, Franz Raulf2 and Horst Mlitz3
(1)
Department of Proctology, Clinic for Dermatology at RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
(2)
Medical Center of Coloproctology, Münster, Germany
(3)
Medical Center of Coloproctology, Saarbrücken, Germany
11.1 Preliminary Note
Amazingly enough, the healing rates after treatment for chronic anal fissure stated in randomized controlled trials are extremely divergent. There are many reasons for that.
In some trials, anal fissures are not exactly defined; others speak of acute and chronic fissures. There are also trials which take only the duration of disease as the basis. Other authors indeed treat the morphological findings differently, but apply different criteria when they also describe the existence of a skin tag and/or hypertrophied anal papilla and/or anal cryptitis and/or fistula as a diagnostic criterion in addition to the actual anal fissure. A look at the results of nifedipine trials in Table 11.1 illustrates that practice.
Table 11.1
Definitions of chronic anal fissure in eight clinical nifedipine trials
Author (year) | Definition |
---|---|
Cook et al. (1999) | Duration of continued presence more than 2 months |
Perrotti et al. (2002) | Duration of continued presence more than 2 months |
Agaoglu et al. (2003) | Duration of continued presence more than 2–3 months, fibers of internal anal sphincter muscle visible |
Ezri and Susmallian (2003) | Duration of continued presence more than 2–3 months,fibers of internal anal sphincter muscle visible or presence of anal skin tag |
Ho and Ho (2005) | Duration of continued presence more than 1.5 months and/or fibers of internal anal sphincter muscle visible and presence of anal skin tag and/or presence of anal papilla |
Mustafa et al. (2005) | Duration of continued presence more than 2–3 months and fibers of internal anal sphincter muscle visible and/or presence of anal papilla |
Tranqui et al. (2006) | Fibers of internal anal sphincter muscle visible |
Katsinelos et al. (2006) | Duration of continued presence more than 2 months, fibers of internal anal sphincter muscle visible |
But how important the existence of secondary changes is with regard to the healing rate after conservative and surgical therapy, has been proved by Brühl and Schmauz (1999) and also by Gupta and Kalasskar (2003). Brühl and Schmauz compared healing rates in anal fissure patients with hypertrophied anal papilla and/or skin tag with the healing rates of patients without these secondary changes. The first group did not show a single case of healing under local glyceryl trinitrate therapy; the second group, however, showed healing in 80% of the cases. Gupta was able to prove that lateral sphincterotomy and simultaneous removal of the hypertrophied anal papilla lead to better results, less pain, less secretion, less pruritus ani, and to greater patient satisfaction (89%) than in those cases in which the anal papilla had not been removed (64%).
Another reason for the varying healing rates lies in the differing application of topical medication, namely, intra-anal, perianal, or a combination of both.
Galenics certainly play an important role, too. Glyceryl trinitrate, for example, is incorporated in the following components: paraffin (yellow, white, liquid), Vaseline, glycerine, or also in lanolin with Vaseline. Ointments, creams, and gels are used as different topical medications. The local availability of the agent, and thus its efficiency, is influenced by the various basic components of the topical medication, the differing solubility, the velocity of the solution process, and the diffusibility.
Performing lateral sphincterotomy, most authors purely schematically transect the internal anal sphincter muscle as far as the pectinate line or even higher without having an exact idea of the actual size of the muscle. Depending on the author, between 33% and 57% of the muscle width is dissected if the internal anal sphincter muscle is transected as far as the pectinate line (see Chap. 11.3.1).
Also, the measurement methods to provide objective evidence of the therapeutic effect have to be evaluated critically.
Various instruments and not approved techniques are used for pressure measurement. Thus, some authors performed continuous-flow anorectal manometry, others intermittent manometry. Water or air-filled balloons, open perfused catheters, or electronic pressure sensors were used as measuring instruments. The diameters of the differing balloon systems lay between 1 and 25 mm. In many cases, the collectives of patients and control groups were too small to allow representative conclusions. In addition, one has to consider that the measuring results are, for instance, dependent on age, gender, and time of day as well as on the stage of the anal fissure disorder (painfulness) and the diameter of the pressure probe. As a rule, an older chronic anal fissure is accompanied by a lower resting pressure than a new one.
Also, the process of anorectal manometry as such can produce artifacts. The insertion of the catheter intensifies the pain, a spasm occurs, that is, the involuntary cramp of both the anal sphincter muscles. Jostarndt et al. (1986) found a significant correlation between pain and resting pressure: the greater the pain, the higher the resting pressure.
Laser Doppler flowmetry is employed for the identification of possible regional underperfusion. For this purpose, a helium-neon laser is used, whose radiation is coupled into the skin. Measurement by Laser Doppler flowmetry is considered as a relative measure of the microvascular blood flow of the skin, and is mostly given in arbitrary units. Absolute flowmetry measurements are not feasible because relevant parameters are not known. They comprise the vascular architecture within the measuring range, local hematocrit, the hemoglobin level, the thickness of the epidermis, and subsequently the exact penetration depth (1–6 mm) of the laser beam. The signal reflected from an unmoving white surface corresponds to the flux number zero. The test signal on the skin contains information received from capillaries, arterioles, and venules.
The definition of the term “healing” presents a particular problem. According to conservative therapy trials as well as after exclusive lateral sphincterotomy, so-called secondary changes remain in situ because they are incapable of remission, neither after these therapies nor spontaneously. How have these findings to be assessed? Are they the cause of relapse? Were fistula formation avoidable, if “healing” had also led to the remission of these changes?
Lindsey et al. (2004) have presented the following four stages of “anal fissure healing”:
Stage I: Fissure healed/symptoms resolved/no surgery required
Stage II: Fissure unhealed/symptoms resolved/no surgery required
Stage III: Fissure unhealed/symptoms satisfactorily improved/no surgery required
Stage IV: Fissure unhealed/symptoms not satisfactorily improved/surgery required
Obviously, the authors are satisfied with their findings concerning Stages I–III and regard these results as “healing.” Scholz et al. (2007) have come to the same assessment.
11.2 Conservative Therapy
11.2.1 Glyceryl Trinitrate
Glyceryl trinitrate (GTN, glycerol trinitrate, glycerine trinitrate) is a rather unstable, poorly water-soluble liquid. The intake of 0.01 g of the substance leads to headache. GTN is especially used in the therapy of angina pectoris and cardiac insufficiency because of its vasodilating effect induced by the release of nitrogen monoxide. It is available in Germany as rectal ointment (0.4% Rectogesic®) for pain relief of chronic anal fissure. A comparative cost accounting was done under the assumption that Rectogesic® therapy achieves healing rates which are nearly as high as those after sphincterotomy. The result was that Rectogesic® treatment will cost £ 616 compared to £ 840 for sphincterotomy treatment (Christie and Guest 2002).
