Authors
Type of disease
Participants
Method
Identified proteins
Rossing et al. [38]
DN
305 individuals
CE-MS
A model that included 65 regulated genes correctly identified diabetic nephropathy with 97 % sensitivity and specificity
Alkhalaf et al. [2]
DN
148 DM patients with albuminuria
83 DM patients without albuminruai
CE-MS
The “DN model”a for DN showed 93.8 % sensitivity and 91.4 % specificity, with an AUC of 0.948 (95 % CI 0.898–0.978)
Jin et al. [18]
DN
43 diabetes patients with microalbuminuria
43 diabetes patients without microalbuminuria
iTRAQ and 2DE/Western blot/MRM
alpha-1-antitrypsin, alpha-1-acid glycoprotein 1 precursor, and prostate stem cell antigen, which had AUC values >0.8, are good biomarker candidates, and the AUC value was improved to 0.921 on combining the 3 proteins
Park et al. [27]
IgAN
13 patients with IgAN
12 healthy controls
2-GE
59 proteins were differentially expressed
Yokota et al. [52]
IgAN
17 patients with IgAN
10 healthy controls
2-D DIGE
10 proteins (albumin, transferrin, α1-antitrypsin, β-globin,
α1-globin, carbonic anhydrase I, cystatin C, retinol-binding
protein 4 and 1-microglobulin) were differentially expressedb
He et al. [15]
IgAN
56 patients with IgANc
14 healthy controls
MALDI-TOF-MS
21 peaks distinguished mild and severe groupsd
50 peaks distinguished mild and normal groupse
50 peaks distinguished severe and normal groupsf
Rocchetti et al. [36]
IgAN
18 patients with IgAN
20 healthy controls
2-D PAGE and nano-HPLC-ESI-MS/MS
Among patients with IgAN, kininogen, ITI-HC1 and
transthyretin levels were different in responders and
nonresponders to ACE inhibitors
Low levels of urine kininogen predicted inadequate or absent
clinical response to ACE inhibitors in 20 patients with
biopsy-proven IgAN
Ngai et al. [26]
MN
Control rats
Rats with PHN assessed
at postinduction days 0, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50g
2D-PAGE
37 differentially expressed proteins across all time points
Piyaphanee et al. [2]
SRNS
19 SRNS
15 SSNS
10 controls
SELDI-TOF-MS
The α1-B glycoprotein was only present in 7 of 19 patients with SRNS; but absent in all SSNS and controls and associated with lower GFR.
Varghese et al. [44]
FSGS
32 patients with FSGS, LN, MN, or DN
2-DE
The urine proteins panel could distinguish different proteinuria diseases with sensitivity ranged from 75 to 86 %, and specificity ranged from 92 to 67 %
Zhang et al. [53]
LN
5 class III LN patients
11 class IV LN patients
3 class V LN patients
SELDI-TOF MS
27 protein irons showed significant differential expression between specific flare intervals of LN
Somparn et al. [40]
LN
5 active LN patients
5 inactive LN patients
2-DE
prostaglandin H 2 D-isomerase was only elevated only in the urine of the active LN group
Suzuki et al. [42]
LN
32 pediatric LN patients
11 juvenile
idiopathic arthritis patients as control
SELDI-TOF-MS
8 proteins with peaks at m/z of 2.7, 22, 23, 44, 56, 79, 100, and 133 kDa were changed in the LN patients compared with non-LN patients
15.3.6 Acute Kidney Injury
Acute kidney injury (AKI) represents a common and devastating problem in clinical medicine. The incidence of AKI varies from 5 % of hospitalized patients to 30–50 % of patients in intensive care units. Despite significant improvements in therapeutics, evidence suggests that the incidence of AKI is increasing at an alarming rate, and the associated mortality and morbidity have remained high despite improvements in clinical care [46, 49, 51]. A major reason for this high mortality and morbidity is the lack of early biomarkers for AKI, resulting in an unacceptable delay in the initiation of therapy. In addition, convenient biomarkers are urgently needed to distinguish between the various etiologies of AKI and to predict its clinical outcomes. Fortunately, the application of proteomics research to human and animal models of AKI has uncovered several novel biomarkers.
