Benign Liver Lesions


Type of adenoma

Prevalence

Malignant transformation

MRI characteristics

Inflammatory HCAs

30–50 %

5–10 %

Plain MRI: hyperintense on T2WI; hypointense on T1WI

HNF-1
$$ \alpha $$
-mutated HCAs

30–35 %

Minimal

Heterogeneous hypointense areas on T1 out-phased sequences with significant signal drops (sensitivity 85 %, specificity 100 %)

On T2WI iso- or hypointense nodule, without significant restriction on DWI


$$ \beta $$
-Catenin-mutated HCAs

10–15 %

20–30 %
 

HNF hepatocyte nuclear factor, HCA hepatocellular adenoma, T2WI T2-weighted imaging, T1WI T1-weighted imaging, DWI diffusion-weighted imaging





Biopsy of Hepatic Adenoma


Because of the risk of a beta-catenin type of hepatic adenoma transforming into a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a bi opsy of the hepatic adenoma can be helpful in determining the subtype; however, owing to the vascular nature of the lesion, there is an increased risk of bleeding. As MRI with contrast medium can help to determine the subtype, liver biopsy is seldom required and should be reserved for cases in which the diagnosis is in question.



Management



Incidental Diagnosis, <5-cm Adenoma with No Symptoms


The first step in the management of the lesion should be to stop taking OCPs if they are involved. Then, 6 months after this, repeat imaging should be performed to document regression or stability in size. Surveillance should be carried out every 6 months for 2 years, and, if stable, annual imaging should be performed [21].


Symptomatic, >5-cm Adenomas


Lesions larger than 5 cm should be considered for resection because of their risk of malignant transformation, spontaneous hemorrhage, and symptoms. Nonsurgical management such as embolization is an alternative for high-operative-risk patients. Because of the higher risk of “beta-catenin” (a phenotypic expression )-type adenoma with regard to malignant transformation, patients should be referred for surgical resection irrespective of the size.


Women Contemplating Pregnancy or Who Are Pregnant


Hepatic adenomas are known to grow during pregnancy and hence there is a risk of acute rupture. However, owing to the rare nature of this disease, clear guidelines on managing these lesions in patients planning to be pregnant are not available. However, in general, lesions <5 cm can be observed with no intervention is required [22].


Hepatic Adenomas in Glycogen Storage Disease


Hepatic adenoma in these patients does pose a risk for malignant transformation. Management is slightly different. Nocturnal tube feeding intended to control the disease has been shown to decrease the size of the adenoma [23]. Given the risk for malignant transformation, resection can be offered. Liver transplantation in patients who develop HCC is curative for both HCC and glycogen storage disease.


Liver Adenomatosis


Liver adenomatosis is the condition where >3 to >10 adenomas are present [24, 25]. Nature and disease behavior are the same and hence similar management criteria apply in this subtype.


Adenomas Summary





  • Adenomas can grow with the use of OCPs.


  • They are mostly asymptomatic.


  • They may grow in size in women on hormonal therapy or during pregnancy.


  • Pregnancy is not contraindicated; however, adenomas measuring more than 5 cm should be addressed surgically before pregnancy.


  • Adenomas have malignant potential for HCC.



Focal Nodular Hyperplasia


Focal nodular hyperplasia is the second most commonly found hepatic lesion in the liver, with a reported prevalence rate of 0.03–0.3 % in autopsy series [26, 27]. FNH is proposed to be due to the arteriovenous malformation resulting in a response from the hepatic stellate cells, resulting in a “central scar” appearance on imaging.

Focal nodular hyperplasia is most frequently diagnosed incidentally, but can be symptomatic in 20–40 % of cases [28, 29]. It has a female preponderance and is proposed to be present at birth and likely to grow under the effect of female hormones. This is slightly different than hepatic adenoma, which may develop de novo under the influence of hormonal stimulation. However, similar to hemangioma, no clear link is found between the discontinuation of OCPs and a reduction in the size of FNH.


Diagnosis


Diagnosis is usually made by identifying the characteristic features on imaging. Liver enzymes as a rule are normal and tumor markers are not elevated. Differential diagnosis includes hepatic hemangiomas or hepatic adenomas. Caution should be observed as the central scar characteristic of FNH can also be seen in the fibrolamellar type of HCC


Imaging


Most of the lesions are solitary; however, multiple FNHs have been reported in 7–20 % of cases. A diagnosis of FNH can be confidently made by identifying the central scar on imaging.


Ultrasound


Focal nodular hyperplasia can be hyper-, hypo- or isoechoic on ultrasound and a central scar can only be identified in 20 % of the cases.


CT with Intravenous Contrast Medium


An appropriately timed liver CT protocol. The lesion is hyperdense in the arterial phase and either hypodense or isodense with a central scar in the portal venous phase.


MRI


On MRI, the FNH can be isointense or hypointense. A central scar can be seen on the delayed phase. In the T2 phase it is slightly hyperintense or isointense. MRI is the definitive imaging modality for FNH.


Management


Focal nodular hyperplasia usually remains stable and rarely causes symptoms. Unlike hepatic adenoma, it does not have the potential for malignant transformation. Thus, intervention with operative removal is only warranted when symptoms are clearly associated or there is diagnostic uncertainty.


FNH and OCPs


Although there may be a hormonal influence, discontinuation of OCPs is not absolutely recommended. However, in women who wish to continue taking OCPs, an annual ultrasound focusing on the change in size can be performed for 2–3 years. In women who discontinue OCPs, follow-up imaging is not required.


