Office-Based Anesthesia for the Urologist




This article describes office-based surgery and office-based anesthesia (OBA), including the safe setup of OBA and safety concerns regarding OBA. Also discussed are the preoperative selection and workup of a patient undergoing OBA, anesthetic options, the prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain, and planning for safe discharge.


Key points








  • Advances in surgical techniques coupled with the development of faster-acting, safer anesthetics allow for more invasive procedures to be performed in an office setting.



  • Economic demands to decrease health costs and patients’ preference for the nonhospital setting also have contributed to the growth of office-based surgery (OBS), and will continue to fuel its growth in the future.



  • It is imperative that we continue to strive to hold the OBS centers to the same standards as ambulatory and hospital settings with regard to patient safety.



  • Anesthesia for OBS should be such that the patient recovers quickly with few side effects or pain, and has a timely discharge.






Introduction


Office-based anesthesia (OBA) is defined as the provision of anesthesia services in an operating or procedure room that is not accredited as an Ambulatory Surgery Center (ASC) by the state in which it operates and is integrated into the day-to-day operations of a physician’s office ; that is, anesthesia and surgery are being performed in an office setting.


Office-based surgery (OBS) is on the increase. In 2005, 25% (10 million) of all elective procedures performed in the United States were performed in an office setting, twice the number seen in 1995.


Urologic procedures are expected to increase by 35% in the United States as the population older than 65 years increases ; at present they make up 5% of all ambulatory procedures. Current office-based urologic procedures include flexible cystoscopy, transrectal prostate biopsy, urethral dilation, urethral meatotomy, vasectomy, varicocele repair, stone removal, circumcision, transurethral surgery of the bladder, and transurethral needle ablation of prostate lesions.


The growth of OBS can be attributed to advances in surgical techniques, associated with less postoperative pain coupled with the development of rapid-acting, safer anesthetics allowing for more complex procedures to be performed in an office-based facility. In addition, the economic demands to decrease health costs and patient preference for the nonhospital setting have contributed to its growth. The advantages of an office setting consist of a more personal, less intimidating environment for patients, ease of scheduling, lower costs, increased privacy, and decreased nosocomial infections. Patients’ perception that procedures performed in the office setting are less invasive and, thus, safer, has also stimulated interest in OBS. A survey performed by Coyle and colleagues found that patients report an overwhelming satisfaction with OBA. Identified predictors of satisfaction were lack of pain and nausea, the ability to remember discharge instructions, and having no memory of the procedure. Identified predictors of dissatisfaction were anxiety, pain, vomiting, and inadequate depth of anesthesia.


OBA is not for every provider or patient, nor is OBS appropriate for every surgeon. Because of the remote location of the office setting, proper selection of patients and procedures is imperative. All types of anesthesia ranging from local, monitored anesthesia care (MAC), regional anesthesia, and general anesthesia (GA) can be performed in the office setting. The main priority of OBA is to minimize pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and postprocedure drowsiness, to ensure patient safety and satisfaction, and to provide a speedy discharge home. The disadvantage of office-based procedures lies with patient safety, owing to a lack of uniform oversight and regulation. In addition, the anesthesiologist may have to practice without backup, consultation, or clinical assistance. It is therefore imperative that the surgeon, anesthesiologist, and office staff ensure that the location where the OBA is being administered is safe.


Despite the rapid growth of OBS, it still remains unregulated in many states, and adherence to safety standards may not be uniform. This article focuses on the requirements for setting up a safe office-based practice, patient selection, and anesthetic management for OBS. The degree of evidence in literature in relation to office-based procedures and complications is not as extensive as that on ambulatory and day-case hospital-based surgery. Ambulatory surgery paradigms can be used for guidance in patient selection and management for OBS. Thus, mention is made herein of ambulatory and hospital-based day surgeries in the hope of extrapolating some of their management rationale to office-based procedures. It is safe to assume that patients who does not meet criteria for a procedure at an ambulatory facility should not be considered for OBS.




