Robotic/Laparoscopic Female Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery


Preoperative considerations

Patient history and physical exam

• Thorough assessment of tolerance of abdominal insufflation/Trendelenberg positioning

 – Smoking history, exercise tolerance, obesity

 – Cardiopulmonary/renal disease

 – Increased ICP

 – Hypovolemic state

• Abdominal survey for scars, hernias, and understanding of prior pelvic surgeries, anatomical variants

• Uterine mobility, adnexal mass

 – Lateral mobility ≥2 cm for uterine vessel access

• Gentle preoperative bowel prep only when deemed necessary (surgeon preference)

 – Mg Citrate, Miralax

Patient positioning and surgical setup

• Proper use of corporeal padding

• Joint flexion at maximum angle of 30°

• Anti-skid materials to decrease risk of nerve injury

 – Pink pad, egg crate, surgical beanbag

• Facial padding, eye taping to reduce facial injury

 – Direct facial trauma responsible for 20% of corneal abrasions

• Be mindful of degree of Trendelenberg positioning absolutely necessary

 – Less steep degree may decrease morbidity without negative effects on surgical time, visibility (Ghomi et al.)

• 30° camera for optimal sacral visualization

 – If distance from umbilicus to pubic symphysis <15 cm, camera port should be supra-umbilical

• Direct visualization and abdominal survey during trocar insertion

 – Port site bleeding most commonly from perforation of inferior epigastric artery

 – 55% of bowel perforations occur during intra-abdominal access

• Use of 8-mm or 5-mm accessory port to decrease hernia risk

Intraoperative complications
 
• Port site bleeding

 – Attempt to cauterize injured vessel with offending trocar in place

 – Tamponade can be attempted using a 12-Fr foley catheter through trocar

 – Sutures can be placed at each side of trocar site and tied externally with removal after 24–48 h

• Bowel injury

 – Use of fan retractors, accessory stitch, Endoloop to retract bowel effectively

 – If injury detected vicryl or barbed suture can be used for repair

 – Repair should be performed in two layers with sutures placed on the long axis of intestine to prevent stricture

• Presacral hemorrhage

 – Middle and lateral sacral vessels should be well delineated

 – Assess for variability of sacral/iliac vessels, particularly on the left side of anterior longitudinal ligament

 – Apply direct pressure with a RAYTEK or cottonoid as first line treatment

 – Hemostatic agents (Floseal, Surgicel) and laparoscopic vessel fasteners should be readily available

• Urinary tract injury/vaginotomy

 – Use of EEA sizers or vaginal stents to allow for proper visualization of vesicovaginal junction

 – Dissection of this junction should be bloodless if correct plane has been identified

 – 25 mg ICG in 10 mL sterile h20 can be injected into ureters prior to RASC for ureteral identification

 – Bladder/vaginal injury should be repaired in a double, imbricating layer using vicryl or barbed suture

 – Mesh should not be placed directly over vaginotomy site, should one occur

Postoperative issues
 
• Surgical site infection

 – Cephalosporins should be redosed intraoperatively after 4 h or with >1500 mL blood loss

 – Patients >120 kg should receive a 3 g initial dose instead of standard 2 g dosing

 – Postoperative antibiotics for wound infection should be targeted at Gram-positive bacteria

• VTE

 – LMWH should be considered in patients >60 yo, as they are deemed “high risk” with VTE risk 20–40%

• Bowel complications

 – Dyschezia, obstructed defecation, and outlet constipation are the most common types of post-op bowel dysfunction and patients should not expect a bowel movement within the first 3 days after surgery

 – Extensive dissection of rectovaginal septum should be avoided to reduce bowel denervation

• Mesh complications

 – Mesh should be placed as flat as possible and against sacral promontory to decrease anorectal dysfunction

 – Supracervical hysterectomy is preferred to reduce mesh extrusion rates

 – Use of lightweight type I mesh to reduce risk of graft infection

• De novo SUI

 – Vaginal examination should be performed intraoperatively to assess for anterior/apical overcorrection which could lead to new onset stress urinary incontinence





References



1.

Oliphant SS, Jones KA, Wang L, Bunker CH, Lowder JL. Trends over time with commonly performed obstetric and gynecologic inpatient procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(4):926.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral


2.

Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:805–23.CrossRefPubMed


3.

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444: Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:1156–8.


4.

AAGL Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide. AAGL position statement: robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in benign gynecology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(1):2–9.CrossRef


5.

Paraiso MF et al. Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: a comparative cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1752–8.CrossRefPubMed


6.

Geller EJ et al. Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(6):1201–6.CrossRefPubMed


7.

Nosti PA et al. Outcomes of abdominal and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014;20(1):33–7.CrossRefPubMed


8.

Costantini E et al. Laparoscopic versus Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2016;196(1):159–65.CrossRefPubMed


9.

Freeman RM et al. A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(3):377–84.CrossRefPubMed


10.

Appledorn SC, Costello AJ. Complications of robotic surgery and how to prevent them. In: Patel VR, editor. Robotic urologic surgery. London: Springer; 2007. p. 69–178.


11.

Moller AM et al. Effect of preoperative smoking intervention on postoperative complications: a randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9301):114–7.CrossRefPubMed

Jun 30, 2017 | Posted by in UROLOGY | Comments Off on Robotic/Laparoscopic Female Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access