Pain Management



Matthias W. Wichmann and Guy Maddern (eds.)Palliative Surgery201410.1007/978-3-642-53709-7_5
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014


5. Pain Management



Suzanne Chapman  and Paul Farquhar-Smith 


(1)
Department of Anaesthetics and Pain, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK

 



 

Suzanne Chapman



 

Paul Farquhar-Smith (Corresponding author)




Abstract

The principles of management of pain after palliative surgery are essentially the same as after any type of surgery. However, there are certain aspects for patients undergoing palliative surgery that need increased vigilance. Patients are often taking opioids for moderate to severe pain (“strong” opioids) which requires careful assessment and a detailed perioperative management plan, providing analgesia but minimising risk of withdrawal, uncontrolled pain and overdose. Multimodal analgesia should be utilised in an opioid-reducing strategy. It is imperative that pain and possible adverse perioperative sequelae should not compromise a quick recovery to allow the patient to have high-quality end-of-life care. Neuraxial blockade, continuous peripheral nerve block techniques and other analgesic adjuvants should be considered. Patient-controlled analgesia offers the flexibility in opioid delivery to adapt to the changing and difficult analgesic needs of this population.



5.1 Introduction


Palliative surgery and procedures are interventions that may improve pain, symptoms and quality of life with minimal impact on the patients’ survival in carefully selected patients. Patients may need surgery for many reasons such as debulking operations (in collusion with chemotherapy and radiotherapy), surgical resection of locally advanced or metastatic cancer, management of malignant obstruction, pathological fracture management and management of bleeding. However, procedures performed with palliative intent may often leave local or metastatic residual disease. Occasionally surgery may be contemplated specifically for analgesic indications.

Examples of palliative surgical procedures include:



  • Colostomy to relieve tumour obstruction in the colon or rectum or for management of rectovaginal fistula


  • Ileostomy for distal small bowel obstruction


  • Ileal conduit for vesicovaginal fistula


  • Gastric bypass for gastroduodenal outflow obstruction in advanced gastric and pancreatic cancer


  • Hepatectomy (liver resection) of metastatic lesions causing pain from capsule distension and jaundice


  • Pulmonary wedge resection to resect metastatic tumours or perform pleurodesis for repeated pleural effusions


  • Nephrostomy tubes to relieve tumour-induced ureteric obstruction causing hydronephrosis


  • Orthopaedic procedures for management of pathological fractures

Perioperative pain in palliative surgery shares the same management principles as for surgery in the general population. However, there are some special considerations that need to be considered in the palliative surgery scenario. Since palliative surgery by definition will tend to occur towards the end of the patients’ cancer journey, it is imperative that the pain management promotes rapid and comfortable recovery to facilitate focus on subsequent end-of-life care.


5.2 Assessment


Holistic assessment of the patients’ pain starts in the preoperative period and is key to successful pain management. All sites of the patients’ pain should be assessed and this should continue postoperatively. Patients may have pain in several sites as well as metastatic disease, and management of these pains also needs to be considered with acute surgical pain. Given that pain is a major symptom of advanced cancer [1], acute pain in the palliative population is likely to be complicated by pre-existing chronic pain. Furthermore, many will be on significant opioid therapy. Palliative patients are often undertreated when they are prescribed analgesia for episodes of acute pain [2].

It is vital that the assessment includes an accurate history of current analgesia especially opioid requirements. This should include the opioid formulations the patient is taking (e.g. modified release and immediate release oral opioids, transdermal patches, transmucosal or buccal opioids). Preoperative opioid use should be assessed and recorded to estimate approximate doses of medication needed for pain control after surgery [3].

It is also being increasingly recognised that a few patients taking opioids for cancer pain may display behaviours akin to recreational drug use which may be problematic in assessment. Estimation of opioid requirements is often difficult due to the variable quality of drug and unwillingness to divulge true opioid consumption. In patients undergoing palliative surgery, a small number may also have a history of previous problematic opioid use and management may be similar to those patients taking recreational opioids. Both of these groups of patients may be relatively tolerant to opioids and the opioid dose required for acute pain management may seem very high [2, 3].

