Single-Access Laparoscopic Approach for Pancreatic Surgery


Type of operation (n = 151) [14]

Indication for operation

Mean operative time (min)

Intraoperative blood loss (cc)

Conversion (Y/N)

Mean length of hospital stay (day)

Early postoperative complication

Late postoperative complication

Cholecystectomy (n = 71) [15, 16]

Gallstones (n = 69)

50 (35–90)

0

N

1.1

Cystic stump leak (n = 1)

Port site hernia (n = 1)

Gallbladder polyp (n = 2)

Splenectomy (n = 22) [9]

Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (n = 21)

65 (40–180)

0–300

Y (N = 1)

2.2

Pancreatic fistula (n = 1)

No

Wandering spleen syndrome (n = 1)

Arterial hemorrhage (n = 1)

Hernia repair (n = 17) [17]

Inguinal hernia (n = 12)

40 (35–65)

0

N

1

No

No

Umbilical hernia (n = 3)

40 (32–75)

Incisional hernia (n = 2)

65 (45–90)

Appendectomy (n = 11)

Acute appendicitis (n = 11)

35 (29–65)

0

N

1

No

Port site hernia (n = 1)

Partial colon resection (n = 8)

Sigmoid colon tumor (n = 7)

90 (70–130)

0

N

6.5

No

No

Rectosigmoid tumor (n = 1)

Distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy (n = 10) [13]

Insulinoma (n = 3)

181 (120–330)

30–500

N

8.1

Pancreatic fistula (n = 1)

Port site hernia (n = 1)

Adenocarcinoma (n = 1)

Neuroendocrine tumor (n = 4)

Gastric atony (n = 1)

Pancreas pseudocyst (n = 1)

Pancreatic fistula (n = 1)

Renal cell cancer metastasis (n = 1)

Pancreatic fistula (n = 1)

Subtotal gastrectomy (n = 4)

Gastric cancer (n = 3)

245 (180–310)

50–310

N

5

Pancreatic fistula (n = 1)

Port site hernia (n = 1)

Gastric stromal tumor (n = 1)

Partial liver resection (n = 3) [18]

Hemangioma (n = 2)

120 (110–145)

50–200

N

3

No

No

Hepatic adenoma (n = 1)

Adrenalectomy (n = 3)

Conn syndrome (n = 1)

60 (50–75)

30–50

N

3.3

Pancreatic fistula (n = 1)

No

Adrenal carcinoma (n = 1)

Metastatic adrenal carcinoma (n = 1)

Nissen fundoplication (n = 2) [19]

Hiatal hernia (n = 2)

105 (100–120)

0

N

1

No

No



In this chapter, we will discuss the technical details of single-access laparoscopic pancreas resection together with its advantages and disadvantages.


11.1.1 Our Experience


Our first case was a female patient who underwent surgery with the diagnosis of renal cancer. During her follow-up period, she referred us with multifocal pancreatic metastasis of a renal cancer. After this first case, we continued to perform single-access laparoscopic pancreas resection for different pathologies including insulinoma, adenocarcinoma, mucinous cyst adenoma, and nonfunctional neuroendocrine tumor.

After performing ten cases of SALS distal pancreatectomies, we achieved to preserve spleen only in one of the cases. This patient had an insulinoma located at pancreatic tail. In this case, after defining the localization of the lesion with laparoscopic ultrasonography, we preserved short gastric vessels. Although we sacrificed the splenic artery, we protected the spleen successfully in the end. In three cases (30 %), we had low-flow pancreatic fistula which ceased spontaneously during the follow-up period. In one case, we had umbilical trocar site hernia. We had no conversion to multi-trocar laparoscopy or open surgery, and no mortality occurred. The main problem was the duration of the surgical procedure which was as expected longer than standard laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies.

In all our cases, we routinely used suction drains which were located in the pancreatectomy bed. Before the removal of drains, we always analyzed the drain fluid for amylase level. If this level was three times higher than normal serum amylase levels, we did not remove the drain and accepted as pancreatic fistula.

One of the main challenging steps of the procedure was caused by the sword fight of the laparoscopic instruments both inside and outside of the abdomen. In order to prevent or minimize this challenge, the use of roticulated instruments is mandatory for this technique. Today, we have even angulated energy devices that are very useful for hemostasis in advanced laparoscopic procedures. The smoke inside the abdomen and air leak are the other minor technical problems during advanced single-access laparoscopic procedures. Using standard laparoscopic trocars can be a solution for the easy evacuation of intra-abdominal fog. Air leak is usually caused by deformation of the special single-access trocars toward the end of the procedure due to overextension of the laparoscopic tools. You can deal with this problem by having an extra single-access trocar for change where needed. The details of our SALS distal pancreatectomy experience are summarized in Table 11.2.


Table 11.2
The details of our SALS distal pancreatectomy case series




























































































































Cases

Age/sex

BMI

Diagnosis

Operative time (min)

Intraoperative blood loss

Conversion (Y/N)

Length of hospital stay

Complication

1

59/F

31.1

Metastatic renal cell cancer

330

100

N

7

Pancreatic fistula

2

52/M

30.3

Insulinoma

210

125

N

5


3

48/F

27.8

Neuroendocrine tumor

205

140

N

5

Port site hernia

4

39/F

26.3

Neuroendocrine tumor

180

210

N

7

Pancreatic fistula

5

33/F

41.2

Pancreas pseudocyst

165

50

N

7


6

29/F

24.7

Neuroendocrine tumor

135

500

N

20

Gastric atony

7

57/M

27.1

Adenocarcinoma

150

115

N

12

Pancreatic fistula

8a

27/M

29.2

Insulinoma

160

90

N

7


9

47/F

28.4

Insulinoma

120

65

N

6


10

40/M

25.5

Neuroendocrine tumor

145

30

N

5



aSpleen preserving achieved in this patient



11.2 Surgical Technique




Mar 29, 2017 | Posted by in GASTROENTEROLOGY | Comments Off on Single-Access Laparoscopic Approach for Pancreatic Surgery

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access