HISTOLOGY AND FUNCTION
Body/Corpus and Fundus (“Oxyntic Mucosa”)
The largest histologic compartment is the gastric body and fundus, comprising 90% of the gastric mucosa (Fig. 2.1). They share similar histology and function as both contain oxyntic (or fundic) glands and have shallow pits that extend less than 25% of the distance to the base (Fig. 2.3). The superficial isthmus contains intensely pink acid-secreting parietal cells that also produce intrinsic factor, important for absorption of vitamin B12 (Fig. 2.4). By comparison, the base of the glands contains bluish-purple pepsinogen-secreting chief cells and scattered enterochromaffin-like (ECL) endocrine cells. The intervening neck area contains a mixture of chief, parietal, and mucus neck cells, the latter of which are important in mucosal regeneration (Figs. 2.5 and 2.6) and should not be mistaken for signet ring cells.
Antrum and Pylorus (“Antral Mucosa”)
The antrum and pylorus comprise the second largest histologic compartment, and most practitioners regard them as interchangeable, as they are histologically similar (Fig. 2.1). The pits of the gastric antrum comprise approximately 50% of the distance to the base of the glands (Fig. 2.7). Abundant lamina propria separates the purely mucus-secreting tortuous glands of the antral mucosa. These cells have abundant frothy cytoplasm with nuclei that appear flattened against the basal aspect (Fig. 2.8), similar to those seen in Brunner glands and gastric cardiac glands. Importantly, gastrin-producing G cells are exclusively found in the gastric antral glands, and they can be highlighted with a gastrin immunohistochemical stain (Fig. 2.9).
FAQ: Why does my “antrum” biopsy frequently look like oxyntic mucosa?
Answer: More than 90% of the gastric mucosa is oxyntic type, leaving only the distal-most portion of the stomach as true antral-type mucosa. It is not unusual for endoscopists to capture transition zone, or even distal corpus when targeting the gastric antrum.
PEARLS & PITFALLS
By comparison, it would be highly unusual for the endoscopist to miss a targeted biopsy of the body or fundus. If a specimen labeled as “body” or “fundus” shows antral-type histology, consider one of the following scenarios:
• Atrophy of the gastric corpus, such as in autoimmune metaplastic atrophic gastritis
• Mixed specimen or carryover
An immunohistochemical stain for gastrin can be helpful in this scenario by highlighting the antral restricted “G” cells; biopsies from the antrum would have a prominent band of G cells, and those from the body/fundus are nonreactive for gastrin (Figs. 2.10–2.13). See also Chronic Gastritis subsection, this chapter.
Transition Zone (“Transitional Mucosa”)
Histologically, the transition between the oxyntic and antral mucosa is gradual, spanning 1 to 2 centimeters. The histology shows mixed glands in varying proportions (Fig. 2.14).
Cardia
The smallest gastric compartment, the gastric cardia, is composed of mucus-secreting cells and is devoid of acid-secreting chief cells and parietal cells. Histologically, the surface epithelium is lined by foveolar cells and the pits and glands are composed of pyloric-type glandular epithelium. In the absence of a biopsy location provided by the endoscopist, the histology is nearly indistinguishable from that of the gastric antrum (Fig. 2.15).
FAQ: Why do my gastric cardia biopsies frequently contain oxyntic mucosa?
Answer: The length of cardiac mucosa is variable. The cardia typically spans only 1 to 4 mm in most adults. It was originally believed that the gastric cardia developed as people aged; however, autopsy studies have disproven this idea, as some infants have cardiac glands and some elderly persons have none, transitioning directly from squamous mucosa to acid-secreting mucosa (Fig. 2.16). Although controversial, the presence of gastric cardiac-type mucosa has also been regarded by some as a purely metaplastic condition secondary to gastroesophageal reflux, Helicobacter infection, and autoimmune gastritis.
PEARLS & PITFALLS
Chronic inflammation is so ubiquitous a finding in the gastric cardia that many practitioners do not mention this finding in their reports; however, the gastric cardiac mucosa may harbor Helicobacter organisms (Fig. 2.17). It is prudent to examine closely or perform staining for Helicobacter organisms in the following scenarios:
• If the pattern of the infiltrate is characteristic of Helicobacter infection; specifically active chronic inflammation, superficial lymphoplasmacytic inflammation, and or prominent lymphoid aggregates with well-formed germinal centers, or
• If the inflammation is exuberant and no additional gastric biopsies were obtained from the gastric antrum and body. In this scenario, careful examination of the cardia might be the only opportunity to diagnose an underlying Helicobacter infection.
