Sexual Dysfunction After Urethroplasty




Posturethroplasty sexual dysfunction (SD) is multifactorial and its true incidence is unknown. Even with the current evidence suggesting that it is uncommon, de novo SD causes dissatisfaction even after a successful surgery. Posterior urethroplasty carries the highest chance of SD, mostly attributable to the pelvic fracture itself rather than the urethroplasty. With anterior urethroplasty, transecting bulbar urethroplasty leads to greater SD compared with penile or nontransecting bulbar urethroplasty. Most patients with posturethroplasty SD recover within 6 months after surgery.


Key points








  • With the voiding function taken care of, the focus is shifting towards the inadvertent complications of urethroplasty, such as sexual dysfunction (SD).



  • De novo posturethroplasty SD is uncommon—approximately 1% (0%–38%) after anterior urethroplasty and approximately 3% (0%–34%) after pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI) repair.



  • The time of assessment and the type of urethroplasty may affect sexual outcomes.



  • For bulbar strictures, nontransecting procedures may provide better sexual outcomes compared with excision and anatomosis.



  • Although posterior urethroplasty has the highest chance of SD, most of it is attributable to the fracture itself rather than the urethroplasty.






Introduction


Urethroplasty is considered the standard of care for urethral stricture disease. With its superior long-term success rates, little morbidity, and cost-effectiveness, it has largely replaced endoscopic procedures as the current gold standard. The goal of urethroplasty is to restore voiding function; thus, most of the available literature uses this criterion to define success. With good long-term success rates of urethroplasty addressing voiding function, focus is shifting toward inadvertent complications, such as SD. As with any other genital surgery, there is a possibility of injury to the cavernous nerves or to the pudendal artery or a chance of penile shortening, which can affect postoperative sexual function. It was Mundy, in 1993, who first reported permanent erectile dysfunction after urethroplasty. In their study of 200 patients, the rate of permanent erectile dysfunction after anastomotic transperineal and abdominoperineal urethroplasty was 5% and that after graft urethroplasty was 0.9%. Corsey and colleagues in 2001 echoed Mundy’s results and showed that the overall satisfaction with erection worsened in 30.9% of the patients after urethroplasty, but also noted a worsening of erection in 27.3% of patients in the control group who underwent circumcision. These contradictory findings sparked a debate and led to further evaluation among reconstructive urologists. Currently, there is a growing concern about the ill effects of urethroplasty on the various aspects of sexual function and certain ways have been proposed to reduce or prevent it.




Introduction


Urethroplasty is considered the standard of care for urethral stricture disease. With its superior long-term success rates, little morbidity, and cost-effectiveness, it has largely replaced endoscopic procedures as the current gold standard. The goal of urethroplasty is to restore voiding function; thus, most of the available literature uses this criterion to define success. With good long-term success rates of urethroplasty addressing voiding function, focus is shifting toward inadvertent complications, such as SD. As with any other genital surgery, there is a possibility of injury to the cavernous nerves or to the pudendal artery or a chance of penile shortening, which can affect postoperative sexual function. It was Mundy, in 1993, who first reported permanent erectile dysfunction after urethroplasty. In their study of 200 patients, the rate of permanent erectile dysfunction after anastomotic transperineal and abdominoperineal urethroplasty was 5% and that after graft urethroplasty was 0.9%. Corsey and colleagues in 2001 echoed Mundy’s results and showed that the overall satisfaction with erection worsened in 30.9% of the patients after urethroplasty, but also noted a worsening of erection in 27.3% of patients in the control group who underwent circumcision. These contradictory findings sparked a debate and led to further evaluation among reconstructive urologists. Currently, there is a growing concern about the ill effects of urethroplasty on the various aspects of sexual function and certain ways have been proposed to reduce or prevent it.




Evaluation and questionnaires


Normal sexual function is a result of complex interplay between vascular, nervous, endocrinologic, and psychological systems leading to erection, ejaculation, orgasm, and overall satisfaction. From a patient’s standpoint, baseline sexual function, cause of the stricture, psychological impact of the stricture or its treatment, postoperative tissue edema or inflammation, or the urethroplasty itself may lead to posturethroplasty SD. Sexual function can be assessed using standard validated questionnaires, such as the International Index of Erectile Function, International Index of Erectile Function – 5, Sexual Health Inventory for Men, O’Leary Brief Male Sexual Function Inventory, and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire for Ejaculatory Dysfunction, but none of these is specific to the posturethroplasty setting. The only validated questionnaire for urethroplasty does not assess changes in the sexual function. Thus, various nonvalidated in-house questionnaires are being used and reported, making comparison among different studies difficult. One such questionnaire, the Post-Urethroplasty Sexual Questionnaire, specifically assesses changes in sexual function after urethroplasty and includes domains, such as genital sensitivity, genital cosmesis, satisfaction after urethroplasty, and the importance of counseling. Another posturethroplasty questionnaire combines the Sexual Health Inventory for Men and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire for Ejaculatory Dysfunction with urethroplasty-specific questions, such as the effect of surgery on the sexual function, postoperative alteration in the penile length, and curvature and genital sensitivity, including glans tumescence and cold feeling of the glans. Various other in-house nonvalidated questionnaires have been used for this purpose but a standard validated uniform questionnaire to assess the sexual outcomes after urethroplasty is still lacking. This review discusses de novo SD after urethroplasty (anterior and posterior urethra), its proposed mechanisms, and the proposed ways to prevent or reduce it.