Significant efforts have been made to develop an early diagnostic biomarker for AKI in the hope that the early identification of renal injury will enable more effective therapeutic interventions. Ho et al. [16] used SELDI-TOF/MA to determine urinary proteomic profiles at different time points following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) operations. The active 25-amino acid form of hepcidin (hepcidin-25) was found to be dominantly elevated in postoperative non-AKI urine samples compared with AKI samples. This biomarker was further validated in an independent cohort of 338 patients [17]. The log10 hepcidin-25/Cr ratio reached a sensitivity of 68 % and a specificity of 68 %, with an AUC of 0.80 for the avoidance of AKI and a negative predictive value 0.96. Areeger et al. [3] collected urine samples from 36 patients after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. They compared the urinary proteomes of patients with and without AKI on the first postoperative day. After the operation, inflammation-associated (zinc-α-2-glycoprotein, leucine-rich α-2-glycoprotein, mannan-binding lectin serine protease 2, basement membrane-specific heparan sulfate proteoglycan, and immunoglobulin kappa) or tubular dysfunction-associated (retinol-binding protein, adrenomedullin-binding protein, and uromodulin) proteins were found to be differentially regulated. Zinc-α-2-glycoprotein and a fragment of adrenomedullin-binding protein were decreased in patients with AKI. The decreased excretion of zinc-α-2-glycoprotein in patients with AKI was confirmed by Western blot and ELISA in an independent cohort of 22 patients with and 46 patients without AKI. Zinc-α-2-glycoprotein is thus a potentially useful predictive marker for AKI after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.
In the last 10 years, urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL, also known as lcn2) has become one of the most important predictive biomarkers of AKI. NGAL is one of the earliest and most robustly induced proteins in the kidney after ischemic or nephrotoxic AKI in animal models. Indeed, the NGAL protein is easily detected in urine soon after AKI [24, 25, 45]. However, NGAL measurements may be influenced by a number of coexisting variables, such as preexisting renal disease and systemic or urinary tract infections [12]. Research to explore more accurate AKI predictive biomarkers is ongoing. Areeger et al. [4] collected urine on the first day of AKI in critically ill patients; 12 patients with an early recovery and 12 matching patients with late/non-recovery were selected, and their proteomes were analyzed by gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. A total of 8 prognostic candidates were identified. Subsequent ELISA quantification demonstrated that IGFBP-7 was the most potent predictor of renal recovery. IGFBP-7 and NGAL, a traditional AKI biomarker, were chosen for further analyses in an independent verification group of 28 patients with AKI and 12 control patients without AKI. The comparative analysis indicated that IGFBP-7 and NGAL were significantly upregulated in the urine of AKI patients, which in turn predicted the mortality (IGFBP-7: AUC 0.68; NGAL: AUC 0.81), recovery (IGFBP-7: AUC 0.74; NGAL: AUC 0.70), and severity (IGFBP-7: AUC 0.77; NGAL: AUC 0.69) of AKI. The levels of these proteins were also associated with AKI duration. IGFBP-7 was a more accurate predictor of renal outcome than NGAL. Thus, IGFBP-7 is a novel prognostic urinary marker that warrants further investigation.
Urinary proteomics provide a novel method for identifying early diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of AKI. This technique can be integrated with and is complementary to traditional hypothesis-driven approaches. Moreover, this technique provides an additional armamentarium for discovery-based biomarker studies and can provide novel insights into the underlying pathophysiology of AKI, which may ultimately lead to the identification of novel therapeutic targets.
15.4 Limitations and Future Perspectives
Kidney disease has been the subject of a number of urinary proteomics studies. This research has greatly improved our understanding of the mechanisms of various kidney diseases and has provided alternative biomarkers for classification, diagnosis, and response prediction. However, several limitations have hampered the development of this approach and the translation of results to clinical applications.
First, there are challenges in the standardization of urine collection, preparation, and storage in urinary proteomics. The quality and quantity of urine proteins are affected by diet and exercise, and thus, sample collection under stable conditions is critical for the reliability and comparability of urinary proteomics results. Moreover, the storage, preparation, and analysis of urine samples may also affect the profiling. Standardization of these techniques is required to obtain more reliable proteomics data. Although an international normal urine collection protocol has been developed by the European Kidney and Urine Proteomics (EuroKUP) group and the Human Kidney and Urine Proteome Project (HKUPP) (http://www.hkupp.org), there are still no globally acceptable guidelines for urine sampling with mass proteinuria [23].