifying a unique PALF cohort who would benefit from targeted immunosuppression therapies.



Other Primary Immune Deficiencies

Primary immune deficiencies (PID) is a rapidly growing group of >350 conditions characterized by increased susceptibility to infections, autoimmunity, and auto-inflammation [37]. An expanding understanding of the reciprocal interactions between the liver and the immune system has identified PID, particularly those with inherited defects in T and B cells or innate immunity, as contributors to children presenting with ALF [38]. Specific conditions that have been associated with liver failure include autoimmune regulator (AIRE) deficiency and SP110 deficiency [38].



Gestational Alloimmune Liver Disease


Gestational alloimmune liver disease (GALD), results from an intrauterine alloimmune liver injury and is the single most common cause of neonatal ALF [39]. The phenotype of neonatal liver disease in association with siderosis of various extrahepatic tissues has been termed neonatal hemochromatosis (NH) for over 20 years. Recently, it has been determined that GALD accounts for 60–90% of NH cases. The remaining patients with the NH phenotype have been found to have a variety of disorders including mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome, bile acid synthetic defects, Down syndrome with myelodysplasia, and severe perinatal infection. While HLH may also present with extra-hepatic iron deposition, iron is present in the reticuloendothelial system (e.g., spleen and macrophages) which is spared in the NH phenotype. In GALD-NH, maternal immunoglobulin G appears to activate fetal complement, which leads to the formation of the membrane attack complex and results in liver cell injury. The resultant pathologic siderosis seen in both the liver and various extrahepatic tissue results from severe liver injury causing iron overload due to poor regulation of maternofetal iron flux. The degree of liver injury can be so profound that death from liver failure can occur within the first few weeks of life [39, 40]. Therefore, liver failure associated with GALD-NH is technically a terminal event of a chronic intrauterine liver disease. However, the phenotype of a family’s index case of NH confronting the clinician is one of ALF and thus deserves to be included in this section for clinical purposes.


Characteristic clinical features of GALD-NH include an ALF presentation usually at birth and almost always in the first days of life. The majority (70–90%) of affected infants are born premature and a history of maternal sibling death is common. Medical history often reveals intrauterine growth restriction and oligohydramnios. Refractory hypoglycemia, severe coagulopathy, hypoalbuminemia, elevated serum ferritin (>1000 μg/L), and ascites are often noted. Strikingly, serum aminotransferase levels are normal or near normal and should alert the clinician to the possibility of GALD-NH [39]. Extrahepatic iron deposition is a hallmark finding. Hemosiderin deposition in the minor salivary glands obtained by a buccal mucosal biopsy is often seen. Alternatively, MRI of the abdomen would suggest the diagnosis with the finding of reduced T2-weighted intensity of the liver and/or the pancreas relative to the spleen. Exchange transfusion and high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is the preferred treatment to remove offending antibodies and block their action, including activation of complement [39].



Inherited Metabolic Disease


Metabolic diseases may not fit the definition of ALF precisely as the condition was certainly present prior to presentation. However, a number of conditions will present acutely in a child who is not known to have the condition until the diagnosis is established and ALF may be the initial presentation. Overall, metabolic diseases account for just under 10% of PALF [1]. While some conditions, such as mitochondrial disease, may present at any age, many metabolic conditions presenting as liver failure segregate within age groups. Metabolic conditions that should be considered in these age groups are listed in Table 4.3. Details of the specific conditions can be found in other sections of this textbook. Highlighting those which have been associated with a presentation of ALF is the purpose of this section.




Table 4.3 Metabolic Disease Presenting as Acute Liver Failure



















Age Condition
<6 months


  • Galactosemia



  • Niemann-Pick type C



  • Tyrosinemia



  • Glycosylation defect



  • Mitochondrial disease*



  • Infantile liver failure syndrome



  • type 1 (LARS deficiency)



  • Hereditary fructose intolerance



  • NBAS deficiency

7 months to 4 years


  • Mitochondrial disease*



  • Tyrosinemia



  • alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency



  • Infantile liver failure syndrome



  • type 1 (LARS deficiency)



  • Hereditary fructose intolerance



  • Urea cycle defects

5 years to 18 years


  • Wilson disease



  • Mitochondrial disease*



  • Fatty liver of pregnancy





* Fatty acid oxidation defects, respiratory chain defects, mitochondrial DNA depletion.


