Preoperative Considerations and Imaging


History assessment

Relevance

Dominant arm

Use of nondominant arm is preferred to minimize negative impact on quality of life

History of previous central venous catheter

Associated with central venous stenosis

History of pacemaker use

Risk of central venous stenosis due to pacemaker wires

History of severe congestive heart failure

Access may alter hemodynamics and cardiac output

History of diabetes mellitus

Associated with small vessel disease in the upper extremity

History of anticoagulant therapy or any coagulation disorder

Abnormal coagulation may cause clotting or problems with hemostasis of access

Presence of comorbid conditions such as malignancy and coronary artery disease that limit the patient’s life expectancy

Morbidity of placement and maintaining access may not justify their use in some patients

History of arterial or venous peripheral catheter

Possible damage to target vasculature

History of heart valve disease or prosthesis

Rate of infection associated with specific access type should be considered

History of previous arm, neck, or chest surgery or trauma

Prior trauma may limit target access sites

Anticipated kidney transplant from a living donor

Central venous catheter may be sufficient

History of vascular access

Limits available access sites, reasons for prior failure may influence future dialysis access planning


Adapted from Vascular Access Work Group [1]



The choice of access is heavily influenced by factors affecting goals of care such as social support and life expectancy. Another important consideration is how soon access is needed. It has been recommended that patients be referred for access placement when in late stage 4 renal failure, which means an estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 20–25 mL/min [3]. Because creation of a functional native fistula could take several months, patients who need access within weeks may be better served by a prosthetic bridge graft. Conversely, arteriovenous fistulas may be attempted even with marginal veins in patients who are 6 months or more away from requiring renal replacement therapy.



Physical Examination


The preoperative examination is most useful when the surgeon participates directly. Each patient has unique needs and physical considerations that greatly influence the choice of access site. For some, the need to preserve the dominant extremity may lead the surgeon to consider the possibility of using a brachial vein in the nondominant arm. The examiner may find that a “failed” prior fistula is actually still patent but has not matured due to inadequate inflow or steal from large vein branches. Suspicion of inadequate radial inflow may stimulate a closer look at the diameter and length of the forearm cephalic vein, which could be proximalized to a loop brachiocephalic fistula. The surgeon has the most insight into what constitutes an acceptable vein and artery.

Physical examination should include the cardiovascular system, looking for evidence of congestive heart failure (Table 10.2). Note should be made of the strength, sensation, and functionality of the upper extremities. If one limb is nonfunctional, it may be the better choice for fistula creation. Chronic skin conditions that may increase the risk of prosthetic graft infection should be noted. Elderly patients with thin forearm skin may be better served with an upper arm access [3]. Obese extremities pose an increased risk of infection, and vessel depth may require a more involved procedure to superficialize the vein. Arterial examination should note the strength and symmetry of the brachial, radial, and ulnar arteries. An experienced examiner can determine if these vessels have normal compliance or are stiff due to calcific disease. Blood pressure must be measured in both extremities. A significantly lower blood pressure (10–15 mm Hg difference in resting systolic pressure) indicates a central arterial stenosis that may prevent adequate inflow. Examination of the anatomic snuff box at the base of the thumb between the extensor hallucis longus and the extensor pollicis brevis may reveal an adequate vein and a strong pulse in the adjacent radial artery branch for creation of a fistula, the distal most location for a functional fistula.


Table 10.2
Physical examination of the arterial and venous system as part of the preoperative surgical evaluation





































 
Exam

Relevance

Arterial assessment

Character of peripheral pulses, supplemented by handheld Doppler evaluation when indicated

An adequate arterial system is needed for access; the quality of the arterial system will influence the choice of access site

Results of Allen test

Abnormal arterial flow pattern to the hand may contraindicate the creation of a radiocephalic fistula

Bilateral upper extremity blood pressure

Determines suitability of arterial access in the upper extremities

Venous assessment

Evaluate for upper extremity edema or differential in arm size

Indicates venous outflow problems that may limit usefulness of the associated potential access site or extremity for access placement

Examination for collateral veins

Collateral veins are indicative of venous obstruction

Examination for evidence of previous central or peripheral venous catheterization

Use of central venous catheters is associated with central venous stenosis. Previous placement of venous catheter may have damaged target vasculature

Examination for evidence of arm, chest, or neck surgery/trauma

Vascular damage associated with previous surgery or trauma may limit access sites

Tourniquet venous palpation with vein mapping

Palpation and mapping allow selection of ideal veins for access


Adapted from Vascular Access Work Group [1]


The Allen Test


The Allen test helps determine the integrity of the palmar arch, which is quite variable, connecting the radial and ulnar artery supply (Fig. 10.1). The value of this information is uncertain for fistula creation at the wrist, but an incomplete arch poses a risk of hand ischemia if the radial artery is ligated or inadvertently occluded. On physical examination, the test is performed by occluding the radial and ulnar arteries by compression while the patient’s fist is clenched and then released. The hand becomes blanched and should rapidly become hyperemic on release of the radial artery (Fig. 10.2). Radial insufficiency is indicated if the palm remains blanched for at least 5 seconds after release of radial compression [4, 5].