FNH Summary





  • FNHs are benign lesions in the liver.


  • They are identified by a central scar on imaging.


  • They rarely grow.


  • There is no risk of malignancy.


Nodular Regenerative Hyperplasia


Nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) is a benign transformation of hepatic parenchyma into nodular form. This is described as a consequence of changes in blood flow through the hepatic parenchyma. This, in turn, leads to hyperplasia of the hepatic architecture to compensate for atrophic hepatocytes in ischemic zones, resulting in a nodular appearance. NRH is associated with immunological and hematological disorders, cardiac or pulmonary disorders, and certain drugs and toxins have been implicated in NRH (Table 5.3).


Table 5.2
Imaging characteristics of benign lesions

























































 
Ultrasound

CE ultrasound

CT

MRI

HCA

Heterogeneous; hyperechoic if steatotic, but anechoic center if hemorrhagic

Arterial phase; hyperenhancement; hypoenhancement in portal phase and no enhancement in late phase

Well-demarcated with peripheral enhancement; homogeneous more often than heterogeneous; hypodense if steatotic, hyperdense if hemorrhagic

HNF-1α: signal lost on chemical shift: moderate arterial enhancement without persistent enhancement during delayed phase

IHCA: markedly hyperintense on T2WI with stronger signal peripherally: persistent enhancement in delayed phase

B-catenin: inflammatory subtype has same appearance as IHCA; noninflammatory is heterogeneous with no signal dropout on chemical shift, isointense on T1WI and T2WI with strong arterial enhancement and delayed washout

THCA

Variable appearance

Subcapsular feeding arteries with mixed or centripetal fitting: arterial phase shows hyperenhancement with hypoenhancement and no enhancement in the portal and late phases respectively

Hypo- to isoattenuating

T1WI: heterogeneous and well-defined iso-to hyperintense mass

Strongly hyperintense with persistent contrast enhancement in delayed phase

FNH

Generally isoechoic

Arterial phase: hyperenhancement; portal and late phases: isoenhancement

Central scar. Arterial phase shows homogenous hyperdense lesion; returns to precontrast density during portal phase, which is hypo- or isodense

T1WI: isointense or slightly hypointense. Gadolinium produces early enhancement with central scar enhancement during delayed phase

T2WI: slightly hyperintense or isointense

NRH

Isoechoic/hyperechoic

Isoenhancement during arterial, portal, and late phases

Unenhancing nodules, sometimes hypodense, with variable sizes (most sub-centimeter)

T1WI: hyperintense

T2WI: varied intensity (hypo-/iso-/hyperintense)

Hemangioma

Hyperechoic with well-defined rim and with few intranodular vessels

Arterial phase: discontinuous peripheral nodular enhancement: progressive and centripetal fill in the portal and late phases

Discontinuous peripheral nodular enhancement isoattenuating to aorta with progressive centripetal fill-in

T1WI: hypointense: discontinuous peripheral enhancement

T2WI: hyperintense relative to spleen

SHC

Homogeneous anechoic fluid-filled space without clear walls and with posterior acoustic enhancement

No enhancement during arterial, portal, or late phases. Lack of enhancement because of avascularity

Isodense to water (because of lack of vascularity): well-demarcated

T1WI: hypointense (no enhancement with gadolinium)

T2WI: hyperintense to spleen and isointense relative to simple fluid

HBCA

Anechoic with irregular walls and internal septations

Arterial phase: hyperenhancement of cystic wall, internal septations, and intracystic solid portion: enhancement washes out progressively: hypoenhancement during portal and late phases

Isodense lesion with well-defined thick wall, mural nodules, and internal septations

T1WI: multilocular mass with homogeneous hyperintensity


IHCA inflammatory hepatocellular adenoma, THCA telangiectatic hepatocellular adenoma, FNH focal nodular hyperplasia, NRH nodular regenerative hyperplasia, SHC sarcomatoid hepatocellular carcinoma, HBCA hepatobiliary cystadenomas



Table 5.3
Diseases associated with nodular regenerative hyperplasia




















Immunological

Hematological

Drugs and toxins

Cardiac and pulmonary disorders

Other

Autoimmune

Polyarteritis nodosa

Rheumatoid arthritis

Felty’s syndrome

Systemic lupus erythematosus

Progressive systemic sclerosis Antiphospholipid syndrome Primary biliary cirrhosis

Celiac disease

CREST syndrome

Primary Sjӧgren’s syndrome

Polymyalgia rheumatic

Lymphocytic thyroiditis Schnitzler syndrome

Immunodeficiency

Hypogammaglobulinemia

Common variable immunodeficiency

Hyper IgM syndrome

Bruton syndrome

HIV patients

Acquired protein S deficiency

Thrombophilia

Myeloproliferative neoplasms

Chronic myelogenous leukemia

Primary myelofibrosis (myeloid metaplasia)

Polycythemia vera

Essential thrombocytosis

Lymphoproliferative neoplasms

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Hodgkin’s lymphoma

Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma

Waldenstrӧm’s macroglobulinemia

Other

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

Sickle cell anemia

Mastocytosis

Aplastic anemia

Chemotherapeutic agents

6-thioguanine

Busulfan and 6-thioguanine

Doxyrubicin

Cyclophosphamide

Chlorambucil

Cytosine arabinoside

Bleomycin

Carmustine

Oxaliplatin

Azathioprine

HIV drugs

Nevirapine

Didanosine

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 20, 2017 | Posted by in GASTROENTEROLOGY | Comments Off on Benign Liver Lesions

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access