REACTIVE GASTRITIS/GASTROPATHY PATTERN
CHECKLIST: Etiologic Considerations for the Reactive Gastritis/Gastropathy Pattern
Bile Reflux
Medications
Alcohol
Portal Hypertensive Gastropathy
Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia
Autoimmune Metaplastic Atrophic Gastritis
Reactive gastritis/gastropathy constitutes the most common gastric injury pattern (Figs. 2.18 and 2.19). In a recent study of over 500,000 gastric specimens, reactive gastritis/gastropathy was reported in up to 15.6% of cases.15 There is no geographic predilection, and its incidence increases with patient age, seen in only 2% of patients under 10 years and in greater than 20% of patients over 80 years.15 Histologically, this injury pattern refers to foveolar mucin cell depletion, a corkscrew-like appearance of the gastric pits, lamina propria edema, smooth muscle fibers extending between the pits and toward the surface, and little to no inflammation (Figs. 2.20–2.23).
Reactive gastritis/gastropathy is another example of a nonspecific injury pattern. In the majority of cases, no precise etiology can be established.16 Of those with identifiable causes, bile reflux, medications (e.g., NSAIDs), alcohol, portal hypertensive gastropathy, gastric antral vascular ectasia, and autoimmune metaplastic atrophic gastritis have been implicated.15,17–22 Although the etiologic possibilities are broad, the previously mentioned etiologies are thought to induce a chemical-type damage, which result in this characteristic gastric injury pattern. Reactive gastritis is most commonly seen in the gastric antrum, supporting the theory that bile reflux is an important contributing factor. In severe cases, this injury pattern can extend into the oxyntic mucosa, sometimes even involving the cardiac mucosa. These cases must be diligently inspected for dysplasia, intestinal metaplasia, and neoplasia because chronic mucosal injury of any sort can increase a patient’s risk of neoplasia. Specimens should be carefully inspected for congested mucosal vessels (which can be seen with portal hypertensive gastropathy) and thrombosed mucosal vessels, which would suggest a diagnosis of gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE), in the appropriate clinical setting. See also Vascular and Hemorrhagic Injury pattern in this chapter.
Despite its relatively high prevalence, the terminology surrounding reactive gastritis/gastropathy is a bit contentious. Equivalent terms include “chemical gastritis,” and “chemical gastropathy.” In 1996, a diverse group of gastrointestinal pathology experts convened to discuss key issues related to the classification and grading of gastritis, culminating in the updated Sydney system recommendations.16 Some preferred “chemical” since it more explicitly states the mechanism of injury; some advocated for “gastropathy” instead of “gastritis” since most cases lack clinically significant inflammation to warrant a “gastritis” designation. This nomenclature controversy is trivial and only important in so far as the reader knows that these terms all refer to the same injury pattern.
KEY FEATURES of the Reactive Gastritis/Gastropathy Pattern:
• Reactive gastritis/gastropathy is the most common gastric injury pattern.
• Morphologic features include gastric surface foveolar mucin cell depletion, a corkscrew-like appearance of the gastric pits, lamina propria edema, smooth muscle bundles extending toward the surface, and little to no inflammation.
• Implicated etiologies include bile reflux, medications (NSAIDs, e.g.,), alcohol, portal hypertensive gastropathy, gastric antral vascular ectasia, and autoimmune metaplastic atrophic gastritis.
PITFALLS & PEARLS
Reactive gastritis/gastropathy pattern can “jump off the slides” and be so eye-catching that it is easy to overlook other important diagnoses. Remember to look at every biopsy for the following sneaky entities, which can be easily obscured by a marked reactive gastritis/gastropathy pattern.
CHECKLIST: Select Diagnoses Not To Miss
Erosion (Figs. 2.24 and 2.25)
Ulceration (Fig. 2.26)
Iron Pill Gastritis (Figs. 2.27 and 2.28)
Intestinal Metaplasia
Portal Hypertensive Gastropathy (Fig. 2.29)
Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia (Fig. 2.30)
Dysplasia
Sneaky Malignant Neoplasms (including Signet Ring and Neuroendocrine Tumors)
Autoimmune Metaplastic Atrophic Gastritis
Granulomata
Amyloid
Lymphocytic Gastritis Pattern
FAQ: What is the preferred terminology for cases of reactive gastritis/gastropathy with prominent acute and chronic inflammation (Figs. 2.31 and 2.32)?
