Operation for Giant Duodenal Ulcer
Michael S. Nussbaum
Keyur Chavda
Introduction
Giant duodenal ulcer (GDU) is a variant of peptic ulcer disease and is defined as a duodenal ulcer crater that is benign and at least 2 cm in diameter. This subset of duodenal ulcers have historically resulted in greater morbidity than usual duodenal ulcers since, by definition, they involve the full thickness of the duodenal wall and occupy a significant portion of the duodenal bulb. Brdiczka first called attention to this entity in 1931 and emphasized the difficulty in diagnosing them with barium roentgenogram. Although once thought to be a rare variant, with the advent of flexible endoscopy and awareness of this entity numerous case reports and case series have been published in the literature. GDUs comprise approximately 1% to 2% of all duodenal ulcers and 5% of peptic ulcers requiring surgical intervention. In the initial reports, few patients were successfully treated with medical therapy. Surgery was favored as the treatment of choice for this disease, and high mortality rates were reported despite surgical intervention. Improvements in surgical techniques have revolutionized the operative treatment and outcome of this condition. However, today, with the widespread use of endoscopy, the introduction of histamine-2 receptor antagonists and later proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), medical treatment has replaced operation as the first line of treatment for the patient with GDU. Because of the large, penetrating nature of these ulcers, when not recognized and treated promptly, complications such as hemorrhage and perforation remain common, and GDUs are still associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Thus, surgical evaluation of a patient with GDU should remain an integral part of patient care in all cases. There are important differences when comparing GDUs to classic peptic ulcers, and they must be approached differently than their more common counterpart.
Standard-sized ulcer disease affects males greater than females at a rate of approximately 2 to 1, whereas it is 3 to 1 for GDU. The etiology of standard-sized and GDUs has been associated with two major contributing causes: recent usage of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and Helicobacter pylori infection. However, the percentage of GDUs caused by H. pylori is less when compared to standard-sized ulcers, and NSAID use plays a more prominent role.
The most common presenting symptom is abdominal pain. Most patients describe the pain as involving the epigastric region, and some experience involvement of the right hypochondrium and/or radiation into the back, particularly when the ulcer penetrates into the pancreas. The pain is more intense and persistent than the pain found with usual ulcer patients. The pain is generally not relieved with food or antacids and weight loss is a frequent comorbidity.
Diagnosis
The most common emergency presentation of GDU is hemorrhage, which may manifest as melena, hematochezia, hematemesis, or any combination of the above, associated with anemia. The size of the ulcer and the surrounding inflammation may cause gastric outlet obstruction with nausea, vomiting, and weight loss. An inflammatory mass in the upper abdomen with associated weight loss, cachexia, malnutrition, and chronic abdominal pain can frequently mislead the clinician to suspect malignancy as the most likely diagnosis. Other important historical features include a past history of ulcer disease and the recent use of NSAIDs.
The size of the ulcer often causes replacement of the duodenal bulb, and as a result GDUs may be missed or misinterpreted as a deformed bulb, diverticulum, or pseudodiverticulum during a barium upper GI series. The advent and widespread use of endoscopy has markedly improved the ability to detect GDUs with greater accuracy. It is not uncommon to encounter a GDU during an endoscopy without the expectation of finding one, and it is important to measure the ulcer so as not to misdiagnose it as a simple peptic ulcer. The ulcers usually are quite deep and involve over 50% of the mucosal circumference of the duodenal bulb. It is essential to exclude a neoplastic source as the cause of ulcer formation with biopsy in the setting of GDUs, particularly when there is nodularity at the edge. A recent review of 52 cases of duodenal ulcers larger than 2 cm found a malignancy rate of approximately 19% (primary duodenal carcinoma in 15%, lymphoma and tuberculosis in 2% each).
Management
Medical Treatment
Prior to the introduction of histamine-2 receptor antagonists in the late 1970s, GDUs were managed primarily surgically. Before 1982, there were very few published reports of long-term successful medical management of GDUs. With the advent of new acid suppression medication, the discovery of H. pylori and its role in ulcer formation with the importance of eradication therapy, successful medical management of most GDUs is now possible. The most recent studies have demonstrated that PPI therapy is a safe and effective first-line treatment in stable patients and should decrease the eventual need for operative intervention. Thus, attempts at medical treatment of GDUs should consist of PPIs. Discontinuation of NSAIDs and antimicrobial treatment of H. pylori infection in conjunction with PPI therapy are important treatment adjuncts in the presence of these risk factors.
Surgical Treatment
Indications
Despite the marked improvement in outcome with medical therapy, GDUs are still associated with high rates of morbidity, mortality, and complications. All patients diagnosed with GDU should be evaluated promptly by a surgeon. Operation is indicated in patients with acute complications of GDU such as hemorrhage and perforation. Intractability, recurrent disease, incomplete healing despite proper medical therapy, and gastric outlet obstruction may require surgical intervention. GDU with adherent clot or a visible vessel on index esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is a marker of an ulcer that is more likely to require early surgical intervention. Uncontrolled hemorrhage and perforation are the most common emergent indications for operation. Unresolving obstruction, intractable or recurrent bleeding, and fistula formation are some of the elective indications for operation. The chronic inflammatory changes associated with these conditions often make the operations in these patients technically quite challenging.
Preoperative Assessment