Occasionally, even patients having palliative surgery may also be on methadone or buprenorphine maintenance programmes and be under the care of drug dependency units. It is important that the patients’ dose is confirmed with their prescribing centre so that this can be maintained and factored into the pain management plan [2].

Whatever the cause or extent of problematic opioid use, it is not considered appropriate to attempt rehabilitation in the postoperative period. The focus for all patients remains providing sufficient analgesia and, in those with high opioid requirements, preventing acute withdrawal symptoms.

The surgical procedure itself may allow anticipation of whether pain will be substantially reduced as a result of the procedure, but the effect of surgery on pain can be extremely variable. Patients may initially have an increase in pain due to surgery, but their overall pain may then be reduced resulting in reduced analgesic requirements. For example, patients with a pathological fracture may experience significant levels of pain preoperatively which may be substantially reduced once they have undergone fixation surgery.

For patients on substantial doses of opioids before the surgery, the focus is to manage a balance of analgesia for acute pain relief. There is a tension between the needs of acute pain management while minimising potential for withdrawal and conversely, reducing chance of opioid overdose. Opioid requirements should be assessed and reassessed frequently to allow optimal titration.

After a meticulous assessment, a perioperative analgesic plan with multidisciplinary input should be developed. Analgesic management should also include the use of non-opioid drugs and other analgesic techniques such as neuraxial and regional anaesthetic techniques all aiming to potentially reduce acute opioid requirements (vide infra). However, it must be remembered there are few experimental data from studies of the management of these patients [4].


5.3 Acute Pain Management


Analgesic medications are classed into three main groups: non-opioids, opioids and adjuvant analgesics. In addition to these three groups, local anaesthetic drugs can be administered by either peripheral or neuraxial routes. Drugs with different underlying mechanisms are used in combination to provide a synergistic effect, and this strategy is termed multimodal analgesia [5]. This approach allows lower doses of each of the drugs in the pain management plan, reducing the potential for adverse effects [6]. In patients known to be on opioids prior to surgery, a combination of drugs with different mechanisms can provide pain relief with a potential “opioid-sparing” effect where the opioid dose may be lowered or maintained without decreasing pain relief.


5.3.1 Non-opioid Analgesia


Non-opioid drugs such as paracetamol (acetaminophen) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are often used for the management of mild to moderate acute pain [5]. Non-opioids alone are rarely sufficient to relieve severe pain that is associated with surgery, but they are an important part of multimodal analgesia. They may also offer an opioid “dose-sparing” effect [6].

Paracetamol is an effective analgesic with few side effects with a good safety profile when taken at recommended doses. It has been shown to reduce postoperative opioid requirements by 20–30 % when given regularly [68]. Although the mechanism of analgesic efficacy of paracetamol remains unclear, it may involve direct and indirect inhibition of central cyclo-oxygenases (COX). The activation of the endocannabinoid system and spinal serotonergic pathways also appears to be integral to the analgesic actions of paracetamol [911]. Paracetamol may also enhance descending inhibitory controls [12].

Paracetamol is available in oral, intravenous and rectal preparations. The intravenous preparation provides faster, potentially more effective analgesia than the equivalent oral dose [13]. Rectal absorption of the drug is poor and subtherapeutic blood concentrations are common. The route chosen will depend on several factors such as whether the patient can take oral analgesia, what preparations are available at a local level and what type of surgery the patient has had (e.g. patients having rectal/bowel surgery or may contraindicate rectal administration).

NSAID refers to both non-selective, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (that inhibit COX-1 and COX-2 isoenzymes) and COX-2 selective inhibitors [14]. NSAIDs inhibit COX, reduce the production of proinflammatory prostaglandins and leukotrienes, are effective analgesics and are an integral part of multimodal analgesia. In combination with paracetamol they can decrease opioid requirements [6].

Many of the adverse effects of NSAIDs are due to the physiological role of prostaglandins being inhibited including gastric mucosal protection, renal tubular function and intrarenal vasodilation, bronchodilatation and production of endothelial prostacyclin (which causes vasodilation and prevents platelet adhesion) [15]. These processes are predominantly regulated by COX-1. Tissue damage induces COX-2 production leading to synthesis of prostaglandins that result in pain and inflammation, and the COX-2 selective NSAIDs are thought to work specifically on this mechanism [16]. However, the use of COX-2 selective NSAIDs has been compromised by the potential increase in cardiac thrombotic complications [16].