Answer: Historically, only minimal chronic inflammation was typical of reactive gastritis/gastropathy; however, an occasional case will feature slightly more acute and chronic inflammation. If the predominant pattern is reactive gastritis/gastropathy, the preferred terminology is “active chronic reactive gastritis/gastropathy.” The alternative wording, “reactive gastritis/gastropathy with acute and chronic inflammation” is often translated by clinicians as “Helicobacter infection.” Certainly, a Helicobacter special stain can be easily performed, although it is almost always negative owing to the microenvironment shifts common to this injury pattern.
ACUTE GASTRITIS PATTERN
An acute gastritis pattern refers to neutrophils in the epithelium of the stomach (Fig. 2.33). This pattern can be accompanied by erosions, ulcerations, and marked reactive epithelial change. Although this injury pattern is etiologically nonspecific, it is most commonly seen in the setting of medication injury, infections (Helicobacter and CMV), and inflammatory bowel disease. This injury pattern can also be seen with iatrogenic injury (gastrotomy tube, postsurgical setting, chemoradiation), alcohol, and in association with polyps and infiltrating processes such as amyloidosis and neoplasms. This section will discuss the most common etiologies of the acute gastritis pattern and will present practical tips to sort out the individual etiologies.
CHECKLIST: Etiologic Considerations for the Acute Gastritis Pattern
Medications
Helicobacter
Cytomegalovirus
Focally Enhanced Gastritis
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
MEDICATIONS
Medication related gastritis is increasingly common as the population ages and our pharmaceutical repertoire expands. The resultant injury pattern is entirely nonspecific and can include a range of pathology, including the reactive gastritis/gastropathy, prominent apoptotic bodies, chronic gastritis with or without acute inflammation, mildly prominent eosinophils, intraepithelial lymphocytosis, granulomata, erosions, ulceration, and vascular degeneration with microthrombi and ischemic damage.23–27 In only a small percentage of cases will the medication be identified. The far more typical scenario is identification of a nonspecific injury pattern, although occasionally refractile or polarizable pill fragments of unclear significance can be seen (Figs. 2.34–2.36). The mechanism of injury may be related to the mechanical damage of the pill as it is “stuck” in the mucosa and causes local physical trauma, or through the resultant downstream chemical effects of the pill itself. Certainly, the most notorious medication culprits include the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) by way of their nonselective inhibition of the cyclooxygenase isoenzymes, resulting in decreased production of mucosal protectant products, such as prostaglandins, mucin, bicarbonate, and dampened microcirculation.28 More recently gastric (and esophageal) mucosal injuries secondary to doxycycline have been described.25–27 Characteristic presentations include severe chest pain shortly after tablet ingestion that is postulated to be related to underlying nerve or vascular ischemia. Endoscopic abnormalities include erosions, ulcerations, friability, and circumferential white “coated”, “hard-to-peel-off” lesions.27 Typical histologic findings include erosions, ulcerations, necrosis, reactive gastritis/gastropathy, and vasculitis with microthrombi. Some advocate referring to these constellation of findings as “toxic-ischemic pattern” (TIP)26 and others advocate the term perivascular “halos” or perivascular zones of edema, reactive myofibroblasts, and lymphoblasts.25 Other medications associated with acute gastritis include potassium chloride in heart failure patients, bisphosphonates in patients with pathologic bone reabsorption, iron, resins, and a variety of chemoradiation therapeutic agents. See also Pigments and Extras subsection, this chapter.