Metabolic conditions affecting infants in the first few months of life include galactosemia, tyrosinemia, Niemann–Pick type C, mitochondrial hepatopathies, hereditary fructose intolerance, urea cycle defects, and the defects associated with recurrent PALF [4143]. Galactosemia should be considered in a child consuming breast milk or other lactose-containing formula and developing liver failure associated with reducing substances in the urine. Hepatosplenomegaly is common and profound coagulopathy can be seen with only modest aminotransferase elevations [2]. Similarly, tyrosinemia can present with a profound coagulopathy and normal or near normal serum aminotransferase levels. Both galactosemia and tyrosinemia can present in association with gram-negative sepsis. Niemann–Pick type C is a lysosomal storage disease and marked splenomegaly is often noted. Hereditary fructose intolerance more classically presents in an older child after the introduction of fructose and/or sucrose, however, several newer infant formulas contain fructose and ALF in the neonatal period has been reported [42]. Mitochondrial hepatopathies are increasingly recognized as an important cause of liver failure due to deficiencies in respiratory complexes I, III, or IV or mitochondrial DNA depletion. With rare exceptions, mitochondrial hepatopathies have associated systemic mitochondrial dysfunction characterized by progressive neurologic deficiencies, cardiomyopathy, or myopathy. Multisystem mitochondrial dysfunction has historically served as a relative contraindication to liver transplant [44]. However, patients with mitochondrial diseases (excluding POLG-related disease) have more recently been shown to tolerate solid-organ transplant with post-transplant survival similar to non-mitochondrial disease patients [45]. Unfortunately, multi-system involvement may not be apparent at the time of liver transplant, and progressive extra-hepatic disease can occur. Lactic acidosis and an elevated molar ratio of lactate to pyruvate (>25 mol/mol) have historically been used to alert the clinician to the possibility of a mitochondrial hepatopathy; however, recent analysis of the PALFSG cohort found that neither an elevated serum lactate ≥ 2.5 mmol/L nor an elevated lactate:pyruvate (L:P) ratio were specific for mitochondrial disease in the setting of PALF and elevation did not predict clinical outcome [46]. Thus it appears that secondary mitochondrial dysfunction, independent of the cause of acute liver failure, may drive lactate and L:P abnormalities in PALF and that neither diagnosis nor clinical decisions (including considerations for liver transplant) should be based solely on these findings [46]. Defects in fatty acid oxidation, a primary function of mitochondria, may become clinically apparent during a period of fasting, as a consequence of anorexia associated with an acute illness, or when the infant begins to sleep through the night. With these defects, hyperammonemia is common as are extra-hepatic manifestations involving the neurologic, cardiac, and muscular symptoms [2]. Recurrent PALF episodes have been associated with the infantile liver failure syndrome type I (LARS mutations) and NBAS deficiency. Importantly, ALF in the neonatal period may be the initial presentation of these rare disorders and a high clinical suspicion is indicated to make the diagnosis [43, 47].


In older infants and young children up to five years of age, mitochondrial diseases, tyrosinemia, hereditary fructose intolerance, and urea cycle defects can be identified. Mitochondrial hepatopathies, particularly disorders of fatty acid oxidation, occur commonly in this age group [48]. Hereditary fructose intolerance outside the neonatal period presents when fructose-containing foods, such as fruits, are introduced into the diet. Urea cycle defects typically present with hyperammonemia, mental status changes and seizures, but without liver synthetic dysfunction. However, PALF has been associated with arginosuccinate synthetase deficiency (citrullinemia type 1) and ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency, although the mechanism of liver injury is uncertain [2, 49, 50].


Wilson disease is the most common metabolic condition associated with PALF in children over five years of age [1]. The presence of a Coombs-negative hemolytic anemia, marked hyperbilirubinemia, low serum ceruloplasmin, and a low serum alkaline phosphatase should prompt consideration of Wilson disease, but confirming the diagnosis remains a challenge. Findings in a predominately adult population suggests that the combination of an alkaline phosphatase to total bilirubin ratio of <4 and an aspartate aminotransferase to alanine aminotransferase ratio of >2.2 provided a rapid and accurate method for diagnosis of Wilson disease presenting as ALF [51]. However, these findings have not yet been confirmed in a pediatric population. Fatty acid oxidation defects can also present with ALF in older children and adolescents.



