Test Tracings: Final Exam




Fig. 20.1



This study demonstrates:

1.

Detrusor overactivity

 

2.

Stress urinary incontinence

 

3.

Impaired compliance

 

4.

Detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (DSD)

 

5.

Increased bladder sensation

 

Answer 5. Increased bladder sensation is demonstrated with early first sensation, early first desire to void, early strong desire to void and diminished maximum cystometric capacity. Detrusor overactivity is not seen on this tracing nor is stress urinary incontinence, impaired compliance, or an obstructed voiding pattern to suggest DSD.



Test Question 2


Clinical history: A 60 year old female presents with complaints of urgency, frequency, nocturia, and urgency-related incontinence. Physical exam is notable for a Grade IV cystocele, Grade III uterine prolapse, and Grade II rectocele. No stress incontinence is elicited with reduction of the prolapse. During urodynamic testing the patient reported urgency and a strong desire to void at 185 cc which she attempted to suppress (Fig. 20.2).

A307505_1_En_20_Fig2_HTML.gif



Fig. 20.2

This study demonstrates:

1.

Detrusor overactivity with leakage

 

2.

Stress urinary incontinence

 

3.

Impaired compliance

 

4.

Striated sphincter dyssynergia

 

5.

Detrusor overactivity without leakage

 

Answer 5. Detrusor overactivity without leakage is demonstrated with the rise in detrusor pressure and vesical pressure during the filling phase. No corresponding leakage is recorded by the uroflometer.


Test Question 3


The videofluoroscopic image (Fig. 20.3) is obtained in the patient described in Test Question 2.

A307505_1_En_20_Fig3_HTML.jpg



Fig. 20.3

This demonstrates:

1.

Bladder diverticulum

 

2.

Significant cystocele

 

3.

Urethral hypermobility

 

4.

Neurogenic bladder

 

5.

Mild cystocele

 

Answer 2. Significant cystocele. The base of the bladder is descended well below the pubic symphysis.


Test Question 4


Clinical history: A 55-year-old female with multiple sclerosis presents with complaints of urgency, frequency, nocturia, and urgency-related incontinence. Physical exam reveals normal genitalia without evidence of prolapse. No stress incontinence is elicited with cough stress test. During urodynamic testing the patient reported urgency and a strong desire to void at 79 cc which she attempted to suppress (Fig. 20.4).

A307505_1_En_20_Fig4_HTML.gif



Fig. 20.4

This study demonstrates:

1.

Detrusor overactivity with leakage

 

2.

Stress urinary incontinence

 

3.

Impaired compliance

 

4.

Detrusor overactivity without leakage

 

5.

Both 1 and 4

 

Answer 5. Detrusor overactivity without leakage is noted first then detrusor overactivity with leakage is demonstrated with the rise in detrusor pressure and vesical pressure during the filling phase. Corresponding leakage is recorded by the uroflometer.


Test Question 5


Clinical history: A 65-year-old white male with a history of Parkinson’s disease presents with a chief complaint of new onset urinary urgency. Urodynamics are shown in Fig. 20.5. He presents with a voiding diary showing volumes of 400–500 mL. Which of the following would be the best next step?

A307505_1_En_20_Fig5_HTML.gif



Fig. 20.5


1.

Timed voiding and antimuscarinics

 

2.

Intravesical botulinum toxin injection

 

3.

Alpha-blocker therapy

 

4.

Observation

 

Answer 1. Timed voiding and antimuscarinics. This patient demonstrates poor bladder compliance on his urodynamic tracing. His detrusor leak point pressure is >40 mm H2O at bladder volumes >380 cc. Therefore, an appropriate next step would be timed voiding. His voided volumes theoretically should be 200–300 cc in order to maintain a normal detrusor pressure. Observation is not an appropriate next step due to the risk of upper tract damage. Alpha-blocker therapy will not improve his abnormal compliance. This patient may ultimately progress and require botulinum toxin injections, but on initial presentation, the least invasive approach should be tried first.


Test Question 6


Clinical History: A 30-year-old male with a history of T11 spinal cord injury is managed with CIC four times daily and maximum anticholinergic therapy. His catheterization diary shows volumes of 250–300 mL. His urodynamic tracing is seen in Fig. 20.6. He still complains of urinary leakage between catheterizations. Which of the following statements is false?

A307505_1_En_20_Fig6_HTML.gif



Fig. 20.6


1.

The patient is at risk of upper tract damage due to an elevated abdominal leak point pressures during filling.

 

2.

Botulinum toxin injections would be an appropriate next step in therapy.

 

3.

Upper tract imaging should be performed on this patient.

 

4.

This tracing demonstrates a compliance abnormality.

 

Answer 1. The patient is at risk of upper tract damage due to an elevated abdominal leak point pressures during filling. This patient’s tracing shows abnormal bladder compliance and an elevated detrusor leak point pressure during filling. Abdominal leak point pressures are not generally related to the risk of upper urinary tract deterioration but detrusor leak point pressures are related to such a risk. Elevations in detrusor pressure, especially a tonic rise as demonstrated in this tracing, are worrisome for upper tract damage. This patient’s clinical presentation and urodynamic tracing should warrant an upper tract evaluation. A renal ultrasound at a minimum should be performed. This patient would be an excellent candidate to study using videourodynamics to assess for a “pop-off” mechanism. Botulinum toxin injection would be a reasonable next step. However, if his detrusor pressure does not subsequently improve, he may ultimately require an augmentation cystoplasty.


Test Question 7


Clinical History: A 68-year-old male with benign prostatic hypertrophy undergoes urodynamics (Fig. 20.7).

A307505_1_En_20_Fig7_HTML.gif



Fig. 20.7

The circles in this study represent:

1.

Detrusor overactivity

 

2.

Detrusor underactivity

 

3.

Provocative maneuver (coughing)

 

4.

Artifact

 

5.

Impaired compliance

 

Answer: 1. Involuntary detrusor contractions produce a rise in pressure in the P ves and P det leads and not in the P abd lead. The circles in this study represent detrusor overactivity. This is not detrusor underactivity as this is related to voiding pressures. A provocative maneuver such as coughing would generally appear as a sharp increase in the P ves and P abd leads due to the sudden increase in pressure generated with the cough. This does not represent an artifact; an increase in pressure in both the P ves and the P det lead in the face of a quiescent P abd represents a bona fide detrusor contraction. Impaired compliance would appear as a slow increase in the P det and P ves signals as the volume in the bladder increases.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 20, 2017 | Posted by in UROLOGY | Comments Off on Test Tracings: Final Exam

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access