CHECKLIST: Select Medications Commonly Associated with the Acute Gastritis Pattern:
Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
Doxycycline
Potassium Chloride
Bisphosphonates
Iron
Resins
Various Chemoradiation Therapeutic Agents
HELICOBACTER PYLORI
Helicobacter pylori is a gram-negative helical or curved bacillus known to colonize more than half of the human population,29 and is found in up to 20% of gastric biopsies in North America.30 Fecal–oral contamination is the major mode of transmission, although the organisms have also been cultivated from vomitus and saliva.29,31–34 Dyspepsia is the most common presenting symptom and endoscopic abnormalities can include gastric and or peptic ulcerations. Recognition of the organism is important for symptom resolution and to prevent infection related neoplasia, such as gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, glandular dysplasia, and adenocarcinoma.35–37 In addition, Helicobacter pylori infections have been associated with iron deficiency anemia, idiopathic thrombocytic purpura, and have an inverse relationship with asthma, allergy, atopic disease, and gastroesophageal reflux disease.32
In classic examples of Helicobacter pylori gastritis, the diagnosis can almost be made at scanning magnification owing to its characteristic histologic findings: a superficial lymphoplasmacytic inflammation that often appears band-like and snug beneath the surface foveolar epithelium, brisk acute inflammation, and prominent lymphoid aggregates (Figs. 2.37–2.39). Occasionally, a lymphocytic gastritis pattern can also be seen (Figs. 2.40–2.42).38,39 See Lymphocytic Gastritis Pattern in this chapter. The Helicobacter pylori organisms can be easily spotted on H&E without the use of ancillary stains.30 Efficient “bug hunts” target mucin-rich foci near the surface, particularly those that are acutely inflamed (Figs. 2.43–2.45). Characteristically, the organisms appear as curved rods (Figs. 2.46 and 2.47). Occasionally, normal oral and gastrointestinal flora can raise concerns for Helicobacter. Important points of distinction from oral and gastrointestinal flora include the following:
1. Location: Helicobacter pylori prefer close association with the surface epithelium, unlike the normal oral and gastrointestinal flora, which are found farther from the surface epithelium and often admixed with luminal debris (Fig. 2.44 vs. Fig. 2.48). It is worthwhile to note that occasionally the Helicobacter organisms can be found in gastric pits and glands, a finding not typical of oral and gastrointestinal flora (Figs. 2.49 and 2.50).40
2. Associated bacteria: Helicobacter pylori clusters have nearly identical similarly shaped organisms, whereas the normal oral and gastrointestinal flora are found as mixed flora composed of a mixed population of rods and cocci (Figs. 2.43–2.45 vs. Fig. 2.48).
3. Background: Lastly, Helicobacter pylori is almost always found suspended within a background of active chronic inflammation, as outlined earlier. In contrast, the normal oral and gastrointestinal flora show no consistent relationship with mucosal injury since they are swallowed, endogenous flora. In challenging cases, the Helicobacter pylori immunostain can be helpful.
In general, Helicobacter organisms and their related pathology are most easily seen in the antrum; however, in cases of intestinal metaplasia or marked reactive gastritis/gastropathy involving the antrum, the resultant microenvironment changes are thought to cause the organisms to shift to the oxyntic mucosa or even cardia, underscoring the importance of looking at every stomach biopsy carefully for Helicobacter. Unfortunately, sometimes the Helicobacter organisms can be difficult to find, especially in treated cases that usually show small, rounded, and rare organisms (Figs. 2.51 and 2.52). In such cases, the Helicobacter immunostain is recommended.30
PEARLS & PITFALLS
Highlights from the 2013 Rodger C. Haggitt Gastrointestinal Pathology Society Recommendations for the Appropriate Use of Special Stains for Helicobacter Detection:30
• The Helicobacter immunostain is the recommended stain of choice based on its superior sensitivity in comparison to histologic stains, and its enhanced ability to detect Helicobacter with treatment effect (coccoid forms) and rare organisms present deep in the glands or intracellular locations
• Indications for the Helicobacter immunostain include the following, assuming no Helicobacter organisms are seen on H&E:
• Inflamed gastric biopsies, including cardiac mucosa and cases of reactive gastritis/gastropathy, although the yield is low (less than 10%) in the absence of moderate-marked acute and chronic inflammation
• Lymphocytic gastritis pattern
• Chronic inactive gastritis with concomitant positive Helicobacter serologies, gastroduodenal ulcers, gastric MALT-type lymphoma or adenocarcinoma, duodenal lymphocytosis, prior Helicobacter infection, and or high-risk demographics
• Inflamed or ulcerated duodenal biopsies with gastric foveolar metaplasia
• Contraindications to Helicobacter immunostains include the following:
• Cases with Helicobacter organisms present on H&E
• Background normal mucosa
• Reactive gastritis/gastropathy lacking inflammation
• Uninflamed gastric polyps
• A clinical request to “rule-out” Helicobacter; thorough histologic examination of the H&E slide is up to 95% sensitive for Helicobacter detection, particularly if greater than five high-power fields (HPFs) are examined
• The society argues against “up-front” Helicobacter immunostains on all esophageal, gastric, and small bowel biopsies, citing insufficient evidence for reduced turnaround time
• No current recommendations were provided for granulomatous gastritis and eosinophilic gastritis
PEARLS & PITFALLS
A lymphocytic gastritis pattern refers to an intraepithelial lymphocytosis that is most easily seen in the superficial foveolar epithelium (Figs. 2.40–2.42). Helicobacter infections and celiac disease are the most common association with this injury pattern.38,39 If Helicobacter is not identified on H&E, a Helicobacter immunostain is recommended.30 Biopsy material negative for Helicobacter should be accompanied by recommendations to exclude Helicobacter with pertinent clinical studies, such as serology, urease breath test, or stool antigen studies. Similarly, celiac disease should be considered when examining any tandem small bowel specimens. If a small bowel specimen is not provided, it is worthwhile to recommend exclusion of celiac disease with pertinent clinical serologies. See also Lymphocytic Gastritis Pattern in this chapter.
