Proximal Gastric Vagotomy
Michael S. Nussbaum
Mark Alan Dobbertien
Introduction
Open proximal gastric vagotomy (PGV), as practiced now for over 40 years and known by other pseudonyms as highly selective vagotomy and parietal cell vagotomy, is a proven effective operation for the definitive surgical management of many complicated gastroduodenal ulcer disease patients and should be part of the armamentarium of all surgeons who care for such patients worldwide. This refined vagotomy operation has the basic surgical tenets of interrupting the vagal innervation to the parietal cell mass in the cardia, fundus, and body of the stomach (responsible for acid secretion) while maintaining the vagal innervation to the antrum and pylorus as well as to the branches of the celiac and hepatic plexus, thus minimizing motility and secretory disturbances in the stomach and the gastrointestinal tract. The effectiveness of PGV in lowering acid secretion has resulted in long-term cure of ulcer in over 90% of the patients and has had the added benefit of virtually eliminating the untoward side effects of less selective uses of vagotomy and drainage procedures or limited gastrectomy (antrectomy) such as dumping, stasis, bile reflux, and diarrhea. Although the PGV operation has been reported to be only performed once, on average, in training by graduating residents and is more technically demanding and time consuming (about 120 minutes average) than truncal vagotomy, the procedure can be performed safely and efficiently when done correctly and mastered. The many advantages of this procedure certainly outweigh the above disadvantages and they should not be considered a cogent rationale to abandon the procedure when performing definitive ulcer surgery.
In this chapter, the indications for the operation will be outlined and the preoperative, operative, and postoperative management for patients undergoing PGV will be presented along with the expected results and complications associated with open PGV.
Indications
PGV is indicated in patients with chronic duodenal ulcers who have failed the currently available maximal medical management regime. It is also sometimes the procedure of choice in stable patients who are not ulcer naïve and have a perforated or bleeding duodenal ulcer and are able to tolerate a definitive operative ulcer procedure once a Graham patch (or accepted alternative) or artery ligation has been performed. In addition, PGV can be used in active ulcer patients receiving medical management who need aortic surgery or organ transplantation to prevent serious, life-threatening ulcer complications such as bleeding or perforation. PGV alone should not be used in patients with pyloric or prepyloric ulcers or for gastric outlet obstruction as the recurrence rate and failure rate are 31% and 55%, respectively, unless a drainage procedure is added to PGV. The indication for PGV in type I gastric ulcer in addition to wedge resection or submucosal resection remains controversial.
Preoperative Planning
Proper preoperative evaluation and management of patients necessitating either elective or emergency surgery using PGV should not be underestimated. Any lack of attention to detail may result in untoward morbidity and mortality. In all cases, a detailed history and physical examination is required as is a review of up-to-date laboratory and imaging data. A preoperative assessment of the patient’s cardiopulmonary risk factors, ASA PA class, APACHE score as well as entering data in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) data base (if available) may assist in the proper management of patients needing elective and emergency PGV. Of particular importance is a detailed review of the individual patient’s ulcer diathesis history, endoscopic findings, pathology, and treatment up to that point. The emergency surgical management of duodenal ulcer complications, such as perforation and bleeding, is often predicated on the previous history of ulcer care prior to their presentation. After the above review and assessment, therapies and technical considerations are manipulated to minimize cardiopulmonary morbidity and mortality, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and surgical site infection. In order to minimize perioperative myocardial infarction, patients with intermediate to high-risk scores are treated with beta blockers without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (unless contraindicated), and this has resulted in a greater than 50% relative reduction in postoperative cardiac events. High-risk pulmonary patients would benefit from incentive spirometry, selective nasogastric tube use, and short-term neuroaxis blockage via epidural anesthetic techniques. Evidence shows that patient-related risk factors, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, age older than 60 years, ASA class of II or higher, functional dependence, congestive heart failure, prolonged surgery, and abdominal surgery, increase the risk for postoperative pulmonary complications. All patients should receive VTE prophylaxis with either unfractionated or low-molecular weight heparin plus sequentional compression devices may be used in addition to anticoagulation in the high-risk surgical patient and in those who have a contraindication to anticoagulation prophylaxis. Caution is advised in using low-molecular weight heparin in patients with renal insufficiency or failure, and it either must be dose-adjusted or unfractionated heparin must be used as a substitute. For most cases of uncomplicated gastroduodenal ulcer surgery, no prophylactic antibiotics are recommended. However, in complicated patients or patients where the gastrointestinal tract will be opened, a first-generation cephalosporin (i.e., cefazolin) should be administered within 1 hour of the surgical incision to reduce the likelihood of a postoperative surgical site infection.