Infectious Diseases


A non-specific prodrome consisting of fever, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal discomfort will precede many cases of ALF in children regardless of etiology. Therefore, it is not surprising that early accounts of ALF often attributed the cause to a virus or infection. As the ability to identify specific infectious agents through serology, culture, and polymerase chain reaction technology has been applied, the burden of viral associated-PALF has become clearer. Although a comprehensive infectious diagnostic work-up is often not performed [10], acute viral infection as the cause of PALF was identified in only 8.4% of subjects [1]. The common hepatitis viruses have not often been found in ALF unless they were endemic to the region or in association with a community outbreak. Although a yet unidentified infectious agent may account for some unexplained cases of ALF in children, efforts to identify rare infectious agents in adults have not been fruitful. Therefore, a reasonable alternative is to classify as indeterminate any patient without an identifiable cause for the ALF until a more specific diagnosis can be established.



Hepatitis Viruses

Acute HAV infection accounts for up to 80% of PALF in developing countries [7, 8, 52]. Since the introduction of the HAV vaccine in 1995, HAV infection in North American children has dramatically declined. In the PALFSG study, only 0.5% of children with ALF had acute HAV infection [1]. In children that do develop acute HAV, less than 1% will proceed to ALF.


Acute hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection resulting in ALF is uncommon in pediatric series from Western Europe and North America, where HBV is not endemic. Among the PALFSG cohort, 0.3% of children had HBV as a final diagnosis [1]. However, in areas where it is endemic, the incidence of HBV-induced PALF is much higher. Death occurs more commonly in older patients and in individuals who acquired HBV following a blood transfusion.


Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has rarely been identified as the cause for ALF, and only a single case of HCV was noted in the more than 1,100 children in the PALFSG [1].


Hepatitis E virus infection is documented by association with epidemics of water-borne diseases not caused by HAV or by the presence of anti-hepatitis E virus antibody in serum. Most experience with hepatitis E virus comes from the Indian subcontinent, where 38% of PALF cases were caused by hepatitis E virus alone or in combination with HAV [53]. Pregnant women are also highly vulnerable to HEV-ALF, with one study demonstrating a case fatality rate of 10.1%, with women in the third trimester particularly at risk.



Infection with Viruses Other Than Hepatitis Viruses

The viruses in the herpes family are highly cytopathic and can cause severe hepatic necrosis, often in the absence of significant inflammation. Herpes simplex virus, human herpes virus 6 (HHV-6), varicella–zoster virus, cytomegalovirus, and Epstein–Barr virus have been reported to cause ALF in both immunocompromised and immunocompetent hosts [1]. Herpes simplex virus most commonly affects infants and newborns while Epstein–Barr virus is the virus most frequently implicated in older children and adolescents. As herpes simplex virus is a sexually transmitted disease, it should also be considered in sexually active adolescents. HHV-6 was detected in the explanted livers of patients who underwent liver transplant for ALF of unknown cause. However, this virus is so prevalent as a latent infection in humans that causality may be difficult to prove in cases of ALF. Little is known about the incidence or case fatality rates among children with ALF secondary to herpes virus infection. However, early detection utilizing newer diagnostic techniques, such as real-time polymerase chain reaction, and early institution of specific therapy may improve survival.


Parvovirus B19 routinely infects children, causing one of the common childhood exanthemas. It rarely can cause severe bone marrow depression and has been associated with mild hepatitis. Its role as a cause of PALF is controversial as it is often associated with other viruses known to cause PALF. This virus has been sought and not found in other studies involving larger numbers of patients with ALF and aplastic anemia [54].


Syncytial giant cell hepatitis with ALF was associated with paramyxovirus infection in a series from Toronto [55]. This infection is more likely to result in chronic progressive hepatitis or late-onset hepatic failure than ALF but should be considered in all three circumstances. Other viruses associated with ALF include adenovirus, dengue fever, and members of the enterovirus family such as echovirus and coxsackie A and B.



Non-Viral Infectious Hepatitis

Infectious agents other than viruses only rarely have been recorded as producing ALF. Despite the rarity of occurrence, they should be considered carefully in every case because they are potentially treatable.