A326551_1_En_10_Fig1_HTML.gif


Fig. 10.1
Variations in vascular anatomy of the palmar arch. (used with permission from 17)


A326551_1_En_10_Fig2_HTML.gif


Fig. 10.2
The allen test, Blanching of the Hand with Compression. Allen test shows open left hand with radial and ulnar artery compression producing pallor of the hand and fingers. (used with permission from 4)

A more quantitative assessment can be made using a continuous-wave Doppler placed over the palmar arch, while the radial and then the ulnar artery are occluded. Decrease in strength of the Doppler signal with radial or ulnar occlusion is an indication of an incomplete palmar arch. The hyperemic response may also be used to assess adequacy of flow. To test this response, the hand is clenched for 2–3 min and then released. If inflow is normal, hyperemia results in increased diastolic flow. Reactive hyperemia can be quantified by calculating the resistive index:



$$ \left(\mathrm{P}\mathrm{S}\mathrm{V}-\mathrm{E}\mathrm{D}\mathrm{V}\right)/\mathrm{P}\mathrm{S}\mathrm{V} $$
where PSV is the peak systolic velocity and EDV the end-diastolic velocity. In one study, the arterial resistive index during reactive hyperemia was significantly lower in successful fistulas than in those that failed within 24 h (0.5 ± 0.1 versus 0.7 ± 0.2) [6]. Another approach is measurement of digital pressures with and without radial compression. A digital pressure less than 60 % of systemic pressure indicates an increased risk of symptomatic steal when a fistula is placed. Some laboratories use photoplethysmography (PPG) to assess the vasculature of the hand. PPG detects the amount of blood in the skin. The waveform is nearly identical that of arterial pressure. For preoperative testing, the PPG is used with a digital cuff to measure blood pressure in the thumb (Fig. 10.3) [4]. The normal waveform has a rapid upstroke with a sharp peak and dicrotic notch in the downslope. Thumb pressure should be above 80 mmHg and should not drop more than 30 % with radial compression. A dampened waveform and low pressures indicate an abnormal ulnar artery or palmar arch.

A326551_1_En_10_Fig3_HTML.gif


Fig. 10.3
The normal allen test. Allen’s test shows open left hand with release of ulnar artery compression while radial artery compression is maintained. Note return of normal color to the hand. (used with permission from 4)

In a study of 287 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, 85 % had a normal Allen test as assessed by simple compression and observation. The remaining 43 underwent duplex scanning of the radial and ulnar arteries; only five were abnormal (2 % of the total group). All of these patients had their radial artery harvested with no adverse consequence to the hand [7]. Although renal failure patients are likely to have more diffuse and calcific disease of their upper extremity arteries than patients undergoing cardiac surgery, this study suggests that a simple Allen test in conjunction with duplex scanning can safely identify patients who will tolerate loss of radial artery perfusion to the hand.

Normal, healthy upper extremity arteries can supply fistula flow while continuing to adequately perfuse the hand. Steal occurs when the inflow is diminished due to central arterial stenosis or stenosis of the brachial or forearm arteries, which is particularly prominent in diabetic patients with renal failure. If there is uncertainty regarding the arterial inflow or the presence of stenosis of distal arteries that will be used for fistula creation, an arteriogram should be obtained.


Examination of the Veins


Normal venous anatomy of the upper extremity is shown in Fig. 10.4. When considering potential fistula sites, it is useful to keep in mind that a successful fistula needs to fulfill the rule of sixes at maturity: the vein should be at least 6 millimeters in diameter (generally 2.5 mm or better at creation); vein depth should be no more than 6 mm; and flow should be at least 600 cc/min. In addition, there should be a length of at least 10 cm of accessible vein for ease of access and adequate separation between the inflow and outflow needles to prevent recirculation. Therefore, the examiner needs to determine if the vein is of adequate diameter, is either not too deep or transposable to a superficial location, and is of adequate length.

A326551_1_En_10_Fig4_HTML.gif


Fig. 10.4
A digit blood pressure cuff and photoplethysmograph (PPG) are used to measure changes in the thumb pressure and volume pulses with and without manual compression of the radial artery. (used with permission from 4)

Physical examination of the veins should be done with the patient in a comfortable environment and preferably well hydrated. Note should be made of prior venipunctures, which may cause synechiae in the vein or scaring of the wall that prevents adequate vessel dilation. Prominent veins on the chest wall, neck, or shoulder should raise suspicion for central venous obstruction, as does hand or forearm edema. Veins may be particularly difficult to examine if the patient has recently finished dialysis and is relatively volume depleted. The extremity is examined in a dependent position. Veins that are not prominent may be dilated by application of a tourniquet and repeated clenching and relaxation of the fist. Ultrasound vein mapping may not be necessary if the examination reveals a 4 mm or larger superficial cephalic or basilic vein in the forearm that is collapsible and can be traced to the elbow or a similar cephalic vein in the upper arm that extends from the elbow to the shoulder. Even in these cases, however, the office examination is enhanced by duplex ultrasound, which confirms vein diameter, patency, lack of thrombosis or stenosis, communication with more central veins, and adequate size and quality of the proposed inflow artery [8]. Occasionally, veins that were not adequate when measured preoperatively become large and dilated in the operating room following regional anesthesia. These veins may be prone to spasm and can sometimes disappoint when used as a fistula. The examiner should not overlook the basilic vein in the forearm, which is often preserved and can be used as a transposition fistula.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 25, 2017 | Posted by in NEPHROLOGY | Comments Off on Preoperative Considerations and Imaging

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access