Revisional Bariatric Surgery

Chapter 8 Revisional Bariatric Surgery



The videos associated with this chapter are listed in the Video Contents and can be found on the accompanying DVDs and on Expertconsult.com.image


Operative revision of failed bariatric surgery is not only a technical challenge but also a logistic one. It is of primary importance that strict criteria be followed for considering patients for revisional bariatric surgery. In particular, if the main reason for reoperation is inadequate weight loss, then the burden is to demonstrate a surgically correctable deficiency. Although the rate of revisions may be increasing, this is by no means a new problem. In light of the increasing number of surgical procedures performed, the need for revisional operations is also on the rise.


Historically, the first two widely performed operations for morbid obesity, the jejunoileal bypass (JIB) and stapled vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), were associated with a high rate of reoperation. The jejunoileal bypass caused nutritional deficiencies and diarrhea. Because of these problems, many patients had to have their jejunoileal bypass revised or reversed. This procedure is no longer being performed and has been replaced by other malabsorptive procedures, including the biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) and the improved variation of the biliopancreatic diversion with or without duodenal switch (DS). The VBG resulted in insufficient weight loss, primarily because of mechanical staple line failure. Over the years, these operations have required revision, conversion to another procedure, or complete reversal. The laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) has emerged as the gold standard for weight loss surgery.


Currently, the most frequently performed operations, LRYGB and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, also require revision for complications or unsatisfactory weight loss. The revision rate for the adjustable gastric banding is at least 10% during the first 2 years for either device-related problems or poor weight loss. Similarly, the revision rate for gastric bypass has been shown to be at least 5% to 10% over the first 5 years.



Operative indications


Although the indications to perform primary weight loss surgery for morbid obesity follow the National Institutes of Health guidelines, the indications for performing revisions are vaguely defined. The surgical options are many and may include revision, conversion to another procedure, or complete reversal.


The main indication for revisional surgery is inadequate weight loss after surgery. Eating habits and exercise routines should be reevaluated before pursuing surgical options. It is well recognized that successful weight loss is invariably associated with behavioral and diet modifications and dedicated exercise.


If structural issues, however, are the cause of the failure of the primary operation, further workup is necessary. Obtaining prior operative records may be helpful in future surgical planning; this unfortunately is not always possible. To delineate postsurgical anatomy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and upper gastrointestinal contrast studies are recommended. These diagnostic modalities allow for evaluation of the gastric pouch, the anastomosis, and the presence of staple line disruption, fistulas, ulcers, or strictures. In addition, the presence of a hiatal hernia and gastroesophageal reflux can be shown. Biopsies of the gastric mucosa for Helicobacter pylori are recommended. A history of H. pylori infection (despite its appropriate eradication) has been shown to lead to postoperative complications.


The most common complications after jejunoileal bypass include chronic renal calculi, malnutrition, bacterial overgrowth, and even renal or hepatic insufficiency. The current recommendation for patients presenting with complications from a previous jejunoileal bypass is to undergo reversal.


After the purely malabsorptive jejunoileal bypass fell out of favor in the 1960s and early 1970s, VBG became the preferred bariatric procedure. The main reasons for reoperation of patients with VBG are dehiscence of the staple line, weight regain, and erosion of the polypropylene mesh or Silastic ring. Options for revision include conversion to an LRYGB or a vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG).


Although VBG has historically been abandoned as a primary weight loss operation, it did yield its successor, the laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). The adjustable gastric band has a well-documented reoperative rate exceeding 10% in the first 2 years for complications such as band slippage and migration, band erosion, and port- or catheter-related complications. Options for revision include band repositioning, replacement, or removal with or without conversion to another weight loss procedure. In the case of band erosion, revision may be performed as a staged procedure, initially removing the eroded band with gastric repair followed subsequently by definitive weight loss surgery, or in a single operation.


Indications for surgery after the LRYGB may include weight regain, nonhealing marginal ulcer, stricture at the gastrojejunostomy or jejunojejunostomy, or malnutrition with severe vitamin deficiencies. In addition, complications that may require reoperation include internal hernia and gastrogastric fistula. Revisional surgery options include laparoscopic resection and reconstruction of the gastrojejunostomy, volume reduction of the pouch, revision of the jejunojejunostomy, reduction of internal hernias with closure of the hernia spaces, and lengthening of the Roux or biliopancreatic limbs.


For insufficient weight loss or weight regain, surgical options include lengthening of the biliopancreatic limb, lengthening of the alimentary limb, reduction of the gastric pouch, conversion to a more aggressive hybrid procedure (biliopancreatic diversion with or without duodenal switch), or placement of an adjustable gastric band on the pouch. An endoscopic revision for gastric bypass surgery (StomaphyX, EndoGastric Solutions, Inc., Redmond, Wash.) treats an enlarged gastric pouch or dilated gastrojejunostomy with endoscopic plications. Initial results with the use of this modality are encouraging; however, long-term results are currently unavailable.


Most insurance companies will approve patients for revisional surgery if the procedure will correct surgical complications (e.g., anastomotic ulcer, fistula, internal hernia). This is not the case, however, when it comes to inadequate weight loss. Insurance companies are much more resistant to granting preauthorization for bariatric revisional surgery.



Preoperative evaluation, testing, and preparation


Before a revisional bariatric procedure is performed, the bariatric surgeon will need to determine the cause of failure and evaluate the patient for appropriate treatment options. The bariatric surgeon will need to determine whether failure is due to a complication with the original surgery or the patient’s inability to adopt the necessary lifestyle changes. The surgeon should discuss with the patient all of the available options for bariatric revision as well as realistic expectations.