After topical application of glyceryl trinitrate, a decrease in anal resting pressure occurs, which provides therefore a better perfusion of the anoderm and pain relief. Since the effect lasts only for a few hours (Ciccaglione et al. 2000; Jonas et al. 2002), a more frequent application over a period of some weeks becomes necessary.
The clinical trials reviewed by us rest upon differing durations of treatment. The following authors applied GTN one to three times per day for 8 weeks: Bailey et al. (2002); Bielecki and Kolodziejczak (2003); Brisinda et al. (2007); Carapeti et al. (1999); De Nardi et al. (2006); Evans et al. (2001); Hashmat and Ishfaq (2007); Jonas et al. (2002); Jones et al. (2006); Libertiny et al. (2002); Lund and Scholefield (1997); Mustafa et al. (2005); Sileri et al. (2007); Zuberi et al. (2000). The following authors applied GTN for six weeks: Brisinda et al. (1999); Chaudhuri et al. (2001); Christie and Guest (2002); Colak et al. (2003); Hyman and Cataldo (1999); Jonas et al. (1999); Lund and Scholefield (1997); Maan et al. (2004); Mishra et al. (2005); Richard et al. (2000); Watson et al. (1996). But there are also reports of shorter or significantly longer periods of therapy. The long-term therapy with nitrates can lead to a weakening of the pharmacological effect (tachyphylaxis). The concentration of GTN in topical medication varies between 0.1% and 0.8%. Despite differing concentrations (0.1–0.4%), the healing rate in 304 anal fissure patients was always 50% after intra-anal application for a period of 8 weeks (Bailey et al. 2002). Carapeti et al. (1999) treated patients with increasing doses of 0.1–0.6% GTN and described similar effects. During a dose-finding study, Watson et al. (1996) treated 19 patients with 0.2–0.8% GTN ointment. To achieve the desired 25% decrease in anal resting pressure, 15 of the 19 patients required a concentration higher than 0.2%. After 6 weeks, nine patients were free of anal fissures. Scholefield et al. (2003) increased systematically the GTN doses in a placebo-controlled RCT. After 2 months, 37.5% of the patients in the placebo group were healed. The healing rate after the application of 0.1% GTN was 46.9%, 40.4% when 0.2% GTN was applied, and 54.1% after a dose of 0.4% GTN.
Differences arise also due to the variety of carriers used for the production of drugs for topical application. Thus, GTN is embedded in paraffin, be it yellow, white, or liquid (Altomare et al. 2000; Bassotti et al. 2000; Brisinda et al.; Carapeti et al.; Dorfman et al. 1999; Hasegawa et al. 2000; Hashmat and Ishfaq; Kennedy et al. 1999; Loder et al. 1994; Lund et al. 1996; Pitt et al. 2001; Watson et al.). GTN embedded in Vaseline was applied by Bacher et al. 1997; Hyman and Cataldo, in glycerin (Oettlé 1997); and in lanolin/Vaseline (Brown et al. 2007; Colak et al.; Richard et al.). Obviously, the magistral preparation of a GTN topical medication is difficult. Azarnoff et al. (2007) analyzed a 0.3% GTN ointment which had been prepared by 24 American pharmacies, and noticed nonconformity with US pharmacopeia in 46% of cases. The median concentration was only 0.2008%, for example.
Also, the sites of GTN application are not uniform. Some authors apply GTN perianally, some intra-anally, and others both perianally and intra-anally. Torrabadella and Salgado (2005) treated 11 patients intra-anally and 15 patients perianally by applying GTN ointment of the same dose. They found a higher healing rate and a significantly better decrease in the anal resting pressure when GTN was applied intra-anally.
Many questions remain unanswered on the basis of these findings. Which topical medication carrier combined with which GTN concentration is the best choice? How many times a day and for which period of time should therapy be carried out? Which is the best site of GTN application? Are there any exclusion criteria like secondary changes or migraine?
As already mentioned, anal fissure patients are characterized by a high degree of tolerance (Table 11.2). Eight trials comprising 491 patients, who have been treated with GTN, mention a period of suffering that lies between 1.9 and 240 months.
Table 11.2
Duration of symptoms in 491 patients before GTN treatment for anal fissure
Author (year) | Anal fissurepatients (n) | Duration of symptomsbefore GTN therapy months |
---|---|---|
Bacher et al. (1997) | 20 | 6 |
Bacher et al. (1997) | 15 | 5.5 |
Lund and Scholefield (1997) | 38 | 12 (2–240) |
Richard et al. (2000) | 38 | 1.9 ± 2.75 |
Richard et al. (2000) | 44 | 2.3 ± 3.65 |
Altomare et al. (2000) | 59 | 10.5 ± 9 |
Altomare et al. (2000) | 60 | 15 ± 21 |
Evans et al. (2001) | 27 | 6–8 |
Evans et al. (2001) | 33 | 6–8 |
Colak et al. (2002) | 52 | 18 (3–36) |
Colak et al. (2002) | 37 | 14 (6–24) |
Mustafa et al. (2005) | 10 | 8.95 (4–24) |
Mustafa et al. (2005) | 10 | 7.65 (4–22) |
Schiano et al. (2006) | 16 | 17.5 (6–31) |
Schiano et al. (2006) | 16 | 16.88 (8–34) |
Schiano et al. (2006) | 16 | 15.19 (7–31) |
Total | 491 |
Anal Resting Pressure
To lower anal resting pressure, Bassotti et al. (2000) treated 12 anal fissure patients perianally with 0.2% nitrate ointment and saw a significant decrease after 20 minutes.
According to Brisinda et al. (1999), resting pressure in 25 patients dropped from 83.4 ± 15.0 to 69.5 ± 16.8 mm Hg after the application of a 0.2% GTN ointment for 1 month. Loder et al. (1994) were able to show a decrease in anal resting pressure of 27% after perianal application of 0.2% GTN in 10 patients. Lund et al. (1997) noticed a significant decrease in anal resting pressure in 23 anal fissure patients 20 min after the application of 0.2% GTN. In 95% of all anal fissure patients, 0.2% GTN ointment lowered anal resting pressure by 20% or more (Thornton et al. 2005). Only GTN reduced effectively the anal resting pressure, but not Vaseline, xylocaine, or hydrocortisone (Maan et al. 2004).
The behavior of anal squeeze pressure under GTN therapy is not uniform (Table 11.3).
