Setting Up an Enhanced Recovery Program Pathway for Bariatric Surgery: Current Evidence into Practice




(1)
Associate Professor of Surgery, Director, Arnold & Blema Steinberg Medical Simulation Centre, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

 



Keywords
Enhanced recovery after surgery for bariatric surgeryBariatric surgery and enhanced recover after surgery programsGastric banding and enhanced recovery programsRoux-en-Y gastric bypass and enhanced recovery programsSleeve gastrectomy and enhanced recovery programsOutcomes analysis and enhanced recovery programs


Over the past two decades in particular, bariatric (or metabolic) surgery has increased in terms of its volume. Indeed, almost 180,000 cases were performed in the United States alone in 2013, comprised mostly of gastric banding (14 %), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (34 %), and sleeve gastrectomy (42 %) [1]. This is not only a testament to the great demand of this type of surgery, in terms of patients who suffer from co-morbidities such as type II diabetes, sleep apnea, hypertension, and polycystic ovarian disease, but also to the fact that the surgery is considered a safe and viable option. Over the past 10 years, technical modifications such as changes to the anastomotic technique, and timing of thrombotic prophylaxis have led to the development of a safer laparoscopic technique [2]. Numerous prospective reports confirm extremely low rates of morbidity and mortality [3, 4].

With this in mind, it is timely to consider the next steps in the evolution of bariatric surgery, such as further reductions in complication rates and decreased length of hospital stay. The impact of clinical care pathways with respect to enhanced recovery programs has been strongly affiliated to colorectal surgery, and more recently have propagated almost all types of surgical practice [5]. It is with this background that it is important and relevant to consider the current scope, and future role of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs (ERPs) with respect to bariatric surgery.


Clinical Pathways in Bariatric Surgery


Whilst not under the name of ERP, the first publication to consider a clinical pathway for bariatric surgery was published in 2001, with respect to 28 patients, 12 of whom were recruited to a multidisciplinary clinical pathway [6]. The pathway involved patient education materials, standardized preoperative and postoperative orders, including early ambulation and oral diet, together with standardized discharge instructions. In comparison to the 16 patients who underwent standard care, there was a reduction in hospital stay of 3 days, similar complication and readmission rates, and a greater than 15 % decrease in resource utilization costs. In 2005, McCarty et al. published results of 2000 consecutive patients having undergone outpatient laparoscopic gastric bypass [7]. Of the 1699 (84 %) discharged within 23 h, 34 (1.7 %) were readmitted within 30 days, with low overall early (38, 1.9 %) and late (86, 4.3 %) complication rates, and only 2 (0.1 %) deaths. In this publication, the authors very much focus upon the perioperative period, in terms of analgesia, antiemetics, and surgical technique.

Whilst both of these studies reflect the impact of standardization of clinical processes, neither describes their approach with regard to adoption by other centers. More recently, in 2013, Lemanu et al. published a randomized controlled trial of enhanced recovery versus standard care after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy [8]. Of their 116 patients, 40 patients underwent the ERP protocol, and were compared to two other groups, i.e., a control group of 38 patients, and a historical cohort of a further 38 patients. What is of interest here is that the authors specifically defined the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative aspects of their ERP protocol (Table 24.1), including a summary of their discharge criteria. Their work was preceded by an extensive review of the current literature of bariatric and major abdominal surgery [9]. With regard to the clinical outcomes, the ERP group had a reduced length of stay (from 2 days to 1 day), with similar complication and readmission rates.


Table 24.1.
Components of bariatric enhanced recovery protocol.



















































Before surgery

Formal standardized preop. education
 
Formal goal-setting session
 
Tour of the ward

Morning of surgery

Clear oral fluids up to 2 h before surgery
 
Carbohydrate drinks × 2

During surgery

8 mg i.v. dexamethasone at induction of surgery
 
Standardized anesthesia [1]
 
Intraperitoneal local anesthesia [2]
 
Avoidance of prophylactic nasogastric tubes and drains

After surgery

Early instigation of oral intake
 
Mobilization 2 h after return to ward
 
Standardized multimodal analgesia [3] and antiemesis [4]
 
Standardized multimodal thromboprophylaxis [5]

After discharge

Telephone calls 1 day and 1 week after discharge
 
2-week follow-up in clinic


Notes:

1. Induction agent (e.g., propofol), inhaled agent (e.g., sevoflurane), paralytic agent (e.g., rocuronium)

2. Bupivacaine 0.5 %

3. Acetaminophen PO or IV; Oxycodone PO or PR; Hydromorphone SC

4. Ondansetron IV

5. Mobilize 4 h after surgery; Sequential compression stockings; Heparin SC 7500 IU q12

Adapted from Lemanu DP, Singh PP, Berridge K, Burr M, Birch C, Babor R, MacCormick AD, Arroll B, Hill AG. Randomized clinical trial of enhanced recovery versus standard care after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Br J Surg. 2013 Mar;100(4):482–9; with permission
< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 28, 2016 | Posted by in GASTOINESTINAL SURGERY | Comments Off on Setting Up an Enhanced Recovery Program Pathway for Bariatric Surgery: Current Evidence into Practice

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access