Introduction


Office-based anesthesia (OBA) is defined as the provision of anesthesia services in an operating or procedure room that is not accredited as an Ambulatory Surgery Center (ASC) by the state in which it operates and is integrated into the day-to-day operations of a physician’s office ; that is, anesthesia and surgery are being performed in an office setting.


Office-based surgery (OBS) is on the increase. In 2005, 25% (10 million) of all elective procedures performed in the United States were performed in an office setting, twice the number seen in 1995.


Urologic procedures are expected to increase by 35% in the United States as the population older than 65 years increases ; at present they make up 5% of all ambulatory procedures. Current office-based urologic procedures include flexible cystoscopy, transrectal prostate biopsy, urethral dilation, urethral meatotomy, vasectomy, varicocele repair, stone removal, circumcision, transurethral surgery of the bladder, and transurethral needle ablation of prostate lesions.


The growth of OBS can be attributed to advances in surgical techniques, associated with less postoperative pain coupled with the development of rapid-acting, safer anesthetics allowing for more complex procedures to be performed in an office-based facility. In addition, the economic demands to decrease health costs and patient preference for the nonhospital setting have contributed to its growth. The advantages of an office setting consist of a more personal, less intimidating environment for patients, ease of scheduling, lower costs, increased privacy, and decreased nosocomial infections. Patients’ perception that procedures performed in the office setting are less invasive and, thus, safer, has also stimulated interest in OBS. A survey performed by Coyle and colleagues found that patients report an overwhelming satisfaction with OBA. Identified predictors of satisfaction were lack of pain and nausea, the ability to remember discharge instructions, and having no memory of the procedure. Identified predictors of dissatisfaction were anxiety, pain, vomiting, and inadequate depth of anesthesia.


OBA is not for every provider or patient, nor is OBS appropriate for every surgeon. Because of the remote location of the office setting, proper selection of patients and procedures is imperative. All types of anesthesia ranging from local, monitored anesthesia care (MAC), regional anesthesia, and general anesthesia (GA) can be performed in the office setting. The main priority of OBA is to minimize pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and postprocedure drowsiness, to ensure patient safety and satisfaction, and to provide a speedy discharge home. The disadvantage of office-based procedures lies with patient safety, owing to a lack of uniform oversight and regulation. In addition, the anesthesiologist may have to practice without backup, consultation, or clinical assistance. It is therefore imperative that the surgeon, anesthesiologist, and office staff ensure that the location where the OBA is being administered is safe.


Despite the rapid growth of OBS, it still remains unregulated in many states, and adherence to safety standards may not be uniform. This article focuses on the requirements for setting up a safe office-based practice, patient selection, and anesthetic management for OBS. The degree of evidence in literature in relation to office-based procedures and complications is not as extensive as that on ambulatory and day-case hospital-based surgery. Ambulatory surgery paradigms can be used for guidance in patient selection and management for OBS. Thus, mention is made herein of ambulatory and hospital-based day surgeries in the hope of extrapolating some of their management rationale to office-based procedures. It is safe to assume that patients who does not meet criteria for a procedure at an ambulatory facility should not be considered for OBS.




Facility considerations and accreditation


Despite the growing popularity of OBA and concerns about its safety, there is still relatively little oversight. Whereas ASCs are tightly regulated, OBS is limited in its regulatory oversight. Lack of regulatory oversight may lead to OBS being performed in an environment with limited or outdated equipment, inadequate emergency resources, and insufficient policies. The skill level of the person providing anesthesia care may range from a board-certified anesthesiologist or certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA) to a surgeon with little or no anesthesia training. At present, only 25 states have issued guidelines to meet safety standards, 14 states require hospital transfer plans for emergency situations, and 9 states require reporting of complications. Eleven states now require accreditation through 1 of several agencies to evaluate the office-based practice setting.