Table 11.3
Anal resting pressure and squeeze pressure in 229 patients before and after GTN therapy (in mm Hg or cm H2O)
Author (year) | mmHg | cmH2O | Patients (n) | Anal restingpressure | Squeeze pressure |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bacher et al. (1997) | × | 35 | |||
Before | 110 | 177 | |||
After GTN therapy | 87 | 157 | |||
Brisinda et al. (1999) | × | 25 | |||
Before | 83 ± 15.0 | 79 ± 26 | |||
After GTN therapy | 71 ± 17 | 86 ± 31 | |||
Brisinda et al. (2007) | 50 | ||||
Before | 89 | 74 | |||
After GTN therapy | 72 | 79 | |||
Kennedy et al. (1999) | × | 24 | |||
Before | 125 ± 8 | n/a | |||
After GTN therapy | 107 ± 7 | ||||
Loder et al. (1994) | × | 11 | |||
Before | 103 | n/a | |||
After GTN therapy | 79 | ||||
Lund et al. (1996) | × | 21 | |||
Before | 118 | n/a | |||
After GTN therapy | 70 | ||||
Lund and Scholefield (1997) | × | 39 | |||
Before | 122 ± 44 | n/a | |||
After GTN therapy | 72 ± 33 | ||||
Mustafa et al. (2005) | × | 10 | |||
Before | 113 ± 13 | n/a | |||
After GTN therapy | 70 ± 13 | ||||
Schiano et al. (2006) | × | 16 | |||
Before | 129 ± 18 | 218 ± 37 | |||
After GTN therapy | 96 ± 17 | 168 ± 26 |
Healing Rates
Healing rates between 41% and 85% could be achieved in 12 clinical GTN trials with a total of 469 patients. The study design, however, was not uniform (Table 11.4).
Table 11.4
Healing rates after GTN treatment in 12 uncontrolled trials with 469 patients (in %)
Author (year) | Patients (n) | Healing rate afterGTN therapy (%) |
---|---|---|
Dorfman et al. (1999) | 27 | 56 |
Gorfine (1995) | 12 | 83 |
Gorfine (1995) | 30 | 77 |
Hasegawa et al. (2000) | 40 | 50 |
Hyman and Cataldo (1999) | 17 | 41 |
Jonas et al. (1999) | 49 | 45 |
Jonas et al. (2002) | 93 | 61 |
Lund and Scholefield (1997) | 39 | 85 |
Lund and Scholefield (1998) | 41 | 73 |
Palazzo et al. (2000) | 45 | 73 |
Pitt et al. (2001) | 64 | 41 |
Ward et al. (2000) | 12 | 66 |
Total | 469 |
Anodermal Perfusion
Laser Doppler flowmetry of anodermal perfusion was carried out before and after the application of GTN ointment in six anal fissure patients (Kua et al. 2001). Before therapy began, a significant reduction of blood flow in the area of the anal fissure was noticed in comparison with other sectors of the anoderm. After the application of GTN, a significant increase of perfusion was observed in the anal fissure area within the first hour.
The following controlled trials deal with the effect of GTN ointment in comparison with other therapeutic measures.
GTN Versus Self-Bougienage
Schiano et al. (2006) compared two groups of 16 patients each: one group practiced self-bougienage with an anal cryothermal dilator, and the other was treated with 0.25% GTN. The authors saw healing in 56% of cases in the first group compared to 62.5% in the second group. Sileri et al. (2007) achieved similar results in a total of 156 patients. The healing rate of those who used anal dilators was 46% compared to 40% of those who received a 0.2% GTN treatment.
GTN Versus Instrumental Anal Dilatation
Boschetto et al. (2004) treated 18 patients with GTN ointment and 18 with a hydropneumatic dilatation which was performed only once. The healing rate was 39% in the first group and 95% in the second one. Tranqui et al. (2006) also performed pneumatic dilatation in combination with GTN ointment in 21 patients. They compared the healing rate in this group with that of 56 patients who had received botulinum toxin together with nifedipine ointment. The healing rate was 71% in the first group and 94% in the second group.
GTN Versus Placebo
The analysis of seven trials with 227 verum patients and 221 placebo controls revealed healing rates of 24–79% in the verum group, and of 8–52% in the placebo group (Table 11.5).
Table 11.5
Healing rates after GTN therapy in seven controlled trials with 227 patients
Author (year) | Patients (n) | Healing rate(GTN %) |
---|---|---|
Altomare et al. (2000) | 59 | 49 |
Carapeti et al. (1999) | 23 | 67 |
Chaudhuri et al. (2001) | 10 | 70 |
Graziano et al. (2001) | 22 | 79 |
Kennedy et al. (1999) | 24 | 46 |
Lund and Scholefield (1997) | 38 | 68 |
Scholefield et al. (2003) | 51 | 24 |
Total | 227 |
GTN Local Versus GTN Transdermal
GTN Versus Nifedipine
Ezri and Susmallian (2003) compared the effect of GTN ointment and nifedipine ointment in 26 patients each, and saw healing rates of 58 and 89%, respectively. Mustafa et al. (2005) tested the oral dose of nifedipine in comparison with GTN ointment in two groups of 10 patients each. The healing rate in both collectives was 50%.
GTN Versus Diltiazem (DTZ)
The authors above (Table 11.6) treated one collective each with GTN or diltiazem locally. Healing rates were not significantly different.
Table 11.6
Healing rates in five trials: GTN versus diltiazem therapy with 275 patients (in %)
Author (year) | Patients with | Healing rate after | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GTN therapy (n) | DTZ therapy (n) | GTN therapy (%) | DTZ therapy (%) | |
Ala et al. (2012) | 36 | 25 | 60 | 91 |
Bielecki and Kolodziejczak (2003) | 21 | 22 | 86 | 90 |
Jonas (2002) | 39 | 12 | 69 | 58 |
Kocher et al. (2002) | 29 | 31 | 86 | 78 |
Shrivastava et al. (2007) | 30 | 30 | 73 | 80 |
TOTAL | 155 | 120 |
Sajid et al. (2008, 2012) proved by meta-analysis that both substances are similarly effective and have the same recurrence rates. GTN, however, produces more side effects.
GTN Versus Xylocaine/Vaseline/Hydrocortisone
Bacher et al. (1997) treated eight patients with GTN ointment and five patients with xylocaine ointment. The anal fissures healed in 12% of cases in the GTN group and in 0.0% in the xylocaine group. Four groups of 16 anal fissure patients each were treated with GTN ointment, xylocaine ointment, Vaseline, or hydrocortisone. Healing rates were 94%, 69%, 25%, and 75%, respectively.
GTN Versus Botulinum Toxin (BTX)
Two collectives of 130 patients each were given either GTN ointment or a BTX injection. Both therapies showed healing rates of 59%. In a meta-analysis, Sajid et al. (2007) proves that GTN is just as efficient as BTX (Table 11.7).