De novo sexual dysfunction: effect of urethroplasty on various aspects of sexual function


SD is a broad term and for a posturethroplasty patient it encompasses erectile dysfunction, ejaculatory dysfunction, penile curvature or chordee, and genital sensitivity disorders. Current available literature suggests that the de novo posturethroplasty SD is uncommon, approximately 1% (0%–38%) after anterior urethroplasty and approximately 3% (0%–34%) after PFUI repair. Postoperative de novo erectile dysfunction can result from an injury to the bulbar artery or to the vascular connections between the cavernosa and the spongiosa during the mobilization of the bulbar urethra or from an injury to the cavernous nerves during the intercrural dissection of the urethra (cavernous nerves run at 1 o’clock and 11 o’clock positions, 3 mm outside the spongiosa). The ejaculatory function can either improve or deteriorate after urethroplasty. Relief of the urethral obstruction leads to an increase in the force of ejaculation and reduces the associated burning or pain, thus improving postoperative ejaculation. Whereas injury to the bulbospongiosus muscle (division and retraction of muscle to expose the bulbar urethra) or to the perineal nerves (perineal nerves may be injured during the dissection of central tendon as they emerge from ischiorectal fossa or small branches of the perineal nerve may be injured while dividing and retracting the bulbospongiosus muscle) may lead to reduced stream of ejaculation or postejaculatory dribbling. Weakening of a ventrally placed graft (pseudodiverticula formation) may also result in ejaculatory dysfunction. Shortening of the urethra after excision and anastomosis for a long bulbar urethral stricture may result in a new-onset penile curvature and chordee. The mobilization and transection of spongiosa required for primary anastomosis may lead to poor blood flow distal to the transection, resulting in postoperative cold glans and poor glans tumescence during erections. Injury to the perineal nerves, which provide sensory supply to perineum, scrotum, and the ventral surface of the shaft of penis, may result in postoperative genital sensitivity disorders. Lastly, the psychological stress of the stricture disease and the recent surgery and postsurgery tissue inflammation and edema may also contribute to the SD. Therefore, urethroplasty can affect multiple domains of sexual function and postsurgery SD is multifactorial in origin.




Factors affecting posturethroplasty sexual function


A patient’s age, length of stricture, previous interventions, and type of urethroplasty have been proposed to affect posturethroplasty sexual function, but evidence is mostly lacking. Posturethroplasty erectile dysfunction was initially shown to be higher in older patients with longer strictures (6.8 cm vs 4.4 cm). Further studies have refuted this association, however, and a recent meta-analysis found no association between the length of the stricture and the incidence of postoperative erectile dysfunction. Similarly, Erickson and colleagues showed that patients greater than 50 years old had a higher decline in erectile function after urethroplasty, but these findings were not reproduced by others and the association between age, length of stricture, previous surgeries, and posturethroplasty SD is unclear.


Sexual function in the immediate postoperative period is poor and as the healing occurs, it tends to improve. Dogra and colleagues, in their prospective analysis of patients undergoing anterior urethroplasty, showed that the erectile function is worst at 3 months after surgery and then recovers to the preoperative level in most patients at approximately 6 months and then remains stable. Similarly, another study showed the postoperative erectile function to be significantly better in patients more than 1 year after urethroplasty compared with those within the first year. This transient decline in the erectile function has been attributed to dissection or thermal injury (electrocautery)–induced neuropraxia of the cavernous nerves or to the postoperative hematoma and inflammation at the surgical site along with the psychological effects of the surgery. A similar recovery in the ejaculatory function after bulbar anastomotic urethroplasty was noted by Beysens and colleagues at 6 months of follow-up. Thus, the timing of assessment is important. At 6 months to 1-year postsurgery, the sexual function returns to the baseline level with no residual effect in most of the patients. There is a residual permanent de novo erectile dysfunction in a small percentage, however, which is the cause of dissatisfaction even after a successful surgery. Available literature, almost unanimously, shows no difference in the posturethoplasty SD rates between the different locations of the stricture or the type of the urethroplasty performed. There is some evidence, however, that posterior urethroplasty carries the highest risk of erectile dysfunction, and in anterior urethroplasties, especially for short bulbar strictures, the nontransecting procedures may better preserve sexual function compared with transecting procedures but the debate continues.