The 3 major organizations for accreditation for OBS facilities are the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO), The Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Healthcare (AAAHC), and the American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities (AAAASF). These organizations differ in their requirements for reporting of adverse events and peer-review process, credentialing and privileging of practitioners without hospital privileges, and enforcement. Accreditation with these associations is voluntary in most states; however, most third-party payers will not reimburse the OBS facility for procedures performed in a nonaccredited office. The Federation of State Medical Boards issued guidelines in 2002 outlining recommended policies and procedures for physicians performing OBS. The American Medical Association (AMA) has also issued 10 core principles for establishing safety standards in offices, and these standards have been endorsed by state medical boards ( Box 1 ). In addition, several professional societies (American Society of Plastic Surgeons, American Society for Anesthetic Plastic Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA]) have issued guidelines and recommendations for improving safety in ambulatory surgery or OBS/OBA.



Box 1





  • Patient informed consent should be obtained.



  • Guidelines and regulation for OBS should be developed according to levels of anesthesia as defined by the ASA.



  • Physicians should use the ASA patient selection classification in considering patient selection for surgery.



  • Physicians should have proper qualifications such as board certification.



  • Physicians should have hospital-admitting privileges or emergency transfer agreement.



  • Facilities should be accredited.



  • There should be a policy in place for adverse event reporting and peer review process.



  • There should be a peer-review process for physician privileging, or a physician may show competence by maintaining core privileging at a licensed hospital or ASC.



  • There should be at least 1 physician trained in ACLS/ATLS or PALS immediately available with appropriate equipment. BLS is mandatory for everyone else in direct patient contact.



  • Those administering sedation/GA should be appropriately trained.



Abbreviations: ACLS, advanced cardiac life support; ATLS, advanced trauma life support; BLS, basic life support; GA, general anesthesia; OBS, office-based surgery; PALS, pediatric advanced life support.


American Medical Association (AMA) 10 core principles for establishing safety standards in offices

Adapted from American Medical Association. Office based surgery core principles. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2003. Available at: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/370/obscoreprinciples.pdf . Accessed March 1, 2013.


The establishment, construction, accreditation, and operation of an OBS facility should be in accordance with the local, state, and federal laws. From an anesthesia standpoint the ASA has developed guidelines for OBA ( Table 1 ). The ASA states that the anesthesiologist “must satisfactorily investigate areas taken for granted in the hospital or ambulatory surgical facility such as governance, organization, construction and equipment as well as policies and procedures including fire, safety, drugs, emergencies, staffing, training and unanticipated patient transfers.” The anesthesiologist must adhere to these guidelines and communicate with the surgeon and staff the need to adhere to these safety guidelines.



Table 1

American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) guidelines for office-based anesthesia










Administration and Facility Clinical Care



  • Quality of Care




    • The facility should have a medical director and governing body that establishes policy and is responsible for the facility and its staff



    • Policy and procedures should be written and reviewed on an annual basis



    • All applicable local, state, and federal regulations should be observed



    • Health care providers should hold a valid license



    • All operating-room personnel who provide clinical care should be qualified to do so



    • The anesthesiologist should participate in ongoing quality improvement and risk-management activities



    • The basic human rights of patients should be recognized





  • Facility and Safety




    • Facilities should comply with all federal, state, and local laws pertaining to fire, building construction and occupancy, accommodations for the disabled, occupational safety and health, and disposal of medical waste and hazardous waste



    • Correct compliance with laws regarding controlled drugs





  • Patient and Procedure Selection




    • The anesthesiologist should be satisfied that the procedure to be undertaken is within the scope of the facility and the health care practitioners



    • The procedure should allow for the patient to be discharged that day



    • Patients at too high risk should be referred to an appropriate facility




  • Perioperative Care




    • The anesthesiologist should adhere to the basic standards of preanesthesia care, basic anesthesia monitoring, and postanesthesia care, and guidelines for ambulatory anesthesia and surgery according to the ASA



    • The anesthesiologist should be physically present during the intraoperative period and immediately available until discharge



    • Patient discharge is the physician’s responsibility and should be documented in the medical record



    • Personnel with training in advanced resuscitative techniques (eg, ACLS, PALS) should be immediately available until all patients are discharged home




  • Monitoring and Equipment




    • See statement on non–operating-room anesthesia locations (see Table 3 )