Table 11.7
Healing rates in five trials: GTN versus BTX therapy (in %)
Author (year) | Patients with | Healing rate after | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GTN therapy (n) | BTX therapy (n) | GTN therapy (%) | BTX therapy (%) | |
Brisinda et al. (1999) | 25 | 25 | 60 | 96 |
Brisinda et al. (2007) | 50 | 50 | 70 | 92 |
De Nardi et al. (2006) | 15 | 15 | 67 | 57 |
Fruehauf et al. (2006) | 25 | 25 | 52 | 24 |
Jones et al. (2006)a | 15 | 15 | 47 | 27 |
Total | 130 | 130 |
GTN Versus Sphincterotomy
The analysis of seven trials with 388 patients (Table 11.8) shows healing rates after GTN treatment (n = 200) between 30% and 90%, and after sphincterotomy (n = 188) between 85% and 100%.
Table 11.8
Healing rates in seven studies on GTN therapy versus sphincterotomy (in %)
Author (year) | Patients treated with | Healing rate after | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GTN (n) | Sphincterotomy (n) | GTN (%) | Sphincterotomy (%) | |
Brown et al. (2007) | 27 | 24 | 41 | 100 |
Evans et al. (2001) | 34 | 31 | 61 | 97 |
Hashmat and Ishfaq (2007) | 28 | 28 | 64 | 100 |
Libertiny et al. (2002) | 35 | 35 | 54 | 100 |
Mishra et al. (2005) | 20 | 20 | 90 | 85 |
Oettlé (1997) | 12 | 12 | 90 | 100 |
Richard et al. (2000) | 44 | 38 | 30 | 90 |
Total | 200 | 188 |
Complication “Headache” After GTN Therapy
Table 11.9 shows that the complication “headache” rate lies within a range between 16% and 100% of patients in 19 trials with a total of 775 individuals.
Table 11.9
Headache after GTN therapy in 19 trials with 775 anal fissure patients (in %)
Author (year) | Anal fissurepatients (n) | Headache after GTN therapy | |
---|---|---|---|
(n) | (%) | ||
Colak et al. (2002) | 37 | 6 | 16 |
Loder et al. (1994) | 11 | 2 | 18 |
Richard et al. (2000) | 44 | 8 | 18 |
Kennedy et al. (1999) | 24 | 6 | 25 |
Mustafa et al. (2005) | 10 | 3 | 30 |
Altomare et al. (2000) | 68 | 23 | 33 |
Brisinda et al. (2007) | 50 | 17 | 34 |
Bacher et al. (1997) | 126 | 50 | 40 |
Ezri and Susmallian (2003) | 26 | 10 | 40 |
Fruehauf et al. (2006) | 25 | 13 | 50 |
Lund and Scholefield (1997) | 80 | 47 | 58 |
Kocher et al. (2002) | 29 | 17 | 59 |
Hasegawa et al. (2000) | 56 | 34 | 60 |
Libertiny et al. (2002) | 19 | 12 | 62 |
Dorfman et al. (1999) | 27 | 17 | 63 |
Carapeti et al. (1999) | 46 | 33 | 72 |
Zuberi et al. (2000) | 18 | 13 | 72 |
Hyman and Cataldo (1999) | 33 | 29 | 88 |
Hashmat and Ishfaq (2007) | 46 | 46 | 100 |
Total | 775 | 386 |
Recurrence Rates
Nineteen trials with a total of 535 patients show recurrence rates between 6% and 64% (Table 11.10).
Table 11.10
Recurrence rates after GTN therapy in 22 trials with 535 patients (in %)
Author (year) | Anal fissurepatients (N) | Recurrence afterGTN therapy (%) |
---|---|---|
Altomare et al. (2000) | 26 | 19 |
Bacher et al. (1997) | 18 | 22 |
Brown et al. (2007) | 27 | 41 |
Carapeti et al. (1999) | 23 | 33 |
Colak et al. (2003) | 48 | 15 |
Colak et al. (2003) | 34 | 9 |
De Nardi et al. (2006) | 15 | 33 |
Dorfman et al. (1999) | 15 | 27 |
Evans et al. (2001) | 20 | 45 |
Ezri and Susmallian (2003) | 26 | 31 |
Hasegawa et al. (2000) | 13 | 8 |
Hasegawa et al. (2000) | 7 | 57 |
Hashmat and Ishfaq (2007) | 28 | 33 |
Jonas (2002) | 25 | 64 |
Kocher et al. (2002) | 26 | 8 |
Libertiny et al. (2002) | 35 | 9 |
Lund et al. (1996) | 21 | 19 |
Lund and Scholefield (1997) | 31 | 16 |
Lund and Scholefield (1997) | 38 | 8 |
Richard et al. (2000) | 13 | 38 |
Schiano di Visconte et al. (2006) | 16 | 19 |
Shrivastava et al. (2007) | 30 | 32 |
TOTAL | 535 |
Conclusion
GTN ointment is regarded as first-line therapy for chronic anal fissure with the intention of pain relief. The differing results concerning healing and relapse rate are probably due to methodological shortcomings of the clinical trials with regard to varying galenics, dosage, and the unknown bioavailability of the preparations which are mostly magistrally produced.
11.2.2 Isosorbide Dinitrate
Isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) is used in the prevention and long-term therapy for angina pectoris. It is not approved for use in the local treatment of anal fissure. In Germany, it is available in pharmacies as Isoket ointment or TD spray Iso Mack®. Only Lysy et al. (1998) use an officinal Isoket spray in their clinical trials. Schouten et al. (1996) and Songun et al. (2003) embedded ISDN in lanolin, white Vaseline, or liquid paraffin, while Parellada (2004) incorporated it in white Vaseline. Werre et al. (2001) gave no details on the ointment carrier they employed. ISDN must be dissolved in an acid environment to ensure its full effect. It is therefore uncertain whether the preparations mentioned above have any effect at all.
ISDN releases nitrogen monoxide and has a relaxing effect on the internal anal sphincter muscle (Parellada 2004; Lysy et al. 1998; Schouten et al. 1996; Werre et al. 2001). It has a vasodilatory effect, too, and leads to a better perfusion (Schouten et al.). This relaxation should facilitate a “reversible chemical sphincterotomy.” Headache frequently occurs in the course of treatment. It generally stops some days after further application. Table 11.11 shows the details of five ISDN therapy studies.
Table 11.11
Details of five local ISDN therapy studies with 221 patients
Author (year) | Anal fissure | Patients (n) | PercentISDN therapy | Treatmentin weeks | Follow-up weeks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Schouten et al. (1996) | Chronic | 34 | 1.0 | 6–12 | 12 |
Lysy et al. (1998) | Chronic | 41 | Spray (three times a day) | 4 | 11 |
Werre et al. (2001) | n/a | 20 | 1.0 (five times a day) | 5 | 20 |
Songun et al. (2003) | Acute/chronic | 100 | 1.0 (five times a day) | 8 | 48 |
Parellada (2004) | Chronic | 26 | 0.2 (three times a day) | 10 | 96 |
However, the trials as such are hardly comparable because chronic anal fissures, for instance, and also both acute and chronic anal fissures are dealt with simultaneously, or no details whatsoever are given to explain the type of anal fissure. Differing concentrations (0.2–1.0%) of the topical medication were used, which were applied between three and eight times per day. The duration of therapy varied between 4 and 12 weeks. Healing rates lay between 67% and 100%, and the relapse rate could reach 14.6% (Table 11.12).