Sexual dysfunction after anterior urethroplasty


Bulbar urethroplasty poses greater risk of injury to cavernosal nerves and the vascular supply, thus has higher chances of postoperative SD. Problems, such as impaired erection and ejaculation, are more frequent after bulbar urethroplasty, whereas, penile curvature and cosmesis are the primary concerns after penile urethroplasty ( Table 1 ).



Table 1

Reported rates of sexual dysfunction after different types of urethroplasties

























































Type of Urethroplasty Erectile Dysfunction (%) Ejaculatory Dysfunction (%) Chordee/Curvature (%) Reduced Glans Turgidity or Coldness Genital Sensitivity
Anterior urethroplasty
Penile flap 40 NA 27.3 NA NA
Penile graft 4.5–19.2 20 15.4–23 NA 45
Bulbar transecting 1–50 10.8–23.3 5–26.6 10–16.7 18.3–58
Bulbar nontransecting 1–26 0–19 0 4–60 40–42
Posterior urethroplasty
Overall 25–86 NA NA NA NA
De novo 2–5 , 3–8.6 NA NA NA


Penile Urethroplasty


Penile urethral strictures are usually managed by dorsal graft urethroplasty and penile flaps are currently seldom used. If the stricture is long, tight, complex, or associated with lichen sclerosis or there is a history of previously failed repair, the procedure can be staged. Various investigators have assessed the impact of different types of urethroplasty on sexual function and mostly no significant differences could be established. Most of these studies were limited, however, by small sample size, heterogeneous patient group, and varied timing of assessment. Penile flap procedures can lead to a decline in the erectile function in approximately 40% and a major change in erectile length and angle in 20% of the cases, which results in a decline in intercourse frequency, leading to overall dissatisfaction in 27% of the patients. Although statistically insignificant, penile flap procedures affect the sexual functions the most. Over the years, the surgery for long penile strictures has moved away from flap procedures to grafting. The impact of graft penile urethroplasty on sexual function is more favorable and is almost similar to that of bulbar urethroplasty (postoperative dysfunction rates 16%–25%). There is no relation between the length of the penile stricture or the graft and the incidence of postoperative erectile dysfunction. Erickson and colleagues assessed ejaculatory function after penile graft urethroplasty and found a stable function in most of the patients. Staging the procedure of graft urethroplasty for pananterior urethral strictures does not seem to adversely affect the sexual functions and the outcomes are similar to that of a single-stage procedure. Xie and colleagues assessed erectile dysfunction after graft urethroplasty for complex pananterior urethral strictures (>10 cm long, either single or at multiple sites) and observed transient penile edema in 5 patients, penile shortening in 6 patients, and an erectile dysfunction rate of 25% at 6 months postsurgery. They suggested an overall low rate of SD as long the stricture did not extend into proximal bulbar urethra or required intercrural dissection. Thus, graft urethroplasty limited to penile urethra leads to temporary erectile dysfunction in patients 20% of the patients, which recovers in most at 6 months after surgery.


Bulbar Urethroplasty


Bulbar urethral strictures are managed either by transecting techniques (ie, excision and primary or augmented anastomosis) or by nontransecting techniques (ie, graft urethroplasty). The management of a short obliterative or a long-segment bulbar stricture is straightforward: excision and anastomosis as the only options for an obliterative stricture and grafting for the long segment stricture. It is the short-segment nonobliterative bulbar stricture, in which both excision and grafting are suitable, that is the cause of debate. Transection is preferred for traumatic strictures, which usually have an obliterative transmural spongiofibrosis, and nontransecting technique is usually reserved for idiopathic strictures, where the spongiofibrosis is superficial and can be excised without the need of transection.


Transecting techniques


Short-segment uncomplicated or obliterative bulbar strictures are amenable to complete excision with primary anastomosis, which is considered as the most successful treatment. Several studies have assessed sexual outcomes after excision and end to end anastomosis and noted a new-onset erectile dysfunction in 21.4% and an ejaculatory dysfunction in 20% of the patients and in 3.3% ejaculation was only possible by manual compression of perineum at the level of the urethral bulb. Neurovascular disorders, such as cold glans, poor glans tumescence, and sensitivity, were noted in 31.6% and new-onset penile curvature was noted in 3.6% of the cases. Despite that all these patients were recurrence-free at 5 years postsurgery, 2 (3%) patients were still dissatisfied by the surgery. Similar poor sexual outcomes have been reported after excision and primary anastomosis for a long (>2.5 cm) bulbar stricture along with a higher chance of postoperative chordee. Therefore, the authors suggested that longer bulbar strictures are better managed by excision followed by augmented roof strip anastomosis, which has similar SD profile with no increased risk of chordee. Thus, despite its excellent success rates, there is a high chance of SD after transecting bulbar urethroplasty resulting from the damage to the bulbospongiosus muscle or the perineal nerve, the transection of spongiosal blood supply, or the shortening of urethra resulting in erectile, ejaculatory, and other types of SD.