    • See standards for basic anesthesia monitoring (see Table 4 )




  • Emergencies and Transfers




    • All facility personnel should be appropriately trained in and regularly review the facility’s written emergency protocols



    • There should be written protocols for cardiopulmonary emergencies and other internal and external disasters such as fire



    • The facility should have medications, equipment, and written protocols available to treat malignant hyperthermia when triggering agents are used



    • The facility should have a written protocol in place for the transfer of patients to a prespecified alternative care facility when extended or emergency services are needed



Based on American Society of Anesthesiologists. Guidelines for office-based anesthesia. Last affirmed October 2009. Available at: http://www.asahq.org/For-Members/Standards-Guidelines-and-Statements.aspx . Accessed March 1, 2013; with permission. A copy of the full text can be obtained from ASA, 520 Northwest Highway, Park Ridge, Illinois 60068-2573.


The facility should have a medical director who is ultimately responsible for the facility, the personnel, and observation of all local, state, and federal laws, codes, and regulations. A formal policy and procedure manual should be available to address issues such as provider qualifications, records, documents, quality improvement, professional liability, handling of controlled medications, and policy for clinical care issues. All health care providers should hold a valid license. The anesthesiologist should ensure that the local state and federal regulations concerning the use of controlled medications are followed. A fire safety plan should be in effect, and emergency evacuations rehearsed. The anesthesiologist should ensure the proper storage, ventilation, and backup of operating-room gases. Anesthesiologists should also ensure that the equipment used is fully supported by the manufacturer or qualified service personnel and that backup electrical power is available, along with emergency lighting and protection against electric shocks or hazards. All elements of infection control should be properly practiced.




Monitoring and equipment


The ASA OBA guidelines state that there should be appropriate anesthesia equipment that is maintained and current, along with basic anesthesia monitoring. Monitoring is expected to be of hospital standard. Box 2 describes the ASA statement on equipment for anesthesia in non–operating-room locations. Box 3 describes the basics of anesthesia monitoring.



Box 2




  • 1.

    A reliable source of oxygen adequate for the length of the procedure and a backup supply of at least an E cylinder should be present.


  • 2.

    An adequate source of suction should be present.


  • 3.

    Scavenging system for scavenging waste anesthetic gases should be present.


  • 4.

    The following should be present: (a) a self-inflating hand resuscitator bag; (b) adequate anesthesia drugs, supplies, and equipment for the intended anesthesia care; (c) standard ASA monitors; (d) a well-maintained anesthesia machine if inhalation anesthesia is to be administered.


  • 5.

    Sufficient electrical outlets including an emergency power supply should be present. Also present should be an isolated electric power or electric circuits with ground fault circuit interrupters, if anesthetizing area is deemed a wet location.


  • 6.

    There should be adequate illumination of the patient, anesthesia machine, and monitoring equipment. In addition, a form of battery-powered illumination should be immediately available.


  • 7.

    There should be sufficient space to accommodate equipment and personnel and to allow access to the patient.


  • 8.

    An emergency cart with a defibrillator, emergency drugs, and other equipment adequate to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation should be present.


  • 9.

    There should be adequate staff trained to support the anesthesiologist and a reliable means of 2-way communication to request assistance.


  • 10.

    All applicable building and safety codes and facility standards should be observed.


  • 11.

    Appropriate postanesthesia management should be provided. In addition to the anesthesiologist, adequate numbers of trained staff and appropriate equipment should be available to safely transport.



ASA statement on equipment for anesthesia in non–operating-room locations

Based on American Society of Anesthesiologists. Guidelines for office-based anesthesia. Last affirmed October 2009. Available at: http://www.asahq.org/For-Members/Standards-Guidelines-and-Statements.aspx . Accessed March 1, 2013; with permission. A copy of the full text can be obtained from ASA, 520 Northwest Highway, Park Ridge, Illinois 60068-2573.


Box 3




  • 1.