Systemic sepsis occasionally presents in a manner that is virtually indistinguishable from ALF. Reported infectious etiologies include Neisseria meningitides infection, septic shock and intra-abdominal abscesses, and portal sepsis with enteric organisms. Spirochetal infection can affect liver function and produce severe hepatitis, even hepatic failure. Congenital syphilis has rarely been determined as a cause of ALF but should be excluded carefully in any neonate with severe hepatitis. Leptospirosis very rarely causes hepatic failure. Finally, in endemic areas, Brucella spp. (brucellosis), Coxiella burnetii (Q fever), Plasmodium falciparum, and Entamoeba histolytica infections have presented as ALF.



Other Rare Causes


Liver failure may be the presenting manifestation of a systemic condition. For example, leukemia can present as liver failure [1]. Cardiovascular shock associated with systemic hypotension, as seen in patients with trauma, sepsis, hemorrhage, cardiomyopathy or left heart failure (e.g., hypoplastic left heart) or following cardiac bypass may also develop liver failure. Budd–Chiari syndrome is a rare cause of PALF as obstruction of the hepatic venous outflow can lead to hepatomegaly, ascites, and evidence of hepatocellular injury. Liver failure may be the presenting feature of celiac disease and, if recognized, is potentially treatable following institution of a gluten-free diet [56].



Diagnostic Approach


The diagnostic evaluation of children with ALF can be challenged by many factors. These include the volume of blood needed to complete diagnostic tests, a rapid clinical trajectory ending in death or liver transplantation prior to a complete evaluation, a differential diagnosis that is incomplete or not prioritized, or clinical improvement that mitigates diagnostic curiosity. In PALF, as many as 30% of patients are left with an indeterminate diagnosis. Given the rarity of PALF, an age-based diagnostic approach is useful to improve diagnostic yield [1]. If a specific diagnosis can be secured, an effective treatment could alter the natural history of the disease.


A detailed history and physical examination cannot be overlooked or abbreviated. The history should include the onset of symptoms such as jaundice, change in mental status, easy bruising, vomiting, and fever. Exposure to contacts with infectious hepatitis, history of blood transfusions, a list of prescription and over-the-counter medications in the home, intravenous drug use, or a family history of Wilson disease, α1-antitrypsin deficiency, infectious hepatitis, infant deaths, or autoimmune conditions might lead to a specific diagnosis. Evidence of developmental delay and/or seizures should prompt an early assessment for metabolic disease. Pruritus, ascites, or growth failure might suggest a chronic liver condition with an acute presentation.


Physical assessment should include evaluation of growth, development, and nutrition status; evidence of jaundice, bruises, or bleeding following venipuncture; and petechiae. Hepatomegaly alone or with splenomegaly, ascites, and peripheral edema can be present. Kayser–Fleischer rings are present in only 50% of patients with Wilson disease who present with ALF. Fetor hepaticus is a sweet distinctive aroma to the breath associated with HE but is rarely present. Findings suggestive of chronic liver disease include digital clubbing, palmar erythema, cutaneous xanthoma, and prominent abdominal vessels, suggesting long-standing portal hypertension. Altered mental status should be assessed but may be difficult to assess in infants and young children.


Laboratory tests for diagnosis will necessarily compete with other studies required to assess the health of the patient and the severity of liver injury. Therefore, laboratory studies needed for management and diagnosis should be prioritized into three areas: (1) general tests to assess hematological, renal, pancreatic, and electrolyte abnormalities; (2) liver-specific tests to assess the degree of inflammation, injury, and function; and (3) diagnostic tests. As almost 50% of children with ALF are under four years of age, limitations on the volume of blood that can be drawn demand a knowledgeable prioritization of tests. In addition, required blood work in preparation for a liver transplant also competes for this limited resource. Proactive coordination of laboratory and diagnostic tests is helpful to ensure high priority tests are performed expeditiously.


The distribution of diagnoses varies greatly within the pediatric age group. While some conditions such as herpes simplex virus can occur within all age categories, others such as GALD and Wilson disease are found within a narrower age range. Therefore, age-based diagnostic prioritization would serve to enhance the likelihood of establishing a diagnosis as quickly as possible. Table 4.4 lists minimal diagnostic tests that have been shown to be most useful for children of different ages based upon the expected diagnoses. Diagnostic tests should not be limited to those listed but should take a high priority when testing is initiated.