Table 11.12
Healing and recurrence after local ISDN therapy in five trials with 155 patients
Author (year) | Patients (n) | Healing after localISDN therapy (%) | Recurrence (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Schouten et al. (1996) | 34 | 88 | 7.0 |
Lysy et al. (1998) | 41 | 83 | 14.6 |
Werre et al. (2001) | 20 | 85 | 10.0 |
Parellada (2004) | 27 | 67 | n/a |
Berkel et al. (2014) | 33 | 33 | 28.0 |
Total | 155 |
Conclusion
Only few and, in addition, not comparable clinical trials on local ISDN therapy are known. Therefore, ISDN therapy cannot be recommended.
11.2.3 Diltiazem
Diltiazem is a calcium channel blocker which leads to relaxation of smooth musculature and vascular dilation.
Carapeti et al. (2000) and Jonas et al. (2001) noticed a significant drop in anal resting pressure after local application of 2% diltiazem gel. Headache, frequently observed after employment of GTN and ISDN, does not seem to play a role in the use of diltiazem. Only one author (Kocher et al. 2002) reports this side effect. However, perianal pruritus is described in 7% of cases after diltiazem treatment, probably caused by the basic component of the topical medication (Knight et al. 2001; Jonas et al. 2001). Therefore, diltiazem should be incorporated in basic cream DAC (Neues Rezeptur-Formularium 2007).
Table 11.13 shows that the relapse rate after diltiazem therapy seems to be lower than that after GTN application: 12.5% vs. 32% (Shrivastava et al. 2007) and 0.0% vs. 2.5% (Kocher et al. 2002).
Table 11.13
Details of 11 topical diltiazem therapy studies with 441 patients
Author (year) | Patients (n) | DTZ therapy application | Durationweeks | Healing | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(n) | (%) | ||||
Carapeti et al. (2000) | 15 | 2% gel, three times a day | 8 | 10 | 67 |
Jonas et al. (2001) | 26 | 2% gel, twice a day | 8 | 17 | 65 |
Knight et al. (2001) | 64 | 2% gel, twice a day | 9 | 47 | 73 |
Kocher et al. (2002) | 31 | 2% cream, twice a day | 6–8 | 22 | 71 |
DasGupta et al. (2002) | 23 | 2% gel, three times a day | 12 | 3 | 48 |
Jonas et al. (2002) | 39 | 2% gel, twice a day | 8 | 19 | 49 |
Griffin et al. (2002) | 47 | 2% cream, twice a day | 8 | 23 | 48 |
Bielecki et al. (2003) | 22 | 2% ointment, twice a day | 8 | 19 | 86 |
Bader et al. (2006) | 32 | 2% gel, twice a day | 6 | 30 | 94 |
Nash et al. (2006) | 112 | 2% cream, twice a day | 6 | 46 | 41 |
Shrivastava et al. (2007) | 30 | 2% ointment | 6 | 24 | 80 |
Samim et al. (2012) | 74 | 2% cream, twice a day | 12 | 32 | 43 |
Total | 515 | 292 |
Diltiazem is available as 2% gel, cream, or ointment. Yet, the basic components of the topical medication are not revealed. Diltiazem was applied perianally, intra-anally, or both perianally and intra-anally two or three times a day. Topical treatment lasted between 6 and 12 weeks, and healing rates (n = 441) lay between 41% and 94%. These differing results probably depend on the different basic components of the topical medications, the differing sites of application, the duration of therapy varying in length, and on the disunity in defining chronic anal fissure.
Conclusion
Headache does not occur after treatment with a diltiazem topical medication. The healing rate is a little higher than that after GTN therapy, and the relapse rate seems to be lower.
11.2.4 Nifedipine
Nifedipine is a calcium antagonist. The agent has an effect particularly on the smooth musculature and leads to a vascular dilation. An oral dose of 20 mg nifedipine results in a significant reduction in anal resting pressure in healthy as well as in anal fissure patients, but not in squeeze pressure (Agaoglu et al. 2003; Cook et al. 1999; Mustafa et al. 2005). The active agent is highly sensitive to light. In Germany, nifedipine is approved for the treatment of both chronic stable and vasospastic angina, and also of essential hypertension. Depending on the dose, there have been hints at an increase of complications of the cardiovascular system, like myocardial infarction, and at rising mortality rates. Headache, flush and peripheral edemata are very often reported in the course of the treatment.
Therefore, an oral dose administered for the treatment of chronic anal fissure is unjustified because of low healing rates and partly grave side effects. The local application of 0.2–0.5% nifedipine, however, appears to result in a high healing rate and a lower complication rate (Tables 11.14 and 11.15).
Table 11.14
Healing rate after oral or local nifedipine application in nine trials with 444 patients (in %)
Author (year) | Nifedipineapplication | Patients (n) | Healing | |
---|---|---|---|---|
(n) | (%) | |||
Agaoglu et al. (2003) | Oral | 10 | 5 | 50 |
Ho and Ho (2005) | Oral | 41 | 7 | 17 |
Mustafa et al. (2005) | Oral | 10 | 5 | 50 |
Golfam et al. (2014) | Oral | 65 | 29 | 49 |
Antropoli et al. (1999) | Local | 141 | 134 | 95 |
Ezri and Susmallian (2003) | Local | 26 | 23 | 89 |
Perrotti et al. (2002) | Local | 55 | 25 | 45 |
Katsinelos et al. (2006) | Local | 31 | 26 | 84 |
Golfam et al. (2014) | Local | 65 | 43 | 73 |
Total | 444 | 297 |
Table 11.15
Details of three local nifedipine therapy studies with 138 patients
Author (year) | Patients (n) | Nifedipineapplied (%) | Additional therapyapplication | Healing durationweeks | Healingrate (%) | Follow-up(Months) | Complications(%) | Recurrencerate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Perrotti et al. (2002) | 55 | 0.3 | 1.5% Lidocaine | 6 | 94.5 | 12 | 0.0 | 5.0 |
Ezri and Susmallian (2003) | 52 | 0.2 | None | 24 | 89.0 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 42.0 |
Katsinelos et al. (2006) | 31 | 0.5 | Dietary fiber | 8 | 96.7 | 19 | 50.0 | 6.6 |
Total | 138 | 92.7 | 13.7 | 17.4 |
Conclusion
An evaluation of the local nifedipine therapy requires the results of further randomized controlled trials.
11.2.5 Indoramin
Indoramin is an alpha-1-adrenoreceptor blocker which is used in the treatment for hypertension.
