Radiologic Testing in Inflammatory Bowel Disease



Radiologic Testing in Inflammatory Bowel Disease


Drew Lambert



INTRODUCTION

This is a new era in radiologic testing of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Particularly in Crohn’s disease (CD), relatively novel techniques are changing the paradigm for radiologic evaluation. In the past, we were limited to fluoroscopic barium examination, but now we have an arsenal of tests using recent advances in computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques. The use of radiologic testing in ulcerative colitis (UC) is less than in CD, primarily owing to the ready access of the colon to endoscopy, but radiologic testing provides a supplemental role. Radiologic testing in UC is most useful when the differentiation of CD and UC is in question and in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). As such, this chapter will focus on CD.

This chapter will provide a brief overview of radiologic testing in IBD. The techniques will be described, but detailed methodology will be left to other sources. The imaging characteristics of the most important radiologic modalities will be outlined. I hope this will provide busy practitioners guidance when reviewing radiologic examinations in their IBD patients.


RADIOLOGIC CLASSIFICATION OF CROHN’S DISEASE SUBTYPES

CD has a protean pattern of bowel involvement that has been classified into the following subtypes based on radiologic appearances: (a) active inflammatory, (b) fibrostenotic, (c) fistulizing/perforating, and (d) reparative/regenerative (1). These subtypes, the features of which are summarized in Table 3.1, can be useful in planning therapy and evaluating disease progression. The system reminds one that the same basic morphologic changes are in play regardless of the radiologic method used to image them. It also provides a framework for discussion of the imaging features manifest in the various radiologic modalities. Keep in mind that these radiologic subtypes can coexist within the same bowel segment and in different segments of bowel within the same patient.

The terminal ileum is the most common site involved in CD. In CD patients who have undergone ileocolic resection, the small bowel just proximal to the ileocolic anastomosis becomes the new most common site of involvement, earning the moniker “neo-terminal ileum.” CD also tends to occur in a discontinuous pattern, with affected bowel segments separated by nondiseased lengths of bowel.


RADIOLOGIC TECHNIQUES

Radiologic techniques for evaluation of IBD range from the conventional abdominal radiograph to sophisticated MRI exams involving multiple complementary sequences. Primary fluoroscopic techniques are the SBFT (with or without peroral pneumocolon) and conventional enteroclysis. Primary CT techniques are conventional CT of the abdomen/pelvis, CT enterography, and CT enteroclysis. Primary MRI techniques are MR enterography, MR enteroclysis, and MR
cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). Transabdominal ultrasound of the small bowel is also performed at some centers, especially outside the United States.








TABLE 3.1 Radiologic Classification of Small Bowel Crohn’s Disease





















































































Active inflammatory subtype



Minimal changes




Superficial ulcerations (aphthae)




Minimal fold thickening or distortion (edema)



Severe changes




Deep ulcers, cobblestone mucosa (longitudinal and transverse ulcers)




Marked wall thickening due to transmural inflammation (mural stratification)




Obstruction secondary to spasm





“Comb sign”


Fibrostenotic subtype



Minimal stenosis




Minimal decrease in luminal diameter, mild prestenotic dilatation




Minimal wall thickening, no bowel wall edema



Severe stenosis




Marked decrease in luminal diameter, with obvious prestenotic dilatation





Marked wall thickening of soft tissue density, no mural edema


Fistulizing/perforating subtype



Deep fissuring ulcers, sinus tracts



Fistulae to adjacent organs, bowel, skin



Associated inflammatory mass


Reparative/regenerative subtype



Mucosal atrophy



Regenerative polyps



Minimal decrease in luminal diameter—no mural edema


From Maglinte DDT, Gourtsoyiannis N, Rex D, et al. Classification of small bowel Crohn’s subtypes based on multimodality imaging. Radiol Clin N Am. 2003;41:285-303.



Conventional Radiography

The abdominal radiograph is most useful in the setting of acute illness and has little role in the routine evaluation of IBD. The acute abdominal series should include a supine or prone view, an upright or left lateral decubitus view, and an upright chest radiograph whenever possible. In CD, small bowel obstruction (SBO) due to stricture can be identified on abdominal radiographs. SBO is indicated by small bowel dilatation (generally >3 cm), multiple air-fluid levels, and often a decompressed colon (due to the evacuation of luminal contents downstream from the obstruction). In UC, the abdominal radiograph is most useful when toxic megacolon is suspected. This is characterized by dilatation of the colon (averaging 8 to 9 cm), wall thickening/nodularity (reflecting edema), and absence of colonic haustra (2). The previously reported affinity of toxic megacolon for the transverse colon likely reflects the visibility of the air-filled transverse colon on supine radiographs rather than a true predilection for this site (3).