    Qualified anesthesia personnel shall be present in the room throughout the conduct of all general anesthetics, regional anesthetics, and monitored anesthesia care.


  • 2.

    During all anesthetics, the patient’s oxygenation shall be continually evaluated.




    • During administration of GA using an anesthesia machine, the concentration of oxygen in the patient’s breathing system shall be measured by an oxygen analyzer with a low oxygen concentration limit alarm in use.



    • During all anesthetics, pulse oximetry shall be used.



  • 3.

    During all anesthetics, the patient’s ventilation shall be continually evaluated.




    • Patients receiving GA shall have continual monitoring of expired carbon dioxide.



    • Alarms to detect and disconnect end-tidal CO 2 should be used.



    • During regional anesthesia (with no sedation) or local anesthesia (with no sedation), the adequacy of ventilation shall be evaluated by continual observation of qualitative clinical signs. During moderate or deep sedation, the adequacy of ventilation shall be evaluated by continual observation of qualitative clinical signs and monitoring for the presence of exhaled carbon dioxide.



  • 4.

    During all anesthetics, the patient’s circulation shall be continually evaluated.




    • Patients receiving anesthesia shall have the electrocardiogram continuously displayed from the beginning of anesthesia until preparing to leave the anesthetizing location.



    • Blood pressure and heart rate shall be determined every 5 minutes.



  • 5.

    During all anesthetics, the patient’s temperature shall be continually evaluated.




    • Patients receiving anesthesia shall have temperature monitored when clinically significant changes in body temperature are intended, anticipated, or suspected.




Standards for basic anesthesia monitoring

Based on American Society of Anesthesiologists. Standards for basic anesthesia monitoring. Last amended October 2010. Available at: http://www.asahq.org/For-Members/Standards-Guidelines-and-Statements.aspx . Accessed March 1, 2013; with permission. A copy of the full text can be obtained from ASA, 520 Northwest Highway, Park Ridge, Illinois 60068-2573.




Procedure suitability


Clearly not all procedures are suited to the office. In general, procedures should be of short enough duration and complexity to allow patient recovery and discharge from the facility. The American Society of Plastic Surgeons has recommended that surgical procedures not exceed 6 hours and that all procedures be completed by 3 pm. Procedures more than 6 hours long may be associated with the development of hypothermia and increased risk for deep venous thrombosis. Surgical procedures involving major blood loss, intractable pain, or immobility severe enough to interfere with routine activities of daily living, as well as major intra-abdominal, intrathoracic, or intracranial surgeries, are unsuitable for the office setting.




Patient safety in office-based surgery


The statistics on morbidity and mortality in OBS are difficult to analyze and compare because of a lack of standard definitions and, thus, of adverse events. In addition, data that are available are conflicting.


Coldiron and colleagues reviewed OBS incidents in Florida over a 7-year period and found 31 reported deaths, 18 associated with cosmetic procedures and 13 associated with medically necessary procedures. Some of these procedures occurred with and some without a licensed anesthesia provider. Seventy-eight percent of the deaths reported occurred following the use of GA for the OBS procedure.


Vila and colleagues reviewed all adverse events reported to the Florida Board of Medicine from 2000 to 2002, and found that the risk of death was 10 times higher in doctors’ offices than in ASCs. The investigators ascribed this to lack of observance to regulatory controls in doctors’ offices.


Domino published results of a review of the ASA closed claims database to compare adverse events after OBA with anesthesia in the ASC setting. The severity of injury for office-based claims was found to be greater than for ambulatory anesthesia claims. Sixty-four percent of the office-based claims concerned death, versus only 21% of ambulatory anesthesia claims. More than 46% of office-based claims were a result of adverse respiratory events in the recovery period that were judged to be preventable with the use of better monitoring.


Morelo and colleagues demonstrated a disturbing trend. During ASC procedures, 62% of injuries resulted in temporary nondisabling injuries and 21% in death. However, during office procedures 21% of injuries were temporary and nondisabling but 64% resulted in death. Moreover, 46% of injuries occurring in the office were considered preventable, as opposed to only 13% in an ASC. The adverse events that occurred in the office included respiratory (50%), cardiovascular (8%), equipment related (8%), drug related (25%), and blunt needle trauma.


Other studies, however, found that there is no difference in the rates of death and adverse events on comparing office-based procedures with ASC procedures.




Patient selection for ambulatory surgery


Just as not all procedures are suitable for the office setting, neither are all patients well suited for OBS. The staff surgeon should be aware of exclusions for OBA, screen the patient for suitability, and forward pertinent health information to the anesthesiologist for review before the day of surgery. Often the anesthesiologist meets the patients for the first time on the morning of surgery, so it is incumbent on the surgeon to ensure that the patient is appropriate for OBA and has undergone appropriate preoperating testing and evaluation. In general, the most suitable patients for OBS are those classified as ASA 1 and 2; however, patients of ASA 3 and 4 may be accepted if their disease states are compensated ( Box 4 ). Most recent recommendations and national surveys do not mention ASA grade as an exclusion criterion for office-based surgery. There is general consensus that patients of ASA 4 are at high risk for OBS. However, this does not mean that OBS is contradicted, rather that the medical conditions degree of stabilization needs to be stringently assessed and the procedure in question thoroughly considered before accepting the patient for OBS.



Box 4





  • ASA Physical Status 1: A normal healthy patient



  • ASA Physical Status 2: A patient with mild systemic disease



  • ASA Physical Status 3: A patient with severe systemic disease



  • ASA Physical Status 4: A patient with severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life



  • ASA Physical Status 5: A moribund patient who is not expected to survive without the operation



  • ASA Physical Status 6: A declared brain-dead patient whose organs are being removed for donor purposes



ASA physical class

Based on American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA physical status classification system. Available at: http://www.asahq.org/Home/For-Members/Clinical-Information/ASA-Physical-Status-Classification-System . Accessed March 1, 2013; with permission. A copy of the full text can be obtained from ASA, 520 Northwest Highway, Park Ridge, Illinois 60068-2573.


One must take into consideration patients’ chronic disease states and whether they are compensated and stabilized. Patients with uncontrolled medical problems or those severe enough to require hospitalization after surgery are unacceptable.


Urologic patients harbor the widest range of ages from infants to the elderly. Compared with the “average” patient undergoing surgery, however, they tend to be older and have more comorbid disease states. More than one-third of urologic patients have severe systemic disease, a higher prevalence than that seen in other specialties. Exclusions to OBA are listed in Box 5 . Box 6 lists conditions that have been associated with adverse outcomes in ambulatory surgery.



Box 5





  • Unstable ASA 3 or 4



  • Myocardial infarction (MI) in past 6 months



  • Severe cardiomyopathy or congestive heart failure (CHF)



  • Uncontrolled hypertension (HTN)



  • Brittle diabetes



  • Active multiple sclerosis



  • Acute substance abuse



  • History of malignant hyperthermia (MH) or strong family history of MH



  • Severe morbid obesity (body mass index [BMI]>35 kg/m 2 )



  • Morbid obesity (BMI>30 kg/m 2 ) with poorly controlled comorbidities



  • Severe obstructive sleep apnea or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease



  • Pacemaker/automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator



  • End-stage renal disease



  • Sickle-cell anemia



  • Dementia



  • Patient on transplant list



  • Recent stoke within 3 months



  • Psychologically unstable



  • Myasthenia gravis



  • Lack of adult escort



  • Difficult airway



  • Acute illness



  • Poorly compensated or incompletely evaluated systemic disease



Exclusions to OBA

Adapted from Refs.


Box 6





  • Congestive heart failure: 12% prolongation of postoperative stay



  • Hypertension: 2-fold increase in risk of intraoperative cardiovascular events



  • Asthma: 5-fold increase in the risk of postoperative respiratory events



  • Smoking: 4-fold increase in the risk of postoperative respiratory events



  • Obesity: 4-fold increase in the risk of intraoperative and postoperative respiratory events



  • Gastroesophageal reflux: 8-fold increase in the risk of intubation-related adverse events



Conditions shown to be associated with adverse outcomes in ambulatory surgery

Adapted from Chung F, Mezei G. Adverse events in ambulatory anesthesia. Can J Anaesth 1999;46(5 Pt 2):21; with permission.




Preoperative evaluation


The preoperative evaluation should start with a thorough history and physical examination including health history, identification of comorbidities, social and family history, allergies, medications, review of systems, and anesthetic history. The physical examination should include vital signs, general appearance, height, weight, and examination of the cardiac and respiratory systems. An airway examination should be performed and documented to include the Mallampati score and assessment of state of dentition, mouth opening, and thyromental distance, and range of motion of the neck. The patient should be informed of nil-by-mouth instructions and anesthetic options ( Table 2 ), and of the need to have a responsible adult available at the time of discharge.



Table 2

Guidelines for fasting before surgery






















Food Material Minimum Fasting Time (h)
Clear liquids (water, pulp-free juice, black coffee, carbonated beverages) 2
Breast milk 4
Infant formula/nonhuman milk 6
Light meal (toast) 6
Fried, fatty foods 8

Adapted from American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preoperative Fasting. Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents for the prevention of pulmonary aspiration: application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures. Anesthesiology 1999;90:899; with permission.


Elderly Patients


Between 2005 and 2020 the elderly population is expected to increase by more than 53%, which will result in the growth and demand for surgical therapies, some of which will undoubtedly be in the office setting.


Chronic medical conditions are more prevalent in the elderly. In patients 70 years or older, hypertension (HTN) is present in 45% to 50%, coronary artery disease (CAD) in 3% to 40%, diabetes in 12% to 15%, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in 7% to 9%. In a cohort study spanning over 5 years incorporating 1.2 million hospital-based outpatient surgeries, age greater than 85 years was one of the strongest predictors of hospital admission and death within 7 days of surgery. Fleisher and colleagues studied 564,267 patients older than 65 undergoing hospital day-case surgery, ASC, and physician OBS. Age greater than 85 years, prior inpatient hospital admission within 6 months, and surgery at a physician’s office identified those patients who were at greater risk of inpatient hospital admission or death within 7 days. The cardiovascular and respiratory response to anesthetics is altered in the elderly by age-induced alterations in pharmacodynamics and kinetics. Chung and Mezei found that the frequency of intraoperative adverse events increased linearly with increasing age, whereas the frequency of postoperative adverse events decreased.


However, elderly patients are at risk for cognitive dysfunction and confusion after surgery, and therefore may benefit from the secure, family environment of an office facility. Canet and colleagues hypothesized that day surgery that minimizes the impact of surgery on daily activities and reduced separation from the home environment may be beneficial to the elderly. Improvements in anesthetic technique now allow patients to return to their baseline state as a result of newer medications with a shorter half-life and quicker elimination. This factor is particularly important in the elderly.


In conclusion, although perioperative complication rates are higher in the elderly, age itself is not a contraindication to OBS. However, elderly patients do require a more thorough preoperative evaluation and management of comorbidities.


Pediatrics


The minimum age in OBA for an otherwise healthy infant has not been established; however, it has been suggested to restrict selection of infants older than approximately 6 months and exclude ex-premature infants because of the risk of apnea. Obviously the personnel who care for children need to be Pediatric Advanced Life Support certified, and the facility needs to have age-appropriate equipment available.


Obesity


Obesity is defined as an excess of body weight 20% greater than ideal body weight, or a body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared, ie, kg/m 2 ) of greater than 30. The obese population poses several issues with regard to ambulatory surgery and OBA. Hypertension, congestive heart failure, respiratory abnormalities, and diabetes are more common in the obese. The prevalence of cardiovascular disease in the obese population is 37%. In addition, approximately 5% of morbidly obese patients have obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Obese patients have been shown to have a significantly increased risk of intraoperative and postoperative respiratory events, including bronchospasm and desaturation caused by decreased functional residual capacity. Difficult intubation is more common in the obese population. Patients with a BMI greater than 35 or a BMI greater than 30 with other comorbidities are contraindicated for OBS.


Pulmonary


As mentioned earlier, asthma and COPD both increase the risk of perioperative complications. Patients should be well stabilized before considering OBA. Patients with asthma and COPD should be questioned on the severity of their symptoms, and medication use including steroids and any aggravating factors. Inhalers should be used as usual, and the patient instructed to bring them on the day of surgery. If the patient has worsening symptoms or poorly controlled COPD/asthma, the office is not an appropriate location for surgery.


In general, patients should stop smoking before surgery. Smoking increases airway reactiveness, inhibits ciliary motility, causes poor wound healing, and increases the rate of complications after surgery.


The evaluating physician should inquire about signs associated with OSA such as snoring, chronic fatigue, and daytime somnolence. The prevalence of OSA is estimated to be 2% in women and 4% in men.


Serious long-term effects include an increase in sympathetic tone caused by chronic hypercarbia and hypoxia, which can lead to ischemic heart disease, hypertension, tachyarrhythmias, deterioration in cognitive function, pulmonary hypertension, cor pulmonale, congestive heart failure, cardiovascular accident/stroke, and sudden death.


Patients with OSA, owing to their airway anatomy, are at a higher risk of experiencing airway obstruction during sedation. The upper airway abnormalities associated with OSA can be the same as those that lead to difficult airway management and intubation. Snoring and OSA were found to be independent risk factors for difficult mask ventilation. Difficult intubation was found to occur 8 times more often in OSA patients than in control patients.


The prevalence of OSA is increasing, most likely as the prevalence of obesity and increased testing for OSA occurs. There is insufficient evidence in the literature to offer guidance as to which OSA patients can be cared for in the office. However, the ASA has published practice guidelines for the perioperative management of patients with OSA. The task force stated that patients with documented OSA may be candidates for OBS if they do not require continuous positive airway pressure, will undergo a minimally invasive procedure, and have limited need for narcotic analgesia.


Neurologic


The evaluating physician should inquire about neurologic diseases such as previous stroke, multiple sclerosis, muscular disorders such as myasthenia gravis, and seizures. Antiseizure medications should be continued throughout the perioperative period. The patients’ baseline functional and neurologic status should be documented. Patients with severe neurologic illnesses, uncontrolled seizures, or recent stroke are not candidates for OBA.


Renal


Chronic kidney disease can arise from numerous systemic diseases, HTN and diabetes being 2 common causes. Although patients with chronic kidney disease may be candidates for OBA, dialysis patients are not suitable for OBA.


Hepatic


Common causes of liver disease include cancer, alcohol abuse, infections such as hepatitis C, or autoimmune conditions. Patients with end-stage liver disease, ascites, coagulopathies, and encephalopathy are not candidates for OBA.


Diabetes


With regard to major surgery, diabetes has been associated with an increased risk of perioperative cardiac, respiratory, and infectious complications. However, despite the increased risk of complications in diabetics undergoing major surgery, it is not an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality following day-case hospital and ASC surgery. The comorbidities associated with diabetes such as difficult airway from stiff joint syndrome (decreased mobility of the atlantoaxial joint), silent myocardial infarction (MI), autonomic neuropathy, decreased ventricular compliance, gastroparesis, abnormal blood pressure, and decreased wound healing should be strongly considered before accepting a patient for OBA. In addition, the duration of the operative procedure, anesthesia, and the disrupted meal schedule, along with potential postoperative emesis, could lead to labile blood sugar levels. Intraoperative blood glucose monitoring should occur every 1 to 2 hours. Only stable, well-controlled diabetics should be considered for OBA.


The history should include the type of diabetes (1 or 2), medications (insulin or oral medications), blood sugar control, and the presence of complications and associated disease states arising from diabetes. Patients should be given instructions on how to manage their diabetic medications before surgery ( Table 3 ).


Mar 11, 2017 | Posted by in UROLOGY | Comments Off on Office-Based Anesthesia for the Urologist

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access