In 2000, Pitt et al. treated chronic anal fissure patients and healthy controls with an oral dose of indoramin, and afterwards found a significant reduction of anal resting pressure for the duration of 3 h.
A year later, they saw a significant drop in anal resting pressure in a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial with a total of 23 patients. Six weeks later, they ound a healing rate of 7% (n = 1) in the indoramin group, and a rate of 22% (n = 2) in the placebo group. Pulse and blood pressure values did not change, but about one-half of the patients complained of a “blocked nose” after the intake of indoramin. The trial was discontinued because the single one “healed” anal fissure recurred after another 6 weeks.
11.2.6 Arginine
Arginine (L-arginine) is a water-soluble amino acid which is present in many foodstuffs. For instance, 100 g peanuts contain 3.46 g arginine.
Arginine leads to the release of nitrogen monoxide (NO), which physiologically causes vascular dilation.
In 2002, Griffin et al. were the first to report a relaxing effect of arginine. They perianally applied 400 mg L-arginine gel to 25 healthy probands and afterwards noticed a decrease in anal resting pressure by 46% on average for the duration of at least 2 h. Side effects such as headache were not found. Later, Acheson et al. (2003) carried out in vitro studies on isolated human internal anal sphincter muscles. They found an average decline in the myogenic tone of 40.2%.
Fifteen anal fissure patients were treated intra-anally by Gosselink et al. (2005) with 40% L-arginine gel five times a day. The healing rate after 18 weeks was 62%. None of the patients complained of headache. Anal resting pressure was significantly reduced, while anodermal blood flow was distinctly increased.
An oral dose of 15 g daily for 7 days led to a rise of the arginine plasma level in healthy probands, but led neither to a reduction of the anal resting pressure nor to an improvement of anodermal perfusion. Side effects were not observed (Prins et al. 2005).
Conclusion
Further randomized controlled clinical trials have to be carried out for the evaluation of the arginine therapy.
11.2.7 Sildenafil
Sildenafil (Viagra®) is a drug intended to treat erectile dysfunction.
The release of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) leads to smooth muscle relaxation. The enzyme phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) splits cGMP which is thus inactivated. Sildenafil inhibits PDE5 selectively and thus ensures that also small quantities of cGMP lead to a muscular relaxation.
In 2002, Jones and Mortensen carried out in vitro tests on the human internal anal sphincter muscle and found a high reduction rate in the muscle tone after the application of PDE5. These findings were confirmed by Ballester et al. (2007) Having tested 32 in vitro samples of internal anal sphincter muscle fibers, they found a significant muscular relaxation of a histamine-mediated contraction, caused by an increase of cGMP.
Aygen et al. (2005) carried out in vitro tests of isolated canine internal sphincter muscle fibers and saw a significant dose-dependent inhibition of acetyl choline-induced contraction after the application of sildenafil.
In 2004, Torrabadella et al. treated 19 chronic anal fissure patients and proved also that the intra-anal dose of 0.75 ml sildenafil cream (10%) effected a significant reduction by 18% on average in the anal resting pressure. Twenty-six percent of patients had little or moderate anal complaints like pruritus ani and burning, but no complications.
Conclusion
The question remains whether the topical application of sildenafil can have besides muscular relaxation also a therapeutic effect in the treatment for chronic anal fissure. It has to be answered in further clinical trials.
11.2.8 Bethanechol
Bethanechol is a direct parasympathomimetic agent, which as agonist immediately stimulates the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor.
Carapeti et al. (1999) showed in healthy volunteers that topical application of bethanechol significantly decreases resting anal sphincter tone.
In a further study, Carapeti et al. (2000) examined the effect of bethanechol in 15 chronic anal fissure patients. The topical perianal application of 0.1% gel three times a day for 8 weeks resulted in complete healing of the anal fissure in 60% of patients. Anal resting pressure was significantly reduced, blood flow had not changed, and no headache or any other side effects were observed.
Conclusion
Randomized controlled clinical trials have to be carried out to evaluate local bethanechol therapy.
11.2.9 Botulinum Toxin
Botulinum toxin (BTX) is a naturally occurring bacterial toxin, which is secreted as exotoxin by Clostridium botulinum under anaerobic conditions. Seven subtypes (A to G) have so far been identified, which do not only differ in their structure from each other, but also in their immunological and pharmacological characteristics. Their biological activity is given in mouse units (mu). One unit corresponds to the amount of toxin which has a lethal effect on 50% of the mice tested (LD50).
In their clinical application, the units of the various BTX products are not equivalent. Therefore, the dosages recommended by the respective manufacturers are not applicable to other BTX preparations.
In Germany, botulinum toxin A is approved as injection solution in the treatment of various diseases, but not in the therapy for anal fissure (Botox®, Vistabel®, Dysport®, and Xeomin®). Accordingly, the use of BTX is defined as a therapeutic or curative attempt applying an approved drug for an unapproved indication (off-label use).
The choice of the injection site differs from author to author. Most authors inject into the internal anal sphincter muscle, while others (Jost et al. 1995; Madalinski et al. 1999) into the external anal sphincter muscle, and others again into the intersphincteric groove (Thornton et al. 2005). Generally, the injections are tolerated well. Rare complications such as anal thrombosis are described by Jost et al. (1995).
Botulinum toxin is a drug with a peripheral effect. It blocks the signal transmission at the neuromuscular junctions by inhibiting the release of acetylcholine. Its application results in a temporary muscle relaxation, lasting about 2–3 months; rarely, cases of permanent incontinence have been described (Brown et al. 2006; Smith and Frizelle 2004).
BTX Studies
There are numerous studies which examine the effect of BTX injection used in the treatment of chronic anal fissure, and there are some trials which compare this effect with other drugs or surgical measures.
Table 11.16 shows in 22 studies with a total of 1013 patients that a healing rate between 43% and 92% and a recurrence rate between 0.0% and 83% can be expected in most cases after an early follow-up period of 2–6 months. But after a 3-year follow-up, only 47% of anal fissures were healed, and the relapse rate was 53% (Arroyo et al. 2005).