Fluoroscopy

In the past, SBFT was the mainstay for evaluation of small bowel involvement in IBD. This is changing with the advent of advanced CT and MRI techniques. However, SBFT will remain a useful technique, as it provides the greatest spatial resolution and the ability to manipulate the bowel using a combination of compression and patient positioning. A combined upper gastrointestinal (UGI) examination of the esophagus and stomach with the SBFT (UGI/SBFT) is generally not necessary unless the patient has symptoms localizable to the upper tract; upper GI involvement by CD is much less common than small bowel involvement, and the combined exam involves more radiation to the patient. A dedicated SBFT is often better suited for patients where small bowel disease is the major focus.

For the SBFT exam, the patient is administered barium sulfate suspension by mouth, after which the progress of the “contrast column” through the small bowel is monitored using serial abdominal radiographs. After the contrast column has reached the cecum (or earlier if abnormal bowel is detected on the serial abdominal images), real-time fluoroscopy is performed with specific emphasis on the terminal ileum. If the terminal ileum cannot be adequately imaged using the singlecontrast (barium only) technique, pneumocolon can be performed to provide double contrast (air and barium). This technique, which involves air-insufflation through a flexible tube placed in the rectum, provides the most detailed view of the terminal ileum mucosa and therefore has the greatest sensitivity in early or mild IBD involvement (4).

Conventional enteroclysis allows a more detailed evaluation of the entire small bowel, but has the drawbacks of requiring preprocedural cathartic colon cleansing, nasojejunal intubation, and increased radiation to both the patient and the radiologist performing the exam. An enteric tube is placed from the nose to the proximal jejunum using fluoroscopic guidance. An occlusion balloon at the end of the tube is inflated and barium suspension is administered using a pump mechanism. The leading edge of the contrast column is followed using intermittent fluoroscopy, with real-time abdominal compression and spot images acquired when an abnormality is detected (5).

Early active inflammatory CD on barium fluoroscopic examination is characterized by thickening or mild nodularity of the mucosa resulting from edema or lymphoid proliferation (3). Shallow erosions surrounded by a circle of edema can also result, representing aphthous ulcers (Fig. 3.1). With intermediate active inflammatory CD, the edema and nodularity of the mucosa progresses, causing fold distortion or obliteration. The aphthous ulcers may increase in depth and width, often fusing to produce crescentic or linear tracks in the mucosa. The increased inflammation can result in thickening and sclerosis of the involved mesentery, producing retraction on the mesenteric border of the affected small bowel. The redundancy created on the antimesenteric border often results in sacculations that are probably the most striking radiologic manifestation of the “asymmetric” bowel involvement in CD (Fig. 3.2). Advanced active inflammatory disease involves the full thickness of the bowel wall, and the imaging characteristics reflect this feature. Deep linear fissures, often in a crosswise pattern of axial and transverse clefts, leave islands of preserved yet edematous mucosa. This results in the so-called ulceronodular or “cobblestone” appearance (Fig 3.3A). The lumen of the bowel is narrowed and the diseased bowel loops appear separated from adjacent loops. This bowel separation is secondary evidence of the bowel wall thickening and perienteric fibrofatty proliferation seen in advanced CD. When the lumen of the bowel is sufficiently narrowed, threadlike contrast filling of the remaining lumen produces the so-called “string sign” of CD.

The fibrostenotic subtype of CD results when collagen deposition in the small bowel produces strictures. These strictures are a common cause of SBO in CD
patients and often necessitate surgery. On barium fluoroscopic exams, strictures will appear as fixed and aperistaltic narrowing in the bowel lumen. When strictures are severe or longstanding, the small bowel just proximal to the stricture will often dilate. Strictures can be multifocal and noncontiguous, reflecting the “skip lesions” of CD, often with dilatation of the intervening small bowel segments. The differentiation of fibrotic from inflammatory stenosis is clinically important, as the former often requires surgery and the latter is generally treated with medication. This diagnostic separation can be quite difficult on fluoroscopic examination, often necessitating follow-up examination after medical therapy to evaluate for lesion response.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 17, 2016 | Posted by in GASTROENTEROLOGY | Comments Off on Radiologic Testing in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access