Table 4.4 Recommendations for Minimal Diagnostic Evaluation by Age in Pediatric Acute Liver Failure (adapted from Ref 1)










































































































































Suspected etiology Recommended tests Recommended age of diagnostic testing
<3 mo 3 mo to 18 y
Systemic herpes infection Herpes blood PCR x x
Urea cycle; other metabolic defects Serum amino acid profile x x
GALD screen Ferritin x
Mitochondrial screen Lactate, pyruvate x x
FAO defects Plasma acylcarnitine profile x x
Tyrosinemia Urine succinylacetone x
Systemic enterovirus infection* Enterovirus blood PCR x x
Acetaminophen toxicity Acetaminophen level x
Hepatitis A Hepatitis A virus IgM x
Hepatitis B Hepatitis B surface antigen x
EBV infection EBV VCA IgM or PCR x
Autoimmune Disease Antinuclear antibody x
Anti–smooth muscle ab x
Liver kidney microsomal ab x
IgG x
Wilson disease** Ceruloplasmin x
24-hour urine copper x
DILI/HDS Exposure Drug history x x
Galactosemia and tyrosinemia Confirm newborn screen results x
Hepatitis B in newborn Confirm maternal hepatitis B serology Procedures x
Viral infection Viral testing for adenovirus, enterovirus, HHV-6, parvovirus, influenza x x
HLH Soluble IL2R, ferritin, triglyceride level x x
Vascular/Anatomical Abnormality Abdominal ultrasound with Doppler x x
Infection Blood culture x x




* unlikely needed > 3 y



** unlikely needed < 1 y


Ab, antibody; APAP, acetaminophen; EBV, Epstein–Barr virus; FAO, fatty acid oxidation defects; GALD, gestational alloimmune liver disease; HDS, herbal dietary supplement; HHV-6, human herpes virus-6; HLH, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; IL2R, interleukin-2 receptor; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; VCA, viral capsule antigen


Identification of those conditions that are amenable to specific therapy, relevant to subsequent pregnancies, or which would be a contraindication to liver transplantation, should take priority. Acute acetaminophen toxicity, herpes simplex, and HLH have targeted treatments that can be lifesaving. Autoimmune hepatitis, a potentially treatable cause of ALF in children of all ages, should be considered early in the evaluation process to enable prompt initiation of treatment. However, autoimmune markers are found in conditions other than autoimmune hepatitis, thus necessitating subjective clinical judgment to influence the final diagnosis and treatment strategy [33]. Acute liver failure may be the initial symptom associated with metabolic defects related to carbohydrate, fatty acid, and protein metabolism in which dietary management serves as treatment. Identifying an index case of GALD will provide an opportunity to treat the mother during subsequent pregnancies with intravenous immunoglobulin and prevent the condition in subsequent pregnancies. Recovery from the acute liver injury in tyrosinemia can be accomplished with nitisinone (2(2-nitro-4-fluoromethylbenzoyl)-1,3-cyclohexanedione). A patient with a systemic mitochondrial disease presenting as ALF, either independent of or associated with valproate intake, will be unlikely to benefit from liver transplant as outcome is uniformly poor. Characterization of underlying mechanisms of liver injury associated with immune dysregulation, metabolic disorders, and unsuspected acetaminophen exposure will identify patients who may be amenable to targeted treatment strategies.



Pathogenesis


The liver is remarkably tolerant and unperturbed despite its engagement with “first-pass” exposure to xenobiotics, foreign proteins, endotoxins, and other potential hepatotoxic substances. The initiation, potentiation, resolution, and recovery of liver injury are efficient, complex, enigmatic, and redundant. How and why patients within the same diagnostic category, such as autoimmune hepatitis, can have myriad presentations ranging from asymptomatic elevations of serum aminotransferases to fatal liver failure is yet to be determined. At the heart of most models of liver injury rests an aberrant or exuberant inflammatory or immune response. It will be through this prism that the discussion on pathogenesis will be viewed.



Hepatic Immunology


The liver is a central immunological organ with high exposure to circulating antigens and endotoxins [57]. In addition to hepatocytes, an estimated 20–40% of the liver cell mass consists of endothelial cells, Kupffer cells, or hepatic macrophages, lymphocytes, biliary cells, and stellate cells. The immunologic milieu that exists within the liver is notably different than that of the peripheral blood compartment. The balance between CD8+ and CD4+ T cells favors CD8+ cells with effector/memory cells more frequent in liver parenchyma than peripheral blood. Natural killer T-cells (NKT cells) as well as NK cells are more abundant in the liver where there is also a large source of gamma–delta T cells. Antigen-presenting cells may be conventional (e.g., Kupffer cells, liver sinusoidal endothelial cells, and dendritic cells) or unconventional (e.g., hepatocytes).