Table 11.16
Details of 22 studies on BTX therapy with 1013 patients
Author (year) | Patients andgroups (n) | Duration of symptomsbefore therapy (Months) | Healing rate and durationafter BTX therapy | Recurrence rate and lapse of time | Anal restingpressure | Anal squeezepressure | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(%) | (Months) | (%) | (Months) | |||||
Arroyo et al. (2005) | 100 | 17 | 47 | 36 | 53.0 | ↓ | → | |
Bhardwaj et al. (2006) | 10 | 12 | 80 | 3 | ↓ | |||
Brisinda et al. (2002) | 75/75 | 12/13 | 89/96 | 2 | 8.0 | 2 | ↓ | → |
Brisinda et al. (2004) | 50/50 | 13/13 | 92/94 | 2 | 0.0 | 22 | ↓ | ↓ |
Espi et al. (1997) | 36 | 73 | 0.0 | |||||
Fernandez Lopez et al. (1999) | 76 | 37 | 67 | 3 | ||||
Godevenos et al. (2004) | 45 | 2–8 | 78 | 2 | 4.4 | |||
Gonzales Carro et al. (1999) | 40 | 3+ | 50 | 6 | ||||
Gui et al. (1994) | 10 | 13 | 70 | 2 | 10.0 | 1 | ↓ | → |
Jost and Schimrigk (1994) | 12 | 6–32 | 83 | 6 | 83.0 | 6 | ||
Jost (1997) | 100 | 14 | 79 | 6 | 8.0 | 6 | ||
Jost et al. (1995 | 25 | 15 | 84 | 6 | 4.0 | 6 | ||
Lindsey et al. (2003) | 40 | 12 | 43 | 2 | ||||
Maria et al. (1998) | 23/34 | 10/13 | 43/67 | 2 | ↓ | → | ||
Maria et al. (2000) | 50 | 16 | 60 | 2 | ↓ | → | ||
Mason et al. (1996) | 5 | 60 | 3 | ↓ | → | |||
Minguez et al. (1999) | 23/27/19 | 12/20/20 | 83/78/90 | 6 | ↓ | ↓ | ||
Simms et al. (2004) | 47 | 10 | 79 | 27.0 | 16 | |||
Thornton et al. (2005) | 56 | 66 | 2.5 | ↓ | ↓ | |||
Tranqui et al. (2006) | 50 | 92 | 4.0 | |||||
Trzcinski et al. (2002) | 13 | 85 | 4 | 8.0 | 4 | ↓ | ↓ | |
Witte and Klaase (2007) | 100 | 77 | 10 | 14.0 | ↓ | ↓ |
The behavior of the sphincter muscles is not clear. Whereas all authors observe a reduction of the anal resting tone, the anal squeeze pressure remains unaltered in some collectives, but is reduced in others.
Below, those controlled trials are presented which compare BTX therapy with other therapy measures.
BTX Versus Lateral Sphincterotomy
The five trials in Table 11.17, too, suggest that the application of BTX produces a similar trend: short-term healing in 41–88% of cases and a high relapse rate in the long-term study.
Table 11.17
Details of five BTX therapy versus lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) trials with 300 patients
Author (year) | Patients and therapy | Healing LIS (%) | BTX | Anal resting pressure | Anal squeeze pressure | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTX (n) | LIS (n) | Healing (%) | Duration (Months) | Recurrence (%) | Lapse of time (Months) | ||||
Arroyo (2005) | 40 | 40 | 92 | 45 | 36 | 55 | 36 | ↓ | → |
Giral et al (2004) | 10 | 11 | 82 | 70 | 2 | 0 | 14 | ↓ | ↓ |
Iswariah (2005) | 17 | 21 | 91 | 41 | 6.5 | 5 | 6 | n/a | n/a |
Massoud (2005) | 25 | 25 | 100 | 88 | 6 | 80 | 6 | n/a | n/a |
Mentes et al. (2003) | 61 | 50 | 94 | 75 | 12 | 11 | 6 | ||
Total | 153 | 147 |
BTX Versus GTN
After a short-term follow-up (2–6 months), healing rates of 20–96%, and no relapse are observed in contrast to the longer follow-up period with a relapse rate of 33% (De Nardi et al. 2006). A meta-analysis (Sajid et al. 2007) provides evidence that BTX is just as efficient as GTN (Table 11.18).
Table 11.18
Details of seven tBTX versus GTN therapy trials with 314 patients
Author (year) | Patients by therapy | Duration of symptoms before (Months) | Healing after BTX therapy | BTX therapy and recurrence | Anal resting pressure | Anal squeeze pressure | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTX | GTN | Rate (%) | Duration (Months) | Rate (%) | After (Months) | ||||
Brisinda et al. (1999) | 25 | 25 | 9.5 | 96 | 2 | 0 | 15 | ↓ | → |
Brisinda et al. (2007) | 50 | 50 | 17 | 92 | 2 | 0 | 21 | ↓ | → |
De Nardi et al. (2006) | 15 | 15 | >3 | 33 | 36 | 33 | 36 | n/a | n/a |
Fruehauf et al. (2006) | 25 | 25 | >2 | 24 | 1/2 | 0 | 14 | n/a | n/a |
Jones et al. (2006) | 15 | 15 +BTX | 15 | 27 | 2 | n/a | n/a | ↓ | ↓ |
Lysy et al. (2006) | 15 | 15 +BTX | 21 | 20 | 1.5 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Madalinski et al. (2001) | 13 | 11 +BTX | n/a | 55 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Total | 158 | 156 |
BTX Versus Placebo
Siproudhis et al. (2003) treated 22 patients with BTX (one-time injection) who had been suffering from anal fissure complaints for 8 months on average, and 22 patients with placebos. After 4–12 weeks, the results did not differ; placebo and BTX had the same therapeutic effect. Five patients in each group were healed, and five patients in each group had to be given surgical treatment.
Maria et al. (1998), however, described results in 15 anal fissure patients who had been treated with a BTX injection and 15 controls who had received a saline solution injection. After 2 months, 11 anal fissures had healed in the verum group, but only two anal fissures in the placebo group. A decrease in anal resting tone could be shown in the verum group. At the end of 16 months, no relapse was observed in any group.
BTX Versus Lidocaine Ointment
Colak et al. (2002) treated 24 patients with BTX and 28 patients with lidocaine ointment. All the patients said to have been suffering from complaints for 12 months on average. After 2 months of treatment, there was a healing rate of 70.58% in the first patient group and of 21.42% in the second group. Different from lidocaine, treatment with BTX resulted in a significantly reduced anal resting tone and in decreased squeeze pressure rates.
BTX Combined with Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy (LIS)
Baraza et al. (2008) performed sphincterotomy in 46 anal fissure patients combined with a simultaneous BTX injection. After an average of 11 months, 85% of anal fissures had healed. After 22 months, however, 50% of patients had a relapse. The high relapse rate is probably due to the fact that the sentinel tag was left intact. The authors state that “The sentinel pile if present was left alone.”
Lindsey et al. (2004) performed sphincterotomy in 30 patients, and simultaneously injected BTX. After 4 months, 93% of anal fissures had healed.
Conclusion
The following findings can be gained from the trials on hand:
- 1.
Since the BTX units of the individual products are differently defined and are not equivalent, a comparison of results makes no sense.
- 2.
The optimal injection site (either internal or external anal sphincter muscle, or intersphincteric groove) is not known.
- 3.
The relapse rates after BTX therapy are low after a short observation period, yet very high after 3 years.
- 4.