Surgical Techniques
Positioning, Anesthesia, and Skin Preparation
The patient is positioned on the operating table in the supine position. At least one arm should be tucked in most instances to provide more room for the operating team and any mechanical retractors. Care must be taken to ensure that the patient is properly off-loaded to prevent nerve injury in both the upper and lower extremity and to prevent back pain in the lordotic areas of the lumbar and cervical spine. A footboard should be
used so that the patient will not move during the procedure when reverse Trendelenburg positioning may cause shifting of the patient on the operating table. Patients should be secured to the operating table using a safety strap. The patient should have a large bore intravenous line and, in the high-risk patient, may need central venous pressure monitoring as well as invasive blood pressure monitoring with an arterial line. A urinary catheter is placed for urine output monitoring and a nasogastric tube is placed once the patient has undergone rapid sequence intubation and the endotracheal tube has been secured. The nasogastric tube is helpful for decompression of the stomach as well as for identifying the esophagus at the diaphragmatic hiatus and as a retraction device on the greater curve of the stomach. Patients should be offered perioperative thoracic epidural analgesia which should be placed prior to the induction of general anesthesia. All patients undergoing PGV should be considered to have a full stomach and therefore require rapid sequence intubation techniques. Muscle relaxation is necessary for open PGV. The patient’s abdomen and lower chest is clipped in the operating room and the patient’s skin is prepared with chlorhexidine-alcohol, which has recently been shown to be superior to povidone-iodine in preventing postoperative surgical site infection. Sterile draping should include the lower chest well above the xiphisternum.
used so that the patient will not move during the procedure when reverse Trendelenburg positioning may cause shifting of the patient on the operating table. Patients should be secured to the operating table using a safety strap. The patient should have a large bore intravenous line and, in the high-risk patient, may need central venous pressure monitoring as well as invasive blood pressure monitoring with an arterial line. A urinary catheter is placed for urine output monitoring and a nasogastric tube is placed once the patient has undergone rapid sequence intubation and the endotracheal tube has been secured. The nasogastric tube is helpful for decompression of the stomach as well as for identifying the esophagus at the diaphragmatic hiatus and as a retraction device on the greater curve of the stomach. Patients should be offered perioperative thoracic epidural analgesia which should be placed prior to the induction of general anesthesia. All patients undergoing PGV should be considered to have a full stomach and therefore require rapid sequence intubation techniques. Muscle relaxation is necessary for open PGV. The patient’s abdomen and lower chest is clipped in the operating room and the patient’s skin is prepared with chlorhexidine-alcohol, which has recently been shown to be superior to povidone-iodine in preventing postoperative surgical site infection. Sterile draping should include the lower chest well above the xiphisternum.