Both innate and adaptive immune responses are generated within the liver. However, given the hepatic enrichment by NK cells, NKT cells, and Kupffer cells, it is not surprising that the innate immune response predominates. Under normal circumstances, the lymphocyte-driven innate response provides a nimble but temperate reaction to pathogens that present to the liver. Kupffer cells and other immune cells express pattern-recognition receptors that detect and bind pathogen-associated molecular patterns expressed on the presumptive pathogen, which is then phagocytosed and quietly eliminated. Activated CD8+ cells residing in the liver direct the immune response against bacterial and viral invasion. Priming of intrahepatic T cells may occur within the liver without having to circulate through draining lymph nodes, thus expediting the immune response. Hepatic NK cells serve to modulate the inflammatory response by mediating the balance between proinflammatory (T helper 1) and anti-inflammatory (T helper 2) cytokines that are generated [57].


Adaptive immune responses involve both B and T cells. Very few B cells reside in the normal liver and thus little is known about their role except under pathologic conditions such as HBV and hepatitis C infections. Antigen-specific CD8+ T cells generate an effector response that includes rapid proliferation coupled with the production of proinflammatory cytokines as well as initiation of cytolytic mechanisms such as perforin and granzyme. Not unexpectedly, the redundancy of the human immune response cannot be easily divided into separate and distinct components. For example, findings suggest that NK cells may have features associated with the adaptive immune response such as “memory,” with rapid secondary expansion upon re-exposure to antigen that is associated with degranulation and cytokine production. Therefore, while missteps in the liver’s overall tolerance of real or perceived pathogens rarely result in liver failure, understanding these events will provide opportunities to extend our knowledge of the interactions between the liver and its environment.



Drug- and Toxin-Induced Injury


Drug-induced liver injury causes approximately 16% of PALF, with acetaminophen toxicity accounting for 80% of the drug-induced cases. The mechanisms by which drugs cause liver injury vary. Early mechanistic studies in mice demonstrated the formation of a reactive metabolite, which is responsible for hepatic glutathione depletion and initiation of the toxicity. This insight led to the rapid introduction of NAC as a clinical antidote as it is known to promote glutathione restoration. However, more recently, substantial progress was made in further elucidating the detailed mechanisms of APAP-induced cell death. Mitochondrial protein adducts trigger a mitochondrial oxidant stress, which requires amplification through a MAPK cascade that ultimately results in activation of c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) in the cytosol and translocation of phospho-JNK to the mitochondria. The enhanced oxidant stress is responsible for the membrane permeability transition pore opening and the membrane potential breakdown. The ensuing matrix swelling causes the release of intermembrane proteins such as endonuclease G, which translocate to the nucleus and induce DNA fragmentation. These pathophysiological signaling mechanisms can be additionally modulated by removing damaged mitochondria by autophagy and replacing them by mitochondrial biogenesis. Although recruitment of inflammatory cells is necessary for removal of cell debris in preparation for regeneration, these cells have the potential to aggravate the injury [58].


Additional aspects of hepatic injury resulting in drug-induced, herbal-induced, and herbal and dietary supplement-induced liver injury constitute an important and growing area of active research, though much remains to be discovered in terms of mechanism. Areas that have recently garnered interest include bile acid homeostasis, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, immune and inflammatory dysregulation, and lipophilicity [59].



Vascular Injury


Acute liver failure can result from reduced or absent arterial blood flow to the liver. The insult can occur because of hemorrhagic shock, trauma, sepsis, coarctation of the aorta, congenital heart defects associated with low cardiac output, congestive heart failure, and liver transplant. Myriad processes are initiated following liver ischemia that include the release of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, complement activation, along with the activation of both the innate and the adaptive immune response. Mitochondrial injury resulting in ATP depletion and surge in toxic reactive oxygen species contribute to the injury.


Liver failure associated with acute obstruction of hepatic outflow is rare but has been described in patients later found to have a coagulation disorder leading to a hypercoagulable state; in patients with Behçet syndrome or idiopathic Budd–Chiari syndrome; and in women immediately postpartum [2].

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Feb 26, 2021 | Posted by in GASTROENTEROLOGY | Comments Off on Chapter 4 – Acute Liver Failure in Children

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access