Historically, revisional bariatric surgery has been very high risk. Two decades ago, the overall complication rate with open revisional surgery approached 50%, with a mortality rate of 5% to 10%. With the advent of laparoscopic surgery, these results have improved dramatically during the past decade. Several recent publications have emphasized that laparoscopic experience is associated with improved outcomes.


Patient education is paramount to a good outcome; other components of the preoperative workup may include nutritional and psychological assessments. These consultations may identify patients suffering from untreated psychiatric conditions such as major depressive disorder, binge eating, drug abuse, or alcoholism. Appropriate psychotherapy or counseling may be necessary before surgery.


Routine preoperative testing should be obtained in addition to endoscopy (EGD) and an upper gastrointestinal contrast study. If the patient has a personal or family history of pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep venous thrombosis (DVT), further workup for hypercoagulability may be required. For patients found to have cholelithiasis on preoperative ultrasound, cholecystectomy may be performed concurrently with the revisional surgery.


Preoperative preparation of the patient may include standard mechanical bowel prep with polyethylene glycol electrolyte (PEG) matrix and oral antibiotics (modified Condon-Nichols bowel prep). Perioperative intravenous antibiotics (such as a second-generation cephalosporin and metronidazole) should be initiated before skin incision.


Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis can be achieved with lower extremity intermittent pneumatic compression garments. Many surgeons advocate the use of unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin routinely. The risks for a VTE event versus hemorrhage (the primary complication of VTE prophylaxis) must be weighed by the surgeon. For patients with a history of PE or DVT, another option to consider is the preoperative placement of a temporary inferior vena cava filter.



Patient positioning and placement of trocars


A bariatric operating room table that can be positioned low and in steep reverse Trendelenburg should be used. The table should have appropriate attachments to allow for safe patient positioning, including split-leg attachments as opposed to stirrups. In addition, right-angle footboards are helpful in supporting the weight of a patient placed in steep reverse Trendelenburg. The patient’s arms should be extended and padded to prevent tension on the shoulder and brachial plexus.


Two monitors are positioned on either side of the patient’s shoulders. Two 40-L high-flow CO2 insufflators are helpful in maintaining pneumoperitoneum during these technically demanding procedures. In addition to high-resolution camera equipment, a variety of bariatric-length laparoscopes with different viewing angles (0, 30, and 45 degrees) are helpful. Bariatric-length (45 cm) instruments are necessary for performing these revisional surgeries. Atraumatic liver retractors should be used to retract the left lobe of the liver.


Invasive hemodynamic monitoring (i.e., arterial or central venous access) is left to the discretion of the surgeon or anesthesiologist, although often it is unnecessary.


Laparoscopic access to the abdominal cavity is more safely accomplished with the use of an optical trocar placed away from previous incision sites. Most of the revisional bariatric surgeries can be carried out by positioning the trocars as shown in Figure 8-1.




Operative technique


Revisional bariatric surgery can be technically demanding, and the surgeon should be prepared for all possible scenarios. These operations are best done with the assistance of an additional experienced laparoscopic surgeon. Adhesions from previous open surgeries present a real challenge when proceeding laparoscopically. Identification of correct anatomy is paramount to the success of the operation. Identification of crucial landmarks, including the caudate lobe of the liver, right crus of the diaphragm, gastroesophageal junction, spleen, inferior vena cava, and pancreas, is necessary to reduce the potential for intraoperative complications. The use of a lighted bougie or intraoperative upper endoscopy, or both, may be helpful in identifying the esophagus, pouch, gastroesophageal junction, and any other preexisting anastomoses. Often, a hiatal hernia is present that may have not been identified previously. Such hiatal hernias should be repaired concomitantly with any other procedures.



Complications of Adjustable Gastric Banding



Conversion of Eroded LAGB to an LRYGB with Partial Gastrectomy


Upon entering the abdomen, there are often dense adhesions encountered between the left lobe of the liver and the area of the previously placed band. These adhesions are divided sharply, and a liver balloon retractor may facilitate exposure. Once the left lobe of the liver is elevated, the band tubing can be followed to the gastroplasty (Fig. 8-2). Gentle traction on the band tubing would lead the surgeon into the area of the buckle and surrounding reactive capsule. This reactive tissue can safely be divided sharply with scissors or energy source staying to the right of the gastroplasty. Often, because of chronic inflammation from the erosion, this is a very difficult plane to identify and dissect. Once the band is clearly identified, scissors can be used to divide and remove the band from around the stomach (Fig. 8-3). The band is removed, exposing the perforation. It is not necessary to divide the overlying gastroplasty because this tissue will be excised. It is usually easier to approach the dissection and mobilization of the fundus and midstomach rather than continuing the dissection in the right paraesophageal region, which is invariably hostile. Once the fundus is mobilized and the gastroesophageal junction and left bundle of the right crus of the diaphragm are identified, the dissection and gastric mobilization progress to the right. The gastrohepatic omentum is opened widely, and the caudate lobe of the liver, right crus of the diaphragm, and esophageal hiatus are identified. Dissection continues cephalad, to the right bundle of right crus of the diaphragm.


< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 20, 2016 | Posted by in GASTOINESTINAL SURGERY | Comments Off on Revisional Bariatric Surgery

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access