Nontransecting techniques


The longer bulbar urethral strictures (>2–3 cm) are mostly managed by nontransecting graft urethroplasty. Keeping the corpora spongiosa intact preserves the blood supply to the glans, theoretically giving the same benefits as the bulbar artery–sparing techniques. Palminteri and colleagues assessed the impact of ventral onlay graft urethroplasty on postoperative sexual functions and observed a worsened ejaculation in 19% and cold glans in only 4% of the patients with preserved erectile function in all at 1 year of follow-up. Worsened ejaculatory function was attributed to the weakening of the ventrally placed graft with pseudodiverticula formation and the investigators concluded that a nontransecting ventral urethroplasty may protect against postoperative SD.


Transecting versus nontransecting bulbar urethroplasty


Several investigators have evaluated whether the nontransecting is superior to the transecting bulbar urethroplasty in terms of sexual outcomes. The rates of erectile dysfunction, ejaculatory dysfunction, and impaired glans turgidity were similar between the 2 groups, with a slightly higher chance of penile angulation or shortening after excision and anastomosis. But the success rate of urethroplasty was higher in excision group compared with grafting and the current evidence suggests that the 2 procedures have almost similar effects on the sexual functions and the difference, if any, is small.


Other techniques and modifications


Injury to the bulbar artery during the dissection and transection of corpus spongiosum is one of the causes of the posturethroplasty SD. For a short-segment proximal bulbar urethral stricture, Jordan and colleagues described a technique of bulbar artery–sparing end-to-end anastomosis, which would theoretically avoid reduced glans turgidity and sensitivity even after spongiosal transection. Posturethroplasty ejaculatory dysfunction is attributed to the weakening of a ventrally placed graft or to the damage to the bulbospongiosus muscle or to the perineal nerves. Palminteri and colleagues suggested ways to reduce risk of postoperative ejaculatory disorders by careful midline opening of the bulbospongiosus, no sectioning of the central perineal tendon, covering the graft with spongiosa, and reconstructing the bulbospongiosus muscle. Even if the muscle is split carefully in midline, the muscle fibers and the perineal nerve fibers running laterally over the muscle may be damaged by retraction and thus even after reapproximation it may not function. To overcome this, Barbagali and colleagues described a modified technique for graft bulbar urethroplasty suitable for both ventral and dorsal graft placement that avoids division of the bulbospongiosus muscle or central perineal tendon. None of the 12 patients who underwent nerve and muscle–sparing graft bulbar urethroplasty (6 ventral and 6 dorsal onlay) reported a decrease in the force of ejaculation or postvoid dribbling or pseudodiverticulae formation at 12 months of follow-up.


Due to the higher chance of SD associated with excision and primary repair, some investigators prefer graft urethroplasty. But for a tight stricture (unable to pass 7F rigid ureteroscope or <3 mm diameter), placement of a graft may not result in an adequate urethral lumen and forces excision and anastomosis. Palminteri and colleagues proposed a novel urethra-sparing technique for tight bulbar urethral strictures using a combination of dorsal and ventral grafts, augmenting the urethra on both sides and achieving an adequate lumen. This double-graft technique preserves the urethral plate and avoids sexual complications and chordee. Of the 12 patients assessed, none reported postoperative erectile dysfunction, penile curvature, or shortening. Despite its excellent sexual outcomes, the reported long-term success rate of this procedure is 89.6%, which is lower than that reported for excision and primary anastomosis.


Although the position of graft placement has never been compared in terms of sexual outcomes, it is proposed that placing the graft dorsally might impair erection by risking injury to the cavernosal nerves and the bulbar arteries, especially when the dissection is very proximal, leading to possible postoperative erectile dysfunction. On the other hand, ventral grafting is technically easier, requires less urethral dissection and mobilization, and can be considered sexually safe. But there is a higher chance of pseudodiverticula formation with subsequent poor postoperative ejaculation and postejaculatory dribble.


In some cases, the stricture may extend into the membranous urethra and because of fear of incontinence and impotence such strictures are usually managed endoscopically. Blakely and colleagues reported on sexual outcomes in 16 men who underwent dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for transurethral resection of prostate or radiation-induced long strictures involving membranous and bulbomembranous urethra and noted new-onset mild erectile dysfunction in only 1 patient. The investigators concluded that by avoiding circumferential dissection and transection of the urethra, there was a little effect on erectile function despite the resection of fibrotic tissue in the intercrural space.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Mar 3, 2017 | Posted by in UROLOGY | Comments Off on Sexual Dysfunction After Urethroplasty

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access