“The Australian as well as the Canadian drug surveillance authorities point out that BTX should only be used in approved indications in the recommended dosage and in knowledge of the anatomical structures and injection techniques” (Quoted from Rheinisches Ärzteblatt of 3 November 2009; translation from the German original). The reason for these recommendations was a variety of effects, unwanted and systemic, and lasting mostly for a limited period of time, such as allergies, diplopia, and hypotonia (differing according to the field of use). However, there were single cases of systemic side effects which were life-threatening, for example, aspiration pneumonia. Five reports referred to cases of death, among them a case of botulism. Except for one case, the complications occurred under medical indications, and partly after off-label use.
- 5.
The findings of most of the trials are of no value because of their methodical shortcomings, especially because of the inexact definition of chronic anal fissure.
11.2.10 Further Therapeutic Agents
Muthukumarassamy et al. (2005) treated a total of 90 chronic anal fissure patients with 5% lignocaine or with 0.5% minoxidil ointment or with a combination of both topical applications for 6 weeks three times a day. Lignocaine is a local anesthetic, and minoxidil is a calcium channel opener which releases nitrogen monoxide (NO) as a muscle relaxant and vasodilator. Minoxidil is applied as an antihypertensive agent which is also topically used as the therapy for androgenetic alopecia (Regaine topical solution or foam). In their noncontrolled, nonrandomized study, the authors found that the combination therapy resulted in healing anal fissure in 32% of cases and that the combination was more effective than the therapy using the substances individually.
Ansaloni et al. (2002) treated 21 anal fissure patients with a daily oral dose of 6 mg lacidipine (Motens) for a period of 28 days. In addition, patients took warm sitz baths. Lacidipine is a calcium channel blocker drug belonging to the 1,4-Dihydropyridine class. It leads to the relaxation of vascular and smooth musculature. The relaxant effect persists longer than under the therapy with nifedipine. In 90.4% of cases, the authors found a complete healing of anal fissure. A change in the systolic or diastolic blood pressure was not observed. In 33% of cases, however, severe side effects such as headache, flush, abdominal pain, or ankle edemata occurred.
The oral dose of 5-aminosalicylic acid (1500 mg Claversal per day) for 14 days seems to have no effect on either the acute or chronic anal fissure. According to Bornschein (1987), there was no significant difference in regard to the healing rate between the verum (n = 24) and placebo group (= 25).
Gonyautoxin belongs to the group of paralytic shellfish toxins (PST) and is a metabolic product of algae accumulated in shellfish. Garrido et al. (2005) injected 100 units of gonyautoxin into the internal anal sphincter muscle of 50 patients with acute or chronic anal fissure. They noticed a decrease in anal resting tone of 43.8% on average. After 28 days, 98% of anal fissures had healed. Side effects were not observed.
Hyperbaric oxygen is assumed to heal chronic wounds due to additional tissue oxygenation. Cundall et al. (2003) saw eight anal fissure patients in 15 treatment sessions for a period of 3 weeks. After 3 months, five anal fissures (33%) had healed.
11.3 Surgical Treatment
11.3.1 Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy (LIS)
According to many authors, the increase of the internal anal sphincter tone stands in the focus to explain the pathogenesis of anal fissure. The partial severance of the internal anal sphincter muscle with the intention to reduce anal sphincter tonus is therefore regarded as a surgical procedure which is looked upon as first-choice therapy because of its assumed safety. Sphincterotomy was described first time ever by Alexis Boyer in his monumental work “Traitë des Maladies Chirugicales” 1818–1826.
The internal anal sphincter is an important muscle of the continence organ. Especially English and American authors, however, assume that the anal sphincter is of only minor importance for fecal continence. Therefore, the sphincter muscle could safely be partially severed.
Yet, we are convinced that the internal anal sphincter is not an insignificant muscle, but extremely important for the closure of the anus (cf. Chap. 1).
The resting tone of the anal closure apparatus is maintained by both the smooth musculature (M. sphincter ani int.), accounting for 55–70%, and the striated musculature (M. sphincter ani ext. and M. puborectalis), accounting for 30–45% (Jostarndt et al. 1986; Schweiger 1982; cf. Chap. 5.2.1). Both muscles degenerate with increasing age. Therefore, sphincterotomy bears the risk of an additional functional deficit in old age (Fig. 11.1).
Fig. 11.1
Loss of anal continence due to aging and lateral internal sphincterotomy
This does not seem to be a general understanding. According to a survey on suitable surgical therapies, 85% of the surgeons interviewed favored anal sphincterotomy (Kraemer et al. 1998). In the year 2000, Argov and Levandovsky headlined “Open lateral sphincterotomy is still the best treatment for chronic anal fissure.”. Also, the American guideline of 2010 calls lateral sphincterotomy the method of choice (Perry et al. 2010).
Indication
The majority of authors sees the indication for partial sphincterotomy in the chronic anal fissure with secondary changes existing for several months already.
Contraindication
Sphincterotomy is contraindicated for all types of fecal incontinence. Preoperative manometry and endoanal sonography give information about possibly existing deficiencies of the sphincter muscle. These tests are recommended for older women and multipara.
Sphincterotomy Techniques
The open lateral sphincterotomy, according to Parks (1967), is performed either under regional or general anesthesia. As a rule, a Parks’ anal retractor is inserted in the anal canal. Then, a left lateral arcuate incision is made above the palpable intersphincteric groove between 2 and 4 o’clock supine positions. The optimal incision size is wide enough so that the internal anal sphincter muscle becomes visible. The surgical scissors are spread to expose the intersphincteric groove and the subanodermal area. Then, the internal anal sphincter muscle can be severed under view (open technique) with scissors in its distal part. In this way, the risk of injuring the anoderm is minimized. The incision wound is finally closed with a dermal suture (Fig. 11.2).
Fig. 11.2
Open lateral sphincterotomy according to Parks, incision of M. sphincter ani int. under view
The closed lateral sphincterotomy was described by Notaras in 1971. As a rule, it is carried out under local anesthesia. A small radiate incision of the skin is made at the anal edge at 3 o’clock. The intersphincteric groove is located by palpation under control of the index finger inserted in the anal canal (closed technique). A special scalpel – similar to the one used in cataract surgery – is advanced with its flat side in the intersphincteric groove. It is then rotated by 90° with its cutting edge perpendicular to the internal anal sphincter muscle, which is severed on retraction. This incision can also be done with scissors. In doing so, the unintentional opening of an anal crypt or an incision of the anoderm can be avoided. Injuring a crypt with subsequent formation of a fistula is looked upon as a complication dependent on the technique. Control by the index finger inserted in the anal canal should prevent this complication. Notaras inaugurated his technique as an ambulatory surgery possible under local anesthesia (Figs. 11.3 and 11.4). This operation technique has already been described by Blandin (1855) in the first half of the 19th century (cf. Chap. 9.5).
Fig. 11.3
Sphincterotomy according to Notaras, position of the scalpel