Incision, Exposure, Exploration, and Definitive Management of Bleeding and Perforation
An upper midline, epigastric incision is recommended when performing open PGV and provides excellent overall exposure. Infrequently, the incision needs to be carried below the umbilicus. An alternative chevron incision may be used, but the disadvantages of muscle transection seem to outweigh the exposure benefits in most cases. Care must be taken to avoid injuring the periosteum of the xiphoid process in order to prevent the rare but under-reported incidence of heterotopic ossification of the abdominal wound. The xiphoid, in most instances, does not need to be excised. Once the skin has been incised, blunt bilateral force is used to transect the subcutaneous tissue in a bloodless field, and this technique reliably identifies the midline fascia and linea alba in situations when previous laparotomies have not been performed. The midline fascia is incised precisely in the midline to avoid disruption of the confluence of the anterior and posterior rectus sheaths. The properitoneal fat is sharply transected and the peritoneum is opened to the full extent of the wound, avoiding any adhesions when present. The ligamentum teres hepatis does not need to be transected in most cases and may be used to patch a perforated duodenal ulcer when omentum is not readily available. Full abdominal exploration is mandatory in order to assess the suspected pathology as well as identify any other unsuspected pathology, unless mitigating circumstances would call for a truncated exploration, such as dense adhesions, when the risk of enterotomy may outweigh the benefits of exploration. Any peritoneal soiling is quickly addressed with suction, irrigation, and control of ongoing spillage from the perforated viscous. The left triangular ligament may be incised to provide right upward mobilization of the lateral segment of the left lobe of the liver for better exposure of the esophageal hiatus. A laparotomy sponge is placed lateral and posterior to the spleen to release any tension on the gastrosplenic ligament, thus minimizing the risk of splenic injury. A self-retaining retractor is next implemented and attached to the operating table. A Thompson or Bookwalter retractor is preferred over a Balfour retractor in most cases. In order to provide the best exposure and retraction, the liver needs to be retracted superiorly and to the right and the parieties need to be placed on tension inferiorly and mediolaterally. The upper abdominal retractors should be placed with the patient in Trendelenburg position. Once the retractors are in place, reversing the Trendelenburg position will provide optimal exposure of the upper abdomen. All of the many important surgical aspects of PGV and the emergency management of perforation and bleeding will be able to be addressed without any further manipulation of the retractor system. In clinical scenarios of duodenal ulcer hemorrhage, an anterior longitudinal gastroduodenostomy across the pylorus is performed and the bleeding artery is ligated, making sure to control the transverse pancreatic artery with a U stitch. After controlling the arterial hemorrhage
the duodenotomy is closed horizontally in a Heineke–Mikulicz fashion. A perforated duodenal ulcer should be patched with well vascularized omentum when available and should not be closed primarily especially if the closure would create narrowing of the duodenum. Closure and patching is an acceptable modification of Graham’s technique, when the ulcer is small and would not result in significant stricturing. The PGV can be added to both of these procedures when indicated. A chronically scarred and obstructed duodenum should be managed either by resection or by PGV with gastrojejunostomy to alleviate the obstruction and to minimize recurrent duodenal ulcer.
the duodenotomy is closed horizontally in a Heineke–Mikulicz fashion. A perforated duodenal ulcer should be patched with well vascularized omentum when available and should not be closed primarily especially if the closure would create narrowing of the duodenum. Closure and patching is an acceptable modification of Graham’s technique, when the ulcer is small and would not result in significant stricturing. The PGV can be added to both of these procedures when indicated. A chronically scarred and obstructed duodenum should be managed either by resection or by PGV with gastrojejunostomy to alleviate the obstruction and to minimize recurrent duodenal ulcer.
Proximal Gastric Vagotomy
PGV requires a surgeon with a tremendous requisite knowledge of vagal and foregut anatomy and a meticulous technical skill-set for best results. The procedure should be able to be performed in less than 2 hours and consists of four (or five) important steps for optimal denervation (completeness of vagotomy), preservation of antral-pyloric mobility, and prevention of ulcer recurrence. The procedural steps involved in PGV are that of anterior lesser omental dissection, posterior lesser omental dissection, distal esophageal dissection, lesser curvature closure, and possibly consideration of extended PGV in the area along the greater curvature across the incisura described by Rosati in order to bring cure rates as high as 98%. The steps in the operation are not necessarily done sequentially and may be altered depending on local conditions for a given patient.
Distal Esophageal Dissection
The PGV is usually begun at the level of the esophageal hiatus and the distal esophagus (Fig. 8.1