NSAIDs are available in oral, parenteral and rectal preparations and are equally effective with a similar speed of onset but with no difference in side effect incidence between routes. The combination of paracetamol and NSAIDs has been found to be more effective than paracetamol alone, but compared to NSAIDs alone was less clinically significant [8, 17].


5.3.2 Opioid Analgesia



5.3.2.1 Mechanisms of Opioid Action


Opioids act via G protein coupled opioid receptors. Several types of receptor have been characterised, but the μ opioid receptor is the most important in opioid-induced analgesia. Opioid receptors are located in synapses in areas of the brain, in the spinal cord and in the periphery intimately associated with pain processing [18]. Opioid receptors are found in many areas of the brain including the periaqueductal grey and locus coeruleus which are involved in the higher processing of pain perception, emotional response and localisation. Elements of the so-called pain matrix are here and the area’s importance in pain has been shown directly by functional imaging [19].

In the spinal cord opioid receptors are localised in the superficial dorsal horn, which modulates transmitter release and pain impulses, resulting in a spinally mediated analgesia. Release of the major excitatory transmitter glutamate at the spinal synapse of the primary afferent nociceptor is reduced by pre- and postsynaptic opioid mechanisms. Other transmitters are also modulated by opioid action such as substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide [20].

Many different opioids are available for use in clinical practice such as opioids for moderate to severe pain including morphine, fentanyl and oxycodone. The opioids for mild to moderate pain (codeine, tramadol) may be used for less major palliative surgery. Choice of opioid will depend on local availability, local guideline or policy and patient tolerance to particular opioids (drug allergy or sensitivity to opioid side effects). The most common side effects are potential respiratory depression, sedation, nausea and vomiting and pruritus [21]. If a patient is on an effective dose of opioid preoperatively with a good efficacy/side effect balance, it is judicious to use the same opioid perioperatively.

Opioids can be delivered by many routes for acute pain management. The most common routes of opioid administration are intravenous, epidural or intrathecal, subcutaneous, intramuscular or oral. They can also be administered via a transdermal patch, sublingual or buccal mucosa and intranasal or rectal routes although these are more commonly used for chronic pain states. Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is the most frequently used method to deliver intravenous opioids postoperatively.


5.3.2.2 Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA)


Intravenous opioids delivered using a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) infusion device provide the most flexible form of opioid analgesia in the postoperative period [22]. Patients have been shown to prefer PCA compared to other routes of postoperative opioid administration [23]. PCA delivers a preset bolus dose on demand with a specified lockout period between each successful dose, and a background infusion can also be administered. These variables can be adjusted according to the patients’ opioid requirements. For patients on opioid therapy prior to surgery, PCA allows higher-than-normal bolus doses to be delivered and a background infusion rate equivalent to the patient’s baseline opioid requirement.

Intravenous opioid PCA provides better analgesia than conventional intramuscular and subcutaneous opioid regimens, although the magnitude of the difference in analgesia is small [24]. Although PCA administration was associated with greater opioid use, there are no differences in duration of hospital stay or opioid-related adverse effects other than pruritus, which is increased, and patient satisfaction is higher [24].

As previously discussed, for patients on preoperative opioids, there is a need to maintain a baseline level of opioid to ensure that an acute withdrawal syndrome is avoided and to ensure that pain that may be present, independent of surgery, is well managed. There are several approaches that can be taken to maintain the baseline opioid levels. As discussed previously, a background infusion can be added to a PCA and the bolus dose titrated to effect. In some cases, where the patient has a fentanyl patch, this could be left on (as long as all practitioners are aware) to maintain background requirements and PCA bolus added. Theoretically perioperative alterations in skin blood flow may result in erratic absorption from the fentanyl patch and some advocate removal of all transcutaneous medication. It should be remembered that absorption may continue after fentanyl patch removal [25]. In more minor palliative surgery, oral medications may be able to be re-established soon after surgery.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Mar 29, 2017 | Posted by in UROLOGY | Comments Off on Pain Management

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access