PEARLS & PITFALLS
One of the most challenging aspects of pathology is recognizing that a single biopsy can have more than one important diagnosis; for example, Helicobacter gastritis can have such striking histologic findings that other key diagnoses can be easily overlooked. Routine consideration of these select diagnoses will avoid such missteps.
CHECKLIST: Select Diagnoses Not To Miss on Busy Helicobacter Gastritis Cases:
Granulomata
Amyloid
Lymphocytic Gastritis Pattern
Intestinal Metaplasia
Glandular Dysplasia
Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma
Infiltrating Adenocarcinoma and Sneaky Signet-Ring Cells
FAQ: What is the best way to approach cases with morphologic features strongly suggestive of Helicobacter infection but in which no organisms are found?
Answer: In challenging cases, a recommendation to clinically exclude Helicobacter with pertinent clinical studies may be prudent (serology, urease breath test, or stool antigen studies). Helicobacter cases can be among the most satisfying because they provide an etiology for the histologic findings and clinical symptoms, and effective treatment can result in symptomatic relief and decreased incidence of gastric MALT lymphoma, glandular dysplasia, and adenocarcinoma. What could be better?! On the other hand, cases with morphology provocative for Helicobacter and no obvious organisms are among the most frustrating because an unrecognized infection can lead to persistent symptoms and increased risk for gastric MALT lymphoma, glandular dysplasia, and adenocarcinoma. What could be worse?! These cases are unavoidably time-consuming and require diligent inspection of multiple HPFs as well as usage of the Helicobacter pylori immunostain. When the classic features of Helicobacter are seen but the organisms are not apparent with the Helicobacter immunostain, a standard note to encourage additional clinical studies is of use. Note, this approach should not be applied to every “juicy” case of chronic gastritis, else it would be overused and its value would be lost. This note is recommended for cases with a minimum of brisk acute and chronic gastritis and superficial lymphoplasmacytic inflammation, with or without prominent lymphoid aggregates and lymphocytic gastritis pattern.
Sample Note: Active Chronic Gastritis Suspicious for Helicobacter
Stomach, Biopsy:
• Antral mucosa with marked active chronic gastritis and superficial lymphoplasmacytosis.
Note: The biopsy shows marked active chronic gastritis with superficial lymphoplasmacytic inflammation. These features are very suspicious for a Helicobacter infection. Although no organisms were identified on the Helicobacter immunostain, clinical exclusion of a Helicobacter infection is recommended with pertinent clinical studies (serology, urease breath test, or stool antigen studies).
HELICOBACTER HEILMANNII
Not every Helicobacter gastritis case is caused by Helicobacter pylori. To date, phylogenetic studies have identified more than 50 species within the Helicobacter genus. The most familiar of these is Helicobacter heilmannii which itself refers to at least five different species, leading some experts to advocate for the more precise nomenclature of “Helicobacter heilmannii-like organisms”. Unfortunately, much less is known about Helicobacter heilmannii-like infections owing to their rarity. The available literature has shown important similarities with Helicobacter pylori, including shared symptomatology (abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting), antral predominant active chronic inflammation with prominent lymphoid aggregates (Figs. 2.53–2.56), gastric and duodenal ulcerations, and suggest an increased risk for gastric MALT lymphoma and adenocarcinoma, underscoring their biologic importance.41–44 Limited anecdotal evidence has shown Helicobacter heilmannii–like infections respond to the same treatment regime as Helicobacter pylori infections. Important points of distinction of Helicobacter heilmannii–like infections from Helicobacter pylori include the following: